Calcano, Gabriela A.

AbstractObjectiveLow‐grade parotid malignancies have high overall survival rates; however, controversy remains about the appropriate extent of surgery. We aim to explore the trends in the extent of parotidectomy performed over time in low‐grade parotid malignancies in the United States, with a hypothesis that there has been a trend towards less aggressive surgery.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study of all low‐grade (grade I) acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) from 2004 to 2020.SettingGeographic areas served by SEER.MethodsTrends were assessed using Cochran‐Armitage tests and logistic regression; Kaplan‐Meier survival curves were used to analyze overall and cancer‐specific survival, and chi‐square tests were used to analyze patient characteristics.ResultsIn total, 1288 patients were identified (916 MEC; 372 ACC). Most patients (n = 772, 60%) were non‐Hispanic white, with an average age of 50.6 years and had a slight female predominance (1.58:1). Most of the cohort presented with tumor stage T1 or T2 (84%), N0 (90.1%), and M0 (96.9%). Treatment with total parotidectomy decreased significantly (34.6 vs 17.7%, P = .02) whereas sacrificing the facial nerve (FN) slightly decreased (20 vs 15.7%, P = .1). A significant increase in N0 patients (71%‐94%, P < .0001) was observed, whereas T staging remained stable (61%‐64%, P = .3). Overall, both ACC and MEC had excellent cancer‐specific survival.ConclusionOver the last 17 years, there has been a significant de‐escalation in the extent of parotidectomy for low‐grade parotid malignancy in the United States.

ImportanceThere is a lack of reliable, patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) instruments to address the multidimensional nature of patient-centered outcomes for patients undergoing parotidectomy. The Parotidectomy Quality of Life Index is a new 35-item validated patient-reported outcome instrument specific to recovery after parotidectomy.ObjectiveTo establish and validate a comprehensive English-language patient-reported QOL instrument specific to parotidectomy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis survey study was conducted in 2 phases: first, in a single-institution cohort (October 12, 2021, to March 7, 2022), and second, as an anonymous web-based survey enrolled via printed promotional brochures and social media platforms (March 13 to July 31, 2023). Inclusion criteria were age at least 18 years and parotidectomy within the last year. For test-retest reliability, a subset of phase II participants volunteered to answer the survey a second time within 2 weeks. Data were analyzed from March 8, 2022, to November 3, 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresItem rankings from phase I participants were used to narrow the original 61-item survey down to 45 items in the phase II survey. To assess construct validity, an exploratory factor analysis was performed. Cronbach α and pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients were used to measure internal consistency, reliability, and redundancy. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients.ResultsPhase I enrolled 38 individuals, of whom 30 completed the survey (15 women [60%]; 21 participants [84%] aged &amp;gt;40 years). Phase II enrolled 342 participants, of whom 317 completed the survey (305 women [89%]; 284 participants [83%] aged &amp;gt;40 years). A total of 42 items across 7 domains were selected based on exploratory factor analysis. After Cronbach α and pairwise correlation analysis, 33 items across 6 multi-item domains and 2 standalone items were incorporated into the final QOL instrument. Cronbach αs for each of the final 6 domains were at least 0.77, suggesting excellent internal validity. Pairwise correlations did not show strong correlations (ie, none ≥0.80), suggesting minimal redundancy between domains. Younger age was significantly associated with a lower global score. Participants with malignant tumors scored lower on 4 of the 6 multi-item domains. Test-retest reliability coefficients for the domains ranged from 0.82 to 0.93, indicating very good reproducibility over a 2-week interval.Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest the Parotidectomy Quality of Life Index demonstrated excellent internal validity and test-retest reliability. With further external validation, this instrument may provide opportunity for quality improvement in clinical practice and has potential as a key patient-reported outcome in future parotidectomy clinical trials.

Abstract Objective Margin distance is a significant prognosticator in oral cavity cancer but its role in HPV‐related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [HPV(+)OPSCC] remains unclear. Here, we investigate the impact of margin distance on locoregional recurrence in HPV(+)OPSCC. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study of surgically treated HPV(+)OPSCC patients. Patients received either standard of care (at least 60 Gy with or without cisplatin) or de‐escalated adjuvant therapy (30‐36 Gy with concurrent docetaxel). Margin distance was measured in mm from the primary specimen or in combination with separately submitted margins. Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis with univariate and multivariable Cox regressions were conducted to determine the impact of margin distance on risk of local and locoregional recurrence. Setting Setting for this is 3 tertiary centers between January 2010 and February 2024. Results Among 1102 included patients, 33 (3.0%) had positive final margins. 374 patients had adequate margin distance data available. Margin distance was >3 mm in 73.4%, 1 to 3 mm in 24.5%, and <1 mm in 2.2% of patients. Positive final margins, pT4 disease, pN2 disease, and surgery alone as a treatment modality ( P < .02 for all) was associated with higher risk of 5‐year locoregional recurrence. Margin distance did not significantly impact risk of local or locoregional recurrence even after adjusting for de‐escalated adjuvant therapy ( P > .05). Conclusion Positive final margins after TORS without adjuvant radiotherapy for HPV(+)OPSCC carries a high risk of local recurrence. Margin distance does not appear to significantly impact risk of local or locoregional recurrence, even after de‐escalated adjuvant radiotherapy.

AbstractObjectiveThe extent of parotidectomy for benign tumors has de‐escalated in the United States. We aim to define modern benchmarks for operative time and hospital length of stay (LOS) in parotidectomy and identify risk factors that may prolong these benchmarks.Study DesignThis is a retrospective cross‐sectional study of all adults who underwent parotidectomy for a primary parotid neoplasm between January 2011 and December 2021 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.MethodsThe extent of parotidectomy was defined using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Prolonged operative time and LOS were defined as above the 75th percentile (longer than 194 minutes and more than 1 day, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient and surgical risk factors that predict prolonged operative time or LOS.ResultsBenign parotidectomies are mostly performed as outpatient procedures in the United States (average LOS <1 day). Prolonged operative time was independently associated with malignant tumors versus benign tumors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4‐3.0), total parotidectomy with facial nerve sacrifice versus lesser extent of parotidectomy (aOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.7‐3.0), and simultaneous reconstructive procedures versus none (P < .001 for all). These features were similarly independently associated with prolonged LOS (P < .001 for all). Complication rates were universally low.ConclusionThe majority of superficial parotidectomies in this country are performed as outpatient procedures requiring <3 hours of operative time, with low complication rates. Malignant tumors, greater extent of parotidectomy, and simultaneous procedures were independently associated with prolonged operative time and LOS. These national benchmarks can inform operating room and hospital bed resource assignments.