García, Joaquín J.

Importance Standard adjuvant therapy for human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) is radiation therapy 60 Gy with or without cisplatin delivered in 30 fractions during 6 weeks. A phase 3 randomized clinical trial demonstrated decreased toxic effects and improved patient-reported outcomes with de-escalated adjuvant radiation therapy (DART) compared with standard therapy; however, outcomes for patients treated in the clinical practice setting following trial adoption remain unknown. Objective To compare characteristics and oncologic outcomes of patients treated with DART during clinical trials (on study) and in clinical practice settings (off study) and report progression-free survival (PFS) by risk category. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included patients treated with DART in the MC1273 and MC1675 trials and in clinical practice after study completion at a multisite tertiary care center. Patients with surgically resectable HPV-OPSCC who underwent margin-negative resection between August 20, 2013, and March 21, 2023, and were treated with DART were included in the analysis. Those with prior head and neck cancer, pT0 or pT4 disease, unknown HPV status, metastatic disease at presentation, synchronous primary tumors, induction chemotherapy, or treatment at an outside institution were excluded. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2024, to July 18, 2025. Interventions DART consisting of 30 to 36 Gy in 1.5- to 1.8-Gy fractions twice daily with docetaxel 15 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8. Main Outcomes and Measures Progression-free survival as measured via Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results A total of 282 patients were included in the analysis: 176 (62.4%) in the on-study group and 106 (37.6%) in the off-study group (252 [89.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 59.1 [9.3] years). Both groups were predominantly male (157 [89.2%] and 95 [89.6%], respectively) and consisted mostly of never smokers (118 [67.0%] and 62 [58.5%], respectively). Pathologic features were similar between groups except for nodal stage (pN1: 155 [88.1%] on study vs 102 [96.2%] off study; pN2: 21 [11.9%] on study vs 4 [3.8%] off study; P = .02). The median follow-up times were 5.2 years (95% CI, 5.2-5.8 years) in the on-study group and 2.2 years (95% CI, 1.9-2.4 years) in the off-study group. Two-year PFS was similar (93% [95% CI, 88%-97%] on study vs 93% [95% CI, 88%-99%] off study). For patients with pN1 and no extranodal extension (ENE), 2- and 5-year PFS were 97% (95% CI, 93%-100%) and 96% (95% CI, 92%-100%), respectively. Patients with pN1 and ENE had a 2- and 5-year PFS of 93% (95% CI, 89%-98%) and 87% (95% CI, 81%-94%), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this retrospective cohort study of patients receiving DART on and off study, oncologic outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Fewer patients with pN2 received DART off study, given the interim results of MC1675. Patients with pN1 and no ENE treated with DART had excellent 2- and 5-year PFS, supporting DART as a compelling treatment option in well-selected patients. An additional study that is currently underway will evaluate biomarker risk-stratified treatment of patients with pN1 and ENE receiving DART.

ImportanceThe De-escalated Adjuvant Radiation Therapy (DART) phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT) showed that in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)−associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, postoperative minimal residual disease (MRD), detected through circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA), was associated with a higher risk of disease progression. When considered along with pathologic factors, postoperative ctHPVDNA assessment may improve patient selection for adjuvant treatment de-escalation; however, more data are needed to demonstrate how it may be used in personalizing treatment intensity.ObjectiveTo determine the association of postoperative MRD status with progression-free survival (PFS) after surgery for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a secondary analysis of the DART RCT, which was conducted from October 2016 to August 2020 in multiple sites in the US. Participants from the de-escalated adjuvant radiation therapy group and the standard of care group with available blood specimen data were included. Reports from 3-month posttreatment surveillance visits were used to assess associations and outcomes. Data analyses were performed from March 2023 to March of 2025.InterventionsThe DART group received 30 to 36 Gy of radiation therapy in 1.5 to 1.8 Gy twice daily, plus docetaxel, 15 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8. The standard of care group received 60 Gy with or without weekly cisplatin, 40 mg/m2.Main Outcome and MeasurePFS.ResultsThe analysis included 140 patients (mean [SD] age, 59.1 [8.4] years; 12 [8.6%] females and 128 [91.4%] males; 97 [69.3%] with no smoking history); characteristics were similar to the overall DART RCT population. Of these, 17 patients (12.1%) had postoperative MRD (13 of 96 [13.5%] receiving DART and 4 of 44 [9.1%] receiving standard of care). For all patients, postoperative MRD positivity was strongly associated with worsened PFS at 24 months (MRD positivity, 69.5%; MRD negativity, 95.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.59). MRD positivity was associated with PFS when evaluating only those patients in the DART group, where 24-month PFS was 68.4% compared to 92.6% for MRD-negative patients (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.93). Three months after completion of all treatment, 8 of 117 patients (6.8%) had detectable ctHPVDNA, whereas 109 of 117 (93.2%) did not, and detection was highly associated with PFS (HR, 20.48; 95% CI, 6.91-60.67).Conclusions and RelevanceThis secondary analysis of the DART RCT found that patients with detectable ctHPVDNA after surgery had a higher risk of disease progression. When added to the pathologic factors considered, ctHPVDNA assessment may improve selection of patients for treatment de-escalation. In addition, the 3-month posttreatment time point, early in surveillance, may identify a sizable portion of patients with progression and may guide intervention and surveillance after surgery for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02908477

Adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma (ALES) is a rare malignancy currently considered a variant of Ewing sarcoma with most known cases harboring EWSR1 rearrangements. Herein we present a series of 6 cases of EWSR1-negative ALES. The tumors arose in the sinonasal tract (n=3), major salivary glands (submandibular gland=1; parotid=1), and anterior mediastinum (n=1) in patients ranging from 25 to 79 years of age. Most tumors were basaloid in appearance, growing in large nests separated by interlobular fibrosis without overt squamous pearls. However, 1 case closely resembled a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with uniformly round nuclei, eosinophilic cytoplasm, and trabecular architecture. All cases were diffusely positive for pan-cytokeratin, p40 or p63, and CD99. A subset of cases showed diffuse reactivity for synaptophysin, including 1 sinonasal tumor which also demonstrated sustentacular S100 protein expression. Molecular testing showed FUS rearrangements in all cases. Gene partners included known ETS family members FEV (n=2) and FLI1 (n=1). Our results expand the molecular diagnostic considerations for ALES to include FUS rearrangements. We also show that ALES may harbor FUS::FLI1 fusion, which has not been previously reported in the Ewing family of tumors. Furthermore, ALES may show unusual histologic and immunophenotypic features that can overlap with olfactory carcinoma including S100-positive sustentacular cells. ALES should be considered in the diagnostic differential of small round cell tumors and tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation with immunohistochemical workup to include p40 and CD99/NKX2.2.

e18055 Background: Entrectinib, a TRK kinase inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of tissue agnostic rare tumors positive for TRK fusions. A very low frequency molecular subset of TRK fusion tumors dubbed as secretory carcinoma (SC) are characterized by organ-agnostic epithelial origin, ETV6-NTRK3 (EN) fusion and distinguishable secretory-type tumor cells. These tumors have been frequently miscategorized as acinic cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. A previous mouse study identified EGF dependent epithelial progenitors as putative cell-of-origin for SC. Methods: To test the role of EGFR signaling in EN mediated transformation and therapy resistance, we expressed EN, kinase-dead EN-K380M, and drug-resistant EN-G623R in human epithelial MCF10A cells with EGF-dependent primitive function and investigated their ability to grow in the presence and absence of EGF and/or entrectinib. To understand the significance of findings based on our model, we analyzed a total of 22 ‘rare’ patients from Mayo Clinic Tissue Registry and analyzed TCGA PanCan datasets. Results: We report herein that EGF signaling is essential for normal growth but dispensable during EN driven transformation. Our findings suggest that levels equivalent to circulating EGF (0.5-1ng/ml) is sufficient to drive 100% resistance to entrectinib in vitro. Three different strategies to blockade EGF/EGFR axis including depletion of EGF in culture system, genetic depletion of EGFR using shRNA as well as cetuximab antibody-based EGFR neutralization potentiated oncogene-addiction and hypersensitivity to entrectinib in our models. As predicted, models with G623R mutation in EN was refractory to entrectinib under all experimental conditions. Further omics analysis of TCGA PanCan suggested that EN and EGFR mutations are mutually exclusive and entrectinib-resistant G623R mutation were uncommon. Interestingly, nearly all EN tumors from Mayo Clinic Tissue Registry immunostained weakly or strongly for EGFR and showed perfect concordance with pEGFR suggesting pathway activation. Conclusions: Together, these findings raise an important question whether blockade of ‘wildtype’ EGFR signaling could improve medical intervention in SC patients presenting with wildtype EGFR and no drug-resistant mutation in entrectinib, by improving oncogene-addiction and attendant hypersensitization of transformed cells to entrectinib.

6016 Background: A germline mutation in let-7 complementary site 6 (LCS6) within the KRAS 3'-untranslated region (rs61764370, the KRAS-variant: TG/GG) is known to associate with poor outcome and drug resistance in various cancers compared to the wild type allele (TT). We examine the prognostic significance of the KRAS-variant in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods: The KRAS-variant was determined in 116 tumor DNA samples from HNSCC patients enrolled in 3 clinical trials and a tissue collection study using a previously validated PCR-based assay. Results: KRAS-variant status could be determined in 108/116 (93%) samples and an allele frequency of TG/GG was 28.7%. These results were correlated with patient demographics, p16/human papillomavirus (HPV) status and clinical outcome. There was no association between p16/HPV status and the KRAS-variant status (Fisher’s exact test, p=1.0). The KRAS-variant was associated with poor progression-free survival in patients treated with cisplatin+/-cetuximab (log-rank p=0.002) but this association was not observed in docetaxel/bortezomib treated patients (log-rank p=0.89). Conclusions: KRAS-variant is a potentially promising biomarker of poor prognosis and a predictive biomarker of cisplatin resistance in R/M HNSCC. Prospective validation is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT00003809.

AbstractBackgroundTreatment options of Ewing sarcoma of the head and neck include surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemoradiotherapy. However, local control can be challenging.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of all patients with head and neck Ewing sarcoma treated from 1972 to 2015 at a single tertiary care hospital.ResultsSeventeen patients met criteria (median 21 years, range 5‐58 years; 5 women). Mean follow‐up was 10.4 years (range 2.2‐39 years). Tumors occurred commonly in the cervical spine (5/17), the skull (3/17), and the paranasal sinuses (3/17). A total of 14 of 17 patients underwent surgical resection, 9 with gross total resection. After multimodality therapy, the 5‐year overall survival (OS) and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) was 87% and 75%, respectively.ConclusionCombined multimodal treatment resulted in a 5‐year OS and RFS of 87% and 75%, respectively. Aggressive surgical resection with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be considered. Although negative margin surgery is the goal, subtotal resection may be acceptable in the setting of adjuvant treatment.

ObjectiveHuman adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) were used to rehabilitate bone damaged by osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in an established animal model.Study DesignProspective animal study.SettingAcademic department laboratory.Subjects and MethodsAfter institutional review board and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval, 24 athymic nude rats were divided into 5 groups: 4 groups irradiated (20 Gy) by brachytherapy catheter placed at the left hemimandible and 1 mock irradiation control (n = 4). For all groups, ORN was initiated by extraction of the central molar 1 week later. After 28 days, animals (n = 5/group) received injection at the extraction site with saline (SAL), ADSCs, platelet‐rich plasma and collagen (PRP/COL), or ADSCs + PRP/COL. Rats were sacrificed 28 days later and their mandibles harvested for histopathology analysis (osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and fibrosis) and bone volume measurement using 3‐dimensional micro–computed tomography.ResultsAll but 1 rat survived the experiment period (23/24). Radiographic and histological analysis revealed 60% bone loss in the SAL group compared with the nonirradiated control. Injection of ADSCs increased jaw region bone volume by up to 36% (P <. 01). All experimental groups (ADSC, PRP/COL, and ADSC + PRP/COL) showed dramatically decreased osteoclast counts (P <. 001) while injection of PRP/COL with or without ADSCs increased osteoblasts. Increased fibrosis was observed after ADSC injection (P <. 05).ConclusionThe application of human ADSCs to an induced mandibular osteoradionecrosis model in athymic rats results in increased deposition or preservation of bone, demonstrated both histologically and radiographically. This offers an encouraging possible treatment option for translational research in this difficult disease.

AimsBiphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (SNS) is a locally aggressive tumour that occurs in the sinonasal region. PAX3–MAML3 has recently been identified as a recurrent fusion gene event in this entity; however, a subset of tumours harbour alternative PAX3 rearrangement without the involvement of MAML3. In this study we sought to characterize the molecular profile of a large series of cases, with a special emphasis on tumours with alternative fusions.Methods and resultsForty‐four examples of SNS were screened by fluorescence in‐situ hybridization and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction to better characterize its molecular profile and identify potential novel fusion genes. Twenty‐four were positive for PAX3–MAML3 (55%), 15 showed rearrangements of PAX3 without MAML3 involvement (34%), one showed rearrangement of MAML3 without PAX3 involvement, and four were negative for the involvement of either gene (9%). Among 15 cases with PAX3 involvement only, three were found to harbour PAX3–FOXO1. Two of these cases arose in the nasal cavities of female patients (aged 31 and 47 years), and one showed bilateral involvement of the nasal cavities of a 35‐year‐old male. A fourth case involved the skull base of a 47‐year‐old male, and was positive for PAX3–NCOA1. Patients with fusion‐negative tumours were slightly older.ConclusionMore than half of the SNSs in this series were positive for PAX3–MAML3. However, a subset of tumours may harbour alternative PAX3 fusion genes or show no involvement of PAX3. Except for a possible weak association between age and molecular profile, the overall morphological and immunophenotypic features of all cases seem to be similar. Because of the rarity of these tumours, the impact of the molecular profile on the clinical course of these tumours remains to be determined.