Turay, David

ABSTRACTBackgroundWe aimed to determine the performance of postoperative computed tomography (CT) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGI) in patients who underwent surgery for a perforated peptic ulcer and to assess the yield of routine postoperative studies.MethodsRetrospective, single‐institution, chart‐review study of patients who underwent a repair of a perforated gastric or duodenal ulcer between August 2004 and September 2021 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ResultsWe identified a total of 240 patients, 28 (12%) were found to have leaks. When any of the four findings (extraluminal gas or fluid collection adjacent to the repair, worsening pneumoperitoneum, or enteral contrast extravasation) was present on postoperative CT scan (n = 116) it had sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 53%–90%), with a specificity of 90% (95% CI 84%–91%). Upper gastrointestinal series (UGI, n = 150) showed a sensitivity of 57% (95% CI 25%–84%) and a specificity of 99% (95% CI 96%–100%). UGI demonstrated higher specificity compared to CT (p < 0.01); there was no significant difference in sensitivity (p = 0.34). The findings from CT scans led to changes in management for a significantly greater number of patients compared to UGI (20% vs. 4%, p < 0.01). The diagnostic yield for leak identification was 3% for routine postoperative CT (n = 63) and 2% for routine UGI studies (n = 141).ConclusionsPostoperative CT is more likely to change management in patients who underwent repair of a perforated peptic ulcer compared to postoperative upper gastrointestinal series. The yield of routine postoperative studies is low, and their benefit is uncertain.

Background Traumatic hemorrhage is a prevalent cause of death nationally, with >50% of civilian deaths estimated to be preventable with more timely intervention. This study investigated the efficacy of training large and diverse audiences in bleeding control methods including tourniquets in community health fair settings. Methods A booth was utilized for bleeding control training at community health fairs via direct demonstrations of pressure, wound packing, and commercial and improvised tourniquet application followed by hands-on practice. Participants self-rated their perceived abilities while instructors rated the participant competency. Results 117 community members participated during two fairs, though not every person completed every portion of the training. Average age was 33 (range 6-82) and the majority were female (65.0%). There was no difference in self-perceived skill compared to trainer grading of participant’s ability to identify life-threatening bleeding (112 (97.4%) vs 106 (97.2%); P = 1), apply pressure (113 (98.3%) vs 106 (97.2%); P = .68), and pack a wound (102 (88.7%) vs 92 (84.4%); P = .43). No difference in difficulty was noted in placing commercial vs improvised tourniquets (16 (43%) vs 14 (45%); P = .87). However, participants were overconfident in their ability to place tourniquets compared to trainer grading, respectively (112 (98.2%) vs 100 (91.7%; P = .03)). Discussion Community fair classes provide opportunities to train large and diverse audiences in bleeding control techniques. However, participants overestimated their ability to appropriately apply tourniquets. Further investigation is needed into best educational approaches to optimize the impact of bleeding control kits that have been distributed in multiple states.

Background There are limited studies regarding the impact of post-operative leak on perforated peptic ulcer disease (PPUD) and conflicting results regarding routine drain placement in operative repair of PPUD. This study aims to identify risk factors for gastrointestinal leak after operative repair of PPUD to better guide intra-operative decisions about drain placement. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center from 2008 to 2019, identifying 175 patients who underwent operative repair of PPUD. Results Patients who developed a leak (17%) were compared to patients who did not. Both hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 3.5 g/dL) ( P = .03) and duodenal ulcers ( P < .01) were identified as significant risk factors for leak. No significant difference was found between leak and no leak groups for AAST disease severity grade, repair technique, or pre-operative use of tobacco, alcohol, or steroids. Post-operative leaks were associated with prolonged hospital stay (29 days compared to 10, P < .01), increased complication rates (77% compared to 48%, P < .01), and increased re-operation rates (73% compared to 26%, <0.01). No difference was identified in patient characteristics or operative leak rates between patients who had drains placed at the index operation and those that did not. Discussion Leak after operative PPUD repair is associated with significant post-operative morbidity. Hypoalbuminemia and duodenal perforations are significant risk factors for post-operative leaks.

Abstract Purpose: Airway manipulation is a high-risk procedure due to aerosolization of viral particles. This has become of paramount importance during the COVID-19 pandemic in an effort to protect personnel involved in airway management. We designed and tested a copper frame to support a plastic drape to contain aerosols and allow for reduction of risk during airway management. The “CopperHead” frame allows airway management with minimal limitations in a wide range of scenarios including elective and urgent intubations, management of unstable patients, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), bronchoscopy, and extubation. The frame was made of copper to utilize its inherent antimicrobial and antiviral properties. Intervention and Measurements: We performed multiple simulations to measure FiO2 accumulation underneath the frame and plastic drape. We also performed defibrillations on a mannequin with the apparatus in place to evaluate for safety during times that the device is not removed prior to defibrillation, as indicated. We then deployed the device throughout our hospital and analyzed the resulting data on procedure success and infection rates in both COVID-positive and COVID-negative cohorts.Main Results: The technique is reproducible and allows for airway manipulation in COVID-19 suspected or confirmed patients. The FiO2 under the copper frame and plastic drape increased, but quickly dispersed when the frame was removed. We performed multiple defibrillations with apparatus in place with no adverse events. We showed that with the device in place, there appears to be no hindrance to successful intubation with 94 successful procedures in 74 patients and an 87% (60/69) first-pass intubation rate, and there were no documented clinicians or respiratory therapy infections through exposures to COVID-19 positive patients.Conclusions: The addition of a copper frame to a plastic drape over patients was an effective way to improve the safety and ease of intubation in the COVID-19 pandemic. This device was well received among our clinicians and served to benefit both intubation and extubation of recovered patients.