Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

7722 citation(s) found for "Ma, Daniel M".

Three Hundred Periprosthetic Tibial Fractures Around a Total Knee Replacement
Dugdale, Evan M. , Alter, Thomas D. , Stuart, Michael J. , Sems, S.A. , Yuan, Brandon J. , Spangehl, Mark J. , Springer, Bryan D. , Berry, Daniel J. , Abdel, Matthew P. , Sems, Stephen A , Abdel, Matthew P , Stuart, Michael J , Yuan, Brandon , Berry, Daniel J , Spangehl, Mark

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery | May 23, 2025 | Volume: 107 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 1579-1589

10.2106/jbjs.24.01407 | PMID 40408445 Get It

Background: Periprosthetic tibial fractures around a total knee replacement (TKR) remain challenging to manage, with little published information for guidance. The purpose of this study was to review the types, management techniques, and outcomes of periprosthetic tibial fractures in the largest series to date. Methods: We identified 300 periprosthetic tibial fractures (285 patients) around a TKR (43% in primary TKRs and 57% in revision TKRs) sustained between 1996 and 2020. Fractures were classified according to Felix et al. as Type I (tibial plateau), Type II (adjacent to stem), Type III (distal to stem), or Type IV (tibial tubercle), with subtypes A (well-fixed component), B (loose component), and C (intraoperative fracture). Of the fractures in this study, 53% were Type I, 24% were Type II, 16% were Type III, and 8% were Type IV. A total of 46% of fractures occurred intraoperatively, and 54% of fractures occurred postoperatively (61% subtype A, 39% subtype B). The mean patient age at fracture was 67 years, and 64% of patients were female. The mean follow-up was 6 years. Results: The intraoperative fracture incidence was 1.40% in revision TKRs and 0.10% in primary TKRs. Among intraoperative fractures, the 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision was highest in Type I (100%) and lowest in Type IV (67%) (p < 0.001). For postoperative fractures, the 2-year survivorship free from any reoperation was 29% and the 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision was 51%. Type-I postoperative fractures had the lowest 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision (10%), whereas Type-III fractures had the highest survivorship (88%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture of the tibia was fourteenfold more likely in revision TKRs compared with primary TKRs. Among all intraoperative fractures, Type-I fractures were well-tolerated, with 100% survivorship free from tibial component revision at 2 years. Conversely, Type-I postoperative fractures had only 10% survivorship at 2 years. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Outcomes of medical and surgical management in infectious intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter cohort analysis
Alawieh, Ali , Zohdy, Youssef M. , Koo, Andrew B. , Saad, Hassan , Baba, Bachar El , Newman, Sarah, Grossberg, Jonathan A , Matouk, Charles , Cawley, C. Michael, Reisner, Andrew , Perez‐Vega, Carlos , Burkhardt, Jan‐Karl , Salem, Mohamed M , Jabbour, Pascal , Naamani, Kareem El, Gooch, M Reid, Starke, Robert M., Abdelsalam, Ahmed , Lu, Victor M , Chalhoub, Reda , Spiotta, Alejandro M , Alawieh, Ali M , Zohdy, Youssef M , Koo, Andrew B , El Baba, Bachar , Grossberg, Jonathan A , Matouk, Charles , Fox, W Christopher , Perez-Vega, Carlos , Jabbour, Pascal , Levitt, Michael R , Chalhoub, Reda M , Spiotta, Alejandro M , Howard, Brian M , Burkhardt, Jan‐Karl , Dimisko, Laurie , Pradilla, Gustavo , Naamani, Kareem El , Schmidt, Richard F. , Gooch, Michael Reid , Abdelsalam, Ahmed, Levitt, Michael R. , Kobeissy, Firas , Barrow, Daniel L.

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | May 23, 2025 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1079-1086

10.1136/jnis-2025-023421 | PMID 40409986 Get It

Introduction Infectious intracranial aneurysms (IIAs) are rare but serious complications of systemic infections, particularly infective endocarditis. These aneurysms are prone to rupture, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Management strategies lack consensus due to the rarity of the condition and reliance on small case series. This study examines the clinical management of IIAs using data from a large multicenter cohort. Methods A retrospective registry-based cohort study was conducted across 11 tertiary care centers in the USA between 2018 and 2023. Patients with IIAs were identified based on clinical and radiographic criteria. The primary outcome was treatment failure defined as persistence, growth, or rupture of the aneurysm. Secondary outcomes were mortality and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days and 1 year. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify outcome predictors. Results A total of 104 patients with 166 aneurysms were included, with a median age of 43 years. Medical management was successful in 56% of cases, with failure often within 18 days of initiation. Predictors of failure included younger age, larger aneurysm size, and rupture at presentation. Surgical and endovascular interventions achieved higher success rates with better outcomes. At 90 days, 57% of patients achieved functional independence (mRS 0–2), while the mortality rate was 24%. Conclusion This study highlights the limitations of medical management for IIAs and underscores the need for early surgical or endovascular intervention in high-risk patients. Outcome predictors aid clinical decision-making, optimizing patient management. Further research is needed to standardize management guidelines for IIAs.
Efficacy of perioperative and neoadjuvant therapies in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a network meta-analysis
Anjum, Muhammad Umair , Naqvi, Syed Arsalan Ahmed , Jajja, Salman Ayub, Raina, Ammad, Afzal, Muhammad Umar, Faisal, Kunwer Sufyan , Segovia, Diana, Jin, Zhaohui , Yoon, Harry H. , Usón, Pedro Luiz Serrano , Starr, Jason S. , Ahn, Daniel H. , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Sonbol, Mohamad B , Uson, Pedro L S , Jin, Zhaohui , Afzal, Muhammad Umar, Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios

The Oncologist | May 23, 2025 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/oncolo/oyaf157 | PMID 40653807 Get It

Abstract Background Optimal treatment for resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains unclear due to limited head-to-head comparisons among chemotherapy and chemoradiation regimens. This network meta-analysis aimed to determine the relative efficacy of available multimodality treatment regimens in these patients. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL were searched till September 20, 2024. Phase 3 randomized trials evaluating perioperative/neoadjuvant systemic therapy ± radiation in resectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma were included. Primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted to compare hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Fifteen trials (8072 patients) were analyzed. pFLOT (perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) ranked highest for DFS in the overall population (P-score 91%), achieving significant improvements compared to surgery alone (HR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.38-0.60) and nCROSS (neoadjuvant paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiotherapy) (0.67, 0.56-0.81). For OS, nPLF + nCRT(EP) (neoadjuvant cisplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil for induction, followed by etoposide, cisplatin, and radiotherapy) (P-score 90%) and pFLOT (P-score 87%) were the top regimens. pFLOT significantly outperformed surgery alone (0.57, 0.45-0.72) and nCROSS (0.73, 0.60-0.89). Based on the limited data available, adding neoadjuvant chemoradiation to pFLOT provided no additional OS (1.14, 0.76-1.72) or DFS (1.22, 0.83-1.82) benefit. Similarly, adding pembrolizumab to perioperative chemotherapy (cisplatin and fluorouracil/capecitabine) was not superior to pFLOT (DFS: 1.10, 0.71-1.69; OS: 1.09, 0.69-1.72). Conclusions pFLOT demonstrated superior efficacy in resectable gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma, outperforming surgery alone, nCROSS, and alternative perioperative regimens. The additive role of immunotherapy requires further investigation to optimize patient selection and outcomes.
Global, Regional, and National Burden of Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Collaborators, GBD 2021 Global Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Risk Factors, Rautalin, Ilari, Stark, Benjamin, Johnson, Catherine O., Kaprio, Jaakko , Korja, Miikka, Krishnamurthi, Rita , Nair, Balakrishnan , Vergouwen, Mervyn D. I. , Abdelkader, Atef , Abdullahi, Auwal , Abualruz, Hasan , Abukhadijah, Hana J , Adamu, Lawan Hassan, Adegboye, Oyelola A. , Adzigbli, Leticia Akua, Agyemang‐Duah, Williams , Ahinkorah, Bright Opoku, Ahmad, Aqeel , Ahmad, Danish , Ahmadzade, Amir Mahmoud , Akkaif, Mohammed Ahmed , Ali, Mohammed Usman, Alif, Sheikh Mohammad , Alimohamadi, Yousef, Alsabri, Mohammed , Altaf, Awais , Alvis‐Guzmán, Nelson , Alwafi, Hassan , Al‐Wardat, Mohammad , Alyahya, Mohammad S. , Amin, Tarek Tawfik , Amindarolzarbi, Alireza , Amusa, Ganiyu , Angappan, Dhanalakshmi , Anuoluwa, Boluwatife Stephen, Anwar, Saleha, Anyasodor, Anayochukwu Edward , Apostol, Geminn Louis Carace, Areda, Demelash, Artamonov, Anton A, Artanti, Kurnia Dwi , Ashemo, Mubarek Yesse , Athar, Mohammad , Aujayeb, Avinash , Awotidebe, Adedapo Wasiu , Azadnajafabad, Sina , Aziz, Shahkaar , Bagheri, Nasser , Taqanaki, Pegah Bahrami , Bahramian, Saeed , Bai, Ruhai , Baig, Atif Amin , Baltatu, Ovidiu Constantin , Bam, Kiran, Barker‐Collo, Suzanne , Bärnighausen, Till , Bastan, Mohammad‐Mahdi , Basu, Sanjay , Bell, Shelly L, Benseñor, Isabela M , Berhie, Alemshet Yirga , Bhagavathula, Akshaya Srikanth , Bhaskar, Sonu , Bhat, Ajay Nagesh, Bhat, Vivek , Birhan, Mekuriaw Mesfin , Borhany, Hamed, Breitner, Susanne , Bulamu, Norma B. , Butt, Zahid A , Cabral, Lucas Scotta , Santos, Florentino Luciano Caetano dos , Cámera, Luis Alberto , Capodici, Angelo , Chadwick, Joshua , Chakraborty, Promit Ananyo , Chanie, Gashaw Sisay , Chattu, Vijay Kumar , Chi, Gerald, Chichagi, Fatemeh , Columbus, Alyssa , Criqui, Michael H, Ohadi, Mohammad Amin Dabbagh , Dadras, Omid , Dalli, Lachlan L. , Debopadhaya, Shayom , Dervišević, Emina , Devanbu, Vinoth Gnana Chellaiyan, Dewan, Syed Masudur Rahman , Dhane, Amol S. , Chi, Thanh, Phuong, Thao Huynh, Dohare, Sushil , Докова, Клара , Dowou, Robert Kokou , Dsouza, Haneil Larson , Dutta, Siddhartha , Dziedzic, Arkadiusz , E’mar, Abdel Rahman, Edvardsson, David , Efendi, Ferry, Nahas, Nevine El , Elgendy, Islam Y. , Eltaha, Chadi, Emeto, Theophilus I. , Fakhradiyev, Ildar , Faris, Pawan , Fauk, Nelsensius Klau , Fazylov, Timur, Fekadu, Ginenus , Fetensa, Getahun, Fischer, Florian, Foschi, Matteo , Fridayani, Ni Kadek Yuni, Gaipov, Abduzhappar , Gajjar, Avi A. , Ganesan, Balasankar , Gebregergis, Miglas Welay, Gebremeskel, Teferi Gebru , Getie, Molla , Ghadirian, Fataneh , Ghasemzadeh, Afsaneh , Gholamalizadeh, Maryam , Gil, Artyom , Goleij, Pouya , Goulart, Alessandra C. , Goulart, Bárbara Niegia Garcia de , Guan, Shi‐Yang , Gupta, Sapna , Habibzadeh, Farrokh , Hadi, Najah R, Hankey, Graeme J. , Harlianto, Netanja I. , Hasani, Hamidreza, Hasnain, Md Saquib , Haubold, Johannes , Havmoeller, Rasmus, Hay, Simon I , Hbid, Youssef , Heidari, Golnaz , Hiraike, Yuta, Hoan, Nguyen Quoc , Hosseinzadeh, Mehdi , Hwang, Bing‐Fang , Ibitoye, Segun Emmanuel , Ikiroma, Adalia , Isola, Gaetano , Iwagami, Masao , Jacob, Louis, Jain, Akhil, Jakovljević, Mihajlo , Jatau, Abubakar Ibrahim , Jawaid, Talha, Jayapal, Sathish Kumar , Jonas, Jost B, Joseph, Nitin , Jürisson, Mikk , Kadashetti, Vidya, Kalani, Rizwan, Kamireddy, Arun , Kandel, Himal , Behnagh, Arman Karimi , Kashoo, Faizan , Kayode, Gbenga A , Kazemi, Foad , Khader, Yousef , Khaing, Inn Kynn , Khan, Fayaz Ahmad , Khan, Mohammad Jobair , Kashani, Hamid Reza Khayat , Khosla, Atulya Aman , Kim, Kwanghyun , Kim, Yun Jin , Korzh, Oleksii , Krishan, Kewal , Krishna, Varun, Krishnamoorthy, Vijay , Kuddus, Mohammed , Kulimbet, Mukhtar , Lahariya, Chandrakant, Lai, Daphne Teck Ching , Lai, Hanpeng , Laksono, Tri, Lallukka, Tea , Latifinaibin, Kaveh, Le, Nhi Huu Hanh, Le, Thao T. , Lee, Munjae , Lee, Yo Han , Lenzi, Jacopo , Leonardi, Matilde, Li, Ming‐Chieh , Li, Xiaopan , Lim, Stephen S , Lin, Jialing , Saute, Ricardo Lutzky , Malik, Ahmad Azam , Marateb, Hamid Reza , Maroufi, Seyed Farzad , Maugeri, Andrea , McPhail, Steven , Mehndiratta, Man Mohan, Mestrovic, Tomislav, Mettananda, Chamila Dinushi Kukulege , Miazgowski, Tomasz , Minervini, Giuseppe , Mithra, Prasanna , Mohamed, Abdalla Z. , Mohammad, Ameen Mosa , Mohammed, Shafiu , Moni, Mohammad Ali , Moradi, Yousef, Moraga, Paula , Morawska, Lídia , Munjal, Kavita , Murray, Christopher J L , Nagarajan, Ahamarshan Jayaraman , Naik, Ganesh R. , Najdaghi, Soroush , Davani, Delaram Narimani , DELETE-ME, Nawsherwan, Nazri-Panjaki, Athare , Negoi, Ruxandra Irina , Nematollahi, Soroush , Nguyen, Hau Thi Hien, Nguyen, Hau Thi Hien, Nguyen, Phat Tuan , Nguyễn, Văn Thành , Niazi, Robina Khan, Nikoobar, Ali , Sá, Antonio Tolentino Nogueira de , Nomura, Shuhei , Nzoputam, Chimezie Igwegbe , Oancea, Bogdan , Ojo-Akosile, Tolulope R, Oliveira, Gláucia Maria Moraes de , Olorukooba, Abdulhakeem Abayomi , Osuagwu, Uchechukwu Levi , Ouyahia, Amel, A, Mahesh Padukudru P, Panagiotakos, Demosthenes B. , Parikh, Romil R., Park, Seoyeon , Pedersini, Paolo , Peprah, Emmanuel , Perico, Norberto, Petermann-Rocha, Fanny Emily, Plotnikov, Evgenii , Полибин, Р. В. , Postma, Maarten J. , Prasad, Manya , Qian, Gangzhen , Rahmanian, Mohammad , Rajaa, Sathish , Rajput, Prashant , Ramadan, Mahmoud M. , Rane, Amey, Rashidi, Mohammad‐Mahdi , Razo, Christian , Reddy, Murali Mohan Rama Krishna, Remuzzi, Giuseppe, Rezaei, Negar , Rezaeian, Mohsen , Rocha, Hermano Alexandre Lima , Rodriguez, Jefferson Antonio Buendia, Roever, Leonardo , Romoli, Michele, Romozzi, Marina, Roy, Nitai , Saddik, Basema Ahmad, Sahoo, Pragyan Monalisa , Salaroli, Luciane Bresciani , Samuel, Vijaya Paul, Samy, Abdallah M , Santric-Milicevic, Milena M., Saravanan, Aswini, Schlaich, Markus P. , Sethi, Yashendra , Seylani, Allen, Shaaban, Ahmed Nabil , Shafie, Mahan , Shaikh, Summaiya Zareen , Shamsutdinova, Alfiya, Sharifan, Amin , Rad, Javad Sharifi, Sharma, Vishal, Shashamo, Bereket Beyene , Shetty, Premalatha K, Shigematsu, Mika, Shorofi, Seyed Afshin, Singh, Paramdeep , Singh, Puneetpal , Singh, Surjit , Sobia, Farrukh , Solanki, Shipra, Soraneh, Soroush , Spartalis, Michael, Srinivasamurthy, Suresh Kumar , Stanikzai, Muhammad Haroon , Sun, Zhong , Swain, Chandan Kumar , Damavandi, Payam Tabaee , Tabatabaeizadeh, Seyed-Amir, Tabche, Celine , Taiba, Jabeen , Tamuzi, Jacques Lukenze , Tan, Ker‐Kan , Teramoto, Masayuki , Thakur, Ramna, Thankappan, Kavumpurathu Raman , Thayakaran, Rasiah , Thirunavukkarasu, Sathish, Ticoalu, Jansje Henny Vera, Tiwari, Krishna Raj , Tonelli, Marcello , Topór-Mądry, Roman , Tovani-Palone, Marcos Roberto Roberto, Tran, Jasmine, Tran, Thang Huu , Duc, Nguyen Tran Minh , Truelsen, Thomas Clement, Unim, Brigid, Vahdati, Sanaz, Vaithinathan, Asokan Govindaraj , Eynde, Jef Van den , Vladimirov, Sergey Konstantinovitch , Waheed, Yasir, Wahood, Waseem , Walde, Mandaras Tariku, Wang, Yanzhong , Wickramasinghe, Nuwan Darshana , Wolfe, Charles D. A., Wubie, Yihun Miskir, Xiao, Hong , Xu, Xiaoyue , Yano, Yuichiro , Yarahmadi, Amir , Ye, Pengpeng, Yon, Dong Keon , Zanghì, Aurora , Zare, Iman, Zastrozhin, Michael, Zhang, Zhi-Jiang , Zhang, Zhiqiang , Zhang, Zhiqiang, Zhao, Hanqing , Zhou, Shang Cheng, Zhumagaliuly, Abzal , Zia, Hafsa, Roth, Gregory A., Topór‐Mądry, Roman , Oliveira, Arão Belitardo , Rahim, Fakher , Saddik, Basema , Waheed, Yasir , Liu, Xuefeng , Zhang, Yunquan , Ozair, Ahmad , Buendía, Jefferson Antonio , Korja, Miikka , Baig, Atif Amin , Shanawaz, Mohd , Elgendy, Islam Y , Hankey, Graeme J , Alif, Sheikh M , Rezaei, Negar , Bhagavathula, Akshaya Srikanth , Van den Eynde, Jef , Ozair, Ahmad , Collaborators, GBD 2021 Global Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Risk Factors, Rautalin, Ilari Matias , Volovici, Victor , Ranta, Annemarei , Rinkel, Gabriël J.E. , Abate, Yohannes Habtegiorgis, Abbastabar, Hedayat , Abd-Allah, Foad , Abdi, Parsa , Abdollahi, Arash , Abiodun, Olugbenga Olusola , Aboagye, Richard Gyan , Abouzid, Mohamed , Abtahi, Dariush , Abu‐Rumeileh, Samir , Abualhasan, Ahmed , Abu‐Zaid, Ahmed , Addo, Isaac Yeboah , Adedoyin, Rufus Adesoji , Adra, Saryia , Ahinkorah, Bright Opoku , Ahmed, Ali , Ahmed, Haroon , Ahmed, Syed Anees , Aji, Budi , Al‐Ajlouni, Yazan A. , Al‐Aly, Ziyad , ALBashtawy, Mohammed , Aljunid, Syed Mohamed , Alomari, Mahmoud A. , Alrawashdeh, Ahmad , Alsabri, Mohammed A., Salman, Rustam Al‐Shahi , Al‐Tammemi, Ala’a B. , Al‐Worafi, Yaser Mohammed , Aly, Hany Z. , Alzoubi, Karem Hasan , Amani, Reza, Anderlini, Deanna , Anil, Abhishek , Arabloo, Jalal , Ärnlöv, Johan , Arumugam, Ashokan , Aryan, Zahra , Jafarabadi, Mohammad Asghari , Ashraf, Tahira , Athari, Seyyed Shamsadin , Azzam, Ahmed Y , Babu, Giridhara R. , Bako, Abdulaziz Tijjani , Banach, Maciej , Bandyopadhyay, Soham , Banik, Biswajit , Bardhan, Mainak , Barqawi, Hiba Jawdat , Barua, Lingkan , Beyene, Kebede Abera , Bhat, Vivek, Bhatti, Gurjit Kaur , Bhatti, Jasvinder Singh , Bijani, Ali , Bikbov, Boris , Birhanu, Mulugeta Molla , Bitra, Veera Raghavulu , Boloor, Archith , Brenner, Hermann , Bugiardini, Raffaele , Călina, Daniela Cornelia , Campos, Luciana Aparecida , Campos‐Nonato, Ismael , Carvalho, Félix , Castañeda-Orjuela, Carlos A , Catapano, Alberico Luigi , Cegolon, Luca , Chakraborty, Chiranjib , Chakraborty, Sandip , Chandika, Rama Mohan , Chaudhary, Anis Ahmad , Chi, Gerald , Ching, Patrick R , Chopra, Hitesh , Choudhari, Sonali Gajanan , Chowdhury, E. , Chu, Dinh‐Toi , Chung, Sheng‐Chia , Silva, Alanna Gomes da , Dai, Xiaochen , Dalal, Koustuv , D’Amico, Emanuele , Dashti, Mohsen , Davletov, Kairat , Cruz-Góngora, Vanessa Vianey De la , Delgado‐Enciso, Iván , Devanbu, Vinoth Gnana Chellaiyan, Dibas, Mahmoud , Doheim, Mohamed Fahmy , Dongarwar, Deepa , D’Oria, Mario , Doshi, Ojas Prakashbhai , Doshi, Rajkumar , Efendi, Defi , Efendi, Ferry , Elhadi, Muhammed , Eltahir, Mohd. Elmagzoub , Fabin, Natalia , Fagbamigbe, Adeniyi Francis , Fahim, Ayesha , Fares, Jawad , Ferreira, Nuno Bravo , Gandhi, Aravind P. , Garg, Ravindra Kumar , Gebrehiwot, Mesfin , Ghadimi, Delaram J. , Ghahramani, Sulmaz , Ghazy, Ramy Mohamed , Ghozy, Sherief , Gilani, Jaleed Ahmed , Gnedovskaya, Elena V. , Hadei, Mostafa , Hamidi, Samer , Hanifi, Nasrin , Haro, Josep María , Hasan, Faizul , Tabatabaei, Mahgol Sadat Hassan Zadeh , Heidari, Mohammad , Hemmati, Mehdi , Holla, Ramesh , Hostiuc, Sorin , Huang, Junjie , Huynh, Hong-Han , Ikeda, Nayu , Ilaghi, Mehran , Ilesanmi, Olayinka Stephen , Ilić, Irena , Ilić, Milena , Islam, Md. Rabiul , Ismail, Nahlah Elkudssiah , Iso, Hiroyasu , Jafarzadeh, Abdollah , Jairoun, Ammar Abdulrahman , Kalani, Rizwan, Kamal, Vineet Kumar , Kanchan, Tanuj , Karami, Jafar , Karaye, Ibraheem M. , Karimi, Yeganeh , Kesse‐Guyot, Emmanuelle , Khan, Fayaz, Khatatbeh, Haitham , Khatatbeh, Moawiah Mohammad , Kheirallah, Khalid Ahmed , Khidri, Feriha Fatima , Khormali, Moein , Kısa, Adnan , Kısa, Sezer , Kivimäki, Mika , Kolahi, Ali‐Asghar , Kompani, Farzad , Kostev, Karel , Kothari, Nikhil , Kunutsor, Setor K. , Kurniasari, Maria Dyah , Kusuma, Dian Palupi , Kytö, Ville , Vecchia, Carlo La , Lahariya, Chandrakant , Latief, Kamaluddin , Lee, Seung Won , Lee, Wei‐Chen , Leonardi, Matilde, Liu, Xuefeng , Lohner, Valerie , Lorenzovici, László , Lotufo, Paulo A. , Lucchetti, Giancarlo , Lusk, Jay B. , Amin, Hawraz Ibrahim M. , Malhotra, Armaan Kush , Malhotra, Kashish , Malta, Déborah Carvalho , Mansournia, Mohammad Alì , Mantovani, LG , Manu, Emmanuel, Marino, Mirko , Martínez, Ramón , Martini, Santi , Martorell, Miquel , Marzo, Roy Rillera , Mathangasinghe, Yasith , Mathews, Elezebeth , Mehmood, Asim , Mehrabani-Zeinabad, Kamran , Menezes, Ritesh G. , Meo, Sultan A , Meretoja, Atte , Meštrović, Tomislav , Sá, Ana Carolina Micheletti Gomide Nogueira de , Minh, Le Huu Nhat , Mirică, Andreea , Мirrakhimov, Erkin М , Mirza‐Aghazadeh‐Attari, Mohammad , Mishra, Ajay Kumar , Mohamed, Ahmed Ismail , Mohammadi, Soheil , Mohammadian-Hafshejani, Abdollah , Mokdad, Ali H. , Molinaro, Sabrina , Momani, Shaher , Ghalibaf, AmirAli Moodi , Moradi, Maryam , Msherghi, Ahmed A.A. , Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin , Nargus, Shumaila , Natto, Zuhair S. , Nauman, Javaid , DELETE-ME, Nawsherwan, Nayak, Vinod C , Newton, Charles R. , Nigatu, Yeshambel T. , Noubiap, Jean Jacques , Nugen, Fred , Oduro, Michael Safo , Okati‐Aliabad, Hassan , Okeke, Sylvester Reuben , Okekunle, Akinkunmi Paul , Olagunju, Andrew T , Olaiya, Muideen Tunbosun , Olufadewa, Isaac Iyinoluwa , Ornello, Raffaele , Ortiz‐Prado, Esteban , Ouyahia, Amel , Owolabi, Mayowa , Padrón‐Monedero, Alicia , Padubidri, Jagadish Rao , Panos, Leonidas D , Pantazopoulos, Ioannis N. , Parikh, Romil R., Patel, Jay , Patel, Urvish , Patoulias, Dimitrios , Pereira, Gavin F , Perianayagam, Arokiasamy , Perna, Simone , Petermann‐Rocha, Fanny , Philip, Anil K. , Пирадов, М. А. , Pradhan, Jalandhar , Puvvula, Jagadeesh , Qasim, Nameer Hashim , Raggi, Alberto , Rahimi‐Movaghar, Vafa , Rahman, Muhammad Aziz , Rahmani, Amir Masoud , Sanati, Ali Rajabpour , Ramasamy, Shakthi Kumaran , Ramazanu, Sheena , Rathish, Devarajan , Rawaf, Salman , Redwan, Elrashdy M , Remuzzi, Giuseppe , Romoli, Michele, Romozzi, Marina , Ross, Allen Guy , Rout, Himanshu Sekhar , Roy, Priyanka , Saad, Aly M A , Saadatian, Zahra , Sabour, Siamak , Sacco, Simona , Sadeghi, Erfan , Saeed, Usman, Sharif‐Askari, Fatemeh Saheb , Sahebkar, Amirhossein , Sajib, Md Refat Uz Zaman , Saleh, Mohamed A. , Samodra, Yoseph Leonardo , MİLİCEVİC, Milena Santric, Saravanan, Aswini , Sarkar, Tanmay, Sarode, Sachin Chakradhar , Sartorius, Benn , Satpathy, Maheswar , Schneider, Ione Jayce Ceola , Schuermans, Art , Selvaraj, Siddharthan , Senthilkumaran, Subramanian , Sepanlou, Sadaf Ghajarieh , Shahwan, Moyad Jamal , Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib , Shamsi, Anas , Shannawaz, Mohammed , Rad, Javad Sharifi, Sharma, Vishal , Shittu, Aminu , Shiue, Ivy , Shlobin, Nathan A. , Siddig, Emmanuel Edwar , Spartalis, Michael , Stanaway, Jeffrey D , Starodubova, Antonina Vladimirovna , Szarpak, Łukasz , Tabatabaeizadeh, Seyed‐Amir , Tabatabaeizadeh, Seyed-Amir, Talaat, Iman Mamdouh , Temsah, Mohamad‐Hani , Thakur, Ramna , Thirunavukkarasu, Sathish, Tiwari, Krishna, Truyen, Thien Tan Tri Tai , Tsai, Daniel Hsiang‐Te , Ullah, Atta , Unnikrishnan, Bhaskaran , Unsworth, Carolyn Anne, Usman, Jibrin Sammani , Valizadeh, Rohollah , Varghese, Joe , Vasankari, Tommi Juhani , Venketasubramanian, Narayanaswamy , Vervoort, Dominique , Villafañe, Jorge Hugo , Vinayak, Manish , Wafa, Hatem A , Walde, Mandaras Tariku, Willeit, Peter , Wolfe, Charles D.A. , Wolfe, Charles D. A., Yamagishi, Kazumasa , Yaribeygi, Habib , Yaya, Sanni , Ye, Pengpeng, Yonemoto, Naohiro , Yu, Chuanhua , Zastrozhin, Michael, Zhang, Chen , Zhang, Zhiqiang, Zielińska, Magdalena , Zyoud, Samer H. , Roth, Gregory A. , Feigin, Valery L. , Kulimbet, Mukhtar , Rahim, Fakher

JAMA Neurology | May 23, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 765

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1522 | PMID 40406922 Get It

Importance Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) represents the third most common stroke type with unique etiologies, risk factors, diagnostics, and treatments. Nevertheless, epidemiological studies often cluster SAH with other stroke types leaving its distinct burden estimates obscure. Objective To estimate the worldwide burden of SAH. Design, Setting, and Participants Based on the repeated cross-sectional Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study, the global burden of SAH in 1990 to 2021 was estimated. Moreover, the SAH burden was compared with other diseases, and its associations with 14 individual risk factors were investigated with available data in the GBD 2021 study. The GBD study included the burden estimates of nontraumatic SAH among all ages in 204 countries and territories between 1990 and 2021. Exposures SAH and 14 modifiable risk factors. Main Outcomes and Measures Absolute numbers and age-standardized rates with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) of SAH incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) as well as risk factor–specific population attributable fractions (PAFs). Results In 2021, the global age-standardized SAH incidence was 8.3 (95% UI, 7.3-9.5), prevalence was 92.2 (95% UI, 84.1-100.6), mortality was 4.2 (95% UI, 3.7-4.8), and DALY rate was 125.2 (95% UI, 110.5-142.6) per 100 000 people. The highest burden estimates were found in Latin America, the Caribbean, Oceania, and high-income Asia Pacific. Although the absolute number of SAH cases increased, especially in regions with a low sociodemographic index, all age-standardized burden rates decreased between 1990 and 2021: the incidence by 28.8% (95% UI, 25.7%-31.6%), prevalence by 16.1% (95% UI, 14.8%-17.7%), mortality by 56.1% (95% UI, 40.7%-64.3%), and DALY rate by 54.6% (95% UI, 42.8%-61.9%). Of 300 diseases, SAH ranked as the 36th most common cause of death and 59th most common cause of DALY in the world. Of all worldwide SAH-related DALYs, 71.6% (95% UI, 63.8%-78.6%) were associated with the 14 modeled risk factors of which high systolic blood pressure (population attributable fraction [PAF] = 51.6%; 95% UI, 38.0%-62.6%) and smoking (PAF = 14.4%; 95% UI, 12.4%-16.5%) had the highest attribution. Conclusions and Relevance Although the global age-standardized burden rates of SAH more than halved over the last 3 decades, SAH remained one of the most common cardiovascular and neurological causes of death and disabilities in the world, with increasing absolute case numbers. These findings suggest evidence for the potential health benefits of proactive public health planning and resource allocation toward the prevention of SAH.
ctDNA and Recurrence Risk for Adjuvant De-Escalation in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
Abel, Kathryn M. Van , Price, Katharine A., Moore, Eric J. , Patel, Samir H. , Hinni, Michael L., Fruth, Briant, Foster, Nathan R. , Neben-Wittich, M.A. , Garces, Yolanda I. , McGee, L.A. , Gamez, Mauricio E. , Rwigema, Jean‐Claude M. , Janus, Jeffrey R. , Kasperbauer, Jan L. , García, Joaquín J., Foote, Robert L. , Daniel, Jeannie, Neben-Wittich, Michelle, McGee, Lisa A, Lester, Scott C. , Holtzman, Adam L. , Van Abel, Kathryn M , Routman, David M. , Yin, Linda X. , Price, Daniel L. , Chintakuntlawar, Ashish V. , Ma, Daniel J.

JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | May 22, 2025 | Volume: 151 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 665

10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0903 | PMID 40402484 Get It

ImportanceThe De-escalated Adjuvant Radiation Therapy (DART) phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT) showed that in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)−associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, postoperative minimal residual disease (MRD), detected through circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA), was associated with a higher risk of disease progression. When considered along with pathologic factors, postoperative ctHPVDNA assessment may improve patient selection for adjuvant treatment de-escalation; however, more data are needed to demonstrate how it may be used in personalizing treatment intensity.ObjectiveTo determine the association of postoperative MRD status with progression-free survival (PFS) after surgery for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a secondary analysis of the DART RCT, which was conducted from October 2016 to August 2020 in multiple sites in the US. Participants from the de-escalated adjuvant radiation therapy group and the standard of care group with available blood specimen data were included. Reports from 3-month posttreatment surveillance visits were used to assess associations and outcomes. Data analyses were performed from March 2023 to March of 2025.InterventionsThe DART group received 30 to 36 Gy of radiation therapy in 1.5 to 1.8 Gy twice daily, plus docetaxel, 15 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8. The standard of care group received 60 Gy with or without weekly cisplatin, 40 mg/m2.Main Outcome and MeasurePFS.ResultsThe analysis included 140 patients (mean [SD] age, 59.1 [8.4] years; 12 [8.6%] females and 128 [91.4%] males; 97 [69.3%] with no smoking history); characteristics were similar to the overall DART RCT population. Of these, 17 patients (12.1%) had postoperative MRD (13 of 96 [13.5%] receiving DART and 4 of 44 [9.1%] receiving standard of care). For all patients, postoperative MRD positivity was strongly associated with worsened PFS at 24 months (MRD positivity, 69.5%; MRD negativity, 95.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.59). MRD positivity was associated with PFS when evaluating only those patients in the DART group, where 24-month PFS was 68.4% compared to 92.6% for MRD-negative patients (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.93). Three months after completion of all treatment, 8 of 117 patients (6.8%) had detectable ctHPVDNA, whereas 109 of 117 (93.2%) did not, and detection was highly associated with PFS (HR, 20.48; 95% CI, 6.91-60.67).Conclusions and RelevanceThis secondary analysis of the DART RCT found that patients with detectable ctHPVDNA after surgery had a higher risk of disease progression. When added to the pathologic factors considered, ctHPVDNA assessment may improve selection of patients for treatment de-escalation. In addition, the 3-month posttreatment time point, early in surveillance, may identify a sizable portion of patients with progression and may guide intervention and surveillance after surgery for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02908477
Macrowire-only direct aspiration first-pass technique for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy: Multicenter technical series using the 0.035″ aristotle Colossus wire
Ares, William J. , Tonetti, Daniel A. , Koneru, Manisha , Dalkilic, Ahmet, Salah, Walid K. , Brinjikji, Waleed , Rajjoub, Kenan , Raz, Eytan, Khawaja, Ayaz , Southwood, Christopher, Dalyai, Richard , Birnbaum, Lee , Chowdhry, Shakeel , M., Huy , Joyce, Evan, Calnan, Daniel R. , Malek, Adel M. , Ares, William J , Tonetti, Daniel , Malek, Adel , Grandhi, Ramesh , Dalkilic, Ahmet, Raz, Eytan , Grandhi, Ramesh

Interventional Neuroradiology | May 22, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/15910199251343117 | PMID 40400317 Get It

Background Larger “macrowires” may facilitate microcatheter-free delivery of large-bore aspiration catheters (ACs) for intracranial endovascular mechanical thrombectomy. We examined the safety and efficacy of the Aristotle Colossus Guidewire for this use. Methods In this retrospective analysis of prospective data from 12 institutions, we identified anterior circulation endovascular mechanical thrombectomy cases involving the Aristotle Colossus guidewire over a 12-month period. The primary efficacy endpoint was successful delivery of the AC to the site without the use of adjunct devices. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with clinically relevant covariables. Results In 122 patients (median age 74 years (interquartile range (IQR) 63–82)), most intracranial occlusions were in the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (95/122, 78.0%). The primary endpoint of microcatheter-free AC delivery was met in 87.7% (107/122) of patients; 93/122 (76.2%) patients underwent microcatheter-free delivery with successful reperfusion via contact aspiration (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade ≥ 2B). The median number of passes was 1 (IQR 1–2). Multivariable regression demonstrated that severe internal carotid artery tortuosity or cervical loop presence (odds ratio (OR): 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01–0.54, p = 0.01) and presence of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03–0.83, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with lower odds of successful AC delivery over the guidewire. Intraprocedural vasospasm occurred in 4.9% (6/122) of cases; there were no reports of vessel dissection or perforation. Conclusions We demonstrate the favorable performance of the Aristotle Colossus guidewire for anterior circulation ischemic stroke intervention. The macrowire appears to safely facilitate navigation of the neurovasculature by large-bore ACs without the need for microcatheter and/or stentriever.
The Role and Performance of Postoperative Imaging After Repair of a Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Strajina, Veljko , Lund, Sarah , Zhu, Rebecca, Stephens, Daniel , Zietlow, John , Heller, Stephanie F. , Turay, David, Mahmoud, Khalid , Harmsen, William S. , Ahmed, Amin Mohamed , Lund, Sarah B, Zietlow, John M, Mahmoud, Khalid H., Mohamed Ahmed, Amin, Khandelwal, Ashish

World Journal of Surgery | May 21, 2025 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2116-2122

10.1002/wjs.12622 | PMID 40399251 Get It

ABSTRACTBackgroundWe aimed to determine the performance of postoperative computed tomography (CT) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGI) in patients who underwent surgery for a perforated peptic ulcer and to assess the yield of routine postoperative studies.MethodsRetrospective, single‐institution, chart‐review study of patients who underwent a repair of a perforated gastric or duodenal ulcer between August 2004 and September 2021 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ResultsWe identified a total of 240 patients, 28 (12%) were found to have leaks. When any of the four findings (extraluminal gas or fluid collection adjacent to the repair, worsening pneumoperitoneum, or enteral contrast extravasation) was present on postoperative CT scan (n = 116) it had sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 53%–90%), with a specificity of 90% (95% CI 84%–91%). Upper gastrointestinal series (UGI, n = 150) showed a sensitivity of 57% (95% CI 25%–84%) and a specificity of 99% (95% CI 96%–100%). UGI demonstrated higher specificity compared to CT (p < 0.01); there was no significant difference in sensitivity (p = 0.34). The findings from CT scans led to changes in management for a significantly greater number of patients compared to UGI (20% vs. 4%, p < 0.01). The diagnostic yield for leak identification was 3% for routine postoperative CT (n = 63) and 2% for routine UGI studies (n = 141).ConclusionsPostoperative CT is more likely to change management in patients who underwent repair of a perforated peptic ulcer compared to postoperative upper gastrointestinal series. The yield of routine postoperative studies is low, and their benefit is uncertain.
Trends in the Extent of Surgical Management for Low‐Grade Parotid Malignancies: A SEER Analysis
Rourk, Katelyn S. , Ali, Hawa M. , Glasgow, Amy E. , Tasche, Kendall K. , Abel, Kathryn M. Van , Moore, Eric J. , Calcano, Gabriela A. , Yin, Linda X , Van Abel, Kathryn M , Rourk, Katelyn , Habermann, Elizabeth B. , Price, Daniel L. , Yin, Linda X.

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | May 21, 2025 | Volume: 173 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 671-680

10.1002/ohn.1305 | PMID 40396455 Get It

AbstractObjectiveLow‐grade parotid malignancies have high overall survival rates; however, controversy remains about the appropriate extent of surgery. We aim to explore the trends in the extent of parotidectomy performed over time in low‐grade parotid malignancies in the United States, with a hypothesis that there has been a trend towards less aggressive surgery.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study of all low‐grade (grade I) acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) from 2004 to 2020.SettingGeographic areas served by SEER.MethodsTrends were assessed using Cochran‐Armitage tests and logistic regression; Kaplan‐Meier survival curves were used to analyze overall and cancer‐specific survival, and chi‐square tests were used to analyze patient characteristics.ResultsIn total, 1288 patients were identified (916 MEC; 372 ACC). Most patients (n = 772, 60%) were non‐Hispanic white, with an average age of 50.6 years and had a slight female predominance (1.58:1). Most of the cohort presented with tumor stage T1 or T2 (84%), N0 (90.1%), and M0 (96.9%). Treatment with total parotidectomy decreased significantly (34.6 vs 17.7%, P = .02) whereas sacrificing the facial nerve (FN) slightly decreased (20 vs 15.7%, P = .1). A significant increase in N0 patients (71%‐94%, P < .0001) was observed, whereas T staging remained stable (61%‐64%, P = .3). Overall, both ACC and MEC had excellent cancer‐specific survival.ConclusionOver the last 17 years, there has been a significant de‐escalation in the extent of parotidectomy for low‐grade parotid malignancy in the United States.
Cold snare endoscopic resection for large colon polyps: a randomised trial
Pohl, Heiko , Rex, Douglas K. , Barber, Jeremy, Moyer, Matthew T. , Elmunzer, B. Joseph , Rastogi, Amit , Gordon, Stuart R. , Zolotarevsky, Eugene, Levenick, John M. , Aslanian, Harry R., Elatrache, Mazen, Renteln, Daniel von , Brahmbhatt, Bhaumik , Keswani, Rajesh N. , Kumta, Nikhil A. , Smith, Zachary L. , Ghanimeh, Mouhanna K. Abu, Simmer, Stephen, MacKenzie, Todd A. , Piraka, Cyrus , von Renteln, Daniel , Smith, Zachary L , Piraka, Cyrus , Wallace, Michael B. , Pleskow, Douglas K. , Sanaei, Omid

Gut | May 20, 2025 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1804-1813

10.1136/gutjnl-2025-335075 | PMID 40393701 Get It

Background Complications of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colorectal polyps remain a concern. Objective We aimed to compare safety and efficacy of cold EMR (without electrocautery) to hot EMR (with electrocautery) of large colorectal polyps. Design In this multicentre randomised trial, patients with any large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colon polyp were assigned to cold or hot EMR (primary intervention), and to submucosal injection with a viscous or non-viscous solution (secondary intervention) following a 2×2 design. The primary outcome was the rate of severe adverse events (SAEs). The secondary outcome was polyp recurrence. In this study, we report results of the primary intervention. Results 660 patients were randomised and analysed. An SAE was observed in 2.1% of patients in the cold EMR group and in 4.3% in the hot EMR group (p=0.10) (per protocol analysis 1.4 vs 5.0%, p=0.017) with fewer perforations following cold EMR (0%) compared with hot EMR (1.6%, p=0.028). Postprocedure bleeding did not differ (1.5% vs 2.2%, p=0.57). The effect of cold resection was independent of the type of submucosal injection solution, polyp size or antithrombotic medications. Recurrence was detected in 27.6% and 13.6% in the cold and hot EMR groups, respectively (p<0.001). Recurrence was not significantly different for 20–29 mm polyps (18.6% vs 13.4%, p=0.24) and for sessile serrated polyps (14.1% vs 8.5%, p=0.33). Conclusion Universal application of cold EMR did not significantly lower SAEs (unless cold EMR could be completed) and doubled the recurrence rate compared with hot EMR. Trial registration details ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT03865537 .