Ivars, Marta

ABSTRACTBackgroundMany vascular anomalies harbor postzygotic somatic variants in GNAQ and GNA11; however, the phenotype of specific G‐protein variants has not been well described. We report the clinical characteristics of 17 patients with a GNA11 R183C variant.MethodsThis case series is derived from a multinational cohort of vascular anomaly patients whose pathogenic mutations were identified using high‐depth next generation sequencing. Data include vascular anomaly features, imaging reports, and extracutaneous manifestations of the GNA11 R183C variant.ResultsWe identified 17 subjects (median age 18 years [range 6–67]) with somatic GNA11 R183C variant. All patients had vascular lesions of the skin that presented as pink‐to‐red in children and deeper red in adults. Most lesions were large, poorly demarcated, and reticulated patches that were often bilaterally distributed. Nevus anemicus was observed in 53% (N = 9) and dermal melanocytosis in 13.3% (N = 2) of individuals. 82% (N = 14) of patients had limb growth discrepancies, and 1 patient had marked thoracic hypoplasia. 47% (N = 8) of patients had facial involvement, and 41% (N = 7) had forehead involvement. One patient experienced seizures due to right hemispheric leptomeningeal angiomatosis consistent with Sturge–Weber syndrome. Other findings included glaucoma (29%, N = 5) and psychomotor delay (29%, N = 5).ConclusionThese findings contribute to our understanding of the clinical spectrum of GNA11 R183C capillary malformations (CMs); patients characteristically present with extensive, bilateral, poorly demarcated, pink‐to‐red CMs associated with nevus anemicus. Glaucoma and growth discrepancies (overgrowth or undergrowth) are common. Leptomeningeal angiomatosis and developmental delay can occur, appearing potentially less prevalent and severe than GNAQ‐associated disease.

Abstract Background Facial angiofibromas (FAs) are a major feature of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Topical rapamycin can successfully treat FAs. A new stabilized cream formulation that protects rapamycin from oxidation has been developed in 0.5% and 1% concentrations. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of a novel, stabilized topical rapamycin cream formulation. Methods This multicentre double-blind randomized placebo-controlled dose–response phase II/III study with a parallel design included participants aged 6–65 years with FAs of mild or moderate severity according to the Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) scale. Participants were randomized to one of three treatment arms: topical rapamycin 0.5%, topical rapamycin 1% or placebo. Treatment was applied once daily for 26 weeks. Safety and efficacy measures were assessed at days 14, 56, 98, 140 and 182. The primary endpoint was the percentage of participants achieving IGA scores of ‘clear’ or ‘almost clear’ after 26 weeks of treatment. Secondary measures included Facial Angiofibroma Severity Index (FASI) and participant- and clinician-reported percentage-based improvement. Safety measures included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and blood rapamycin concentration changes over time. Results Participants (n = 107) were randomized to receive either rapamycin 1% (n = 33), rapamycin 0.5% (n = 36) or placebo (n = 38). All treated participants were included in the final analysis. The percentage of participants with a two-grade IGA improvement was greater in the rapamycin 0.5% treatment group (11%) and rapamycin 1% group (9%) than in the placebo group (5%). However, this was not statistically significant [rapamycin 0.5%: odds ratio (OR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36–8.18 (P = 0.50); rapamycin 1%: OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.33–8.40 (P = 0.53)]. There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of participants treated with rapamycin cream that achieved at least a one-grade improvement in IGA [rapamycin 0.5%: 56% (OR 4.73, 95% CI 1.59–14.10; P = 0.005); rapamycin 1%: 61% (OR 5.14, 95% CI 1.70–15.57; P = 0.004); placebo: 24%]. Skin adverse reactions were more common in patients following rapamycin application (64%) vs. placebo (29%). Conclusions Both rapamycin cream formulations (0.5% and 1%) were well tolerated, and either strength could lead to clinical benefit in the treatment of FA.