Foster, Jessica

ABSTRACT Background Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of treatment for pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors, but dose selection remains uniform despite interpatient variability in tumor radiosensitivity. This is consequential in children, for whom toxicity can have lifelong effects. Genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) integrates tumor genomics with delivered radiation dose to quantify the biological effect of radiotherapy and has been validated across adult malignancies. Its relevance in pediatric CNS tumors is unknown. Methods We performed a cohort study using gene expression and data from 246 pediatric patients with high-grade glioma, medulloblastoma, or ependymoma from the Children’s Brain Tumor Network. GARD was calculated using a sequencing-adapted radiosensitivity index integrated with radiation dose through the linear–quadratic model. Associations of GARD and physical radiation dose with event-free and overall survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by tumor type and anatomic location. Patients who did not receive radiotherapy comprised a negative control cohort (sham-GARD). Results Among patients receiving radiotherapy, physical dose was uniform, whereas GARD showed substantial interpatient variability in biological effect. Higher GARD was associated with improved event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·83–0·97; p=0·004) and overall survival (HR 0·90, 95% CI 0·83–0·99; p=0·018). Physical dose was not associated with either endpoint. Among patients who did not receive radiotherapy, sham-GARD was not associated with outcomes, supporting GARD as a treatment-specific predictor rather than a prognostic biomarker. Conclusions In pediatric CNS tumors, the biological effect of radiotherapy quantified by GARD was associated with outcomes, whereas physical dose was not. These findings challenge uniform radiotherapy dosing and support genomically informed dose individualization. Prospective evaluation of GARD-guided radiotherapy is warranted to optimize tumor control while minimizing long-term toxicity in children.

Abstract Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumors (DLGNT) are rare central nervous system tumors. Our understanding of the clinical course, prognostic factors, and optimal treatment strategies remains limited. Histologic, molecular, and clinical data were collected and analyzed for 25 patients with DLGNT reviewed at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. The median age at diagnosis was 6 years (11 months-20 years). Nineteen (72%) patients were male. The disease was localized at diagnosis in 12 (48.0%) patients, with most tumors localized in the spinal cord. BRAF fusion was present in 22 (95.6%) of 23 patients who had material for testing. Of 18 patients who had tissue for DNA methylation profiling, 3 (16.7%) matched to DLGNT MC-1, 3 (16.7%) to DLGNT MC-2, and 12 (66.7%) did not match to a DLGNT subclass. Median follow-up was 63 months. Twenty-four (96.0%) patients received adjuvant therapy after initial diagnosis or at progression. Thirty-five cytotoxic chemotherapy and 24 single-agent targeted therapy regimens were used in 22 and 13 patients, respectively. With targeted therapy, 3 (12%) patients had partial responses. Eleven (44.0%) received radiotherapy. Median progression-free survival (PFS) after a patient’s first chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy regimen was 44 months (1-77), 11 months (4-39), and 16.5 months (9-23), respectively. The 5-year PFS was 18.7%±9.2, while the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 82.4%±9.2. The 5-year OS was lower in patients older than 9 years at diagnosis (60.0%±21.9 vs 91.7%±8.0, p = 0.02). Ki67 >4% was associated with worse PFS (0%±0 vs 24.6%±11.9 at 5 years, p = 0.03). Initial disease dissemination (localized vs. disseminated) and 1q gain status do not influence PFS or OS. PFS for DLGNT remains poor across all treatment modalities, including targeted therapies, despite the high frequency of BRAF fusions. Due to its rarity, establishing optimal therapeutic strategies for DLGNT requires additional treatment and outcome data and prospective multi-institutional trials.