Khabir, Sevda Alipour

Background: Pulsatile tinnitus (PT) is frequently caused by venous sinus stenosis and may be associated with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Venous sinus stenting (VSS) directly addresses venous outflow obstruction and has emerged as a therapeutic option; however, outcome data remain heterogeneous. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and durability of VSS for PT and to compare outcomes between IIH-associated and isolated PT. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through December 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Clinical studies reporting PT outcomes after VSS were included. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to estimate pooled rates of overall improvement, complete resolution, and recurrence. Prespecified subgroup analyses compared IIH versus isolated PT. Results: Thirty-two studies comprising 850 patients were included (641 with IIH; 209 with isolated PT). Venous sinus stenosis accounted for 90.3% of treated etiologies. The pooled rate of overall PT improvement was 89.8% (95% CI, 85.5-92.9). Complete resolution occurred in 87.1% (95% CI, 82.5-90.6). Recurrence at last follow-up was 10.9% (95% CI, 8.3-14.2). Improvement and complete resolution rates did not differ significantly between IIH and isolated PT. Recurrence was higher in IIH (12.0%) than in isolated PT (5.7%), without reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: VSS is associated with high rates of PT improvement and complete resolution with low recurrence. Recurrence trends appear higher in IIH, suggesting underlying pathophysiology may influence durability.

Background/Objectives: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) often features dural venous sinus stenosis; venous sinus stenting (VSS) improves venous outflow and intracranial pressure, but most stents are off-label, and few are engineered for intracranial venous anatomy. The aim was to synthesize animal models relevant to IIH/VSS, catalogue stents used clinically for VSS and summarize corresponding animal data, appraise current preclinical VSS research, and propose a pragmatic preclinical evaluation framework. Methods: We performed a targeted search (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus; through to May 2025), dual-screened the records in Nested Knowledge, and extracted the model/device characteristics and outcomes as per the predefined criteria. Results: We identified 65 clinical VSS studies; most were retrospective and used off-label carotid/peripheral/biliary stents (Precise, Zilver, and Wallstent were the most frequent). Recent dedicated systems (River, BosStent) have limited animal evidence; VIVA has GLP porcine venous peripheral data demonstrating its patency, structural integrity, and benign healing outcomes. Rodent models reproduce obesity/androgen drivers with modest, sustained ICP elevation; large animal models show the technical feasibility of in sinus implantation, but no chronic focal venous stenosis model fully mirrors the IIH condition. Conclusions: Despite broad clinical uptake, the translational underpinnings of VSS in IIH remain incomplete: most devices lack intracranial venous-specific preclinical validation, and there is no existing animal model that recapitulates both IIH biology and focal sinus stenosis.