McGee, L.A.

Healthcare Systems Science (HSS) is an important part of medical education because it helps physicians understand how healthcare systems work and how to improve them. However, it is not commonly included in graduate medical training. This manuscript describes the creation and use of a radiation oncology (RO) HSS curriculum that was built with medical school faculty and adapted to the needs of residents in our residency program. The curriculum included sixteen sessions over ten months and covered six domains: person centered care, population centered care, team-based care, high value care, leadership, and health policy economics and technology. Each session included a short lecture and a case discussion on topics such as financial toxicity, telemedicine, workflow improvement, burnout, health equity, and billing. The curriculum was used successfully with regular participation from residents and faculty, showing that it can fit into an existing residency schedule. Residents completed pre- and post-intervention surveys assessing understanding, consideration, confidence, and satisfaction related to HSS domains using 5-point Likert-scale items. Among residents with paired survey data, scores for understanding of HSS, incorporation of HSS into care planning, confidence applying HSS principles, and satisfaction with HSS integration all improved following curriculum completion. This experience shows that adding HSS to RO residency training is practical and useful, and it may also be a helpful model for other residency programs.

Purpose To implement and evaluate a faculty mentorship skill development curriculum within a radiation oncology department at a single academic medical center. Methods A three-part faculty development curriculum consisting of three 45-minute facilitated workshops was implemented for physician faculty mentors. The curriculum was designed to support mentors in navigating mentoring relationships, aligning expectations, and fostering mentee independence. Content was informed by evidence-based mentorship frameworks and adult learning principles, including models developed by the Center for the Improvement of Mentored Experiences in Research, social cognitive theory, and principles of psychological safety and self-efficacy. Faculty participants representing a range of academic ranks and mentoring experience levels participated voluntarily. Pre- and post-curriculum self-assessment surveys evaluated participant understanding and implementation of mentorship skills, as well as perceptions of common mentorship challenges, using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses. Results Curriculum content progressed from foundational mentorship concepts, including mentor roles, mentoring networks, and stages of mentoring relationships, to communication strategies, expectation alignment, and promotion of mentee independence. Educational methods included brief didactic instruction, case-based discussion, guided reflection, and peer-to-peer learning. Survey data demonstrated improvement in participant self-assessment scores across all evaluated mentorship domains, including mentoring across differences, supporting mentee goal achievement, confidence as a mentor, providing constructive feedback, awareness of mentorship challenges, setting clear expectations, and understanding core mentorship competencies. Participants also reported reduced perceived challenges related to mentorship, with the largest improvements observed in setting boundaries, mentoring across differences, and addressing sensitive topics. Conclusions This faculty mentorship development curriculum was feasible to implement and demonstrated favorable early improvements in self-reported mentorship knowledge, confidence, and perceived ability to navigate common mentorship challenges. Further longitudinal evaluation is needed to assess sustained implementation of mentorship skills and longer-term impact on mentoring relationships.

Importance Standard adjuvant therapy for human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) is radiation therapy 60 Gy with or without cisplatin delivered in 30 fractions during 6 weeks. A phase 3 randomized clinical trial demonstrated decreased toxic effects and improved patient-reported outcomes with de-escalated adjuvant radiation therapy (DART) compared with standard therapy; however, outcomes for patients treated in the clinical practice setting following trial adoption remain unknown. Objective To compare characteristics and oncologic outcomes of patients treated with DART during clinical trials (on study) and in clinical practice settings (off study) and report progression-free survival (PFS) by risk category. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included patients treated with DART in the MC1273 and MC1675 trials and in clinical practice after study completion at a multisite tertiary care center. Patients with surgically resectable HPV-OPSCC who underwent margin-negative resection between August 20, 2013, and March 21, 2023, and were treated with DART were included in the analysis. Those with prior head and neck cancer, pT0 or pT4 disease, unknown HPV status, metastatic disease at presentation, synchronous primary tumors, induction chemotherapy, or treatment at an outside institution were excluded. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2024, to July 18, 2025. Interventions DART consisting of 30 to 36 Gy in 1.5- to 1.8-Gy fractions twice daily with docetaxel 15 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8. Main Outcomes and Measures Progression-free survival as measured via Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results A total of 282 patients were included in the analysis: 176 (62.4%) in the on-study group and 106 (37.6%) in the off-study group (252 [89.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 59.1 [9.3] years). Both groups were predominantly male (157 [89.2%] and 95 [89.6%], respectively) and consisted mostly of never smokers (118 [67.0%] and 62 [58.5%], respectively). Pathologic features were similar between groups except for nodal stage (pN1: 155 [88.1%] on study vs 102 [96.2%] off study; pN2: 21 [11.9%] on study vs 4 [3.8%] off study; P = .02). The median follow-up times were 5.2 years (95% CI, 5.2-5.8 years) in the on-study group and 2.2 years (95% CI, 1.9-2.4 years) in the off-study group. Two-year PFS was similar (93% [95% CI, 88%-97%] on study vs 93% [95% CI, 88%-99%] off study). For patients with pN1 and no extranodal extension (ENE), 2- and 5-year PFS were 97% (95% CI, 93%-100%) and 96% (95% CI, 92%-100%), respectively. Patients with pN1 and ENE had a 2- and 5-year PFS of 93% (95% CI, 89%-98%) and 87% (95% CI, 81%-94%), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this retrospective cohort study of patients receiving DART on and off study, oncologic outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Fewer patients with pN2 received DART off study, given the interim results of MC1675. Patients with pN1 and no ENE treated with DART had excellent 2- and 5-year PFS, supporting DART as a compelling treatment option in well-selected patients. An additional study that is currently underway will evaluate biomarker risk-stratified treatment of patients with pN1 and ENE receiving DART.

Abstract Purpose: Head and neck (HN) radiotherapy contour quality directly impacts local control (LC) and survival; however, few departments peer review (PR) contours prior to radiotherapy planning (RTP). This study reports outcomes of a single institution’s formal HN contour PR process. Methods: A formal HN contour PR process was implemented. Prior to RTP, HN radiation oncologists reviewed contours, provided feedback and assigned contour grades as follows: R0 (no change), R1 (minor revision, not high risk) or R2 (major revision; high risk). The PR task was completed and the contour grade was recorded. Cochran-Armitage trend test was performed. Results: Pilot PR process was performed over a 7-month period for 88 patients, followed by a maintenance phase. Contours were graded as follows: R0 ( N = 51), R1 ( N = 20) and R2 ( N = 17). Over time, the number of R2 revisions decreased ( p = 0.0001); month 1 ( N = 7), month 2 ( N = 3), month 3 ( N = 5), month 4 ( N = 2) and months 5–7 ( N = 0). Conversely, the number of R0 revisions improved over time ( p = 0.0203); month 1 ( N = 5), months 2–3 ( N = 9), month 4 ( N = 5), month 5 ( N = 8), month 6 ( N = 12) and month 7 ( N = 3). Each radiation oncologist demonstrated reduction in R2 revisions during the pilot. During maintenance, all 3 radiation oncologists demonstrated low rates of R2 revisions of less than 3 cases per year. Conclusion: Incorporation of HN contour PR into routine clinical workflow is feasible. The collective experience of multiple high-volume HN radiation oncologists led to improved contour quality in the pilot for each radiation oncologist and continued to ensure high quality in the maintenance phase.

ABSTRACT Background As head and neck cancer survival rates improve, there is growing demand for quality survivorship care and tools to predict patient adherence; this study aims to evaluate an advanced practice provider ( APP )‐led survivorship clinic and assess these key metrics. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 213 head and neck cancer patients treated with curative radiation therapy between 2016 and 2023, to assess follow‐up adherence in an advanced practice provider–led survivorship clinic. Results With a median follow‐up of 2.4 years, follow‐up care metrics identified high completion percentages (> 90%) for lung cancer screening, smoking cessation, thyroid screening, dental evaluation, xerostomia, dysphagia, and dysgeusia. The HOUsing ‐based SocioEconomic Status ( HOUSES ) index at diagnosis showed a significant adherence difference (median percentile, 78% vs. 55%, adherent vs. nonadherent; p = 0.03). Conclusions High adherence rates with guideline‐defined care metrics are achievable in an advanced practice provider‐led head and neck cancer survivorship clinic. The HOUSES index may assist in predicting nonadherence; however, further studies are needed.

ImportanceThe De-escalated Adjuvant Radiation Therapy (DART) phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT) showed that in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)−associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, postoperative minimal residual disease (MRD), detected through circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA), was associated with a higher risk of disease progression. When considered along with pathologic factors, postoperative ctHPVDNA assessment may improve patient selection for adjuvant treatment de-escalation; however, more data are needed to demonstrate how it may be used in personalizing treatment intensity.ObjectiveTo determine the association of postoperative MRD status with progression-free survival (PFS) after surgery for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a secondary analysis of the DART RCT, which was conducted from October 2016 to August 2020 in multiple sites in the US. Participants from the de-escalated adjuvant radiation therapy group and the standard of care group with available blood specimen data were included. Reports from 3-month posttreatment surveillance visits were used to assess associations and outcomes. Data analyses were performed from March 2023 to March of 2025.InterventionsThe DART group received 30 to 36 Gy of radiation therapy in 1.5 to 1.8 Gy twice daily, plus docetaxel, 15 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8. The standard of care group received 60 Gy with or without weekly cisplatin, 40 mg/m2.Main Outcome and MeasurePFS.ResultsThe analysis included 140 patients (mean [SD] age, 59.1 [8.4] years; 12 [8.6%] females and 128 [91.4%] males; 97 [69.3%] with no smoking history); characteristics were similar to the overall DART RCT population. Of these, 17 patients (12.1%) had postoperative MRD (13 of 96 [13.5%] receiving DART and 4 of 44 [9.1%] receiving standard of care). For all patients, postoperative MRD positivity was strongly associated with worsened PFS at 24 months (MRD positivity, 69.5%; MRD negativity, 95.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.59). MRD positivity was associated with PFS when evaluating only those patients in the DART group, where 24-month PFS was 68.4% compared to 92.6% for MRD-negative patients (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.93). Three months after completion of all treatment, 8 of 117 patients (6.8%) had detectable ctHPVDNA, whereas 109 of 117 (93.2%) did not, and detection was highly associated with PFS (HR, 20.48; 95% CI, 6.91-60.67).Conclusions and RelevanceThis secondary analysis of the DART RCT found that patients with detectable ctHPVDNA after surgery had a higher risk of disease progression. When added to the pathologic factors considered, ctHPVDNA assessment may improve selection of patients for treatment de-escalation. In addition, the 3-month posttreatment time point, early in surveillance, may identify a sizable portion of patients with progression and may guide intervention and surveillance after surgery for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02908477

Because proton beam therapy (PBT) can lower the dose of radiation to the heart, lungs, and breast, it is an established radiation modality for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Pencil beam scanning (PBS) PBT facilitates the treatment of more extensive targets. This may be especially of value for lymphoma patients who require RT to both mediastinal and axillary targets, defined here as extended target RT (ETRT), given the target distribution and need to minimize the lung, heart, and breast dose. Using the Proton Collaborative Group registry, we identified patients with HL treated with PBT to both their mediastinum and axilla, for which DICOM-RT was available. All patients were treated with PBS. To evaluate the dosimetric impact of PBS, we compared delivered PBS plans with VMAT butterfly photon plans optimized to have the same target volume coverage, when feasible. Between 2016 and 2021, twelve patients (median 26 years) received PBS ETRT (median 30.6 Gy (RBE)). Despite the large superior/inferior (SI, median 22.2 cm) and left/right (LR, median 22.8 cm) extent of the ETRT targets, all patients were treated with one isocenter except for two patients (both with SI and LR > 30 cm). Most commonly, anterior beams, with or without posterior beams, were used. Compared to photons, PBS had greater target coverage, better conformity, and lower dose heterogeneity while achieving lower doses to the lungs and heart, but not to the breast. No acute grade 3+ toxicities were reported, including pneumonitis. Proton ETRT in this small cohort was safely delivered with PBS and was associated with an improved sparing of the heart and lungs compared to VMAT.

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a retrained large language model (LLM) tailored to the needs of HN cancer patients treated with radiotherapy, with emphasis on symptom management and survivorship care. Methods: A comprehensive external database was curated for training ChatGPT-4, integrating expert-identified consensus guidelines on supportive care for HN patients and correspondences from physicians and nurses within our institution’s electronic medical records for 90 HN patients. The performance of our model was evaluated using 20 patient post-treatment inquiries that were then assessed by three Board certified radiation oncologists (RadOncs). The rating of the model was assessed on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) based on accuracy, clarity of response, completeness s, and relevance. Results: The average scores for the 20 tested questions were 4.25 for accuracy, 4.35 for clarity, 4.22 for completeness, and 4.32 for relevance, on a 5-point scale. Overall, 91.67% (220 out of 240) of assessments received scores of 3 or higher, and 83.33% (200 out of 240) received scores of 4 or higher. Conclusion: The custom-trained model demonstrates high accuracy in providing support to HN patients offering evidence-based information and guidance on their symptom management and survivorship care.

Proton therapy has emerged as a crucial tool in the treatment of head and neck and skull-base cancers, offering advantages over photon therapy in terms of decreasing integral dose and reducing acute and late toxicities, such as dysgeusia, feeding tube dependence, xerostomia, secondary malignancies, and neurocognitive dysfunction. Despite its benefits in dose distribution and biological effectiveness, the application of proton therapy is challenged by uncertainties in its relative biological effectiveness (RBE). Overcoming the challenges related to RBE is key to fully realizing proton therapy’s potential, which extends beyond its physical dosimetric properties when compared with photon-based therapies. In this paper, we discuss the clinical significance of RBE within treatment volumes and adjacent serial organs at risk in the management of head and neck and skull-base tumors. We review proton RBE uncertainties and its modeling and explore clinical outcomes. Additionally, we highlight technological advancements and innovations in plan optimization and treatment delivery, including linear energy transfer/RBE optimizations and the development of spot-scanning proton arc therapy. These advancements show promise in harnessing the full capabilities of proton therapy from an academic standpoint, further technological innovations and clinical outcome studies, however, are needed for their integration into routine clinical practice.

Abstract In radiotherapy, 2D orthogonally projected kV images are used for patient alignment when 3D-on-board imaging(OBI) unavailable. But tumor visibility is constrained due to the projection of patient’s anatomy onto a 2D plane, potentially leading to substantial setup errors. In treatment room with 3D-OBI such as cone beam CT(CBCT), the field of view(FOV) of CBCT is limited with unnecessarily high imaging dose, thus unfavorable for pediatric patients. A solution to this dilemma is to reconstruct 3D CT from kV images obtained at the treatment position. Here, we propose a dual-models framework built with hierarchical ViT blocks. Unlike a proof-of-concept approach, our framework considers kV images as the solo input and can synthesize accurate, full-size 3D CT in real time(within milliseconds). We demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach on 10 patients with head and neck(H\&N) cancer using image quality(MAE:<45HU), dosimetric accuracy(Gamma passing rate(2%/2mm/10%):>97%) and patient position uncertainty(shift error:<0.4mm). The proposed framework can generate accurate 3D CT faithfully mirroring real-time patient position, thus significantly improving patient setup accuracy, keeping imaging dose minimum, and maintaining treatment veracity.