Moore, Jeremy P.

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to investigate the procedural characteristics, efficacy, and safety of atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation for atrial tachyarrythmia (AT) in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Background Although AVJ ablation is an established treatment option for intractable AT in the general population, there is no existing data on this treatment in patients with CHD. Methods Data were analyzed from an observational, retrospective, multicenter cohort, initiated jointly by the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society and the International Society of Adult Congenital Heart Disease. Eleven centers contributed baseline, procedural and longitudinal data, including vital status, echocardiographic data, QRS duration, and NYHA class. Outcomes were assessed at early (3 months-1 year), and late follow-up (≥2 years) after AVJ ablation. Results A total of 66 patients (46.7 ± 20.2 years) underwent 71 AVJ ablations. In total, 58.5% had moderate or complex CHD, including 17.1% patients with a systemic RV or single ventricular circulation. The cumulative AVJ ablation success rate was 98.5%. An abnormal location of the atrioventricular conduction pathway was successfully targeted in 20.0% of the patients, which was significantly more common in patients with complex CHD compared to moderate or mild CHD (44.4%, 15.8%, and 3.6%, respectively; both P<0.05). Thirty-six patients (54.5%) underwent primary pacemaker implantation as part of the ‘pace and ablate’ strategy; final pacing modes were VVI pacing in 60.9%, and CRT/CSP in 39.1%. The transplant-free survival rates at 2, 5 and 10 years after AVJ ablation were 91.5%, 84.3%, and 69.0%, respectively. The acute and long-term complication rates were 3.0% and 13.6%, respectively. Conclusions AVJ ablation can be successfully performed in CHD patients with a high acute success rate and low complication rate. Anatomical challenges were common, which underscores the need for careful planning and operator experience. Given the acceptable long-term survival, these findings support the consideration of a ‘pace and ablate’ strategy in CHD patients with intractable AT.

AbstractCardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing‐induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre‐procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow‐up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

Background The objective of this international multicenter study was to investigate both early and late outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with a systemic right ventricle (SRV) and to identify predictors for congestive heart failure readmissions and mortality. Methods and Results This retrospective international multicenter study included 13 centers. The study population comprised 80 adult patients with SRV (48.9% women) with a mean age of 45±14 (range, 18–77) years at initiation of CRT. Median follow‐up time was 4.1 (25th–75th percentile, 1.3–8.3) years. Underlying congenital heart disease consisted of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries and dextro‐transposition of the great arteries in 63 (78.8%) and 17 (21.3%) patients, respectively. CRT resulted in significant improvement in functional class (before CRT: III, 25th–75th percentile, II–III; after CRT: II, 25th–75th percentile, II–III; P =0.005) and QRS duration (before CRT: 176±27; after CRT: 150±24 milliseconds; P =0.003) in patients with pre‐CRT ventricular pacing who underwent an upgrade to a CRT device (n=49). These improvements persisted during long‐term follow‐up with a marginal but significant increase in SRV function (before CRT; 30%, 25th–75th percentile, 25–35; after CRT: 31%, 25th–75th percentile, 21–38; P =0.049). In contrast, no beneficial change in the above‐mentioned variables was observed in patients who underwent de novo CRT (n=31). A quarter of all patients were readmitted for heart failure during follow‐up, and mortality at latest follow‐up was 21.3%. Conclusions This international experience with CRT in patients with an SRV demonstrated that CRT in selected patients with SRV dysfunction and pacing‐induced dyssynchrony yielded consistent improvement in QRS duration and New York Heart Association functional status, with a marginal increase in SRV function.

Background Patients with Eisenmenger syndrome are known to have a high incidence of sudden cardiac death ( SCD ), yet the underlying causes are not well understood. We sought to define the predictors of SCD in this population. Methods and Results A retrospective analysis of all patients with Eisenmenger syndrome from 2 large tertiary referral centers was performed. ECGs, prolonged ambulatory recordings, echocardiograms, and clinical histories were reviewed; and the cause of death was identified. A total of 246 patients (85 [34.6%] men) with a mean age of 37.3 (±14.2) years were followed up for a median of 7 years. Over the study period, 136 patients died, with 40 experiencing SCD and 74 experiencing cardiac death (sudden and nonsudden). Age, atrial fibrillation, prolonged QRS duration, complete heart block, right atrial enlargement, right bundle branch block, increased right atrial pressure, impaired biventricular function, and the presence of a pacemaker were associated with increased risk of SCD , whereas advanced pulmonary hypertension therapies were protective. Atrial fibrillation (11.45‐fold increased risk; P <0.001) and QRS duration ≥120 ms (2.06‐fold increased risk; P =0.034) remained significant predictors of SCD in the multivariate analysis, whereas advanced pulmonary hypertension therapies were strongly protective against SCD ( P <0.001). Conclusions Atrial arrhythmias, impaired ventricular function, and conduction system disease were associated with increased risk of SCD in this cohort of patients with Eisenmenger syndrome, providing an opportunity for early risk stratification and potential intervention. Clinical heart failure symptoms (New York Heart Association class ≥ II ) were predictive of increased mortality but not of SCD , suggesting a potential arrhythmic cause behind SCD .

AbstractBackgroundAxillary implant location is an alternative implant location in patients for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) for the purposes of improved cosmetic outcome. The impact from the patient's perspective is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare scar perception scores and quality of life (QOL) in pediatric patients with axillary CIED implant location versus the standard infraclavicular approach.MethodsThis is a multicenter prospective study conducted at eight pediatric centers and it includes patients aged from 8 to 18 years with a CIED. Patients with prior sternotomy were excluded. Scar perception and QOL outcomes were compared between the infraclavicular and axillary implant locations.ResultsA total of 141 patients (83 implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD]/58 pacemakers) were included, 55 with an axillary device and 86 with an infraclavicular device. Patients with an ICD in the axillary position had better perception of scar appearance and consciousness. Patients in the axillary group reported, on average, a total Pediatric QOL Inventory score that was 6 (1, 11) units higher than the infraclavicular group, after adjusting for sex and race (P = 0.02).ConclusionsQOL is significantly improved in axillary in comparison to the infraclavicular CIED position, regardless of device type. Scar perception is improved in patients with ICD in the axillary position.