Kadirvel, R

Background: Pulsatile tinnitus (PT) is frequently caused by venous sinus stenosis and may be associated with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Venous sinus stenting (VSS) directly addresses venous outflow obstruction and has emerged as a therapeutic option; however, outcome data remain heterogeneous. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and durability of VSS for PT and to compare outcomes between IIH-associated and isolated PT. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through December 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Clinical studies reporting PT outcomes after VSS were included. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to estimate pooled rates of overall improvement, complete resolution, and recurrence. Prespecified subgroup analyses compared IIH versus isolated PT. Results: Thirty-two studies comprising 850 patients were included (641 with IIH; 209 with isolated PT). Venous sinus stenosis accounted for 90.3% of treated etiologies. The pooled rate of overall PT improvement was 89.8% (95% CI, 85.5-92.9). Complete resolution occurred in 87.1% (95% CI, 82.5-90.6). Recurrence at last follow-up was 10.9% (95% CI, 8.3-14.2). Improvement and complete resolution rates did not differ significantly between IIH and isolated PT. Recurrence was higher in IIH (12.0%) than in isolated PT (5.7%), without reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: VSS is associated with high rates of PT improvement and complete resolution with low recurrence. Recurrence trends appear higher in IIH, suggesting underlying pathophysiology may influence durability.

Background The middle meningeal artery (MMA) has emerged as an endovascular route for treating chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), meningioma, and refractory headaches. The third ARISE roundtable convened experts from neurology, neurosurgery, neuroradiology, industry, and regulatory agencies to develop consensus guidance on current evidence for MMA-based therapies Methods Over 50 experts participated in a multi-stakeholder discussion. Evidence from randomized and observational studies, early-phase interventional series, and preclinical work was reviewed. Breakout groups focused on four domains: (1) MMA embolization (MMAE) for CSDH, (2) preoperative embolization of meningiomas, (3) MMA-targeted therapies for headache, and (4) transvascular access for endovascular drainage of subdural hematomas. Consensus recommendations were developed by a writing committee Results Randomized trials support MMAE as an adjunct to surgery or medical management for selected patients with non-acute, symptomatic CSDH to reduce recurrence, progression, and reoperation. Evidence remains insufficient to support MMAE for acute or asymptomatic subdural hematomas. For meningioma, observational data suggest that preoperative embolization in experienced centers can reduce blood loss and operative time and may delay recurrence in large, hypervascular tumors with predominant dural or external carotid supply; primary embolization and intra-arterial oncologic therapies remain investigational. Early series of MMA-directed lidocaine infusion for refractory migraine, status migrainosus, and post-subarachnoid hemorrhage headache show short-term benefit, highlighting the need for controlled trials. Preclinical and first-in-human studies of combined MMAE and transvascular drainage for CSDH demonstrate high technical success, rapid radiographic and clinical improvement, and no early recurrences Conclusion The MMA represents a vascular pathway for an expanding spectrum of neurointerventional therapies.