Nanda, Ronica H.

ABSTRACT Background Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of treatment for pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors, but dose selection remains uniform despite interpatient variability in tumor radiosensitivity. This is consequential in children, for whom toxicity can have lifelong effects. Genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) integrates tumor genomics with delivered radiation dose to quantify the biological effect of radiotherapy and has been validated across adult malignancies. Its relevance in pediatric CNS tumors is unknown. Methods We performed a cohort study using gene expression and data from 246 pediatric patients with high-grade glioma, medulloblastoma, or ependymoma from the Children’s Brain Tumor Network. GARD was calculated using a sequencing-adapted radiosensitivity index integrated with radiation dose through the linear–quadratic model. Associations of GARD and physical radiation dose with event-free and overall survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by tumor type and anatomic location. Patients who did not receive radiotherapy comprised a negative control cohort (sham-GARD). Results Among patients receiving radiotherapy, physical dose was uniform, whereas GARD showed substantial interpatient variability in biological effect. Higher GARD was associated with improved event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·83–0·97; p=0·004) and overall survival (HR 0·90, 95% CI 0·83–0·99; p=0·018). Physical dose was not associated with either endpoint. Among patients who did not receive radiotherapy, sham-GARD was not associated with outcomes, supporting GARD as a treatment-specific predictor rather than a prognostic biomarker. Conclusions In pediatric CNS tumors, the biological effect of radiotherapy quantified by GARD was associated with outcomes, whereas physical dose was not. These findings challenge uniform radiotherapy dosing and support genomically informed dose individualization. Prospective evaluation of GARD-guided radiotherapy is warranted to optimize tumor control while minimizing long-term toxicity in children.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Pediatric Central Nervous System Cancers provide multidisciplinary diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment recommendations for diffuse high-grade gliomas and medulloblastomas in children and adolescents. This article summarizes the studies and panel discussion that serve as the rationale for comprehensive care recommendations included in the NCCN Guidelines for Pediatric Central Nervous System Cancers.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric malignancy. Advancements in technology that enhance our understanding of the biology of the disease, risk-adapted therapy, and enhanced supportive care have contributed to improved survival rates. However, additional clinical management is needed to improve outcomes for patients classified as high risk at presentation (eg, T-ALL, infant ALL) and who experience relapse. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for pediatric ALL provide recommendations on the workup, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of the disease, including guidance on supportive care, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and pharmacogenomics. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines focuses on the frontline and relapsed/refractory management of pediatric ALL.

Abstract Background: Retrospective studies suggest that primary breast surgery is associated with improved overall survival (OS) in Stage IV breast cancer. TBCRC 013 is a multi-center prospective registry study evaluating the role of surgery for the primary tumor in Stage IV disease. Methods: From 7/09 - 4/12, 128 eligible pts from 14 sites were enrolled in two cohorts (A: Stage IV with intact primary tumor (n = 112); B: metastases (mets) within 3 months of primary surgery (n = 16)). Baseline patient and tumor characteristics, and surgery of the primary were correlated with 2yr overall survival (OS) using log rank, Kaplan Meier and Cox regression for all patients. Comparisons were also made between cohorts A and B and within cohort A stratified by response to systemic therapy. Responders included those with any response (partial,complete) or stable disease at distant sites. Results: Median pt age was 52yrs(21-79) and median primary tumor size 3.2cm(0.7-15). Phenotypes were ER+ 106 (83%), HER2neg 91(71%), and triple neg 10(8%). 60(47%) had bone-only mets. The only significant baseline difference between cohorts A and B was the presence of palpable nodes (A:62% vs B:0%, p<0.001). There were no differences in age, tumor size, ECOG scores, ER or HER2 status, number or sites of mets between cohorts A and B. At a median follow-up of 25 mo (95%CI, 23-31), 2yr OS for all pts is 86% (80-92) and is superior in cohort B as compared to A, (100% vs 84%, p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis (MVA) including all pts, only surgery, ER and HER2 positivity were associated with improved OS (table). Among 112 pts with an intact primary (Arm A), 17(15%) were non-responsive (NR) to systemic therapy, 3(18%) of whom required palliative surgery at a median time of 10.4mos. 2yr OS among NR was 33% (15-69) as compared to 94% (88-99) in Arm A responders (R) (p<0.001). ER positivity was the only baseline difference between NR (65%) and R (88%) within Arm A (p = 0.02). Among 94(85%) Arm A responders, 39(41%) had elective surgery (median 8.4 mos, 95%CI:6.9-10.3) and only 1 of the remaining 47(2%) required palliation. When limited to Arm A responders, elective surgery was not associated with improved 2yr OS (surgery vs not: 94% vs 92%, p = 0.5). Median time to progression following elective surgery was 12 mos (95%CI,8-19mos). When cohort B (n = 16) and cohort A surgery groups (n = 39) are combined, surgery of the primary tumor is associated with improved 2yr OS (96% vs 74%, p = 0.002). Conclusions: In this prospective registry study, patients diagnosed with mets within 3 months of primary breast surgery have an improved 2yr OS. When all pts having surgery (A + B) are examined, surgery is associated with improved OS on MVA, but when limited to Arm A responders, elective surgery does not improve OS. Given that the number of Arm A responders is small, results from the prospective randomized trial will be needed to address this question. These data also demonstrate that the need for surgical palliation of the primary tumor is uncommon in the modern era. Multivariate Analysis for OSN = 128HR Death (95%CI)pvalueSurgery0.28 (0.10-0.74)0.01ER positivity0.28 (0.10-0.72)0.01HER2 positivity0.21 (0.06-0.74)0.01MVA included: age, tumor size, ECOG, ER, PR, HER2, met sites, and surgery Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-18-09.