Fiorella, David

Background Randomized trials have shown equivocal outcomes between a direct aspiration as first-pass technique (ADAPT) and stent retriever (SR) stroke thrombectomy, yet whether specific patient subgroups benefit differentially from one technique over the other remains unknown. Methods In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, patients with large vessel occlusion were included, and those who underwent ADAPT versus SR first-pass thrombectomy (either as standalone or combined with aspiration) were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of first-pass effect (FPE, modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2c or better with one attempt) with no symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). A causal forest model was used to estimate the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) for each patient, with larger CATEs indicating that ADAPT is expected to be more advantageous. Patients were stratified by CATEs, and outcomes were compared between treatment groups. Results Among 6700 included patients, ADAPT (n=3695, 55%) was associated with a higher rate of FPE with no sICH (39.9% vs 26.9%; adjusted OR (aOR) 2.07, 95% CI 1.77 to 2.41, P<0.001). The causal forest identified significant treatment effect heterogeneity (interaction P<0.001), where ADAPT was more advantageous in more recent years and among patients with M1 occlusions presenting in earlier time windows. Low-CATE patients showed no statistically significant difference between techniques (aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.45, P=0.70), while medium- and high-CATE patients demonstrated progressively larger ADAPT advantages (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.55, and aOR 2.99, 95% CI 2.24 to 3.98, respectively, both P<0.001). Conclusions ADAPT may be superior to SR for a majority of patients, particularly in recent years, and among patients with M1 occlusions presenting in earlier time windows.

Background The middle meningeal artery (MMA) has emerged as an endovascular route for treating chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), meningioma, and refractory headaches. The third ARISE roundtable convened experts from neurology, neurosurgery, neuroradiology, industry, and regulatory agencies to develop consensus guidance on current evidence for MMA-based therapies Methods Over 50 experts participated in a multi-stakeholder discussion. Evidence from randomized and observational studies, early-phase interventional series, and preclinical work was reviewed. Breakout groups focused on four domains: (1) MMA embolization (MMAE) for CSDH, (2) preoperative embolization of meningiomas, (3) MMA-targeted therapies for headache, and (4) transvascular access for endovascular drainage of subdural hematomas. Consensus recommendations were developed by a writing committee Results Randomized trials support MMAE as an adjunct to surgery or medical management for selected patients with non-acute, symptomatic CSDH to reduce recurrence, progression, and reoperation. Evidence remains insufficient to support MMAE for acute or asymptomatic subdural hematomas. For meningioma, observational data suggest that preoperative embolization in experienced centers can reduce blood loss and operative time and may delay recurrence in large, hypervascular tumors with predominant dural or external carotid supply; primary embolization and intra-arterial oncologic therapies remain investigational. Early series of MMA-directed lidocaine infusion for refractory migraine, status migrainosus, and post-subarachnoid hemorrhage headache show short-term benefit, highlighting the need for controlled trials. Preclinical and first-in-human studies of combined MMAE and transvascular drainage for CSDH demonstrate high technical success, rapid radiographic and clinical improvement, and no early recurrences Conclusion The MMA represents a vascular pathway for an expanding spectrum of neurointerventional therapies.

Abstract Background Recent trials have furthered uncertainty regarding the endovascular benefit for medium vessel occlusions (MeVO). Stent retrievers (SR) were employed in the first attempt in most interventional arm participants. We sought to compare outcomes in acute MCA M2 occlusions between frontline aspiration and SR, and to delineate procedural and anatomical covariates associated with differential treatment effect. Methods Retrospective analysis of a multicenter stroke thrombectomy cohort identified cases of MT for M2 occlusions. Unmatched and propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts were generated comparing frontline aspiration to standalone and combined SR. The primary outcome was functional independence (mRS 0–2) at 90 days. Recanalization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), mortality, and the effect of M2 laterality, division occlusion and procedure time were assessed. Results About 1734 patients with M2 occlusions underwent either frontline aspiration (n = 711) or SR/combined (n = 958) thrombectomy between 2013 and 2024. PSM analysis favored aspiration for functional independence (49.9% vs 44.0%, OR 1.27 (1.03–1.57)), complete recanalization (61.2% vs 48.7%, OR 1.66 (1.34–2.05)), complete first pass effect (35.0% vs 27.6%, OR 1.42 (1.13–1.78)), and sICH (3.5% vs 6.2%, OR 0.55 (0.33–0.91)), with no difference in mortality. Frontline aspiration had significantly shorter procedural times (median 28 [IQR 15–49.5] vs 51 [IQR 35–78] minutes; p &lt; 0.001). For every minute increase in procedure time, the probability of functional independence decreased significantly (p &lt; 0.001) less with frontline aspiration (0.35%) compared to SR/combined (1.61%). Conclusion Frontline aspiration for M2 occlusions resulted in better clinical and angiographic outcomes compared to SRs. Future trials for MeVO with a focus on contact aspiration thrombectomy may succeed where recent trials have failed.

Background Contact aspiration remains a frontline approach for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Early evidence correlates catheter size with procedural efficiency and clinical outcomes. Larger‐bore (LB) aspiration catheters may enhance clot ingestion, increase aspiration force, and facilitate faster and more complete recanalization. However, the transition from standard LB catheters (0.068‐0.072″) to super‐large‐bore (SLB, ≥0.080″) devices has raised questions regarding both safety and clinical benefit. Although the use of SLB catheters is increasing, comparative data on their performance versus LB catheters remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SLB compared with LB catheters including data from a large multicenter international registry. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with AIS due to LVO treated at 46 international stroke centers between January 2013 and June 2025. Among eligible patients, propensity score matching (PSM) at a 5:1 ratio was used to balance baseline characteristics between those treated with standard LB catheters and those treated with SLB catheters. Safety endpoints included intraprocedural complications, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), distal embolization, and 90‐day mortality. Efficacy endpoints included functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0‐2), successful recanalization (TICI ≥2b), first‐pass effect (TICI ≥2b on the first aspiration attempt), and procedural timing to TICI2b. Results A total of 3,100 patients were included (LB n=3,024; SLB n=67). After PSM (LB n=335; SLB n=67), safety outcomes were comparable between groups in terms of intraprocedural complications occurred (p=0.5), sICH (p>0.9), embolization to new territory (p=0.2), and 90‐day mortality (p>0.9). Efficacy outcomes were similarly consistent for functional independence (mRS 0‐2) (p>0.9), successful recanalization (p>0.9), first‐pass effect (p=0.5), and time to TICI ≥2b (27.6 vs. 24.5 minutes; p=0.9). These findings remained consistent in the subgroup with ICA and M1 occlusions, with no significant differences in safety (intraprocedural complications [p=0.4], sICH [p>0.9], embolization to new territory [p=0.6], or 90‐day mortality [p>0.9], nor in efficacy outcomes (functional independence at 90 days [p>0.9], successful recanalization [p=0.9], first‐pass effect [p=0.6], and time to TICI ≥2b [p=0.9]). Conclusion In this large multicenter analysis, the use of SLB aspiration catheters demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy to standard LB catheters for MT in AIS. Despite theoretical advantages in aspiration dynamics, SLB devices did not confer significant procedural or clinical benefit over LB catheters. These findings suggest that while SLB catheters are a feasible alternative, technical and clinical outcomes remain comparable to LB catheters. Further prospective studies are warranted to clarify potential clinical advantages. image

Background Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has transformed acute ischemic stroke (AIS) care, with onset-to-puncture (OTP) time widely recognized as a critical determinant of outcome. However, emerging evidence suggests that in-hospital procedure time (PT)—from arterial puncture to final recanalization—may have an equally or more significant impact. This study examines the relative contribution of PT versus OTP to functional outcomes in patients with AIS undergoing EVT. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 6644 patients with AIS treated at 44 international stroke centers from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR; 2016–2023). Multivariable regression, time-equivalence analysis, and marginal effects modeling were used to assess associations between PT, OTP, and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) outcomes. Centers were stratified by procedural efficiency and compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Mediation analysis evaluated whether PT accounted for inter-center differences. Results PT and OTP were independently associated with functional outcomes; however, PT had a significantly stronger effect (adjusted OR for mRS 0–2: PT=0.56 vs OTP=0.96 per hour). Each 5 min increase in PT was equivalent to 78–100 min of additional OTP in outcome impact. Centers with faster average PT had higher rates of functional independence (number needed to treat (NNT)=10), fewer complications, and lower symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates. PT significantly mediated the relationship between center tier and outcomes (Sobel’s P<0.001). Conclusion While minimizing OTP remains important, PT exerts a greater influence on outcomes after EVT. Procedural efficiency should be emphasized in stroke systems of care and included in center performance metrics to improve patient outcomes.

Background The contact aspiration (CA) technique is often used to perform endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS); however, rescue strategies are necessary if CA fails to achieve recanalization. This study investigates the outcomes of incorporating stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy in the rescue strategy following failed CA. Methods EVT patients with failed CA attempts were identified from a large multicenter registry and stratified by rescue technique: CA alone or incorporating SR in the rescue strategy. Outcomes included successful recanalization, 90-day functional outcomes (defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Results Among 1885 patients with failed CA attempts, conversion to SR was associated with higher recanalization rates (85.2% vs 80.6%; p=0.03), higher rates of second-pass recanalization (31.2% vs 23.4%; p<0.001), and better 90-day outcomes (mRS 0–2: 35.2% vs 29.9%; p=0.04) when compared with repeated CA attempts. Trevo SRs showed higher odds of successful recanalization (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.9; p=0.02), second-pass recanalization (aOR=1.7; p=0.01), and reduced odds of sICH (aOR=0.3; p=0.02). EmboTrap SRs were associated with higher odds of 90-day mortality (aOR=2.6; p=0.004) and sICH (aOR=2.9; p=0.04) and lower odds of recanalization (aOR=0.5; p=0.03). Conclusions Incorporating SR in the rescue strategy after a failed CA improves recanalization rates and functional outcomes. Trevo SRs demonstrated superior efficacy and safety when incorporated into the rescue strategy.

ARISE (Aneurysm/AVM/cSDH Roundtable Discussion With Industry and Stroke Experts) organized a one-and-a-half day meeting and workshop and brought together representatives from academia, industry, and government to discuss the most promising approaches to improve outcomes for patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). The emerging role of middle meningeal artery embolization in clinical practice and the design of current and potential future trials were the primary focuses of discussion. Existing evidence for imaging, indications, agents, and techniques was reviewed, and areas of priority for study and key questions surrounding the development of new and existing treatments for cSDH were identified. Multiple randomized, controlled trials have met their primary efficacy end points, providing high-level evidence that middle meningeal artery embolization is a potent adjunctive therapy to the standard (surgical and nonsurgical) management of neurologically stable cSDH patients in terms of reducing rates of disease recurrence. Pooled data analyses following the formal conclusion and publication of these trials will form a robust foundation upon which guidelines can be strengthened for cSDH treatment modalities and optimal patient selection, as well as delineate future lines of investigation.