Orscelik, Atakan

Background The impact of certain comorbidities on mechanical thrombectomy (MT) outcomes remains largely unexplored. Diabetes mellitus (DM) and admission hyperglycemia have been associated with poor clinical outcomes for patients treated with MT. In this study, we sought to investigate the effects of DM and admission hyperglycemia on MT outcomes. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Data regarding successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] ≥2b), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2), excellent outcomes (mRS 0–1), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality were extracted from the included studies. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects model. Results Twenty-one studies comprising 9708 patients were included. A total of 2311 patients (24%) had a history of DM, and 2026 patients (21%) had admission hyperglycemia. Admission hyperglycemia was associated with significantly lower odds of mTICI ≥2b (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.55–0.89), mRS 0–2 (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.41–0.53), and mRS 0–1 (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.34–0.55) as compared to normoglycemic state. Patients with hyperglycemia had significantly higher rates of sICH (OR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.66–2.54) and mortality (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.58–2.52) than normoglycemic patients. Diabetes mellitus was associated with significantly high rates of mortality (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.31–2.3) and lower rates of mRS 0–2 (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.48–0.76) in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Our results indicate that admission blood glucose levels and DM can negatively affect MT outcomes. Further research should focus on optimizing MT outcomes for these patients.

Background As the use of flow diverters has expanded in recent years, predicting successful outcomes has become more challenging for certain aneurysms. Objective To provide neurointerventionalists with an understanding of the available machine learning algorithms for predicting the success of flow diverters in occluding aneurysms. Methods This study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the four major medical databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were screened. The study included original research articles that evaluated the predictive abilities of various machine learning algorithms for determining the success of flow diverters in achieving aneurysm occlusion. Results Five studies out of 217 were included based on our criteria. The included studies used various variables (patient demographics, aneurysm and parent artery characteristics, flow diverter and hemodynamic-related features, and angiographic parametric imaging) to predict flow diverter treatment outcomes. The machine learning algorithms used, along with their respective accuracy rates, were as follows: logistic regression (61% and 85%), support vector machine (88%), Gaussian support vector machine (90%), linear support vector machine (85%), decision tree (80%), random forest (87%), k-nearest neighbors (83% and 85%), XGBoost (87%), CatBoost (86%), deep neural networks (77.9%), and recurrent neural networks (74%).Two studies trained the machine learning models with both all features and the most significant features. Both studies observed that the accuracy of machine learning models decreased by removing the insignificant features. Conclusion The current literature indicates that machine learning algorithms can be trained to predict the success of flow diverters with an accuracy of up to 90%.

Background Aneurysm treatments are crucial to minimize the rupture risk. The underlying molecular processes mediating cellular remodeling, endothelialization, and aneurysm healing following endovascular treatment are poorly understood. The current study aims to explore circulating miRNA as a treatment and outcome-associated biomarkers in patients undergoing endovascular treatment. Methods Patients undergoing endovascular interventions for unruptured intracranial aneurysms, using either flow diverter placement or coil embolization, were enrolled. Blood samples were collected before the intervention and during a follow-up period between 6 and 18 months. Total mRNA/miRNA was isolated from plasma, followed by RNA-seq analysis. Gene Ontology analysis was used to identify pathways linked to altered miRNA expression. Results Twenty-three patients participated, with 13 (56.5%) undergoing flow diversion and 10 (43.5%) coil embolization. The median follow-up sample collection time was 10.70 months (SEM ± 1.32). No significant differences in angiographic occlusion were noted between intervention groups. Differentially expressed miRNAs were not identified between groups at baseline. However, at follow-up, 39 miRNAs were upregulated and 41 were downregulated, independent of intervention. Notably, three miRNAs (miR-4746-5p, miR-4685-3p, and miR-490-3p) were downregulated in the flow diversion group compared to the coil embolization group. Bioinformatics analysis revealed associations with upregulated fluid shear stress, p53, adherens junction pathways, along with downregulated apoptosis pathways. Conclusions This study suggests that fluid shear stress and apoptosis may influence aneurysm healing or thromboembolic events in flow diverter-treated patients. Further research is warranted to elucidate the functional significance of these findings in treatment outcomes, providing valuable insights for improved patient care in intracranial aneurysm management.

Background The choice of angiography system could influence the outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but its impact is not yet well understood. This study aims to compare the clinical and technical outcomes of MT performed with single plane versus biplane angiography systems. Method We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus to include studies on patients with AIS who underwent MT with either single plane or biplane angiography up to May 4, 2024. The primary outcome was a favorable outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2 at 90 days after the procedure. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test and Q statistics. Results Five studies with a total of 1562 patients were analyzed. Of these, 68.4% were treated with biplane systems and 31.6% with single plane systems. Single plane angiography was associated with a significantly higher rate of favorable outcomes (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.80; P<0.01). There were no significant differences in successful recanalization, periprocedural complications, procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, or contrast volume between the two systems. Conclusion While single plane angiography systems may offer slightly better outcomes in MT for AIS, both systems appear equally effective in most clinical and technical perspectives, suggesting that system selection may be more dependent on availability and procedural requirements rather than inherent superiority. Our findings may encourage clinicians to use single-plane angiography in settings where the biplane angiography suite availability is limited, but it should be noted that this observation may have been influenced by selection bias, particularly since the larger studies included in our meta-analysis did not observe this effect in adjusted analyses for potential confounder factors.

Abstract Objective Flow diversion (FD) is a relatively new technique for treating large, wide-necked, or fusiform aneurysms. Although FD is a more preferred option than coiling or clipping techniques in neurosurgery and neuroradiology clinics, the blood flow mechanism inside the aneurysm sac is not fully understood after the treatment. Besides, effective metal surface area (EMSA), a property of an FD related to porosity, shows variation at the patient's aneurysm neck by providing more or less blood flow inside an aneurysm sac than planned, causing nonstagnant or stagnant fluid region formation in the sac, respectively. Thus, the change in FD's EMSA can significantly affect the treatment's effectiveness, making even operation unsuccessful when variation in FD's EMSA at the aneurysm neck is overlooked. Materials and Methods In this study, a large aneurysm of a 52-year-old female patient was numerically investigated by virtually placing two commercially available FDs with different EMSA values one by one into the aneurysm-carrying artery. Results While FD stents at the aneurysm site substantially reduced the blood flow into the aneurysm, an FD with a 15.6% EMSA caused blood to flow in the aneurysm sac to have six times more kinetic energy than that of FD with a 29.5% EMSA. Conclusion Although FD's EMSA value demonstrated nearly up to 20% reduction at the patient's aneurysm neck based on a product catalog value, numerical model results revealed that the stagnated region's formation inside the aneurysm sac could be determined within a 9% difference based on digital subtraction angiography reformat image.

Background A combination of intravenous (IVT) or intra-arterial (IAT) thrombolysis with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) has been investigated. However, there is limited data on patients who receive both IVT and IAT compared with IVT alone before MT. Methods STAR data from 2013 to 2023 was utilized. We performed propensity score matching between the two groups. The primary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0–2. Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral infarction (mTICI) ≥2B, ≥2C), early neurological improvement, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 90-day mortality. Results A total of 2454 AIS-LVO patients were included. Propensity matching yielded 190 well-matched patients in each group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in either ICH or sICH (odds ratio (OR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–1.24, P=0.37; OR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.24, P=0.21, respectively). Rates of successful recanalization and early neurological improvement (ENI) were significantly lower in MT+IVT + IAT. mRS 0–1 and mortality were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the MT+IVT + IAT group demonstrated superior rates of good functional outcomes (90-day mRS 0–1) compared with patients in the MT+IVT group who had mTICI ≤2B, (OR: 2.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.99, P=0.04). Conclusion The combined use of IAT and IVT thrombolysis in AIS-LVO patients undergoing MT is safe. Although the MT+IVT+ IAT group demonstrated lower rates of recanalization and early neurological improvement, long-term functional outcomes were favorable in this group suggesting a potential delayed benefit of IAT.

Background The flow diversion treatment of aneurysms located distal to the Circle of Willis has recently increased in frequency. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical and radiological outcomes of flow diverter (FD) embolization in treating M1 aneurysms. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Scopus were searched up to May 2024 using the Nested Knowledge platform. We included studies assessing the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes for M1 aneurysms. Results of FDs classified as Pipeline Embolization Devices (PED) versus other types of FDs. Angiographic occlusion rates, ischemic and hemorrhagic complications, and favorable clinic outcomes were included. All data were analyzed using R software version 4.2.2. Results Thirteen studies with 112 total patients (58 patients for PED and 54 patients for other FD devices) were included in our meta-analysis. The overall adequate (complete + near-complete) occlusion rates were 85.1%. The complete occlusion rate was higher with PED than with other FD devices (72.9% PED and 41.6% for non-PED FDs, respectively, p -value <.01). The ischemic complications were 9.9% and 9.0% for the PED and non-PED groups, respectively ( p -value = .89). The overall modified Rankin Scale 0–2 was 100% for the non-PED and 97.1% for the PED group ( p -value = .51). In-stent stenosis rate was 7.5% for PED devices compared to 2.6% in the non-PED group ( p -value = .35). Conclusions This relatively small meta-analysis showed high rates of adequate and complete occlusion in FD treatment of M1 segment aneurysms, with favorable safety profiles. PEDs were associated with higher rates of complete aneurysm occlusion compared to other types of FDs.

Background Although direct contact aspiration has emerged as one of the leading techniques for mechanical thrombectomy (MT), there is still ongoing debate about the aspiration/suction pump devices that can optimize recanalization rates. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis comparing the aspiration efficacy of 60 ml syringe and pump devices in benchtop MT models. Methods Systematic literature review was conducted using Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Outcomes of interest included flow rate and vacuum pressure delivered by a 60 ml syringe and several aspiration pumps. We used a random effects model to calculate the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and a statistically significant difference was considered as a two-sided p -value of less than 0.05. Results We included six benchtop studies comparing 60 ml syringes and vacuum pumps. Our meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in vacuum pressure (MD:0.71inHg, 95% CI: [−0.81;2.23], p = 0.359) and flow rate (MD:0.27 mL/s, 95% CI: [−3,07; 3.61], p = 0.873) between 60 ml syringes and vacuum pumps groups. Conclusions Our study demonstrated comparable performance in terms of vacuum pressure and flow rates between a 60 ml syringe and a heterogeneous combination of commercially available aspiration pumps.

Background The comparison of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) outcomes between patients with the hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign (HMCAS) and non-HMCAS is important to evaluate the impact of this radiological finding on treatment efficacy. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between HMCAS and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing thrombectomy, comparing the outcomes over non-HMCAS. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library to identify studies on MT outcomes for M1 occlusions of HMCAS over non-HMCAS. Inclusion criteria encompassed modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and successful recanalization. Using R software version 4.1.2, we calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results The meta-analysis was performed for 5 studies with 724 patients. There was no association found between presence of HMCAS and achieving mRS 0–2 (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.29–1.47; p = .544). Mortality analysis also showed no significant association with presence of HMCAS (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.37–1.65; p = .520). No significant difference in sICH risk (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.24–9.66; p = .646) was found between groups. Recanalization analysis showed a non-significant positive association (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.67–2.28; p = .501). Heterogeneity was observed in all analyses. Conclusion Our findings showed that there is no statistically significant difference in mRS scores, mortality, sICH, and recanalization success rates between the HMCAS and non-HMCAS groups.