Brown, Anna

Abstract Introduction Heterozygous germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in the 5' untranslated region of ANKRD26 cause inherited thrombocytopenia and predisposition to hematologic malignancy (HM). The estimated lifetime HM risk is ~10% based on families ascertained from an inherited thrombocytopenia cohort. However, the malignancy spectrum, molecular features, precursor states, and overall clinical outcomes remain poorly defined. Methods We established an international, multicenter cohort of individuals with ANKRD26-related thrombocytopenia diagnosed after undergoing genetic evaluation due to a personal and/or family history of thrombocytopenia and/or HM. Clinical, pathologic, and molecular data were collected for 27 individuals with germline ANKRD26 PVs from 21 unrelated families treated at 11 institutions across 5 countries. Statistical analyses were performed using R (v4.4.2). Results Patients were predominantly male (18/27) and white (25/27). Thrombocytopenia was typically identified in childhood (median age 10 years, range 0-48) with a genetic diagnosis made later (median age 53 years, range 2-80). The mean (+/- SD) pre-malignancy platelet count was 45 +/- 24 K/uL (range 5-87). ANKRD26 PVs observed in each family included: c.-126T>C (n=9), c.-128G>A (n=3), c.-134G>A (n=3), c.-116C>T (n=3), c.-118C>T (n=2), and c.-118C>A (n=1). Thirteen HMs were diagnosed in 11 of 27 (41%) patients, including myelodysplastic neoplasm/syndrome (MDS, n=5), acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n=3), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n=2), MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap (n=2), and Langerhans cell histiocytosis (n=1). The median age at first HM diagnosis was 63 years (range 49-80). Recurrent somatic features in myeloid malignancies included complex karyotype (4/11, 36%) and TP53 mutations (5/10, 50%). Of the 3 patients with AML, 1 achieved a partial remission (PR) with venetoclax combined with cladribine, idarubicin, and cytarabine but relapsed, 1 achieved a PR with azacitidine but relapsed <100 days after haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), and 1 had primary refractory disease. Among 5 patients with MDS, 1 was refractory to decitabine, 1 underwent alloSCT but relapsed 2 years post-transplant, 1 remains in remission post-alloSCT with 1 year of follow-up, 1 is undergoing alloSCT evaluation, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Both patients with CML achieved durable major molecular remissions with imatinib. To better estimate HM risk, we assumed 100% penetrance of thrombocytopenia for ANKRD26 PV carriers and included family members with chronic thrombocytopenia who had not had germline genetic testing. In this expanded series (n=62), 16 individuals developed a HM (26%). Additional diagnoses included MDS with progression to AML (n=1), AML (n=1), CML (n=1), and leukemia of unknown type (n=2). Cumulative incidence of HM was 0% by age 40 years, 17% by age 60 years, and 60% by age 80 years. Somatic sequencing of peripheral blood was performed in 5 HM-unaffected ANKRD26 PV carriers. One individual was found to have clonal hematopoiesis driven by TET2 (c.1648C>T, p.Arg550*) with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of 9% at age 55. Bone marrow biopsy showed mild megakaryocytic atypia and 4% blasts without overt evidence of malignancy. To assess the prevalence of ANKRD26-related HM, we assessed the frequency of ANKRD26 PVs in 2 large MDS/AML cohorts. In the ARUP database (9662 AML, 6397 MDS), 2 individuals (0.01%) had an ANKRD26 PV with a VAF consistent with germline origin. In the MSK-IMPACT Heme Germline MDS/AML cohort (n = 284), no ANKRD26 P/LP variants were identified. Conclusions Germline ANKRD26 PVs underlie <1% of MDS/AML diagnoses but may represent a high-risk subtype characterized by complex karyotype, TP53 mutations, and high risk of relapse. Among our series, the incidence of HM was low early in life but increased substantially with age, reaching 60% by 80 years. This exceeds prior estimates, which were derived from individuals ascertained from thrombocytopenia-based registries. Together, our findings suggest that ANKRD26-associated HM may represent a high-risk clinical entity, and that age and family history should inform surveillance strategies. More studies are needed to define genetic and environmental modifiers of HM risk as well as precursor states to enable early detection and disease interception.

Abstract This retrospective analysis aimed to provide evidence-based risk stratification of TP53-mutated (TP53mut) myeloid neoplasms (MNs). Of 580 MNs harboring TP53mut with variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥2%, 219 (37.8%), 194 (33.4%), 92 (15.9%), and 75 (12.9%) were classified as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with low blasts (MDS-LB), MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB)-2, and -EB1 according to the revised fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, respectively. Hierarchical analysis identified the following 4 risk groups with distinct survival: (1) MDS-LB, (2) MDS-EB1/EB2/AML VAF <10%, (3) MDS-EB1/EB2 VAF ≥10%, and (4) AML VAF ≥10%. We next evaluated the impact of allelic status, VAF, and complex karyotype (CK). In our cohort, the significance of biallelic status was limited to MDS with <5% blasts and not for blasts 5% to 9%, as proposed by the International Consensus Classification (ICC), or 5% to 19%, as proposed by the fifth edition of the WHO (WHO-5). MDS-EB1 and -EB2 with VAF ≥10% had comparable survival (9.6 vs 7.2 months; P = .12), regardless of allelic status. Contrary to the ICC proposal, MDS-EB1/EB2 with VAF <10% and CK had poor survival compared with those without CK, comparable to MDS-EB1/EB2 with VAF ≥10% (5.6 vs 26.2 vs 6.3 months; P = .003). Survival of TP53mut AML was poor (median 3.9 months) regardless of allelic/CK status. Thus, using ICC or WHO-5 may underestimate prognosis of MDS with blasts 5% to 19% and 5% to 9%, respectively. Collectively, the hierarchical model acknowledges poor survival of 91.9% TP53mut MDS and AML compared with 36.5% and 80.7% by WHO-5 and ICC, respectively.

Background: TP53-mutated (TP53mut) myeloid neoplasms (MN) have particularly poor survival. Discrepancies in defining TP53mut MN have impact on diagnostic work up, therapeutic decisions, and clinical trial enrolment. Methods: MN cases harboring TP53mut (variant allele frequency, VAF ≥2%) were classified based on bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) blast % using the 4th revision of the WHO classification (WHO-4R). Biallelic loss was defined as (i) ≥2 mutations each with VAF ≥2%; (ii) single TP53mut VAF ≥2% plus 17p loss detected on karyotype, FISH, or SNP; or (iii) single TP53mut VAF ≥50%, whereas monoallelic loss was defined as single TP53mut VAF <50% without 17p loss. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from diagnosis. Conditional Inference Trees (CIT) analysis was used to determine the true effect of a predictor. Results: We identified 580 cases including WHO-4R defined acute myeloid leukemia (AML, BM/PB blasts ≥20%, n=219, 37.8%), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts-2 (EB-2, BM 10-19% or PB 5%-19%, n=92, 15.9%), MDS with excess blasts-1 (EB-1, BM 5-9% or PB 2-4%, n=75, 12.9%), and the remaining were MDS with low blasts (-LB, BM <5% and PB ≤1%, n=194, 33.4%). Of the 578 cases evaluable for allelic status, 437 (75.6%) and 141 (24.4%) had biallelic and monoallelic TP53 loss, respectively. Higher frequency of biallelic loss was observed with increasing blasts. 63.2%, 73.3%, 78% and 86.3% of cases with MDS-LB, MDS-EB1, MDS-EB2, and AML had bi-allelic TP53 loss (P<0.0001). In a multivariable analysis, WHO-4R categories, VAF ≥10%, and biallelic loss were independent predictors of poor survival. CIT analysis further stratified the cohort into 4 groups with distinct survival: (1) MDS-LB (n=194, 33.4%); (2) MDS-EB1/EB2 and AML with VAF <10% (n=38, 6.6%); (3) MDS-EB1/EB2 with VAF ≥10% (n=149, 25.7%); and (4) AML with VAF ≥10% (n=199, 34.3%). MDS-LB cases could be further stratified based on allelic status and complex karyotype (CK): OS was poor for cases with biallelic TP53 loss and monoallelic TP53mut with CK compared to monoallelic TP53mut without CK, who had the most favorable survival (12.7 vs. 13 vs. 34.8 months, P<0.0001).MDS-EB1/EB2/AML with VAF<10% could also be stratified by CK: MDS-EB1/EB2/AML with VAF<10% cases without CK had the favorable survival compared to their counterparts with CK and MDS-EB1/EB2 with VAF ≥10% cases (26.2 vs. 5.6 vs. 6.3 months, P=0.003).MDS-EB1/EB2 with VAF ≥10% was a homogenous subgroup: Biological characteristics including the proportion of cases with biallelic TP53 loss, CK (P>0.9), monosomal karyotype (MK, P>0.9), del 5q (P=0.6), del 7q (P=0.4), and del 17p (P=0.2) were comparable between MDS-EB1 and -EB2 with VAF ≥10%. Importantly, median OS of MDS-EB1 and EB2 with VAF ≥10% was comparable (9.6 vs. 7.2 months, P=0.12). OS in this group was comparable regardless of the blast %, allelic status, or presence of CK.AML with VAF ≥10% had extremely poor survival: Median OS was 3.9 months. Survival of AML was equally poor irrespective of the mono- or biallelic (3.6 vs. 3.9, P=0.89) and non-CK vs. CK (1.8 vs. 3.9 months, P=0.09). Combined, our model would acknowledge poor survival of 514 (89.1%) cases. In contrast, retrospective application of the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-5) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) would classify only 211 (36.4%) and 468 (80.7%) cases as biallelic/multi-hit TP53mut MN, respectively. Finally, the Harrell's c-index of the proposed model, WHO-5, and ICC was 0.66, 0.571, and 0.617, respectively. Conclusion: We provide evidence for subsequent refinements in classifying MN harboring TP53mut. Our salient findings include: (i) acknowledgement of CK as ‘biallelic equivalent’ in MDS-LB; as well as EB1/EB2/AML with VAF 2 to <10% cases; and (ii) demonstration of poor survival of MDS-EB1 and -EB2 with VAF ≥10% regardless of the allelic status. In conclusion, our proposed model acknowledged poor survival of a higher proportion of cases as TP53mut MN compared to the current models with a higher c- index.

Abstract High prevalence of IDH mutations in seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with myeloid neoplasm, elevated 2-hydroxyglutarate, dysregulated innate immunity, and proinflammatory microenvironment suggests causative association between IDH mutations and seronegative RA. Our findings merit investigation of IDH inhibitors as therapeutics for seronegative IDH-mutated RA.

BACKGROUND: Recent World Health Organization (WHO) classifications (5 th edition), International Consensus Classification (ICC) recognized TP53-mutated ( TP53mut) myeloid neoplasms (MNs) as a distinct subcategory, acknowledging their uniformly poor outcomes. However, there are critical differences between the two guidelines in how TP53 allelic status is assigned. Both WHO-5 and ICC acknowledged the poor outcome of multi-hit TP53mut but excluded single-hit TP53mut. These changes are driven by a pivotal study demonstrating favourable outcome of single-hit TP53mut, however this study predominantly included de novo myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) cases (Bernard et al. Nat Med 2020). In contrast, we previously reported poor outcome of TP53mut therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN) irrespective of the allelic status of TP53 (Hiwase et al Blood 2022andShah et al BCJ 2023). Finally, the ICC removed the subcategory of “therapy-related,” substituting it with diagnostic qualifiers instead. The WHO has grouped t-MN with secondary MN and renamed it as “myeloid neoplasm post cytotoxic therapy,” with the assertion that only multi-hit T P53mut MDS occurring post-cytotoxic therapy have poor outcome compared with single-hit. METHODS: We analyzed one of the largest international cohorts of TP53mut MN (n=544) with full characterization of TP53mut allele status utilizing uniform ICC criteria and similar large numbers of de novo and t-MN cases managed at Mayo Clinic Enterprise (USA) and South Australian MDS Registry, Adelaide (Australia) with clinical, integrated genomic profiling, and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: In our cohort of TP53mut MN (n=544), 475 (87.3%) MN had TP53mut variant allele frequency (VAF) of ≥10% and thus satisfied ICC criteria for TP53mut MN. Majority of TP53mut t-MN presented with MDS (bone marrow (BM) blasts 0-9%) compared de novo MN (62% vs. 48%; P=0.0012). While acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (BM blasts ≥20%) were more prevalent in TP53mutde novo MN compared to t-MN (38% vs. 24%; P= 0.001) and there was no difference in frequency of MDS/AML (BM blasts 10-19%) between the two cohorts (14% vs. 14%; P=0.8) ( Figure 1A). Majority of TP53mut were observed in the DNA-binding domain in t-MN and de novo MN (95% vs. 96.2%; P=0.48). However, mutations in Tetramer Domain were more frequent in t-MN (4.3% vs. 0.3%; P=0.002), whereas those in the TAD2 domain were more frequent in de novo TP53mut MN (2.4 vs. 0%; P =0.006). Integrating the mutation, conventional G-banding cytogenetic, copy number variation (CNV), FISH, and SNP array analysis, TP53mut MDS (BM blast 0-9%; n=260) were classified as multi-hit (n=179, 68.9%) or multi-equivalent (n=35, 13.5%) and single-hit (n=46, 17.7%) (Arber et al. Blood 2022). Striking enrichment of multi-hit/multi-hit equivalent was observed in TP53mut t-MDS compared to de novo MDS (91% vs. 72%; P<0.0001). While single-hit TP53mut were prevalent in de novo MDS compared to t-MDS (28% vs. 9%; P<0.0001). Importantly, median overall survival (OS) of single-hit was significantly longer than multi-hit de novo MDS (25.4 vs. 7.2 months; P=0.0002). In contrast to this we did not observe OS difference between single-hit and multi-hit TP53mut t-MDS (11.6 vs. 10.9 months; P =0.73) ( Figure 1B). CONCLUSION: Our study based on a large international cohort of T53mut MN provides compelling evidence that in contrast to de novo MDS, single hit TP53mut t-MDS is associated with poor outcome. Our data supports the consideration of single hit t-MDS as a multi-hit equivalent.

BACKGROUND: The association between myeloid neoplasm (MN) and autoimmune rheumatological diseases (AIRD) is increasingly recognized. Furthermore, prolonged cytotoxic disease modifying anti-rheumatological drugs (DMARD) for AIRD may potentially induce therapy-related MN (t-MN), a lethal haematological malignancy with dismal outcomes. However, the genetic association and mechanism underpinning immune dysfunction in patients with between MN and AIRD is not fully elucidated. METHODS: In this collaborative study across the two disciplines and continents (Australia and USA), we assessed the burden of well-defined AIRD in a large cohort of MN (n=1702) that included myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n=861), acute myeloid leukaemia (AML; n=640), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN; n=89) and MDS/MPN overlap (n=112). We characterized the cytogenetic and mutational landscape of MN with AIRD (MN-AIRD) and without AIRD. In order to assess the mechanistic link between AIRD and MN, we investigated the bone marrow microenvironment in MN-AIRD vs. well-curated age matched controls. RESULTS: 132 (7.75%) of MN (n=1702) had concomitant AIRD. Although association of AIRD was observed across all subtypes of MN, enrichment of AIRD was observed in patients with MDS, MDS/MPN and MPN compared to AML (9.5% vs. 9.8% vs 10.1% vs. 4.67%; P <0.001). Inflammatory arthritis (n=65; 49.24%) followed by inflammatory connective tissue diseases (CTD, n=23; 17.42%), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR, n=18; 13.63%) and vasculitis (n=16; 12.12%) were the most prevalent AIRD in the MN cohort. Notably, 87.7% of inflammatory arthritis were rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n=57). Striking survival differences were observed between t-MN without AIRD and MN-AIRD (14.0 vs. 33.7 months; P <0.0001) and t-MDS no-AIRD and MDS-AIRD (16.1 vs. 33.4 months, P =0.001). Chromosomal abnormalities including complex karyotype, monosomal karyotype, del 5q, del 7q, marker chromosome and TP53 mutations were enriched in t-MN following independent primary cancer (t-MN without AIRD). However striking enrichment of IDH1 and IDH2 (henceforth referred as IDH) mutations in MN with AIRD compared to MN without AIRD (20% vs. 11%, P =0.02), particularly in MDS-AIRD compared to MDS without AIRD (21% vs. 7%; P =0.001). The enrichment of IDH mutations were particularly prevalent in in MN cases with RA compared to other AIRD (34% vs. 11%; P =0.005). While IDH mutations were observed in only 8% and 6% of PMR and inflammatory CTD patients, respectively. Surprisingly higher frequency of IDH mutations was observed in evaluable seronegative compared to seropositive RA patients (62% vs. 0%; P =0.006). We also observed that majority of IDH mutations in seronegative RA were IDH1 (6/8; 75%) while IDH2 mutations were common other AIRD (6/6; 100%) ( P =0.009). We also assessed the impact of DMARDs on genomics of myeloid neoplasm. The majority of MN-AIRD patients treated with methotrexate did not harbor poor risk cytogenetic and mutation features such as complex karyotype, monosomal karyotype, del 5q, del 7q and/or TP53 mutation. In contrast, the majority of patients who had cyclophosphamide harbored high risk cytogenetic and molecular features. To assess pathogenic mechanisms linking MN and AIRD, we evaluated bone marrow microenvironment in myeloid neoplasm patients with and without AIRD. Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) isolated from MN-AIRD were highly senescent compared to age matched healthy controls, MN without AIRD, with defective proliferating and differentiation capacity of MN-AIRD and secretion of highly proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our key findings include: 7.8% of MN were associated with AIRD with stronger association of AIRD with MDS and MDS/MPN compared to AML and striking enrichment of IDH mutations in MN with inflammatory arthritis compared to MN with other AIRD (29% vs 11%; P =0.02), especially in seronegative RA compared to seropositive RA (62% vs. 0%; P =0.006). In contrast to cyclophosphamide and azathioprine, majority of cases treated with methotrexate did not harbor poor risk cytogenetic and/or TP53 mutation. As methotrexate is widely used as an anchor drug in many rheumatology treatment regimens, this is a highly significant finding of clinical relevance.

BACKGROUND: Recently proposed World Health Organization (WHO, 5 th edition) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) recognized myeloid neoplasms (MN) harboring TP53-mutated ( TP53mut) as a separate entity. However, there are critical differences between the two classifications regarding allelic-status, variance allele frequency (VAF) cut-off and blast categories, that may lead to under- or overestimation of the risk. METHODS: We analyzed MN harboring TP53mut (VAF ≥2%, n=536) managed at Mayo Clinic (USA) and South Australia Health Network (Australia). ICC (Arber et al, Blood 2022) and WHO (Bluebook, Beta v2) definitions were used to stratify MN harboring TP53mut. RESULTS: Of 536 cases, 379 (71%) had myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (<20% blasts) and 157 (29%) had acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Using WHO, 160 (42%) of 379 were classified as MDS-bi TP53 as they harbored 2 TP53mut (n=115; 30%) or 1 TP53mut plus confirmed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or copy neutral LOH (cnLOH) of TP53 locus (n=45; 12%). Sixty-two (16%) TP53mut MDS with VAF >49% were classified as presumptive MDS-bi TP53. Of the 157 cases with 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49%, 17 confirmed to have an intact wild-type TP53 copy and were classified as monoallelic. While 140 (89%) cases did not have copy number variation (CNV) analysis. We next evaluated the number of TP53mut cases classified differently by WHO and ICC. As WHO does not recognize TP53mut AML as a separate entity, 157 (29%) TP53mut AML were not classifiable. 46% (174/379) of the TP53mut MDS including 48 (30%), 12 (19%) and 79 (65%) of bi TP53, presumptive bi TP53 and monoallelic TP53mut MDS according to WHO were classified differently by ICC ( Figure 1A). Discordance between the two classifications were predominantly driven by: (i) The difference in VAF cut-off. Sixty patients (11%) with TP53mut VAF <10% were excluded from the ICC classification of TP53mut MN as it mandates TP53mut VAF cut-off ≥10%. 11 (18%) and 41 (68%) of these had bi TP53, monoallelic TP53mut MDS by WHO criteria while 8 (13%) had AML. Importantly, within the VAF <10% cohort, median overall survival (OS) of 2 TP53mut or 1 TP53mut with 17p13.1 (hereafter 17p) deletion or complex karyotype (CK, n=30) was significantly poor compared to 1 TP53mut VAF <10% (11.6 vs 32.4 months; P =0.002, Figure 1B), suggesting that ICC may underestimate the poor prognosis of multi-hit or multi-hit equivalent TP53mut MN with VAF <10%. (ii) The difference in bone marrow blast cut-off. The underlying assumption by WHO is that prognosis of bi TP53mut MDS is poor irrespective of blast percentage category (0-9% vs 10-19%). In contrast, ICC considers that TP53mut MDS/AML (blasts 10-19%) is associated with poor prognosis irrespective of TP53 allelic status. Median OS of TP53mut MDS with 10-19% blasts was significantly poor compared to blast 0-9% (6.4 vs 11.6 months, P <0.0001). Second, median OS of bi TP53mut was significantly poor than monoallelic TP53mut in MDS- blast 0-9% (10.1 vs 15.9 months; P =0.0001) but not in blasts 10-19% (6.8 vs 6.2 months; P =0.19). Hence, exclusion of monoallelic TP53mut MDS with blast 10-19% as TP53mut MN from the WHO classification may underestimate the poor prognosis. (iii) The difference in the definition of biallelic and multi-hit TP53 loss. 35 cases with 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49%, had 17p deletion but did not have CNV analysis to confirm the loss of TP53 locus and could not be classified further using WHO. ICC classified 18 (50%) of these cases as multi-hit. Median OS of 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49%, and 17p deletion on karyotype was significantly poor than 1 TP53mut (VAF ≤49%without 17p deletion on karyotype (6.4 vs 14.6 months, P =0.001). (iv) The difference in the definition of multi-hit equivalent. 32% (33/104) WHO defined monoallelic cases without available CNV data, were classified as multi-hit-equivalent by ICC as they harbored CK. However, WHO does not consider CK as presumptive evidence of bi TP53. Median OS of 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49% with CK was significantly poor compared to 1 TP53mut without CK (8.2 vs 26.9 months, P =0.0008). CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that poor prognosis of ‘multi-hit’ TP53 with VAF <10% is underestimated by ICC. On the other hand, poor prognosis of monoallelic TP53 MDS with 10-19% blasts as well as 1 TP53mut VAF ≤49% in the presence of CK is underestimated by WHO. These data suggest that both classifications can be further refined.