Tuchscherer, Amy M.

ImportanceThere is a lack of reliable, patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) instruments to address the multidimensional nature of patient-centered outcomes for patients undergoing parotidectomy. The Parotidectomy Quality of Life Index is a new 35-item validated patient-reported outcome instrument specific to recovery after parotidectomy.ObjectiveTo establish and validate a comprehensive English-language patient-reported QOL instrument specific to parotidectomy.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis survey study was conducted in 2 phases: first, in a single-institution cohort (October 12, 2021, to March 7, 2022), and second, as an anonymous web-based survey enrolled via printed promotional brochures and social media platforms (March 13 to July 31, 2023). Inclusion criteria were age at least 18 years and parotidectomy within the last year. For test-retest reliability, a subset of phase II participants volunteered to answer the survey a second time within 2 weeks. Data were analyzed from March 8, 2022, to November 3, 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresItem rankings from phase I participants were used to narrow the original 61-item survey down to 45 items in the phase II survey. To assess construct validity, an exploratory factor analysis was performed. Cronbach α and pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients were used to measure internal consistency, reliability, and redundancy. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients.ResultsPhase I enrolled 38 individuals, of whom 30 completed the survey (15 women [60%]; 21 participants [84%] aged >40 years). Phase II enrolled 342 participants, of whom 317 completed the survey (305 women [89%]; 284 participants [83%] aged >40 years). A total of 42 items across 7 domains were selected based on exploratory factor analysis. After Cronbach α and pairwise correlation analysis, 33 items across 6 multi-item domains and 2 standalone items were incorporated into the final QOL instrument. Cronbach αs for each of the final 6 domains were at least 0.77, suggesting excellent internal validity. Pairwise correlations did not show strong correlations (ie, none ≥0.80), suggesting minimal redundancy between domains. Younger age was significantly associated with a lower global score. Participants with malignant tumors scored lower on 4 of the 6 multi-item domains. Test-retest reliability coefficients for the domains ranged from 0.82 to 0.93, indicating very good reproducibility over a 2-week interval.Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest the Parotidectomy Quality of Life Index demonstrated excellent internal validity and test-retest reliability. With further external validation, this instrument may provide opportunity for quality improvement in clinical practice and has potential as a key patient-reported outcome in future parotidectomy clinical trials.

Objective To assess quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes after modified subtotal petrosectomy with ear canal closure (mSTP) for chronic otitis media. Study Design Survey study. Setting Tertiary referral center. Patients Patients with chronic otitis media. Interventions mSTP. Main Outcome Measures Survey results from enrolled patients on the validated disease-specific Chronic Ear Survey (CES) and Chronic Otitis Media Outcome Test-15 (COMOT-15) regarding their current state of health and, if surgery was performed within 3 years of enrollment, their state of health before mSTP. Results A total of 23 patients were studied, including 19 who underwent surgery within 3 years of enrollment. Postoperatively, mean total CES scores were 80 and COMOT-15 scores were 41, with a higher CES and a lower COMOT-15 indicating better QoL. There were statistically significant improvements after mSTP in the CES activity restriction (25% difference; p = 0.008), symptom (17% difference; p = 0.007), and medical resource (13% difference; p = 0.03) domain and total (18% difference; p = 0.006) scores. In addition, there were statistically significant improvements in the COMOT-15 ear symptom (−22% difference; p < 0.001) domain and total (−16% difference; p = 0.01) scores; however, improvements in the hearing function and mental health domains did not achieve statistical significance. Postoperative COMOT-15 total scores were significantly better for patients who underwent aural rehabilitation compared to those who did not (−17% difference; p < 0.001). Conclusion Modified subtotal petrosectomy with ear canal closure is a useful intervention for patients with recalcitrant chronic otitis media, offering improved QoL in appropriately selected patients. Aural rehabilitation, when feasible, provides the potential for further QoL improvement.