Mahmoud, Khalid

ABSTRACTBackgroundWe aimed to determine the performance of postoperative computed tomography (CT) and upper gastrointestinal series (UGI) in patients who underwent surgery for a perforated peptic ulcer and to assess the yield of routine postoperative studies.MethodsRetrospective, single‐institution, chart‐review study of patients who underwent a repair of a perforated gastric or duodenal ulcer between August 2004 and September 2021 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ResultsWe identified a total of 240 patients, 28 (12%) were found to have leaks. When any of the four findings (extraluminal gas or fluid collection adjacent to the repair, worsening pneumoperitoneum, or enteral contrast extravasation) was present on postoperative CT scan (n = 116) it had sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 53%–90%), with a specificity of 90% (95% CI 84%–91%). Upper gastrointestinal series (UGI, n = 150) showed a sensitivity of 57% (95% CI 25%–84%) and a specificity of 99% (95% CI 96%–100%). UGI demonstrated higher specificity compared to CT (p < 0.01); there was no significant difference in sensitivity (p = 0.34). The findings from CT scans led to changes in management for a significantly greater number of patients compared to UGI (20% vs. 4%, p < 0.01). The diagnostic yield for leak identification was 3% for routine postoperative CT (n = 63) and 2% for routine UGI studies (n = 141).ConclusionsPostoperative CT is more likely to change management in patients who underwent repair of a perforated peptic ulcer compared to postoperative upper gastrointestinal series. The yield of routine postoperative studies is low, and their benefit is uncertain.