Williamson, Richard A.

Background The contact aspiration (CA) technique is often used to perform endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS); however, rescue strategies are necessary if CA fails to achieve recanalization. This study investigates the outcomes of incorporating stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy in the rescue strategy following failed CA. Methods EVT patients with failed CA attempts were identified from a large multicenter registry and stratified by rescue technique: CA alone or incorporating SR in the rescue strategy. Outcomes included successful recanalization, 90-day functional outcomes (defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Results Among 1885 patients with failed CA attempts, conversion to SR was associated with higher recanalization rates (85.2% vs 80.6%; p=0.03), higher rates of second-pass recanalization (31.2% vs 23.4%; p<0.001), and better 90-day outcomes (mRS 0–2: 35.2% vs 29.9%; p=0.04) when compared with repeated CA attempts. Trevo SRs showed higher odds of successful recanalization (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.9; p=0.02), second-pass recanalization (aOR=1.7; p=0.01), and reduced odds of sICH (aOR=0.3; p=0.02). EmboTrap SRs were associated with higher odds of 90-day mortality (aOR=2.6; p=0.004) and sICH (aOR=2.9; p=0.04) and lower odds of recanalization (aOR=0.5; p=0.03). Conclusions Incorporating SR in the rescue strategy after a failed CA improves recanalization rates and functional outcomes. Trevo SRs demonstrated superior efficacy and safety when incorporated into the rescue strategy.

Background A combination of intravenous (IVT) or intra-arterial (IAT) thrombolysis with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) has been investigated. However, there is limited data on patients who receive both IVT and IAT compared with IVT alone before MT. Methods STAR data from 2013 to 2023 was utilized. We performed propensity score matching between the two groups. The primary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0–2. Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) ≥2B, ≥2C), early neurological improvement, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 90-day mortality. Results A total of 2454 AIS-LVO patients were included. Propensity matching yielded 190 well-matched patients in each group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in either ICH or sICH (odds ratio (OR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–1.24, P=0.37; OR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.24, P=0.21, respectively). Rates of successful recanalization and early neurological improvement (ENI) were significantly lower in MT+IVT + IAT. mRS 0–1 and mortality were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the MT+IVT + IAT group demonstrated superior rates of good functional outcomes (90-day mRS 0–1) compared with patients in the MT+IVT group who had mTICI ≤2B, (OR: 2.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.99, P=0.04). Conclusion The combined use of IAT and IVT thrombolysis in AIS-LVO patients undergoing MT is safe. Although the MT+IVT+ IAT group demonstrated lower rates of recanalization and early neurological improvement, long-term functional outcomes were favorable in this group suggesting a potential delayed benefit of IAT.

Background Multiple randomized trials could not establish the noninferiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone without preceding intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or superiority of IVT followed by EVT in anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion stroke. The role of prior IVT in posterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion remains controversial. Methods In this multicenter, retrospective study, patients with stroke with large‐vessel occlusion in the posterior circulation who received EVT alone or with IVT were selected from the stroke thrombectomy and aneurysm registry between 2013 and 2022. Effects of IVT followed by thrombectomy on favorable functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin scale≤3 at 90 days) and safety were investigated using multivariable logistic and linear regression models. Results Of the 588 included patients, 67% (n = 394) were treated with EVT alone and 29% (n = 170) with EVT after IVT, and 4% (n = 24) have missing values on this variable. Controlling for multiple confounding factors, IVT was not associated with a higher likelihood of favorable functional outcome at 90 days (odds ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.52–2.09; P = 0.901). Thrombectomy alone did not show any safety advantages compared with those receiving IVT. Conclusion Similar functional outcomes and complication rates were seen in patients with posterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion treated with EVT alone versus EVT after IVT. Further prospective studies are required to determine the utility of IVT in posterior circulation stroke, especially in patients being directly admitted to thrombectomy centers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: First pass effect (FPE) is a metric increasingly used to determine the success of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) procedures. However, few studies have investigated whether the duration of the procedure can modify the clinical benefit of FPE. We sought to determine whether FPE after MT for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke is modified by procedural time (PT). METHODS: A multicenter, international data set was retrospectively analyzed for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke treated by MT who achieved excellent reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2c/3). The primary outcome was good functional outcome defined by 90-day modified Rankin scale scores of 0–2. The primary study exposure was first pass success (FPS, 1 pass vs ≥2 passes) and the secondary exposure was PT. We fit-adjusted logistic regression models and used marginal effects to assess the interaction between PT (≤30 vs >30 minutes) and FPS, adjusting for potential confounders including time from stroke presentation. RESULTS: A total of 1310 patients had excellent reperfusion. These patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on PT: ≤30 minutes (777 patients, 59.3%) and >30 minutes (533 patients, 40.7%). Good functional outcome was observed in 658 patients (50.2%). The interaction term between FPS and PT was significant ( P = .018). Individuals with FPS in ≤30 minutes had 11.5% higher adjusted predicted probability of good outcome compared with those who required ≥2 passes (58.2% vs 46.7%, P = .001). However, there was no significant difference in the adjusted predicted probability of good outcome in individuals with PT >30 minutes. This relationship appeared identical in models with PT treated as a continuous variable. CONCLUSION: FPE is modified by PT, with the added clinical benefit lost in longer procedures greater than 30 minutes. A comprehensive metric for MT procedures, namely, FPE 30 , may better represent the ideal of fast, complete reperfusion with a single pass of a thrombectomy device.

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients often require multiple passes during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to open the vessel. Yet, at times, even numerous passes are unsuccessful. This study aims to investigate the impact of the number of passes on the outcomes of patients who underwent failed MT. Methods: We used Data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) from 2013 to August 2023. Patients who underwent MT for ICA, M1, or M2 with unsuccessful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≤ 2a) were included. Primary outcome was 90- day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. Secondary outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH). Outcomes were compared among patients who received ≤ 2, 3, 4, and ≥ 5 MT passes. Results: 736 patients met inclusion criteria. 90-day mRS 0-2 was found to decrease with number of passes (Figure 1). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that 3 passes (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.23 -0.96, P-value: 0.04), 4 passes (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.19 -1.03, P-value: 0.07), and ≥ 5 passes (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08 -0.50, P-value: <0.001) were associated with lower odds of mRS 0-2 compared to ≤ 2 passes. However, there were no significant differences between groups in ICH, sICH, or 90-day mortality. Conclusion: The number of passes affects functional outcomes among stroke patients who underwent failed MT.

Introduction: The benefits of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are not well established. Methods: This study included patients from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) who underwent MT for ICA, M1, or M2 occlusions with unsuccessful MT (mTICI score ≤ 2a). Patients who received IVT prior to MT were compared to those who received MT alone. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed using age, sex, premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS), admission National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), occluded vessel, ASPECTS score, mTICI score, and symptom onset to groin puncture time. The primary outcome was favorable 90-day outcomes (mRS 0-2). Results: Of 610 patients with unsuccessful MT, 219 were matched in each group. Median ages were 70 [IQR: 61 - 80] and 73 [IQR: 62 - 81] in the IVT + MT and MT alone groups, respectively. In the IVT + MT group. Final TICI scores of 0, 1, and 2a were achieved in 92 (42.0%), 33 (15.1%), and 94 (42.9%) patients, respectively, compared to 76 (34.7%), 29 (13.2%), and 114 (52.1%) in the MT alone group. The IVT + MT group showed a significantly. higher 90-day mRS of 0-2 (aOR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.53-4.32) and mRS of 0-3 (aOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.36-3.12). There were no significant differences between the groups in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, or 90-day mortality rates. Conclusions: IVT is associated with improved functional outcomes in patients with unsuccessful MT. Ensuring that IVT is provided to all eligible stroke patients should remain a priority.

Introduction: The outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs) in different vessels remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate MT outcomes in AIS patients with isolated MeVOs in different occluded vessel segments using the data from an ongoing international multicenter registry, the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR). The aim of this study is to investigate MT outcomes in AIS patients with isolated MeVOs in different occluded vessel segments using the data from an ongoing international multicenter registry, the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR). Methods: 110 AIS patients with MeVO who undertook MT between January 2010 and December 2022 were retrospectively investigated. MeVO was defined as isolated occlusion of the A2 or A3 (A23O) segment of the anterior cerebral artery, M3 segment of the middle cerebral artery (M3O), and P2 or P3 segment of the posterior cerebral artery (P23O). The primary outcome measure was a 90-day modified Rankin score (mRS) 0-2. The 90-day mRS 0-1, any intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality were used as secondary outcomes. Outcomes were compared between A23O, M3O, and P23O. Results: Median (interquartile range) age was 68.3 (58.4-76.0) years and 49 patients were female (46.7%). MeVO included 17 A23O (15.5%), 60 M3O (54.5%), and 33 P23O (30.0%).Compared to patients with A23O (17.7%), those with M3O (56.7%) and P23O (45.5%) had a higher proportion of 90-day mRS 0-2 (M3O, adjusted odds ratio 10.3, 95% confidence interval 1.71-62.2, p = 0.01; P23O adjusted odds ratio 8.86, 95% confidence interval 1.32-59.3, p =0.02). Other outcomes showed no significant differences. Conclusions: This study indicates A2O might be related to poorer outcomes compared to M3O and P23 in MT treatment for AIS patients due to isolated MeVO. Efforts should be aimed at improving outcomes following A23O to match those at other MeVO locations.

Introduction: The combination of intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been thoroughly investigated. However, no study has explored the outcomes of combining both intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis with MT. Methods: Data from Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) from 2013 to 2023 was utilized. We compared AIS patients with LVO who underwent MT with combined intra-venous and intra-arterial thrombolysis (IV+IA) and with intra-venous thrombolysis alone (IV). We performed propensity score (PS) matching between the two groups using age, sex, premorbid mRS, admission NIHSS, occluded vessel, ASPECTS score, time from symptoms onset to arterial puncture, and frontline technique. Primary outcomes were any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and symptomatic ICH (sICH). Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization (mTICI ≥2C), early neurological improvement (defined as 4 or more points improvement in NIHSS score in 24 hours), 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2, mRS 0-1, and mortality. Results: A total of 2495 LVO-related AIS patients were included, consisting of the IA+IV group (n = 266) and the IV group (n = 2228). Propensity matching yielded 192 well-matched patients in each group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in either ICH or sICH (odds ratio [OR]: 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.52, p = 0.60; OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.42-2.03, p > 0.90, respectively). The IA+IV group had a significantly lower proportion of successful recanalization (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.27-0.62, p < 0.001), and early neurological improvement (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.30-1.00). However, 90-day mRS 0-2, mRS 0-1, and mortality rates showed no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the combined use of IA and IV thrombolysis in AIS patients undergoing MT is safe. Although the IA+IV group demonstrated lower rates of recanalization and early neurological improvement, long-term functional outcomes and mortality rates were comparable to the IV-thrombolysis group, indicating a potential delayed benefit of additional IA thrombolysis therapy.

Objective: To determine whether first pass effect (FPE) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (LVO-AIS) is modified by procedural time (PT). Methods: The Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR), a multi-center international dataset, was retrospectively analyzed for anterior circulation LVO-AIS treated by MT who achieved excellent reperfusion (TICI 2c/3). The primary outcome was good functional outcome as defined by a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. The primary study exposure was first pass success (FPS, 1 pass vs ≥2 passes) and the secondary exposure was PT. Logistic regression models were fit-adjusted and marginal effects used to assess the interaction of PT (≤30 vs >30 minutes) and FPS, adjusting for potential confounders including time from last known well to start of MT. Results: A total of 1,310 patients had excellent reperfusion. These patients were divided into two cohorts based on PT: ≤30 minutes (777 patients, 59.3%) and > 30 minutes (533 patients, 40.7%). Good functional outcome was observed in 658 patients (50.2%). The interaction term between FPS and PT was significant (p=0.018). Individuals with FPS in ≤30 minutes had 11.5% higher adjusted predicted probability of good outcome compared with those who required ≥2 passes (58.2% vs. 46.7%, p=0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the adjusted predicted probability of good outcome based on FPS in individuals with PT >30 minutes (p=0.763). This relationship appeared identical in models with PT treated as a continuous variable. Conclusion: In a large, real-world, multi-national dataset, we find that FPE is importantly modified by PT. The added clinical benefit of FPE is lost in longer procedures (>30 minutes). These data argue for a new metric for MT procedures, namely, FPE 30 , that better represents the ideal of fast, complete reperfusion with a single pass of a thrombectomy device.