Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

315 citation(s) found for "Vachon, CM".

Whole-Exome Sequencing-Based Linkage Analysis of Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) Pedigrees
Camp, Nicola J. , Wei, Xiaomu , Earle, Angel, Norman, Aaron D. , Sinnwell, Jason P. , Demangel, Delphine , Griffin, R. L. , McKay, James , Offit, Kenneth , Vijai, Joseph , Chen, Siwei , O’Brien, Daniel , Klein, Robert J. , Kumar, Shaji, Lipkin, Steven M. , Vachon, Celine M. , Waller, Rosalie G. , Clay-Gilmour, Alyssa I, Camp, Nicola J , Norman, Aaron D , Sinnwell, Jason P , Griffin, Rosalie , Offit, Kenneth , Joseph, Vijai , Rajkumar, Vincent, Klein, Robert , Lipkin, Steve , Waller, Rosalie G , Clay‐Gilmour, Alyssa , Dumontet, Charles , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Kumar, Shaji , Vachon, Celine M.

Cancers | November 10, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 3611

10.3390/cancers17223611 | PMID 41300981 Get It

Background/Objectives: Family history is a known risk factor for multiple myeloma (MM) and its precursor condition, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Previous genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified 35 common loci associated with MM risk and 21 associated with MGUS. The objective of this study was to identify less common and rare genetic loci predisposing to MM/MGUS through whole-exome sequencing (WES)-based linkage analysis. Methods:Multipoint linkage analysis was conducted using the Multipoint Engine for Rapid Likelihood Inference (MERLIN) with the Lander–Green algorithm on germline WES data from 79 pedigrees with 2 or more affected relatives (120 MM, 86 MGUS, and 21 unaffected). Genome-wide linkage was evaluated using 12,946 independent single-nucleotide variants (linkage disequilibrium r2 < 0.05). Results: Significant linkage was observed at chromosome 6q22.33–q24.2 by the non-parametric model (logarithm-of-odds (LOD) = 3.3) and suggestive linkage by the dominant parametric model (heterogeneity LOD (HLOD) = 2.5). Fourteen rare variants within this region were prioritized using family-specific partial LOD scores and in silico functional prediction tools. Nine of these variants, REPS1, THEMIS, TAAR6, AHI1, VNN1, VNN3, MTFR2/FAM54A, LAMA2, and PHACTR2, overlapped immune-regulatory regions in blood cell lines and were not previously identified in GWASs. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the utility of applying a linkage analysis framework to familial WES data for identifying genomic regions and candidate genes that may contribute to MM/MGUS predisposition. These findings provide new insight into the inherited risk and etiology of familial MM and MGUS.
Threshold-Based Overlap of Breast Cancer High-Risk Classification Using Family History, Polygenic Risk Scores, and Traditional Risk Models in 180,398 Women
Ho, Peh Joo , Loo, Christine Kim Yan , Lim, Ryan Jak Yang, Goh, Mui Heng, Abubakar, Mustapha , Ahearn, Thomas U. , Andrulis, Irene L. , Antonenkova, Natalia, Aronson, Kristan J. , Augustinsson, Annelie , Behrens, Sabine , Bodelón, Clara , Bogdanova, Natalia , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Brantley, Kristen D. , Brenner, Hermann , Byers, Helen L., Camp, Nicola J. , Cessna, Melissa H., Chang-Claude, Jenny, Choi, Ji-Yeob , Czene, Kamila , Dörk, Thilo , Eliassen, A. Heather , Engel, Christoph , Eriksson, Mikael , Evans, D. Gareth , Fritschi, Lin , Genkinger, Jeanine M. , Geurts-Giele, Willemina R.R. , Glendon, Gord, Hall, Per , Hamann, U. , Ho, Cecilia Y.S., Hooning, Maartje J. , Hoppe, Reiner , Humphreys, Keith , Ito, Hidemi , Jakubowska, Anna , Jernström, Helena , John, Esther M. , Johnson, Nichola , Kang, Daehee , Kim, Sung‐Won , Kitahara, Cari M. , Ko, Yon-Dschun, Kraft, Peter, Kwong, Ava , Lambrechts, Diether, Larsson, Susanna C. , Li, Shuai , Lindblom, Annika , Linet, Martha, Lissowska, Jolanta , Lophatananon, Artitaya , MacInnis, Robert J. , Mannermaa, Arto, Manoukian, Siranoush, Margolin, Sara, Matsuo, Keitaro , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Taib, Nur Aishah Mohd , Murphy, Rachel A. , Newman, William G. , Obi, Nadia , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Panayiotidis, Mihalis I. , Park, Sue K. , Park‐Simon, Tjoung‐Won , Patel, Alpa V , Peterlongo, Paolo , Plaseska‐Karanfilska, Dijana , Pylkäs, Katri , Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Rodríguez, Juan , Sandler, Dale P. , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Scott, Christopher G. , Shahi, Shamim , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Shulman, Katerina, Simard, Jacques , Southey, Melissa C., Stone, Jennifer , Taylor, Jack A. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Teras, Lauren R. , Vachon, Celine M., Houdt, Maxime Van , Verhoeven, Jelle , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Wolk, Alicja , Yamaji, Taiki , Yip, Cheng Har , Zheng, Wei , Hartman, Mikael , Li, Jingmei , Investigators, on behalf of the ABCTB, Investigators, kConFab, Investigators, MyBrCa, Investigators, SGBCC, Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Diether , Hamann, Ute , Hooning, Maartje J. , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Czene, Kamila , Dörk, Thilo , Eliassen, A Heather , Engel, Christoph , Eriksson, Mikael , Evans, D Gareth , Fletcher, Olivia , Fritschi, Lin , Genkinger, Jeanine , Hall, Per N , Ho, Cecilia Y S , Humphreys, Keith , Ito, Hidemi , Jakubowska, Anna , Jernström, Helena , Johnson, Nichola , Kim, Sung-Won , Kitahara, Cari M , Kwong, Ava , Larsson, Susanna C , Li, Shuai , Lindblom, Annika , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lophatananon, Artitaya , Maclnnis, Robert , Matsuo, Keitaro , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Mohd Taib, Nur Aishah , Murphy, Rachel A , Newman, William G , Obi, Nadia , Panayiotidis, Mihalis I , Park, Sue K , Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won , Peterlongo, Paolo , Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana , Pylkäs, Katri , Rashid, Muhammad U , Rennert, Gad , Rodriguez, Juan , Sandler, Dale P , Sawyer, Elinor J , Scott, Christopher , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Simard, Jacques , Stone, Jennifer , Taylor, Jack A , Teo, Soo H , Teras, Lauren R , Houdt, Maxime Van , Verhoeven, Jelle , Weinberg, Clarice R , Wolk, Alicja , Zheng, Wei , Hartman, Mikael , Li, Jingmei , Lambrechts, Diether , Behrens, Sabine , John, Esther M , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Lambrechts, Diether , Augustinsson, Annelie , Brenner, Hermann , Camp, Nicola J , Brantley, Kristen D , Lim, Ryan Jak Yang, Byers, Helen, Castelao, Jose E. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Colonna, Sarah V. , Daly, Mary Beryl , Derouane, Françoise , Fletcher, Olivia , Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , Ho, Weang-Kee , Howell, Anthony , Iwasaki, Motoki , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Mannermaa, Arto , Manoukian, Siranoush , Margolin, Sara , Milne, Roger L. , Muir, Kenneth , O’Brien, Katie M. , Rennert, Gad , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Southey, Melissa C. , Terry, Mary Beth , Torres, Diana , Investigators, on behalf of the ABCTB, Investigators, kConFab, Investigators, MyBrCa, Investigators, SGBCC

Cancers | November 3, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 3561

10.3390/cancers17213561 | PMID 41228354 Get It

Background: Breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) and traditional risk models (e.g., the Gail model [Gail]) are known to contribute largely independent information, but it is unclear how the overlap varies by ancestry, age, disease type (invasive breast cancer, DCIS), and risk threshold. Methods: In a retrospective case–control study, we evaluated risk prediction performance in 180,398 women (161,849 of European ancestry; 18,549 of Asian ancestry). Odds ratios (ORs) from logistic regression models and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were estimated. Results: PRS for invasive disease showed a stronger association in younger (<50 years) women (OR = 2.51, AUC = 0.622) than in women ≥ 50 years (OR = 2.06, AUC = 0.653) of European ancestry. PRS performance in Asians was lower (OR range = 1.62–1.64, AUC = 0.551–0.600). Gail performance was modest across groups and poor in younger Asian women (OR = 0.94–0.99, AUC = 0.523–0.533). Age interactions were observed for both PRS (p < 0.001) and Gail (p < 0.001) in Europeans, whereas in Asians, age interaction was observed only for Gail (invasive: p < 0.001; DCIS: p = 0.002). PRS identified more high-risk individuals than Gail in Asian populations, especially ≥50 years, while Gail identified more in Europeans. Overlap between PRS, Gail, and family history was limited at higher thresholds. Calibration analysis, comparing empirical and model-based ROC curves, showed divergence for both PRS and Gail (p < 0.001), which indicates miscalibration. In Europeans, family history and prior biopsies drove Gail discrimination. In younger Asians, age at first live birth was influential. Conclusions: PRS adds value to risk stratification beyond traditional tools, especially in younger women and Asian ancestry populations.
Histologic correlates of background parenchymal uptake on molecular breast imaging
Speltz, Lydia Bardwell, Ghosh, Karthik, Visscher, Daniel W., Cole, Kristin C., Kroneman, Trynda, Maxwell, Robert W. , Conners, Amy Lynn , Hunt, Katie N. , Rhodes, Deborah J. , Vachon, Celine M. , Speltz, Lydia J. Bardwell , Scott, Christopher G. , Cole, Kristin C., Vachon, Celine M. , Hruska, Carrie B.

No container title available | October 15, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-7724449/v1 Get It

Abstract Background Molecular breast imaging (MBI) has shown utility as a supplement to mammography in women with dense breasts. Background parenchymal uptake (BPU), which describes the level of Tc-99m sestamibi in fibroglandular tissue on MBI, varies among women with similar density. Higher BPU is associated with greater breast cancer risk. The goal of this work is to investigate the histological correlations of BPU that may explain this association with risk. Methods We compared histologic features of prospectively collected benign breast tissue biopsies from healthy women who had a region of dense tissue on mammography exhibiting one of the extreme categories of BPU on MBI: either photopenic or marked. Tissue composition of specimens was assessed by measuring area of epithelium, stroma, and fat and counting lobules. Lobular involution status was assessed by an expert pathologist as either none, partial, or complete. Ki-67 index and estrogen receptor-alpha expression were also assessed. Results Biopsies were performed in 48 women (mean age 54.9 years [SD 11.1 years]), including 20 with marked BPU and 28 with photopenic BPU. Women with marked BPU were younger (mean age 49.9 vs. 58.4 years, p = 0.004), had higher body mass index ( p = 0.01), and were more likely premenopausal ( p = 0.005). Marked BPU specimens had a higher proportion of epithelium (14.5% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001), lower stromal content (44.8% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.005), similar fat (18.9% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.41), and greater lobule counts (15.5 vs. 6.3, p < 0.001) compared to photopenic specimens. Complete lobular involution was less frequent in marked tissue than in photopenic tissue (10.5% vs. 76%, p < 0.001). Ki-67 index was higher in marked BPU tissues (5.4% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.006), though the difference was attenuated after adjustment for epithelial area (p = 0.26). Estrogen receptor-alpha expression did not differ between marked and photopenic groups (25.6% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.12). Conclusions Marked BPU on MBI is associated with greater epithelial content, less lobular involution, and higher proliferative activity—features characteristic of tissue at elevated risk for malignant transformation. These findings suggest that BPU provides functional information beyond mammographic density, supporting its role as an imaging biomarker for breast cancer risk in women with dense breasts. Trial Registration: NCT01240278 and NCT01588834
Pathogenic Variants, Family History, and Cumulative Risk of Breast Cancer in US Women
Keil, Alexander P. , Taylor, Jack A. , Yadav, Siddhartha , Culver, Hoda Anton, Auer, Paul L. , Bodelón, Clara , Haiman, Christopher A., Lindströem, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, Nathanson, Katherine L. , Patel, Alpa V. , Penney, Kathryn L., Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Teras, Lauren R., Vachon, Celine M. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Yao, Song, Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Yadav, Siddhartha , Taylor, Jack A , Nathanson, Katherine L , O’Brien, Katie M. , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Polley, Eric C. , Boddicker, Nicholas , Hu, Chunling , Ambrosone, Christine B. , Brantley, Kristen D. , Burnside, Elizabeth S. , Chen, Fei , Domchek, Susan M. , Eliassen, A. Heather , Hodge, James M. , Kraft, Peter , Lacey, James V. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Olson, Janet E. , Palmer, Julie R. , Penney, Kathryn , Scott, Christopher G. , Teras, Lauren R. , Trentham‐Dietz, Amy , Vachon, Celine M. , Yao, Song , Zirpoli, Gary , Couch, Fergus J. , Sandler, Dale P.

JAMA Oncology | October 9, 2025 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1458

10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.3875 | PMID 41066089 Get It

Importance Inherited pathogenic variants (PVs) in known predisposition genes can greatly increase breast cancer risk, but the combined impact of PV status, family history, and other factors on breast cancer risk in the general US population has not been well described. Objective To evaluate population-based breast cancer risk estimates for those with established PVs overall and stratified by first-degree family history of breast cancer and other factors. Design, Setting, and Participants This study used pooled data from 13 US-based breast cancer case-control studies participating in the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) consortium. Enrollment for individual studies occurred between 1976 and 2013, and results are based on data released March 2023, with analyses conducted from June 2022 to July 2025. Exposures PVs, breast cancer family history, self-reported race and ethnicity, and established risk factors. Main Outcomes and Measures Breast cancer rate ratios for PVs in 7 genes were estimated from the CARRIERS consortium. PV status and incidence and mortality statistics were combined using the Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimation (iCARE) model to estimate conditional cumulative breast cancer risks and 95% CIs, stratified by family history and standardized to the US population. Models that incorporated population-based data and published estimates for established epidemiologic risk factors were also evaluated. Results A total of 67 692 women were studied, including 33 841 who were diagnosed with breast cancer. PVs in ATM , BRCA1 , BRCA2 , CHEK2 , and PALB2 were strongly associated with breast cancer risk, with BRCA1 and PALB2 PVs showing evidence of heterogeneity by family history. In models considering PVs, family history, and established risk factors, the estimated cumulative risks of breast cancer by age 50 years ranged from 2.4% (95% CI, 2.4-2.4) in women with no PVs and no family history to 35.5% (95% CI, 21.6-55.1) in PALB2 PV carriers with a family history. Among women who have not been diagnosed with breast cancer by age 50 years, the cumulative risk of breast cancer by age 80 years ranged from 11.1% (95% CI, 11.0-11.2) in noncarriers with no family history to 70.5% (95% CI, 52.8-83.5) for PALB2 carriers with a family history. PV-specific cumulative risk estimates varied across subgroups defined by race and ethnicity and potentially modifiable epidemiologic risk factors. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, population-based estimates of cumulative breast cancer risk for established PVs, as informed by the CARRIERS case-control sample, varied by family history and potentially modifiable risk factors. These estimates provide guidance for identifying individuals who will most benefit from enhanced screening and prevention strategies.
Exogenous Hormones, Tumor Intrinsic Subtypes, and Breast Cancer
Cornet, Charlotte Le , Truong, Thérèse, Bolla, Manjeet K. , Koutros, Stella, Stone, Jennifer , Shulman, Katerina, Aronson, Kristan J. , Guénel, Pascal, Patel, Alpa V , Bodelón, Clara , Teras, Lauren R., Shahi, Shamim , Dossus, Laure, Kaaks, R., Holleczek, Bernd , Hoppe, Reiner , Czene, Kamila, Hall, P.F., Mannermaa, Arto, Wu, Anna H. , Obi, Nadia , Panayiotidis, Mihalis I. , Haiman, Christopher A., Shu, Xiao , Perou, Charles M. , Alsten, Sarah Van, Eliassen, A. Heather, Kraft, Peter, Ahearn, Thomas U., Evans, D. Gareth , Wolk, Alicja, Easton, Douglas F., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Vachon, Celine M. , Chang-Claude, Jenny, Evans, D Gareth , Perou, Charles M , Stone, Jennifer , Panayiotidis, Mihalis I , Jung, Audrey , Behrens, Sabine , Middha, Pooja , Truong, Thérèse , Jernström, Helena , Wang, Qin , Southey, Melissa C. , Freeman, Laura E. Beane , Koutros, Stella , Rennert, Gad , Murphy, Rachel A. , Guénel, Pascal , Teras, Lauren R. , Lacey, James V. , Dossus, Laure , Kaaks, Rudolf , Brenner, Hermann , Brauch, Hiltrud , Czene, Kamila, Mannermaa, Arto , Michailidou, Kyriaki , McLean, Catriona , Haiman, Christopher A., Augustinsson, Annelie , Zheng, Wei , Troester, Melissa A. , Abubakar, Mustapha , Ahearn, Thomas U., Wolk, Alicja , Milne, Roger L. , Easton, Douglas F. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Vachon, Celine M. , Fortner, Renée T. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny

JAMA Network Open | July 7, 2025 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e2519236

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19236 | PMID 40622713 Get It

ImportanceEtiologic heterogeneity in breast carcinogenesis needs to be well characterized for targeted prevention. Associations between menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) and oral contraceptive (OC) use and breast cancer intrinsic-like subtypes are not well understood.ObjectiveTo examine whether exogenous hormone use is differentially associated with breast cancer subtypes and to evaluate heterogeneity by intrinsic-like subtypes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis study pooled data from 31 nested and population-based case-control studies involved in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. The study population included individuals with breast cancer and control participants from 13 case-control studies nested in prospective cohorts (recruited between 1982 and 2011) and 18 population-based case-control studies (recruited between 1990 and 2013). Data analysis was performed in June 2024.ExposureMHT use (estrogen-progestin therapy [EPT] or estrogen-only therapy [ET]) in postmenopausal women and OC use in premenopausal women (never, past use, or current use).Main Outcomes and MeasuresBreast cancer intrinsic-like subtypes (luminal A–like, luminal B–like, luminal B–ERBB2 [formerly HER2 or HER2/neu]-like, ERBB2 enriched–like, or triple-negative) were determined by immunohistochemistry of tumor sections. Polytomous logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between exogenous hormones and risk of breast cancer by intrinsic-like subtypes. Analyses by subtypes were stratified by body mass index (BMI [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]; healthy weight, 18.5-&amp;lt;25; overweight, 25-&amp;lt;30; or obesity, ≥30).ResultsThis study included 42 269 individuals with breast cancer (11 901 [28.2%] premenopausal and 30 368 [71.8%] postmenopausal; 23 353 [55.2%] had a known intrinsic-like subtype) and 71 072 control participants. The mean (SD) age of all participants was 57.9 (10.9) years. In postmenopausal women, associations between current MHT use (EPT or ET) and breast cancer differed by subtype. Current EPT users with healthy weight were more likely to be diagnosed with luminal A–like (odds ratio [OR], 2.51 [95% CI, 2.26-2.80]) or luminal B–ERBB2-like (OR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.61-2.37]) subtypes. These associations were attenuated but remained for individuals with overweight (OR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.02-1.92]) or obesity (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.01-2.78]). EPT use increased the odds of being diagnosed with luminal B–like tumors solely in women with healthy weight (OR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.17-1.86]). Current ET use was positively associated with luminal A–like disease in women with healthy weight only (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.01-1.32]), showing inverse associations with higher BMI (obesity: OR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.50-0.85]). In premenopausal women, recent OC use was associated with luminal B–ERBB2-like (OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.09-2.08]), ERBB2 enriched–like (OR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.55-3.51]), and triple-negative (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.33-2.29]; P &amp;lt; .04 for heterogeneity) tumors.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, clear differences were observed in associations between current EPT use and luminal-like breast cancer subtypes and other subtypes. EPT users with healthy weight were more likely to be diagnosed with luminal-like breast cancer compared with nonusers. Subtype heterogeneity was less apparent in associations of OC and ET use. Future studies on contemporary formulations, patterns of use, and routes of administration of exogenous hormone usage are warranted.
Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography-based Radiomics for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Case-Control Study
Nguyen, Alex , Cohen, Eric A. , Maghsoudi, Omid Haji , Acciavatti, Raymond J. , Pantalone, Lauren , Mankowski, Walter C. , Scott, Christopher G. , Winham, Stacey J. , Vachon, Celine M. , Maidment, Andrew D. A. , Nguyen, Alex A , Haji Maghsoudi, Omid , Winham, Stacey J , Maidment, Andrew D A , Conant, Emily F , Kontos, Despina , Scott, Christopher , Mankowski, Walter C , Acciavatti, Raymond J , Vachon, Celine M. , Conant, Emily F. , McCarthy, Anne Marie

Radiology: Imaging Cancer | July 3, 2025 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/rycan.240318 | PMID 40607929 Get It

Three-dimensional radiomic analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis outperformed two-dimensional measures in breast cancer risk assessment.
Frequency and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Tau Positron Emission Tomography Positivity
Raghavan, Sheelakumari, Costoya‐Sánchez, Alejandro , Mainta, Ismini , Rodríguez-Fonseca, Omar Darío, Perissinotti, Andrés , Gu, Yuna , Yun, Jihwan, Peretti, Débora Elisa , Aguiar, Pablo , Bischof, Gérard N. , Seo, Sang Won , Villeneuve, Sylvia , O’Brien, John T. , Jagust, William, Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Carrillo, Marı́a C., Joie, Renaud La , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Pontecorvo, Michael J. , Johnson, Keith A. , Weiner, Michael W. , Petersen, Ronald C., Jack, Clifford R. , Schöll, Michael , Labonté, Anne , Faubert, Anne‐Marie, Mathieu, Axel, Madjar, Cécile , Carrier, Charles Edouard, Kazazian, Christina, Lepage, Claude, Maillet, David , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Dea, Doris, Courcot, Blandine, Debacker, Clément , Fontaine, David, Knopman, David S. , Multhaup, Gerhard, Maltais, Jean‐Robert, Breitner, John C.S. , Poirier, Judes, Cheewakriengkrai, Laksanun, Sager, Mark A., Dauar‐Tedeschi, Marina, Rajah, Natasha, Aisen, Paul, Toussaint, Paule‐Joanne , Pierre, Bellec, Kostopoulos, Penelope, Étienne, Pierre , Tariot, Pierre N. , Orban, Pierre , Hoge, Rick, Thomas, Ronald J. , Gauthier, Serge , Craft, Suzanne , Montine, Thomas J. , Nair, Vasavan, Bohbot, Véronique D. , Venugopalan, Vinod, Ituria‐Medina, Yasser, Khachaturian, Zaven S., Teigner, Eduard, Anthal, Elena, Yu, Elsa, Ferdinand, Fabiola, Pogossova, Galina, Mayrand, Ginette, Duclair, Guerda, Gagné, Guylaine, Newbold‐Fox, Holly, Leppert, Illana, Tremblay‐Mercier, Jennifer , Frenette, Joanne, Frappier, Josée, Kat, Justin, Miron, Justin , Wan, Karen, Mahar, Laura, Carmo, Leopoldina, Théroux, Louise, Dufour, Marianne, Lafaille‐Magnan, Marie‐Élyse, Savard, Mélissa, Tuwaig, Miranda, Petkova, Mirela, Rioux, Pierre, Meyer, P.T., El‐Khoury, Rana, Gordon, Renee, Giles, Renuka, Das, Samir, Wang, Seqian, Tabrizi, Shirin , Mathotaarachchi, Sulantha , Dubuc, Sylvie, Lee, Tanya , Beaudry, Thomas, Gervais, Valérie, Pagé, Véronique, Desautels, René, Benbouhoud, Fatiha, Saint‐Fort, Eunice Farah, Verfaillie, Sander C.J. , Farzin, Sarah , Salaciak, Alyssa , Tullo, Stéphanie , Daoust, Leslie‐Ann, Köbe, Theresa , McSweeney, Melissa, Nilsson, Nathalie , Pishnamazi, Morteza, Bedetti, Christophe , Hudon, Louise, Greco, Claudia, Chapleau, Marianne , St‐Onge, Frédéric , Boutin, Sophie , Geddes, Maiya R. , Ducharme, Simon , Jean, Gabriel, Sylvain, Elisabeth, Élie, Marie‐Josee, Leblond‐Baccichet, Gloria, Soucy, Jean‐Paul , Ozlen, Hazal , Bailly, Julie, Mohammediyan, Béry, Chen, Yalin , Remz, Jordana, Rentz, Dorene M., Amariglio, Rebecca E. , Blacker, Deborah , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Dickerson, Brad C., Donovan, Nancy J. , Farrell, Michelle E. , Gómez, Cristina Lois, Marshall, Gad A. , Oaoo, Kate, Price, Julie, Prokopiou, Prokopis C. , Reynolds, Gretchen , Skylar-Scott, Irina A., Vila‐Castelar, Clara , Yang, Hyun‐Sik , Trojanowki, John Q., Green, Robert C, Perrin, Richard J. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Potter, William Z. , Bernard, Marie , Jackson, Jonathan, Masliah, Eliezer , Masterman, Donna, Okonkwo, Ozioma, Ryan, Laurie, Silverberg, Nina, Fleisher, Adam , Fockler, Juliet , Conti, Cat, Jin, Chengshi , Nosheny, Rachel L. , Ashford, Mariam, Flenniken, Derek , Kormos, Adrienne, Montine, Tom, Rafii, Michael, Raman, Rema , Gessert, Devon, Salazar, Jennifer, Zimmerman, Caileigh, Cabrera, Yuliana, Walter, Sarah , Miller, Garrett, Coker, Godfrey, Clanton, Taylor, Hergesheimer, Lindsey, Smith, Stephanie , Adegoke, Olusegun, Mahboubi, Payam, Moore, Shelley, Pizzola, Jeremy, Shaffer, Elizabeth , Harvey, Danielle, Forghanian-Arani, Arvin, Borowski, Bret, Ward, Chad, Gunter, Jeff, Kantarci, Kejal, Thompson, Paul , Jahanshad, Neda , DeCarli, Charles , Knaack, Alexander , Fletcher, Evan, Chen, Stephanie R, Choe, Mark, Crawford, Karen , Yuschkevich, Paul A, Reiman, Eric M. , Mathis, Chet, Landau, Susan , Cairns, Nigel J. , Householder, Erin, Franklin, Erin , Bernhardt, Haley, Taylor‐Reinwald, Lisa, Korecka, Magdalena , Figurski, Michal, Neu, Scott, Nho, Kwangsik, Foroud, Tatiana M., Faber, Kelley , Wilmes, Kristi, Thal, Leon J., Dage, Jeffrey L. , Eloyan, Ani , Hammers, Dustin B. , Kirby, Kala, Kramer, Joel, Legarde, Julien, Murray, Melissa E., Newell, Kathy L. , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Clark, David , Day, Gregory S, Duara, Ranjan , Graff-Radford, Neill R, Grant, Ian , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Carrillo, María C. , O'Brien, John Tiernan , Jack, Clifford R , Schöll, Michael , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Dage, Jeffrey L , Rial, Alexis Moscoso , Heeman, Fiona , Raghavan, Sheelakumari , Essen, Martijn van , Camacho, Valle , Silva‐Rodríguez, Jesús , Ribaldi, Federica , Coomans, Emma M. , Brum, Wagner Scheeren , Grothe, Michel J. , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Malpetti, Maura , Rowe, James B. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Smith, Ruben , Hansson, Oskar , Garibotto, Valentina , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , LaMontagne, Pamela , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Tam, Angela , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Dansereau, Christian , Picard, Cynthia , Michaud, Diane, Couture, Doris, Cuello, A. Claudio , Barkun, Alan , Evans, Alan Charles , Tardif, Christine Lucas , Knopman, David S. , Near, Jamie , Leoutsakos, Jeannie‐Marie , Brandt, Jason , Pruessner, Jens C. , Morris, John C. , Collins, D. Louis , Chakravarty, M. Mallar , Eisenberg, Mark Jeffrey , Rajah, Maria Natasha , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Bellec, Pierre , Thomas, Ronald, Fonov, Vladimir , Vallee, Isabelle, Vogel, Jacob W. , Dadar, Mahsa , Appleby, Melissa , Meyer, Pierre‐François, Gonneaud, Julie , Pascoal, Tharick Ali , Vachon‐Presseau, Étienne , Spreng, R. Nathan , Rentz, Dorene M. , Buckley, Rachel F. , Gagliardi, Geoffroy Pierre , Gatchel, Jennifer R. , Guzmán‐Vélez, Edmarie , Jacobs, Heidi I.L. , Jutten, Roos J. , Pardilla‐Delgado, Enmanuelle , Price, Julie C. , Quiroz, Yakeel T. , Schultz, Aaron P. , Schultz, Stephanie A. , Sepulcre, Jorge , Vannini, Patrizia , Toga, Arthur W. , Beckett, Laurel , Saykin, Andrew J. , Potter, William, Barnes, Lisa L. , Gonzalez, Hector, Ho, Carole , Hsiao, John , Jackson, Jonathan , Veitch, Dallas P. , Neuhaus, John M , Rafii, Michael S. , Jimenez‐Maggiora, Gustavo Adolfo , Donohue, Michael , Arani, Arvin , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Jones, David T. , Kantarci, Kejal , Senjem, Matthew L. , Reid, Robert I. , Fox, Nick C. , Malone, Ian B. , Thomopoulos, Sophia I. , Nir, Talia M. , Tosun, Duygu , Das, Sandhitsu R. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Chen, Kewei , Risacher, Shannon L. , Shen, Li , Nudelman, Kelly , Ghetti, Bernardino , Grinberg, Lea T. , Hammers, Dustin B , Kirby, Kala, Kukull, Walter A. , Murray, Melissa E. , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S , Wolk, S. J. , Womack, Kyle

JAMA | June 16, 2025 | Volume: 334 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 229

10.1001/jama.2025.7817 | PMID 40522652 Get It

Importance Tau positron emission tomography (PET) allows in vivo detection of neurofibrillary tangles, a core neuropathologic feature of Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective To provide estimates of the frequency of tau PET positivity and its associated risk of clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Longitudinal study using data pooled from 21 cohorts, comprising a convenience sample of 6514 participants from 13 countries, collected between January 2013 and June 2024. Cognitively unimpaired individuals and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD dementia, or other neurodegenerative disorders were included. Exposures Tau PET with flortaucipir F 18, amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, and clinical examinations. Tau PET scans were visually rated as positive according to a US Food and Drug Administration– and European Medicines Agency–approved method, designed to indicate the presence of advanced neurofibrillary tangle pathology (Braak stages V-VI). Main Outcomes and Measures Frequency of tau PET positivity and absolute risk of clinical progression (eg, progression to MCI or dementia). Results Among the 6514 participants (mean age, 69.5 years; 50.5% female), median follow-up time ranged from 1.5 to 4.0 years. Of 3487 cognitively unimpaired participants, 349 (9.8%) were tau PET positive; the estimated frequency of tau PET positivity was less than 1% in those aged younger than 50 years, and increased from 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) at 60 years to 19% (95% CI, 16%-24%) at 90 years. Tau PET positivity frequency estimates increased across MCI and AD dementia clinical diagnoses (43% [95% CI, 41%-46%] and 79% [95% CI, 77%-82%] at 75 years, respectively). Most tau PET–positive individuals (92%) were also Aβ PET positive. Cognitively unimpaired participants who were positive for both Aβ PET and tau PET had a higher absolute risk of progression to MCI or dementia over the following 5 years (57% [95% CI, 45%-71%]) compared with both Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–negative (17% [95% CI, 13%-22%]) and Aβ PET–negative/tau PET–negative (6% [95% CI, 5%-8%]) individuals. Among participants with MCI at the time of the tau PET scan, an Aβ PET–positive/tau PET–positive profile was associated with a 5-year absolute risk of progression to dementia of 70% (95% CI, 59%-81%). Conclusions and Relevance In a large convenience sample, a positive tau PET scan occurred at a nonnegligible rate among cognitively unimpaired individuals, and the combination of Aβ PET positivity and tau PET positivity was associated with a high risk of clinical progression in both preclinical and symptomatic stages of AD. These findings underscore the potential of tau PET as a biomarker for staging AD pathology.
Breast cancer screening mammography among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals: A nationwide study of >10,000 TGD individuals.
Thao, Viengneesee , Helfinstine, David A. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Vachon, Celine M, Davidge‐Pitts, Caroline , Carroll, Evelyn F. , Jatoi, Aminah , Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth , Le‐Rademacher, Jennifer , Ridgeway, Jennifer L. , Shufelt, Chrisandra , Tevaarwerk, Amyé

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 1530-1530

10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.1530 Get It

1530 Background: Regular breast cancer screening reduces mortality. The American College of Radiology (ACR) recommends annual screening mammography for asymptomatic, average risk 1) transgender and gender diverse (TGD) men (individuals assigned female sex at birth but identify as men) age 40+ and with residual breast tissue and 2) TGD women (individuals assigned male sex at birth but identify as women) age 40+ and on gender-affirming hormone therapy for 5+ years. This nationwide study investigated screening mammography in TGD individuals. Methods: Four cohorts were identified with complex algorithms of medical and pharmacy data in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a longitudinal, administrative insurance claims database that includes patients with commercial insurance and Medicare Advantage: 1) TGD men, 2) TGD women, 3) individuals with gender dysphoria not meeting other TGD criteria (NMOT), and 4) cisgender women -- all of whom met ACR screening criteria. The primary endpoint was the percentage of individuals with high adherence, defined as completing >75% of recommended screenings; comparisons were made across the cohorts (Chi-square test). Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare adherence between TGD men and cisgender women with adjustment for demographics and with 1:4 matching (on race/ethnicity, age group, year of healthcare plan enrollment, and duration of follow-up). Results: 10,478 TGD individuals (3,778 TGD men; 1,294 TGD women; and 5,406 with gender dysphoria NMOT) and 6,218,369 cisgender women were identified. For TGD men, TGD women, individuals with gender dysphoria NMOT, and cisgender women, high adherence was observed in 41.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 39.5, 42.6%); 7.4% (95% CI: 6.0, 8.8%); 11.9% (95% CI: 11.0, 12.7%); and 38.3% (95% CI: 38.3, 38.4%), respectively, p < 0.0001. No screening ever in these same populations was observed in 23.6% (95% CI: 22.2, 24.9%); 81.3% (95% CI: 79.2, 83.4%), 72.8% (95% CI: 71.6, 74%), and 35.9% (95% CI: 35.8, 35.9%), respectively, p < 0.0001. When TGD men were matched and compared to 15,112 cisgender women, a differential association was observed between gender and high adherence by age group (p < 0.0001); compared to cisgender women, the likelihood of high adherence in TGD men ages 40-49 (n = 2,472), 50-59 (n = 852), 60-69 (n = 320), and 70+ (n = 134) were as follows: odds ratios (OR‘s): 1.38 (95% CI: 1.28, 1.50), p < 0.0001; 1.57 (95% CI: 1.35, 1.81), p < 0.0001; 0.812 (95% CI: 0.619, 1.065), p = 0.1316; and 1.277 (95% CI 0.835, 1.951), p = 0.2595, respectively. Conclusions: This study found that TGD men manifest relatively high adherence to screening mammography, whereas TGD women and individuals with gender dysphoria NMOT manifest low adherence. Future research should focus on improving breast cancer screening in these underserved populations.
Clinical impact of integrating polygenic risk scores with breast cancer risk assessment models: Results from the prospective multisite GENRE-2 clinical trial.
Pruthi, Sandhya , Klassen, Christine L. , Fraker, Jessica , Chumsri, Saranya , Khatri, Lakshmi, Vachon, Celine M. , Schaid, Daniel J. , Carlson, Erin E. , Ongie, Laura J., Hasadsri, Linda , Yadav, Siddhartha , Stan, Daniela , Khan, Seema A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Sinnwell, Jason P. , Couch, Fergus J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 10544-10544

10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.10544 Get It

10544 Background: Incorporation of Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) can refine traditional breast cancer risk assessment models to provide precise estimates of breast cancer risk. However, the impact of such an integrated model on clinical decision-making related to breast cancer surveillance and preventive strategies is not fully understood. Methods: The GENRE-2 is a prospective single-arm multisite clinical trial (NCT04474834) incorporating PRS into standard breast cancer risk assessment models to determine the impact of PRS on clinical decisions on breast cancer prevention and surveillance. Women at high risk of breast cancer due to NCI-BCRAT 5-year risk of ≥ 3%, or IBIS (Tyrer-Cuzik) 10-year breast cancer risk of ≥5%, biopsy-proven high-risk breast lesion, or a pathogenic variant (PV) in ATM , BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 or PALB2 , were enrolled from five sites in the United States. All women were invited to complete surveys on their breast surveillance and cancer prevention decisions based on pre-PRS standard risk models and post-PRS risk estimation, and further annual surveys are planned for 10 years. Results: Among 902 women enrolled in the study, 605 (median age: 52 years) received PRS results and completed a survey to date. Of those who received PRS results,195 (32.2%) were PV carriers. Among non-carriers, the median 10-year and lifetime pre-PRS IBIS-based risk was 10.0% and 28.7%, respectively. Among PV carriers, the CanRisk-based 10-year and lifetime pre-PRS risk estimates were 6.3% and 25.2% for ATM , 22.3% and 77.6% for BRCA1 , 18.5% and 77.7% for BRCA2 , 7.1% and 25.7% for CHEK2 , and 16.8% and 38.0% for PALB2 PV carriers, respectively. After the incorporation of PRS, the lifetime risk of breast cancer increased by at least 10% in 31% of non-carriers and 7.7% of PV carriers and decreased by at least 10% in 10.7% of non-carriers and 7.7% of PV carriers. The proportion of non-carriers with lifetime risk < 20% or > 40% changed from 17.3% and 22.0%, respectively, in the pre-PRS evaluation to 24.4% and 32.9%, in the post-PRS evaluation. A higher lifetime post-PRS score was associated with intent to take preventive action (surgery or endocrine agents). In non-carriers, the proportion of women with a lifetime risk < 20% with intent to take preventive action was 11%, compared to 36.8% of those with a lifetime risk > 40% (p < 0.001). Similarly, in PV carriers, the proportion of women with lifetime risk < 20% with intent to take preventive action was 20.8% compared to 41.1% of those with lifetime risk > 40% (p = 0.015). Conclusions: The GENRE-2 trial demonstrates that the incorporation of PRS into breast cancer risk assessment models in high-risk women is feasible and leads to clinically meaningful changes in breast cancer risk estimates and decision-making regarding preventive strategies. Evaluation of the implementation of breast cancer risk management strategies in study participants is ongoing and will be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT04474834 .
Radiomic Parenchymal Phenotypes of Breast Texture from Mammography and Association with Risk of Breast Cancer
Winham, Stacey J. , Scott, Christopher G. , Gastounioti, Aimilia , Horng, Hannah , Norman, Aaron D. , Mankowski, Walter C. , Pantalone, Lauren , Jensen, Matthew R. , Acciavatti, Raymond J. , Cohen, Eric A. , Brandt, Kathleen R. , Vachon, Celine M. , Scott, Christopher , Gastounioti, Aimilia , Horng, Hannah , Norman, Aaron D , Mankowski, Walter C , Jensen, Matthew R , Acciavatti, Raymond J , Maidment, Andrew D A , Brandt, Kathleen R , Conant, Emily F , Kerlikowske, Karla M , Kontos, Despina , Vachon, Celine M. , Winham, Stacey J , McCarthy, Anne Marie , Maidment, Andrew D. A. , Conant, Emily F. , Kerlikowske, Karla

Radiology | May 13, 2025 | Volume: 315 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/radiol.240281 | PMID 40358450 Get It

Radiomic parenchymal phenotypes on mammograms were used to predict breast cancer risk among both Black and White women, notably for false-negative findings and symptomatic interval cancer.