Hudis, CA

Abstract Background: CALGB 40502/NCCTG N063H (Alliance) compared weekly NP or Ix to P; most patients received bevacizumab. Ix was inferior to P, and NP was not superior with a trend toward inferiority. Toxicity was increased in the experimental arms compared to P (Rugo et al, JCO 2015). We report long-term follow-up (FU) of this trial with an unplanned subset analysis in hormone receptor positive (HR+) and triple negative (TNBC) breast cancer. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive P (90 mg/m2), Ix (16 mg/m2) or NP (150 mg/m2) on a 3 week (wk) on, 1 wk off schedule, stratified by prior adjuvant taxane use and hormone receptor status. B was initially given to all patients, but became optional in 3/2011 and was added to stratification. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included safety and overall survival (OS). With a target N=900 patients, the study was powered to detect a hazard ratio of 1.36 (median PFS 10 vs 13.6 months). Eligibility included no prior chemotherapy for MBC, >12 mo from adjuvant P and measurable disease. Results: 799 patients were randomized between 11/08 and11/11 (283 to P, 271 to NP, 245 to Ix); 98% received bevacizumab. 68% (546) had HR+ disease, 25% (201) had TNBC. Median FU is 5 years. Median PFS is unchanged at 10.8, 9.2 and 7.4 mo for P, NP and Ix with hazard ratios (95% CIs) of 1.13 (0.94-1.34) and 1.44 (1.2-1.72) for NP and Ix to P, respectively. Median OS was 27.1, 24.2 and 23.6 months for P, NP and Ix with hazard ratios of 1.10 (0.91-1.34) and 1.3 (1.07-1.57) for NP and Ix to P, respectively. The effects of NP vs P on PFS and OS were significantly modified by subtype (interaction p=0.0018 and 0.0073), whereas Ix vs P was unchanged (interaction p's > 0.9, Table). More patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events in the experimental arms (14 vs 27 vs 23% for P, NP and Ix). Table P (mo)NP (mo)NP to P; HR (95% CI)Ix (mo)Ix to P, HR (95% CI)TNBC, PFS6.47.40.79 (0.55-1.12)15.61.39 (0.99-1.96)3HR+, PFS12.29.61.29 (1.04-1.59)181.5 (1.21-1.86)3TNBC, OS15.3210.74 (0.51-1.07)215.11.28(0.9-1.82)4HR+, OS33.226.61.25 (0.99-1.58)225.41.35(1.07-1.714Interaction tests: 1. p=0.0018; 2. p=0.0073; 3. p=0.96; 4. p=0.92 mo: months; HR: hazard ratio·· Conclusion: In patients with chemotherapy-naive MBC, Ix was inferior to P for PFS, and P was better tolerated than either NP or Ix. In this retrospective subset analysis, Ix and NP were inferior to P in HR+ disease, with a suggestion of improved PFS and OS with NP in patients with TNBC. Further investigation is required to explain and validate the subtype specificity seen in this exploratory analysis. Support: U10CA180820, U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180888. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00785291 Citation Format: Rugo HS, Barry WT, Moreno-Aspitia A, Lyss A, Huebner L, Mayer EL, Naughton M, Layman RM, Carey LA, Somer RA, Toppmeyer D, Velasco M, Perez EA, Hudis CA, Winer E. Long-term follow-up of CALGB 40502/NCCTG N063H (Alliance): A randomized phase III trial of weekly paclitaxel (P) compared to weekly nanoparticle albumin bound nab-Paclitaxel (NP) or ixabepilone (Ix) +/- bevacizumab as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-06.

Abstract Background: Cognitive changes for older women who receive chemotherapy are poorly understood. Methods: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 49907 enrolled 633 women ≥65 years with early stage breast cancer and randomized them to standard adjuvant chemotherapy (AC or CMF) or capecitabine (N Eng J Med 360:2055, 2009). Patients enrolled on the Quality of Life companion study (N = 350) included women who had cognitive and psychological functioning sufficient for providing informed consent and participation in the trial (J Clin Oncol 29:1022, 2011). Participants completed an 18 item questionnaire focusing on their subjective report of cognitive function (attention, problem-solving, speed, new learning, and remote memory) at 6 time points (baseline, mid-treatment, within 1 month post treatment, and at 12, 18, and 24 months post treatment). Possible scores for each item ranged from 1–7 (‘above average’ - ‘severe problem’). Cognitive function score (CFS) was defined as the mean score of items 1–18. Cognitive impairment was defined as CFS 1.5 standard deviations above the overall average baseline. Univariate associations were tested between baseline CFS and patient characteristics (treatment, race, education, number of positive nodes, hormone receptor status, HER2 status, performance status, number of comorbidities, fatigue and depression) using Kruskal-Wallis testing. Frequency distributions were used to describe cognitive impairment. Multivariate analyses were not completed because few women reported subjective cognitive impairment during the study period. Results: 297 assessments were received at baseline, 280 at both mid-treatment and within 1 month post-treatment, 259 at 12 months, 245 at 18 months and 240 at 24 months post-treatment. The median age was 72 (65–85); 32% received AC, 21% CMF, and 47% capecitabine. Most women were white (87%) and had a performance status of 0 (73%). Approximately half of women had a high school degree or less and the majority had stage I-II (78%), hormone-receptor positive (68%) cancers and most did not experience depression or fatigue at baseline. At baseline, the overall mean CFS was 2.1 (‘normal ability’) and 19 women (6%) had mild to severe impairment. Baseline scores did not differ by treatment (p = 0.35). Worse cognitive function at baseline was associated with less education (p < 0.01), increased number of positive nodes (p = 0.02), 4+ comorbid conditions (p < 0.01) and fatigue (p = 0.02), although differences for these groups were small. During the study period, overall mean cognitive function scores remained at ‘normal ability’. At mid-treatment, within 1 month post treatment, 12, 18 and 24 months, cognitive impairment was present in 19 (6%), 19 (6%), 29 (10%), 31 (12%), 18 (7%), and 22 (9%), respectively. Conclusions: Our data suggest that in a healthy group of women without baseline cognitive impairments on objective screening, chemotherapy does not seem to be associated with changes in self-reported cognitive function over time. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-08-05.

Abstract Background: Our group and others have identified a subset of ER/PR(−) breast cancers characterized by expression of the androgen receptor (AR) and androgen-dependent growth (Doane 2006). We conducted a proof-of-concept multicenter phase II study to test the efficacy of the AR-antagonist, bicalutamide for the treatment of AR(+) ER/PR(−) MBC (NCT00468715). Results of the primary endpoint, clinical benefit rate (CBR), were presented at ASCO (Gucalp 2012). Data for the impact of bicalutamide on circulating hormone levels in women are limited. Elevations in serum testosterone (T) and estradiol (E) have been observed for men treated with bicalutamide. We hypothesized comparable patterns of change in circulating endocrine markers in response to bicalutamide for women with MBC. Methods: Patients (pts) with AR(+) (IHC ≥10%), ER/PR(−) (IHC <10%) MBC were eligible for treatment (tx) if ECOG performance status ≤2 and normal organ function regardless of menopausal status. There was no limit to prior tx except prior trastuzumab required if HER2(+). Tx consisted of bicalutamide 150mg orally daily in 28-day cycles (C). Toxicity assessed q4 weeks, response q12wks. Primary endpoint was CBR. Peripheral blood was collected for total and free T, E and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) at baseline, start of C2 (C2) and at end of study (EOS). Standard institutional assays were used. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was done to compare baseline to C2 and EOS values. Results: 26 patients with AR(+) ER/PR(−) MBC were treated on study. Evaluable number (n) of pts at baseline, C2 and EOS are 26, 26 and 19 respectively. Two pts remain on study. Menopausal status: pre=2, post=24. Baseline median total and free T and estradiol were consistent with expected norms, however a wide range was observed (Table). There were no significant differences observed for median free T, total T, E or SHBG between baseline and C2 or baseline and EOS. Changes in hormone levels could not be stratified by menopausal status or response to bicalutamide given small sample size. Given the wide range of baseline values, we examined the percent change for each endocrine biomarker from baseline to C2 and EOS. As shown in the Table, there was no difference in median percent change observed across time points for each biomarker. Conclusions: No discernible patterns of change in T, E or SHBG were observed in response to bicalutamide therapy when given to women for the treatment of AR(+), ER/PR(−) MBC. These circulating hormones require further evaluation for use as a pharmacodynamic marker. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-05-02.

Abstract Background: Intrinsic breast cancer subtypes determined by the PAM50 assay are reported to be prognostic independent of standard clinicopathological variables. The CALGB (Alliance) 9741 adjuvant trial randomized treatment in a 2×2 factorial design to (i) 2-wk (dose dense; DD) vs 3-wk therapy and (ii) sequential vs concurrent doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel (A>T>C vs AC>T). DD therapy improved disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) (Citron et al. JCO 2003.). A significant interaction between intrinsic breast cancer subtypes and the use of DD therapy was hypothesized. Methods: C9741 was conducted in collaboration with ECOG, NCCTG, and SWOG. Biospecimens were collected from 1652 of 2005 subjects. Multiplexed gene expression profiling (NanoString Technologies, Inc) generated PAM50 subtype calls (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, basal-like), risk of relapse (ROR) score, and proliferation score for 1321 cases (80%). Excluded samples were due to insufficient tumor (n = 181) or RNA (n = 150). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). The primary analysis to determine if the clinical benefit of DD therapy is dependent on intrinsic subtype was conducted as a test of interaction in a Cox proportional hazards model (3 degrees of freedom, df; alpha=0.05). Similar analyses were performed for ROR score and proliferation score as continuous measures of risk (1 df). PAM50 subtype, ROR score, and proliferation score were evaluated in separate multivariate models adjusting for number of positive nodes, menopausal status, dose density, and sequence of therapy. Results: Improved outcomes for DD therapy in the evaluable subset mirrored results from the complete dataset (HR = 1.20; 95%CI 0.99–1.44) with a median follow-up of 12.3 yrs. Subtype analysis identified 32% luminal A (n = 417), 26% luminal B (n = 341), 20% HER2-enriched (n = 267), and 22% basal-like (n = 296). Intrinsic subtypes were prognostic of RFS (p < 0.0001) irrespective of treatment assignment with HRs relative to the luminal A subgroup of 1.50 (luminal B), 1.70 (HER2-enriched) and 1.66 (basal-like). No subtype specific treatment effect on RFS was identified (p = 0.44). ROR scores (range 0–100, median 60) were also prognostic of RFS (HR = 1.12 for a 10-unit change; 95% CI 1.07–1.18; p < 0.0001), but no association with DD therapy benefit was seen (p = 0.58). Similar results were obtained for the proliferation score, for OS as a secondary endpoint, and from multivariate models with clinical covariates. Conclusion: The prognostic value of PAM50 subtype, ROR score, and proliferation score remains highly significant in patients treated with contemporary adjuvant anthracycline and taxane based chemotherapy. Intrinsic subtype did not predict for improved survival with the 2-wk DD vs 3-wk treatment schedule; we hypothesize that this is because the prognostic differences by subtype outweighed the modest but significant clinical benefit of DD chemotherapy administration for the overall population. Planned clinical validation studies will assess the ability of PAM50 and other gene signatures to stratify patients and individualize systemic therapy regimens based on the expected risk of distant recurrence. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-01.

Abstract Background: Retrospective studies suggest that primary breast surgery is associated with improved overall survival (OS) in Stage IV breast cancer. TBCRC 013 is a multi-center prospective registry study evaluating the role of surgery for the primary tumor in Stage IV disease. Methods: From 7/09 - 4/12, 128 eligible pts from 14 sites were enrolled in two cohorts (A: Stage IV with intact primary tumor (n = 112); B: metastases (mets) within 3 months of primary surgery (n = 16)). Baseline patient and tumor characteristics, and surgery of the primary were correlated with 2yr overall survival (OS) using log rank, Kaplan Meier and Cox regression for all patients. Comparisons were also made between cohorts A and B and within cohort A stratified by response to systemic therapy. Responders included those with any response (partial,complete) or stable disease at distant sites. Results: Median pt age was 52yrs(21-79) and median primary tumor size 3.2cm(0.7-15). Phenotypes were ER+ 106 (83%), HER2neg 91(71%), and triple neg 10(8%). 60(47%) had bone-only mets. The only significant baseline difference between cohorts A and B was the presence of palpable nodes (A:62% vs B:0%, p<0.001). There were no differences in age, tumor size, ECOG scores, ER or HER2 status, number or sites of mets between cohorts A and B. At a median follow-up of 25 mo (95%CI, 23-31), 2yr OS for all pts is 86% (80-92) and is superior in cohort B as compared to A, (100% vs 84%, p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis (MVA) including all pts, only surgery, ER and HER2 positivity were associated with improved OS (table). Among 112 pts with an intact primary (Arm A), 17(15%) were non-responsive (NR) to systemic therapy, 3(18%) of whom required palliative surgery at a median time of 10.4mos. 2yr OS among NR was 33% (15-69) as compared to 94% (88-99) in Arm A responders (R) (p<0.001). ER positivity was the only baseline difference between NR (65%) and R (88%) within Arm A (p = 0.02). Among 94(85%) Arm A responders, 39(41%) had elective surgery (median 8.4 mos, 95%CI:6.9-10.3) and only 1 of the remaining 47(2%) required palliation. When limited to Arm A responders, elective surgery was not associated with improved 2yr OS (surgery vs not: 94% vs 92%, p = 0.5). Median time to progression following elective surgery was 12 mos (95%CI,8-19mos). When cohort B (n = 16) and cohort A surgery groups (n = 39) are combined, surgery of the primary tumor is associated with improved 2yr OS (96% vs 74%, p = 0.002). Conclusions: In this prospective registry study, patients diagnosed with mets within 3 months of primary breast surgery have an improved 2yr OS. When all pts having surgery (A + B) are examined, surgery is associated with improved OS on MVA, but when limited to Arm A responders, elective surgery does not improve OS. Given that the number of Arm A responders is small, results from the prospective randomized trial will be needed to address this question. These data also demonstrate that the need for surgical palliation of the primary tumor is uncommon in the modern era. Multivariate Analysis for OSN = 128HR Death (95%CI)pvalueSurgery0.28 (0.10-0.74)0.01ER positivity0.28 (0.10-0.72)0.01HER2 positivity0.21 (0.06-0.74)0.01MVA included: age, tumor size, ECOG, ER, PR, HER2, met sites, and surgery Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-18-09.