Back to Authors

Baratz, Keith H.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0676-7646

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 31

Analysis of Keratoconus-Related Phenotypes in Two Pcsk1 Mouse Models
Beatty, C. H., Cai, Jingwen, Yu, Hongfang, Sun, Jiong, Heo, Yejin, Baratz, Keith H. , Patel, SI, Estes, Amy, Kuo, Anthony N., Liu, Y, Beatty, Carol, Yu, Hongfang, Heo, Yejin, Bernhisel, Ashlie

Translational Vision Science & Technology | February 4, 2026 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 3

10.1167/tvst.15.2.3 Get It

Endothelial Cell Loss 1 Year After Successful DMEK in the Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study
Lass, Jonathan H. , Lass, Jonathan H., Benetz, Beth Ann, Verdier, David D., Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B., Bauza, Colleen E., Reed, Zachariah W., Greiner, Mark A., Mian, Shahzad I., Patel, Sanjay V., Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis W., Soper, Mark C., Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S., Kollman, Craig, Beck, Roy W., Price, Marianne O., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lucas, Katelyn, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Baratz, Keith H. , Hardtke, Elainey, Treichel, Emily J., Hood, Christopher , Nallasamy, Nambi , Verkade, Angela , Jones, Kristin, Shapiro, Jeremy N. , Leavy, Lisa, Sinkey, Chris, Tenkman, Lawrence R., Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Vislisel, Jesse M., Sharma, Yogi, Young, Angela M. , Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Phillips, Paul, Maloney, Charlene, Jun, Albert S. , Maria, Christina, Boyce, Michelle, Kam, Yong, Crosser, Vicki, Chen, Jessica , Straiko, Michael D., Bauer, Alex, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Veldman, Peter B., Evans, Que, Majmudar, Parag A., Epstein, Rachel , Vaidya, Neal, Rosselson, Marie, Nykaza, Jim, Jurkunas, Ula V., Venkateswaran, Nandini, Cheung, Michael K., Ayres, Brandon D. , Haught, Drew Monteleone, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, G, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark, Hardten, David R., Reeves, Sherman, Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Hamill, M. Bowes , Nguyen, Jessica, Koo, Ellen, Stanfield, Ryan, Greenwood, Michael, Ernst, L, Messer, Brooke, Risbrudt, Nick, Stofferahn, Seth, Saville, Alyson, Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Potts, Luke B. , Alexander, Jamie, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Buckman, Natalie, Ansin, Amy, Clover, Jameson , Pivoney, Charles, Vizzerra, Anthony, Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Mullins, Monica, Statz, Brianne, Fout, Elizabeth, Drury, Donna, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta, Richards, Leslie, Raghupathy, Sangeetha, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Kollman, Craig, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann, Lê, Jimmy T. , Redford, Maryann , Arafah, Baha M. , Greiner, Mark, Johnson, Paula C, Keeler, D. K., Monnier, Vincent M. , Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Soper, Mark, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Hawkins, Barbara S., Macsai, Marian S., Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad, Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dawson, Lauren, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Sengupta, Pratim , Wadleigh, Garth, Greiner, Mark A. , Lass, Jonathan H., Benetz, Beth Ann, Verdier, David D., Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta B., Bauza, Colleen E., Reed, Zachariah W., Greiner, Mark A., Mian, Shahzad I., Patel, Sanjay V., Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis W., Soper, Mark C., Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S., Kollman, Craig, Price, Marianne O., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lucas, Katelyn, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Hood, Christopher, Sáles, Christopher S. , Sinkey, Chris, Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Young, Angela, Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Daoud, Yassine J. , Eghrari, Allen Omid , Ali, Muhammad , Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Epstein, Rachel H. , Vaidya, Neal, Jurkunas, Ula V. , Cheung, Michael, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, Gwen, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark, Reeves, Sherman, Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Nguyen, Jessica, Greenwood, Michael, Messer, Brooke, Saville, Alyson, Omar, Ahmed F. , Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Schmidt, Gregory A. , Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Price, Marianne O. , Szczotka-Flynn, Loretta, Richards, Leslie, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy W. , Kollman, Craig, McCarthy, Chris, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann, Greiner, Mark, Johnson, Paula, Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Soper, Mark, Aleppo, Grazia , Bateman-House, Alison , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad, Pramanik, Sudeep, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dingess, Ryan, Sengupta, Paromita

JAMA Ophthalmology | October 17, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1053

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.4261 Get It

Importance The effect of cornea donor diabetes on endothelial cell density (ECD) and morphometry after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not known. Objective To determine whether endothelial cell loss (ECL) and morphometric changes 1 year after successful DMEK are related to cornea donor’s diabetes status. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2024 at 28 US clinical sites (46 surgeons) and 13 eye banks. Included in the trial were the eyes of recipients (some of whom received tissue from donors without diabetes and others who received tissue from donors with diabetes) who underwent successful DMEK, primarily for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, and had at least 1 analyzable postoperative endothelial image. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution. Main Outcomes and Measures ECD, ECL, coefficient of variation in cell area (CV), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) at 1 year from eye bank and postoperative specular central endothelial images. Results A total 1274 eyes of 982 recipients (mean [SD] age, 70 [8] years; 569 female [57.9%]; 816 [64.1%] with tissue from donors without diabetes and 458 [35.9%] with tissue from donors with diabetes) were included in the study. Preoperatively, mean (SD) central ECD in tissue from donors without diabetes and with diabetes were 2676 (290) cells/mm 2 and 2671 (286) cells/mm 2 , respectively. At 1 year, mean (SD) ECL was 28.3% (16.1%) and 28.0% (17.0%), in the donor groups without and with diabetes, respectively (adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −2.3% to 1.4%), resulting in a mean (SD) 1-year ECD of 1927 (498) cells/mm 2 and 1920 (496) cells/mm 2 , respectively (adjusted mean difference = 10 cells/mm 2 ; 95% CI, −36 to 56; P = .95). No difference in ECD at 1 year associated with diabetes severity was noted ( P = .97). Mean (SD) CV did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (31.5% [4.1%] vs 31.4% [4.1%]; adjusted mean difference = −0.4%; 95% CI, −0.9% to 0.1%; P = .51), and mean (SD) HEX did not differ at 1 year between the 2 groups of eyes (57.7% [5.8%] vs 57.2% [5.8%]; adjusted mean difference = 0.1%, 95% CI, −0.8% to 0.9%; P = .33). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that ECL and morphometry 1 year after DMEK were not affected by cornea donor diabetes status. With comparable 1-year graft success with tissue from donors with and without diabetes demonstrated in this trial, these findings support the use of corneas from donors with diabetes for endothelial keratoplasty procedures. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480
Donor Diabetes and 1-Year Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Success Rate
Price, Francis W. , Szczotka‐Flynn, Loretta , Bauza, Colleen , Reed, Zachariah W., Arafah, Baha M. , Greiner, Mark A. , Johnson, Paula, Keeler, Devon B., Pramanik, Sudeep, Soper, Mark, Terry, Mark A., Titus, Michael S. , Verdier, David D. , Kollman, Craig, Lass, Jonathan H. , Lass, Jonathan H., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Gang, Anjulie, Hall, Taylor, Lynn, A. G., Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Baratz, Keith H. , Hardtke, Elainey, Treichel, Emily J., Hood, Christopher , Nallasamy, Nambi , Verkade, Angela , Jones, Kristin, Shapiro, Jeremy, Leavy, Lisa, Sinkey, Chris, Tenkman, Lawrence R., Gordon, DJ, Ketcherside, Christopher, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Vislisel, Jesse M., Sharma, Yogi, Young, Angela M. , Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James L. , Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Phillips, Paul, Maloney, Charlene, Jun, Albert S. , Maria, Christina, Boyce, Michelle, Kam, Yong, Crosser, Vicki, Chen, Jessica , Straiko, Michael D., Bauer, Alex, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Veldman, Peter B., Evans, Que, Majmudar, Parag A., Epstein, Rachel , Vaidya, N. N., Nykaza, Jim, Venkateswaran, Nandini, Ayres, Brandon D. , Haught, Drew Monteleone, Prasad, Elizabeth, Toti, Gwen, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Hansen, Mark D., Hardten, David R., Reeves, Sherman W., Dreyer, Allison, Mack, Megan, Hamill, Mark, Nguyen, Jessica , Stanfield, Ryan, Greenwood, Michael , Ernst, Lindsay, Risbrudt, Nick, Saville, Alyson, Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Potts, Luke B. , Alexander, Jamie, Rinn, Jennifer, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Sica, Chris, Buckman, Natalie, Ansin, Amy, Clover, Jameson , Pivoney, Charles, Vizzerra, Anthony, Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Mullins, Monica, Statz, Brianne, Fout, Elizabeth, Drury, Donna, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Richards, Leslie, Raghupathy, Sangeetha, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy, Garrett, Kaitlyn, Reed, Zachariah, Benetz, Beth Ann , Lê, Jimmy T. , Redford, Maryann , Arafah, Baha, Greiner, Mark, Keeler, Devon, Monnier, Vincent M. , Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Hawkins, Barbara S., Macsai, Marian S., Patel, Sanjay, Mian, Shahzad I. , Pramanik, Sudeep , Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Gabrielson, Deanna, Barton, Glenn, Bear, Andrew, Das, Pravamaya, Dawson, Lauren, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Wadleigh, Garth, Price, Marianne O. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Pramanik, Sudeep, Titus, Michael S., Beck, Roy W. , Lass, Jonathan H., Group, Diabetes Endothelial Keratoplasty Study, Lynn, Ashlyn, Cole, Shawna, Phelps, Derek, Hardtke, Elainey, Hood, Christopher, Shapiro, Jeremy, Sáles, Christopher S. , Leavy, Lisa, Gordon, DJ, Fox, Jenni, Coonfield, Kristy, Young, Angela, Schoenberg, Evan, Kelly, Sharra, Huffman, James, Sears, Melinda, Stone, Merisa, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Daoud, Yassine J. , Eghrari, Allen Omid , Ali, Muhammad , Crosser, Vicki, Croasdale, Christopher, Brown, Gayle Waldheim, Evans, Que, Epstein, Rachel H. , Nykaza, Jim, Jurkunas, Ula V. , Cheung, Michael, Wier, Jim, Brandsdorfer, Ari, Pape, Denise, Mack, Megan, Hamill, M. Bowes, Nguyen, Jessica, Koo, Ellen H. , Stanfield, Ryan, Risbrudt, Nick, Saville, Alyson, Omar, Ahmed F. , Castaneda, Leslie, Torres, Nidia, Bokosky, John, Cardenas, Ilina, Murphy, Doreen, Priebe, Kinsey, Schmidt, Gregory A. , Elbanhawy, Lindsey, Statz, Brianne, Tavolazzi, Trisha, Lass, Jonathan, Lass, Jonathan, Richards, Leslie, Spruill, Rashad, Bauza, Colleen, Beck, Roy, McCarthy, Chris, Reed, Zachariah, Arafah, Baha, Greiner, Mark, Titus, Michael, Verdier, David, Velhuisen, Paul Van, Aleppo, Grazia , Bateman-House, Alison , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Patel, Sanjay, Price, Francis, Terry, Mark, Sell, David, Barton, Glenn, Das, Pravamaya, Dingess, Ryan, Madere, Mark, Sengupta, Partha Pratim , Wadleigh, Garth

JAMA Ophthalmology | October 17, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1043

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.4253 Get It

Importance If the success of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is not affected by whether the donor has diabetes, then the donor pool should expand. Objective To determine whether the 1-year DMEK success rate is affected by the presence of diabetes in the donor. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2022 to July 2025 at 28 clinical sites (46 surgeons), with donor corneas provided by 13 eye banks in the US. Included in the study were individuals undergoing low to moderate risk DMEK (95% for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy). Study data were analyzed from April to September 2025. Intervention DMEK performed with a cornea from a donor without or with diabetes, assigned using a minimization procedure (comparable with randomization) to achieve an approximate 2:1 distribution, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures Graft success at 1 year Results A total of 1097 individuals (1421 study eyes; median [IQR] age, 71 [66-76] years; 631 female [57.5%]) were included in the study. The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.3% (95% CI, 95.0%-97.5%) among 912 study eyes (64.2%) receiving tissue from donors without diabetes and 97.1% (95% CI, 95.5%-98.4%) among 509 study eyes (35.8%) receiving tissue from donors with diabetes (difference between groups = 0.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −1.2 to 2.6; P = .63). The 1-year cumulative probability of graft success was 96.5% (95% CI, 93.6%-98.9%) in the mild donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 173) and 97.3% (95% CI, 95.4%-98.8%) in the moderate to severe donor diabetes severity subgroup (n = 336), using a diabetes severity rating scale based on medical history. The rates of primary donor failure, early failure related to surgical complications, and subsequent failure were as follows: 2.5% (23 of 912), 0.7% (6 of 912), and 0.3% (3 of 912), respectively, in recipients of tissue from a donor without diabetes, and 2.6% (13 of 509), 0.4% (2 of 509), and 0%, respectively, among recipients of tissue from a donor with diabetes. There were no failures due to graft rejection. Conclusions and Relevance The 1-year success rate in eyes undergoing DMEK with successfully prepared tissue was very high regardless of donor diabetes status. These results, supported by the separately reported finding that endothelial cell loss and cornea morphometry after 1 year were not affected by donor diabetes status, provide strong support for having no restrictions on the use of tissue from donors with diabetes for DMEK. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05134480
Evaluation of AI Summaries on Interdisciplinary Understanding of Ophthalmology Notes
Becerra, Clara M. Castillejo , Dahl, Heidi M., Patel, Neil R. , Kaplan, Tyler M., Kohli, Darrell, Bothun, Erick D. , Mohney, Brian G., Tooley, Andrea A. , Baratz, Keith H. , Iezzi, Raymond , Bakri, Sophie J. , Roddy, Gavin W. , Hodge, David O. , Sit, Arthur J. , Chen, John J. , D'Souza, Haley S, Barkmeier, Andrew J. , Hodge, David, Chen, John J , Castillejo Becerra, Clara M , Sit, Arthur J , Tailor, Prashant D. , D’Souza, Haley S. , Patel, Neil R., Starr, Matthew R.

JAMA Ophthalmology | April 4, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 410

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.0351 Get It

ImportanceSpecialized ophthalmology terminology limits comprehension for nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals, hindering interdisciplinary communication and patient care. The clinical implementation of large language models (LLMs) into practice has to date been relatively unexplored.ObjectiveTo evaluate LLM–generated plain language summaries (PLSs) integrated into standard ophthalmology notes (SONs) in improving diagnostic understanding, satisfaction, and clarity.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRandomized quality improvement study conducted from February 1, 2024, to May 31, 2024, including data from inpatient and outpatient encounters in a single tertiary academic center. Participants were nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals and ophthalmologists. The single inclusion criterion was any encounter note generated by an ophthalmologist during the study dates. Exclusion criteria were (1) lack of established nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals for outpatient encounters and (2) procedure-only patient encounters.InterventionAddition of LLM-generated plain language summaries to ophthalmology notes.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was survey responses from nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals assessing understanding, satisfaction, and clarity of ophthalmology notes. Secondary outcomes were survey responses from ophthalmologists evaluating PLS in terms of clinical workflow and accuracy, objective measures of semantic quality, and safety analysis.ResultsA total of 362 (85%) nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals (33.0% response rate) preferred the PLS to SON. Demographic data on age, race and ethnicity, and sex were not collected. Nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals reported enhanced diagnostic understanding (percentage point increase, 9.0; 95% CI, 0.3-18.2; P = .01), increased note detail satisfaction (percentage point increase, 21.5; 95% CI, 11.4-31.5; P < .001), and improved explanation clarity (percentage point increase, 23.0; 95% CI, 12.0-33.1; P < .001) for notes containing a PLS. The addition of a PLS was associated with reduced comprehension gaps between clinicians who were comfortable and uncomfortable with ophthalmology terminology (from 26.1% [95% CI, 13.7%-38.6%; P < .001] to 14.4% [95% CI, 4.3%-24.6%; P > .06]). PLS semantic analysis found high meaning preservation (bidirectional encoder representations from transformers score mean F1 score: 0.85) with greater readability than SONs (Flesch Reading Ease: 51.8 vs 43.6; Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 10.7 vs 11.9). Ophthalmologists (n = 489; 84% response rate) reported high PLS accuracy (90% [320 of 355] a great deal) with minimal review time burden (94.9% [464 of 489] ≤1 minute). PLS error rate on ophthalmologist review was 26% (126 of 489). A total of 83.9% (104 of 126) of errors were deemed low risk for harm and none had a risk of severe harm or death.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, use of LLM-generated PLSs was associated with enhanced comprehension and satisfaction among nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals, which might aid interdisciplinary communication. Careful implementation and safety monitoring are recommended for clinical integration given the persistence of errors despite physician review.
Conjunctival Melanoma With Invasion of a LASIK Flap Interface
Krivit, Jenna , Salomão, Diva R. , Baratz, Keith H. , Bahr, Tyler , Dalvin, Lauren A.

JAMA Ophthalmology | March 27, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 448

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.0400 Get It

This case report describes invasion of a laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap interface by conjunctival malignant melanoma in a male patient aged 71 years.
Low-Dose Valacyclovir in Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus
Cohen, Elisabeth J. , Liu, Mengling , Baratz, Keith H. , Mian, Shahzad I., Choulakian, Mazen Y., Warner, David B., Lu, Ying , Twi-Yeboah, Alberta , Kim, Jiyu , Lopez-Jimenez, Carlos, Laury, Sarah, Jeng, Bennie H., Weissbart, Sarah B. , Abazari, Azin, Chou, Timothy , Chang, Eileen , Amescua, Guillermo , Koo, Ellen, Galor, Anat , Berestka, John S., Nanji, Afshan, Stutzman, Richard D., Clements, John, Davies, Emma , Saeed, Hajirah N. , Ciralsky, Jessica, Fernández, A. Gómez-Bastero , Sippel, Kimberly C. , Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Daluvoy, Melissa B. , Liu, Katy C., Ewald, M., Groos, Erich B, Chang, Bernard, Shivitz, Ira A., Hill, Jordan , Fowler, Priscilla G., Read, Russell W. , Geggel, Harry S. , Rony, Sayegh, Rapuano, Christopher J. , Meghpara, Beeran, Holland, Gary N. , Irvine, John, Aldave, Anthony J. , Edmund, Tsui, Chen, Judy , Honig, Marc A, Snyder, Lee A, Lubniewski, Anthony J., Katz, Douglas, Capoor, Seema, Gonzales, John, Keenan, Jeremy, Morkin, Melina I., Kenyon, Kenneth R., Lee, William B., Christenbury, Joseph, LaMattina, Kara C. , Negahban, Kambiz, Rao, Ronihi, Ament, Christine S, Lopatynsky, Marta O., Barbato, John D, Sarkar, Jayati S, Macsai, Marian S., Herz, Joshua B, Al-Mohtaseb, Zaina , Matoba, Alice Y., Cooney, Theresa, Sugar, Alan , Shtein, Roni M., Nehls, Sarah, Warner, Evan J. , Nettune, Greg, Bowman, Brad, Gelender, Henry, Alexander, Jamie K. , McCall, Tyrone, Zaffos, Joshua, Beebe, Walter E., Potts, Luke B. , Lustbader, Jay M., Oboh-Weilke, Aruoriwo, Hammersmith, K.M., Orlin, Stephen E., Nagra, Parveen K., Sulewski, Michael E., Bunya, Vatinee Y. , Shafer, Brian M. , Viriya, Elizabeth T., Qureshi, Anam, Lazzaro, Douglas R., Palazzolo, Laura , Goyal, Himani , Schrack, Katie E, Raber, Irving M. , Ayres, Brandon D. , Finklea, Brenton, Reeves, Sherman W., Awad, Omar E, Hardten, David R., Reilly, Charles, Flynn, William J., Rashid, Edward D, Wen, Angie E, Harris, David J. , Shaik, Neha, Seedor, John A., Rosenfeld, Steven I., Winnick, Marc , Amir, Ahmad Fitri , Sherman, Mark D., Chaon, Benjamin, Soukiasian, Sarkis H., Rao, Naveen K. , Steiner, Anne, Winokur, Jules , Udell, Ira J., Shih, Carolyn, Gorski, Matthew , Schrier, Amilia, Lobo-Chan, Ann-Marie , Sugar, Joel, Munir, Wuqaas W, Sunshine, Sarah B. , Miller, Donald M. , Gensheimer, William G. , Zegans, Michael E. , Weiss, Jayne S. , Bernal, María José , Barron, Bruce J., Hindman, Holly B. , Wise, R., Gelston, Christopher D. , Taravella, Michael J. , Davidson, Richard S. , Tran, Uyen, Bartley, Jeremy, McCulley, James P., Verity, Steven M., Bowman, Wayne, Blomquist, Preston H. , Mootha, V. Vinod , Thorne, George, Renucci, Ann M, Verdier, David D. , Sivaraman, K. R., Nordlund, Michael L., Hwang, Frank S. , Affeldt, John E., Ingraham, Herbert J., Guibord, Nathalie M., Dobbins, Kendall, Thareja, Tarika , Zaugg, Brian , Mifflin, Mark D., FORSTOT, S. LANCE, Fish, Robert A, Repine, Karen, Wildes, Michael, Estopinal, Christopher B., Brown, Donna, Koreishi, Aaleya, Ple-plakon, Patricia, Clemons, Carol S., Ashe, S, Bonaffini, Sarah G. , Houser, Kourtney, Wallace, M. Christopher , Wesberry, Jesse M, Yeung, Sonia N. , Noordeh, Nima, Faucher, Anne, Robert, Marie‐Claude , Rullo, Jacob, Johnson, Davin , Mah, Dean, Chew, Hall F., Hassonlou, Mojgan, Liu, Shaohui , Eikenberry, Jennifer , Yung, Chi-Wah, Shen, Joanne F , Yu, Charles, Ta, Christopher N. , Goins, Kenneth M., Sutphin, John E., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Rostov, Audrey Talley, Vyas, Neil , Hsu, Kimberly , Goodman, Gerri, McHam, Lisa, Oates, Dale, Rizkalla, Ramy, Shukla, Anita N. , Veena, Mathew , See, Craig W. , Feder, Robert S., Baqai, Jeanine, Basti, Surendra, Haddadin, Ramez I., You, Jae Young , Dixit, Lena, Patel, Ravi H, Golde, Kimberly T, Zaidman, Gerald W., Mahesh, Sankara, Wesolosky, Jason D., Jeffrey, Helen, Mannis, Mark J., Meyer, Jay J. , Niederer, Rachael L. , Colby, Kathryn , McLeod, Stephen D. , Melia, Michele , Sugar, Elizabeth A. , Taylor, Carol R., Nagel, Maria A. , Lass, Jonathan H. , Lu, Ying , Jeng, Bennie H. , Troxel, Andrea B. , Hochman, Judith S. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Warner, David B., Lu, Ying, Lee, Ting‐Fang , Tonk, Rahul Singh , Martinez, Jaime D. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Chamberlain, Winston , Chodosh, James , Fernandez, Ana G Alzaga, Hill, Jordan, Omar, Ahmed F. , Syed, Zeba A. , Lee, Olivia, Irvine, John, Deng, Sophie X. , Huang, Andrew , Margolis, Todd P. , Seitzman, Gerami D. , Hamrah, Pedram , Lee, Hyunjoo, Weikert, Mitchell P. , Hood, Christopher T. , Woodward, Maria A. , Shtein, Roni Mintz , Zaffos, Joshua, Prescott, Christina R. , Haberman, Ilyse D. , Ritterband, David C. , Harris, David J, Ahmad, Sumayya , Amir, Ahmad, Srikumaran, Divya S. , Akpek, Esen K. , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Miller, Donald M, Bernal, Maria, Barron, Bruce, Wise, Ronald, Shieh, Christine , Thorne, George, Renucci, A., Sivaraman, Kavitha, Affeldt, John, Guibord, Nathalie M, Lin, Amy , Patel, Ravi, Asbell, Penny A. , Wallace, Michael, Iovieno, Alfonso , Teichman, Joshua C. , Robert, Marie-Claude , Harissi‐Dagher, Mona , Baxter, Stephanie A. , Benson, Matthew, Tone, Stephan Ong , Yung, C.–W., Lin, Charles C. , Vyas, Neil M, Oates, Dale, Veena, Mathew, Goshe, Jeffrey M. , Sharma, Vikas , Miller, Darby D. , Ma, Jeffrey H, Dupps, William Joseph

JAMA Ophthalmology | March 6, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 269

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6114 Get It

Importance High-quality evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment in herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) is necessary to guide care. Objective To determine whether suppressive valacyclovir compared with placebo delays the occurrence of new or worsening stromal keratitis (SK), endothelial keratitis (EK), iritis, or dendriform epithelial keratitis (DEK) during 12 months of treatment and if treatment benefit persisted at 18 months (secondary end point). Design, Setting, and Participants The Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) was a randomized clinical trial conducted in 95 sites from November 2017 to June 2024. Immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with a history of an HZO rash, documented active keratitis or iritis within 1 year, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater were eligible. After determined to be eligible, participants were randomized in 4 strata: age at onset (<60 years vs ≥60 years) and disease duration (<6 months vs ≥6 months). Interventions A total of 12 months of double-masked daily valacyclovir, 1000 mg, or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was time to first occurrence within 12 months of new or worsening SK, EK, iritis, or DEK. Results A total of 527 participants (median [IQR] age, 60 [50-68] years; 266 female [50.5%]; 266 in the valacyclovir group; 261 in the placebo group) were randomized in 4 strata; 481 completed 12 months, and 460 completed 18 months. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. At 12 months, primary end points occurred in 86 participants (33%) assigned to placebo and 74 (28%) assigned to valacyclovir, and at 18 months in 104 participants (40%) assigned to placebo and 86 (32%) assigned to valacyclovir. The hazard ratio (HR) of the primary end point at 12 months was 0.77 for participants taking valacyclovir vs placebo (HR, 0.77; adjusted 95% CI, 0.56-1.05; P = .09) and 0.73 at the secondary end point at 18 months (HR, 0.73; adjusted 95% CI, 0.55-0.97; P = .03). There was a reduction of multiple other secondary end points at 12 months (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.95; P = .02) and 18 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Although the primary outcome did not show a benefit of suppressive valacyclovir treatment, secondary study outcomes showed treatment superiority at the 18-month end point and reduced number of multiple episodes of keratitis or iritis at both 12 and 18 months. These results support consideration of 1 year of suppressive valacyclovir treatment for HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196
Low-Dose Valacyclovir for Postherpetic Neuralgia in the Zoster Eye Disease Study
Warner, David, Jeng, Bennie H., Kim, Jiyu , Liu, Mengling , Baratz, Keith H. , Mian, Shahzad I., Choulakian, Mazen Y., Meyer, Jay J. , Lu, Ying , Twi-Yeboah, Alberta , Lopez-Jimenez, Carlos, Laury, Sarah, Cohen, Elisabeth J. , Weissbart, Sarah B. , Abazari, Azin, Chou, Timothy , Chang, Eileen , Amescua, Guillermo , Koo, Ellen, Galor, Anat , Berestka, John S., Nanji, Afshan, Stutzman, Richard D., Clements, John, Davies, Emma , Saeed, Hajirah N. , Ciralsky, Jessica, Fernández, A. Gómez-Bastero , Sippel, Kimberly C. , Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Daluvoy, Melissa B. , Liu, Katy C., Ewald, M., Groos, Erich B, Chang, Bernard, Shivitz, Ira A., Hill, Jordan , Fowler, Priscilla G., Read, Russell W. , Geggel, Harry S. , Rony, Sayegh, Rapuano, Christopher J. , Meghpara, Beeran, Holland, Gary N. , Irvine, John, Aldave, Anthony J. , Edmund, Tsui, Chen, Judy , Honig, Marc A, Snyder, Lee A, Lubniewski, Anthony J., Katz, Douglas, Capoor, Seema, Gonzales, John, Morkin, Melina I., Kenyon, Kenneth R., Lee, William B., Christenbury, Joseph, LaMattina, Kara C. , Negahban, Kambiz, Rao, Ronihi, Ament, Christine S, Lopatynsky, Marta O., Barbato, John D, Sarkar, Jayati S, Macsai, Marian S., Herz, Joshua B, Al-Mohtaseb, Zaina , Matoba, Alice Y., Cooney, Theresa, Hood, Christopher , Sugar, Alan M., Shtein, Roni M., Nehls, Sarah, Warner, Evan J. , Nettune, Greg, Bowman, Brad, Gelender, Henry, Alexander, Jamie K. , McCall, Tyrone, Zaffos, Joshua, Beebe, Walter E., Potts, Luke B. , Lustbader, Jay M., Oboh-Weilke, Aruoriwo, Hammersmith, K.M., Orlin, Stephen E., Nagra, Parveen K., Sulewski, Michael E., Bunya, Vatinee Y. , Shafer, Brian M. , Viriya, Elizabeth T., Qureshi, Anam, Lazzaro, Douglas R., Palazzolo, Laura , Goyal, Himani , Schrack, Katie E, Raber, Irving M. , Ayres, Brandon D. , Finklea, Brenton, Reeves, Sherman W., Awad, Omar E, Hardten, David R., Reilly, Charles, Flynn, William J., Rashid, Edward D, Wen, Angie E, Shaik, Neha, Seedor, John A., Rosenfeld, Steven I., Winnick, Marc , Amir, Ahmad, Sherman, Mark D., Chaon, Benjamin, Soukiasian, Sarkis H., Rao, Naveen K. , Steiner, Anne, Winokur, Jules , Udell, Ira J., Shih, Carolyn, Gorski, Matthew , Schrier, Amilia, Lobo-Chan, Ann-Marie , Sugar, Joel, Munir, Wuqaas W, Sunshine, Sarah B. , Miller, Donald M. , Gensheimer, William G. , Zegans, Michael E. , Weiss, Jayne S. , Bernal, M.L. , Barron, Bruce, Hindman, Holly B. , Wise, Ronald E. , Gelston, Christopher D. , Taravella, Michael J. , Davidson, Richard S. , Tran, Uyen, Bartley, Jeremy, McCulley, James P., Verity, Steven M., Bowman, Wayne, Blomquist, Preston H. , Mootha, V. Vinod , Thorne, George, Renucci, A., Verdier, David D. , Sivaraman, K. R., Nordlund, Michael L., Hwang, Frank S. , Affeldt, John, Ingraham, Herbert J., Guibord, Nathalie M, Dobbins, Kendall, Thareja, Tarika , Zaugg, Brian , Mifflin, Mark D., Forstot, S. Lance, Fish, Robert A, Repine, Karen, Wildes, Michael, Estopinal, Christopher B., Brown, Donna, Koreishi, Aaleya, Ple-plakon, Patricia, Clemons, Carol S., Patel, Ravi , Ashe, Sanda, Bonaffini, Sarah G. , Houser, Kourtney, Wallace, Michael A., Wesberry, Jesse M, Yeung, Sonia N. , Noordeh, Nima, Faucher, Anne, Rullo, Jacob, Johnson, Davin , Mah, Dean, Benson, Matthew , Chew, Hall F., Hassonlou, Mojgan, Liu, Shaohui , Eikenberry, Jennifer , Yung, Chi-Wah, Shen, Joanne F , Lin, Charles C. , Yu, Charles, Ta, Christopher N. , Goins, Kenneth M., Sutphin, John E., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Rostov, Audrey Talley, Vyas, Neil , Hsu, Kimberly, Goodman, Gerri, McHam, Lisa, Oates, Dale, Rizkalla, Ramy, Shukla, Anita N. , Veena, Mathew , See, Craig W. , Feder, Robert S., Baqai, Jeanine, Basti, Surendra, Haddadin, Ramez I., You, Jae Young , Dixit, Lena, Patel, Ravi H, Golde, Kimberly T, Zaidman, Gerald W., Mahesh, Sankara, Sharma, Vikas, Wesolosky, Jason D., Jeffrey, Helen, Mannis, Mark J., Niederer, Rachael L. , Lu, Ying , Jeng, Bennie H. , Troxel, Andrea B. , Hochman, Judith S. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Lee, Ting‐Fang , Tonk, Rahul Singh , Martinez, Jaime D. , Patel, Sanjay V. , Chamberlain, Winston , Chodosh, James , Fernandez, Ana G Alzaga, Perez-Quinones, Victor L, Hill, Jordan, Omar, Ahmed F. , Syed, Zeba A. , Lee, Olivia, Irvine, John, Deng, Sophie X. , Edmund, Tsui, Huang, Andrew , Margolis, Todd P. , Seitzman, Gerami D. , Keenan, Jeremy David , Hamrah, Pedram , Lee, Hyunjoo, Barbato, John D, Weikert, Mitchell P. , Hood, Christopher, Woodward, Maria A. , Sugar, Alan, Shtein, Roni Mintz , Prescott, Christina R. , Haberman, Ilyse D. , Schrack, Katie E, Ritterband, David C. , Harris, David J, Ahmad, Sumayya , Srikumaran, Divya S. , Akpek, Esen K. , Tu, Elmer Yuchen , Miller, Donald M, Bernal, Maria, Shieh, Christine , Thorne, George, Sivaraman, Kavitha, Lin, Amy , Repine, Karen, Asbell, Penny A. , Ashe, S, Wallace, Michael, Iovieno, Alfonso , Teichman, Joshua C. , Robert, Marie-Claude , Harissi‐Dagher, Mona , Baxter, Stephanie A. , Benson, Matthew, Tone, Stephan Ong , Hassonlou, Mojgan, Yung, C.–W., Svanda, Kerri, Keppol, Stacy, Vyas, Neil M, McHam, Lisa, Veena, Mathew, Goshe, Jeffrey M. , Miller, Darby D. , Ma, Jeffrey H

JAMA Ophthalmology | March 6, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 277

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6113 Get It

Importance Evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment on postherpetic neuralgia is necessary to guide care. Objective To test the hypothesis that suppressive treatment with 1000 mg/d of oral valacyclovir for 12 months reduces the prevalence, severity, and duration of postherpetic neuralgia compared with placebo at 12 and 18 months in participants with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial including 527 immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with history of HZO rash, documented keratitis, or iritis within 1 year and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or greater. The study was conducted at 95 participating sites (in Canada, New Zealand, and the US) from November 2017 to June 2024 and participant visits occurred every 3 months. Intervention Treatment with 1000 mg/d of valacyclovir or placebo for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia, severity as determined by pain score (a score of ≥3 on a scale of 1-10), pain duration (≥3 months after HZO onset), and total daily dose of pain medication. Results Of the 527 participants (490 completed 12 months of treatment and 460 completed 18 months), 73 (14%) had postherpetic neuralgia and were analyzed by age at HZO onset (<60 years or ≥60 years) and disease duration (recent [<6 months] or chronic [≥6 months]). Of the 73 participants with postherpetic neuralgia (34 in the valacyclovir group and 39 in the placebo group), the mean age was 62.4 years (SD, 13.6 years), 59% were female, 5% were Black or African American, and 10% were Hispanic. The prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia at 12 months was not reduced by valacyclovir (12/32 [38%]) compared with placebo (14/35 [40%]) (between-group difference, 2.5% [95% CI, −20.8% to 25.8%]; P >.99). The participants who were younger than 60 years at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration had lower pain scores in the valacyclovir group (mean score, 0.3 [SD, 0.9]) vs the placebo group (mean score, 0.8 [SD, 1.9]) at 12 months ( P = .045) and at 18 months (mean score, 0.2 [SD, 0.9] vs 1.0 [SD, 2.3], respectively; P = .02). There was a decrease in pain duration in the valacyclovir group at 18 months (mean, 13.6 [SD, 11.4] months) vs the placebo group (mean, 18.7 [SD, 29.5] months) (linear mixed-effects model between-group difference, −3.39 months [95% CI, −6.73 to −0.04 months]; P = .046). The total daily dose of neuropathic pain medication was lower in the valacyclovir group (mean, 271.4 [SD, 593.8] mg/d) vs the placebo group (mean, 363.4 [SD, 592.2] mg/d) at 12 months (linear mixed-effects model P = .006) and at 18 months (mean, 209.0 [SD, 412.8] mg/d vs 286.2 [SD, 577.9] mg/d, respectively; linear mixed-effects model P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance One year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir was associated with a lower dosage of neuropathic pain medication. Participants in the valacyclovir group, who were younger at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration, had lower pain scores. These secondary outcomes support consideration of 1 year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir to reduce dosage of pain medications and pain due to HZO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196
Recruitment Strategies and Obstacles During the Zoster Eye Disease Study
Sherman, Mark D., Warner, David, Cohen, Elisabeth J. , Jiménez, Carlos López , Baratz, Keith H. , Jeng, Bennie H. , Niederer, Rachael L. , Asbell, Penny A. , Mian, Shahzad I. , Lee, Ting‐Fang , Gillespie, Colleen C.

Cornea | December 3, 2024 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1101-1106

10.1097/ico.0000000000003762 Get It

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify successful recruitment strategies and obstacles reported by principal investigators (PIs) of the Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS). Methods: A web-based survey was created by a subset of ZEDS PIs and distributed to ZEDS PIs after study enrollment was closed. The survey queried investigators about recruitment strategies and obstacles, use of prophylactic oral antiviral medication, electronic medical records, telemedicine, COVID-19 effect, turnover of research staff, and recruitment outreach to minority and underserved populations. The survey allowed objective measures and free-text options. Analysis from centers with higher enrollment was compared with centers with lower enrollment to identify successful strategies and common obstacles. Results: The most frequently cited helpful strategies were participation from ophthalmologists within the PI's institution (33/63, 52%), ophthalmology resident referrals (23/63, 37%), and chart review (23/63, 37%). Travel to participating clinical center (42/63, 67%) and ongoing prophylactic use of oral systemic antiviral medication (39/63, 62%) were common obstacles. Research coordinator turnover was identified as a contributor to reduced recruitment success by 49% (31/63) of PIs and made recruitment much harder for 22% (14/63). A small number of investigators used telemedicine (18/63, 29%) and few made efforts to recruit from minority and underserved populations (10/63, 16%). Conclusions: Our survey highlights the importance of internal ophthalmologist referral, chart review, and research coordinator commitment for successful clinical trial recruitment. We discuss the impact of prophylactic use of oral antiviral medication on recruitment. Future randomized clinical trials should mobilize the helpful recruitment strategies and improve outreach to underserved populations.
Anatomic Characteristics of Eyes With Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
Miller, Darby D. , Wagner, Isabella V. , Hasan, Syed A. , Stewart, Michael W., Towne, Caleb M., Baratz, Keith H. , Li, Zhuo , Miller, Darby D , Wagner, Isabella V , Li, Zhuo

Cornea | September 5, 2024 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 311-323

10.1097/ico.0000000000003694 Get It

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the anatomic characteristics of eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) with eyes without FECD. Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review performed at an academic medical center. Patients with FECD were identified through a search of the electronic medical records. Eligible patients underwent Scheimpflug imaging and optical biometry and were compared with age and sex-matched control subjects who underwent similar testing in preparation for cataract surgery. Several measurements of the cornea, anterior chamber, and eyes were evaluated using multivariable linear regression models and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: A total of 404 eyes (202 eyes with FECD and 202 control eyes) were included in this study. Compared with controls, eyes with FECD had shallower AC depths, lower AC volumes, and narrower angles. Conversely, the spherical equivalent before cataract surgery, corneal pachymetry, and corneal volume were higher in eyes with FECD. On Scheimpflug imaging analysis, these anatomical differences were present in FECD eyes with and without corneal edema. After adjusting for sex, these differences remained statistically significant. Shorter axial length was found to be statistically significant in male eyes but not in female eyes with FECD. Conclusions: This study reports new ocular characteristics in FECD eyes with and without edema. Optical biometry and Scheimpflug imaging established that the anatomic findings in eyes with FECD were not simply due to the larger volume of an edematous cornea but rather unique to eyes with FECD. These findings will provide reliable, normative data for future studies examining surgical, medical, and anatomical factors in FECD.
Corneal Backscatter, Pachymetric Indices, and Ectasia Indices for the Assessment of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
Hodge, David O. , Baratz, Keith H. , Patel, Sanjay V , Patel, Sanjay V.

Cornea | June 3, 2024 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 427-434

10.1097/ico.0000000000003577 Get It

Purpose: To determine whether corneal backscatter, pachymetric indices, and ectasia indices derived from Scheimpflug tomography can identify Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) corneas with abnormal tomography, the relationships between these parameters and tomographic edema in FECD, and if these parameters help predict improvement in central corneal thickness (CCT) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: Tomography maps of 132 eyes of 80 subjects with FECD were analyzed to determine how backscatter, pachymetric, and ectasia parameters compared with the instrument's normative database and if any predicted tomographic edema. Tomography maps from a separate group undergoing DMEK were split into derivation (48 eyes of 39 subjects) and validation (45 eyes of 41 subjects) subgroups to derive a predictive model of improvement in CCT after DMEK. Backscatter, pachymetric, and ectasia parameters were incorporated to determine if the model could be enhanced. Results: Among all ectasia, pachymetric, and backscatter parameters, at best only 65% of FECD corneas with definite tomographic edema could be identified based on the instrument's normative database. Among all parameters individually, the highest sensitivity for detecting tomographic edema was 77%. Anterior and mid-corneal backscatter featured in a model predicting improvement in CCT after DMEK with high performance in derivation (R2 = 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.87) and validation (R2 = 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.52–0.83) subgroups. Conclusions: The Scheimpflug camera software program could not reliably detect abnormal tomography in FECD from corneal backscatter, pachymetric indices, or ectasia indices. Corneal backscatter contributes to, but does not enhance, a predictive model of improvement in CCT after DMEK.