Layman, R.M.

Abstract Background: BTX-9341 is a first-in-class bifunctional degrader of cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)4 and CDK6 that also inhibits the transcription of CDK2 and Cyclin E. Preclinical data highlight its superiority compared with approved CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in inhibition of phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (p-RB), cell cycle arrest, and in vivo efficacy in breast cancer (BC) xenografts. BTX-9341 is active in CDK4/6i-resistant models with p-RB half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) of 1-15 nM and can overcome key mechanisms that drive CDK4/6i resistance. Here we report early monotherapy data from the first-in-human study of BTX-9341 in patients (pts) with advanced and/or metastatic HR+/HER2- BC. Methods: BTX-9341-101 is a multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label trial to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy of orally administered BTX-9341 in pts with RB1 wild type advanced and/or metastatic HR+/HER2- BC who received prior CDK4/6i therapy. An accelerated titration and Bayesian Optimal Interval design (BOIN) were used. The primary objective of dose escalation is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum evaluable dose (MED) of BTX-9341 monotherapy and in combination with fulvestrant. Secondary objectives include the characterization of BTX-9341 on PK and efficacy; exploratory objectives include the assessment of BTX-9341 on PD and PK/PD relationships. Results: As of June 9, 2025, 12 pts were evaluated at the following BTX-9341 once daily (QD) dose levels: 50 mg (dose level [DL]1), 100 mg (DL2), and 75 mg (DL3) monotherapy, and 50 mg in combination with fulvestrant (DLA). Pts received up to 4 lines of therapy in the metastatic setting prior to enrollment. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at any dose levels during the 28-day DLT period. The most common adverse events (AEs) during the DLT period were decreased neutrophil and white blood cell counts (Grades 1-4). There were no dose reductions in DL1. The starting dose was reduced in all pts in DL2; DL3 is currently enrolling. At least 2-fold accumulation was observed after QD dosing, and steady-state trough concentrations were in the range of in vitro IC50 values at DL1 and higher dose levels. Serum thymidine kinase activity (sTKa), a clinical biomarker for tumor response to CDK4/6 inhibition, showed >50% reduction at Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) compared with baseline for 7 of 8 evaluable monotherapy pts, with 6 pts below the sTKa detectable level. “On target” PD reductions in CDK4, CDK6, CDK2, and Cyclin E levels were observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Of the 8 evaluable monotherapy pts, the best overall responses in pts with measurable disease included 1 pt with a confirmed partial response (PR) and 3 pts with stable disease ([SD] first assessed at 8 weeks; i.e., the first time point for assessment in the protocol), and in pts with non-measurable disease, 2 pts had non-complete response (CR)/non-progressive disease. For all pts, the longest duration on treatment was 10 cycles. A clinical benefit rate (defined as a best overall response of CR, PR, or SD for pts with measurable disease or non-CR/non-progressive disease for pts with non-measurable disease, per RECIST v1.1 at Week 24) of 66.7% was observed in the completed cohorts (DL1 and DL2). Conclusion: BTX-9341 monotherapy shows a favorable safety profile, with the most common AEs being decreased neutrophil and white blood cell counts, at doses that show encouraging preliminary PK/PD and efficacy, enabling further evaluation of monotherapy and in combination with fulvestrant. The trial is actively enrolling with anticipated completion of dose escalation enrollment by the end of 2025 (Clinical trial: NCT06515470). Citation Format: A. Patnaik, M. Block, M. Cristofanilli, Q. Liu, H. Majeski, A. Shakya, P. Rajagopalan, C. Deshpande, T. Marmon, S. Padam, D. Powell, A. H. Chourasia, R. Urbanski, M. Goetz, R. M. Layman. First-in-human Phase 1 study of BTX-9341, a CDK4/6 bifunctional degrader, as monotherapy and in combination with fulvestrant in patients with advanced and/or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer - first emerging data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-06-04.

Abstract Background: CALGB 40502/NCCTG N063H (Alliance) compared weekly NP or Ix to P; most patients received bevacizumab. Ix was inferior to P, and NP was not superior with a trend toward inferiority. Toxicity was increased in the experimental arms compared to P (Rugo et al, JCO 2015). We report long-term follow-up (FU) of this trial with an unplanned subset analysis in hormone receptor positive (HR+) and triple negative (TNBC) breast cancer. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive P (90 mg/m2), Ix (16 mg/m2) or NP (150 mg/m2) on a 3 week (wk) on, 1 wk off schedule, stratified by prior adjuvant taxane use and hormone receptor status. B was initially given to all patients, but became optional in 3/2011 and was added to stratification. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included safety and overall survival (OS). With a target N=900 patients, the study was powered to detect a hazard ratio of 1.36 (median PFS 10 vs 13.6 months). Eligibility included no prior chemotherapy for MBC, >12 mo from adjuvant P and measurable disease. Results: 799 patients were randomized between 11/08 and11/11 (283 to P, 271 to NP, 245 to Ix); 98% received bevacizumab. 68% (546) had HR+ disease, 25% (201) had TNBC. Median FU is 5 years. Median PFS is unchanged at 10.8, 9.2 and 7.4 mo for P, NP and Ix with hazard ratios (95% CIs) of 1.13 (0.94-1.34) and 1.44 (1.2-1.72) for NP and Ix to P, respectively. Median OS was 27.1, 24.2 and 23.6 months for P, NP and Ix with hazard ratios of 1.10 (0.91-1.34) and 1.3 (1.07-1.57) for NP and Ix to P, respectively. The effects of NP vs P on PFS and OS were significantly modified by subtype (interaction p=0.0018 and 0.0073), whereas Ix vs P was unchanged (interaction p's > 0.9, Table). More patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events in the experimental arms (14 vs 27 vs 23% for P, NP and Ix). Table P (mo)NP (mo)NP to P; HR (95% CI)Ix (mo)Ix to P, HR (95% CI)TNBC, PFS6.47.40.79 (0.55-1.12)15.61.39 (0.99-1.96)3HR+, PFS12.29.61.29 (1.04-1.59)181.5 (1.21-1.86)3TNBC, OS15.3210.74 (0.51-1.07)215.11.28(0.9-1.82)4HR+, OS33.226.61.25 (0.99-1.58)225.41.35(1.07-1.714Interaction tests: 1. p=0.0018; 2. p=0.0073; 3. p=0.96; 4. p=0.92 mo: months; HR: hazard ratio·· Conclusion: In patients with chemotherapy-naive MBC, Ix was inferior to P for PFS, and P was better tolerated than either NP or Ix. In this retrospective subset analysis, Ix and NP were inferior to P in HR+ disease, with a suggestion of improved PFS and OS with NP in patients with TNBC. Further investigation is required to explain and validate the subtype specificity seen in this exploratory analysis. Support: U10CA180820, U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180888. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00785291 Citation Format: Rugo HS, Barry WT, Moreno-Aspitia A, Lyss A, Huebner L, Mayer EL, Naughton M, Layman RM, Carey LA, Somer RA, Toppmeyer D, Velasco M, Perez EA, Hudis CA, Winer E. Long-term follow-up of CALGB 40502/NCCTG N063H (Alliance): A randomized phase III trial of weekly paclitaxel (P) compared to weekly nanoparticle albumin bound nab-Paclitaxel (NP) or ixabepilone (Ix) +/- bevacizumab as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-06.