Grossberg, Jonathan A

Background Randomized trials have shown equivocal outcomes between a direct aspiration as first-pass technique (ADAPT) and stent retriever (SR) stroke thrombectomy, yet whether specific patient subgroups benefit differentially from one technique over the other remains unknown. Methods In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, patients with large vessel occlusion were included, and those who underwent ADAPT versus SR first-pass thrombectomy (either as standalone or combined with aspiration) were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of first-pass effect (FPE, modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2c or better with one attempt) with no symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). A causal forest model was used to estimate the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) for each patient, with larger CATEs indicating that ADAPT is expected to be more advantageous. Patients were stratified by CATEs, and outcomes were compared between treatment groups. Results Among 6700 included patients, ADAPT (n=3695, 55%) was associated with a higher rate of FPE with no sICH (39.9% vs 26.9%; adjusted OR (aOR) 2.07, 95% CI 1.77 to 2.41, P<0.001). The causal forest identified significant treatment effect heterogeneity (interaction P<0.001), where ADAPT was more advantageous in more recent years and among patients with M1 occlusions presenting in earlier time windows. Low-CATE patients showed no statistically significant difference between techniques (aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.45, P=0.70), while medium- and high-CATE patients demonstrated progressively larger ADAPT advantages (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.55, and aOR 2.99, 95% CI 2.24 to 3.98, respectively, both P<0.001). Conclusions ADAPT may be superior to SR for a majority of patients, particularly in recent years, and among patients with M1 occlusions presenting in earlier time windows.

Introduction Infectious intracranial aneurysms (IIAs) are rare but serious complications of systemic infections, particularly infective endocarditis. These aneurysms are prone to rupture, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Management strategies lack consensus due to the rarity of the condition and reliance on small case series. This study examines the clinical management of IIAs using data from a large multicenter cohort. Methods A retrospective registry-based cohort study was conducted across 11 tertiary care centers in the USA between 2018 and 2023. Patients with IIAs were identified based on clinical and radiographic criteria. The primary outcome was treatment failure defined as persistence, growth, or rupture of the aneurysm. Secondary outcomes were mortality and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days and 1 year. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify outcome predictors. Results A total of 104 patients with 166 aneurysms were included, with a median age of 43 years. Medical management was successful in 56% of cases, with failure often within 18 days of initiation. Predictors of failure included younger age, larger aneurysm size, and rupture at presentation. Surgical and endovascular interventions achieved higher success rates with better outcomes. At 90 days, 57% of patients achieved functional independence (mRS 0–2), while the mortality rate was 24%. Conclusion This study highlights the limitations of medical management for IIAs and underscores the need for early surgical or endovascular intervention in high-risk patients. Outcome predictors aid clinical decision-making, optimizing patient management. Further research is needed to standardize management guidelines for IIAs.