Arkin, Lisa M.

ABSTRACTBackgroundMany vascular anomalies harbor postzygotic somatic variants in GNAQ and GNA11; however, the phenotype of specific G‐protein variants has not been well described. We report the clinical characteristics of 17 patients with a GNA11 R183C variant.MethodsThis case series is derived from a multinational cohort of vascular anomaly patients whose pathogenic mutations were identified using high‐depth next generation sequencing. Data include vascular anomaly features, imaging reports, and extracutaneous manifestations of the GNA11 R183C variant.ResultsWe identified 17 subjects (median age 18 years [range 6–67]) with somatic GNA11 R183C variant. All patients had vascular lesions of the skin that presented as pink‐to‐red in children and deeper red in adults. Most lesions were large, poorly demarcated, and reticulated patches that were often bilaterally distributed. Nevus anemicus was observed in 53% (N = 9) and dermal melanocytosis in 13.3% (N = 2) of individuals. 82% (N = 14) of patients had limb growth discrepancies, and 1 patient had marked thoracic hypoplasia. 47% (N = 8) of patients had facial involvement, and 41% (N = 7) had forehead involvement. One patient experienced seizures due to right hemispheric leptomeningeal angiomatosis consistent with Sturge–Weber syndrome. Other findings included glaucoma (29%, N = 5) and psychomotor delay (29%, N = 5).ConclusionThese findings contribute to our understanding of the clinical spectrum of GNA11 R183C capillary malformations (CMs); patients characteristically present with extensive, bilateral, poorly demarcated, pink‐to‐red CMs associated with nevus anemicus. Glaucoma and growth discrepancies (overgrowth or undergrowth) are common. Leptomeningeal angiomatosis and developmental delay can occur, appearing potentially less prevalent and severe than GNAQ‐associated disease.

ImportanceMorphea is an insidious inflammatory disorder of the skin and deeper tissues. Determining disease activity is challenging yet important to medical decision-making and patient outcomes.ObjectiveTo develop and validate a scoring tool, the Morphea Activity Measure (MAM), to evaluate morphea disease activity of any type or severity that is easy to use in clinical and research settings.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis pilot diagnostic study was conducted from September 9, 2019, to March 6, 2020, in 2 phases: development and validation. During the development phase, 14 morphea experts (dermatologists and pediatric dermatologists) used a Delphi consensus method to determine items that would be included in the MAM. The validation phase included 8 investigators who evaluated the tool in collaboration with 14 patients with pediatric morphea (recruited from a referral center [Medical College of Wisconsin]) during a 1-day in-person meeting on March 6, 2020.Main Outcomes and MeasuresDuring the development phase, online survey items were evaluated by experts in morphea using a Likert scale (score range, 0-10, with 0 indicating not important and 10 indicating very important); agreement was defined as a median score of 7.0 or higher, disagreement as a median score of 3.9 or lower, and no consensus as a median score of 4.0 to 6.9. During the validation phase, reliability (interrater and intrarater agreement using intraclass correlation coefficients), validity (using the content validity index and κ statistics as well as correlations with the modified Localized Scleroderma Severity Index and the Physician Global Assessment of Activity using Spearman ρ coefficients), and viability (using qualitative interviews of investigators who used the MAM tool) were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative variables. Data on race and ethnicity categories were collected but not analyzed because skin color was more relevant for the purposes of this study.ResultsAmong 14 survey respondents during the development phase, 9 (64.3%) were pediatric dermatologists and 5 (35.7%) were dermatologists. After 2 rounds, a final tool was developed comprising 10 items that experts agreed were indicative of morphea activity (new lesion in the past 3 months, enlarging lesion in the past 3 months, linear lesion developing progressive atrophy in the past 3 months, erythema, violaceous rim or color, warmth to the touch, induration, white-yellow or waxy appearance, shiny white wrinkling, and body surface area). The validation phase was conducted with 14 patients (median age, 14.5 years [range, 8.0-18.0 years]; 8 [57.1%] female), 2 dermatologists, and 6 pediatric dermatologists. Interrater and intrarater agreement for MAM total scores was good, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.844 (95% CI, 0.681-0.942) for interrater agreement and 0.856 (95% CI, 0.791-0.901) for intrarater agreement. Correlations between the MAM and the modified Localized Scleroderma Severity Index (Spearman ρ = 0.747; P < .001) and the MAM and the Physician Global Assessment of Activity (Spearman ρ = 0.729; P < .001) were moderately strong. In qualitative interviews, evaluators agreed that the tool was easy to use, measured morphea disease activity at a single time point, and should be responsive to changes in morphea disease activity over multiple time points.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, the MAM was found to be a reliable, valid, and viable tool to measure pediatric morphea activity. Further testing to assess validity in adults and responsiveness to change is needed.