Back to Authors

Martinez, Maria Elena

Mayo Clinic

University of California San Diego

Citations 4

Pathogenic Variants, Family History, and Cumulative Risk of Breast Cancer in US Women
Keil, Alexander P. , Taylor, Jack A. , Yadav, Siddhartha , Culver, Hoda Anton, Auer, Paul L. , Bodelón, Clara , Haiman, Christopher A., Lindströem, Sara, Martinez, Maria Elena, Nathanson, Katherine L. , Patel, Alpa V. , Penney, Kathryn L., Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Teras, Lauren R., Vachon, Celine M. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Yao, Song, Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Yadav, Siddhartha , Taylor, Jack A , Nathanson, Katherine L , O’Brien, Katie M. , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Polley, Eric C. , Boddicker, Nicholas , Hu, Chunling , Ambrosone, Christine B. , Brantley, Kristen D. , Burnside, Elizabeth S. , Chen, Fei , Domchek, Susan M. , Eliassen, A. Heather , Hodge, James M. , Kraft, Peter , Lacey, James V. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Olson, Janet E. , Palmer, Julie R. , Penney, Kathryn , Scott, Christopher G. , Teras, Lauren R. , Trentham‐Dietz, Amy , Vachon, Celine M. , Yao, Song , Zirpoli, Gary , Couch, Fergus J. , Sandler, Dale P.

JAMA Oncology | October 9, 2025 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1458

10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.3875 Get It

Importance Inherited pathogenic variants (PVs) in known predisposition genes can greatly increase breast cancer risk, but the combined impact of PV status, family history, and other factors on breast cancer risk in the general US population has not been well described. Objective To evaluate population-based breast cancer risk estimates for those with established PVs overall and stratified by first-degree family history of breast cancer and other factors. Design, Setting, and Participants This study used pooled data from 13 US-based breast cancer case-control studies participating in the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) consortium. Enrollment for individual studies occurred between 1976 and 2013, and results are based on data released March 2023, with analyses conducted from June 2022 to July 2025. Exposures PVs, breast cancer family history, self-reported race and ethnicity, and established risk factors. Main Outcomes and Measures Breast cancer rate ratios for PVs in 7 genes were estimated from the CARRIERS consortium. PV status and incidence and mortality statistics were combined using the Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimation (iCARE) model to estimate conditional cumulative breast cancer risks and 95% CIs, stratified by family history and standardized to the US population. Models that incorporated population-based data and published estimates for established epidemiologic risk factors were also evaluated. Results A total of 67 692 women were studied, including 33 841 who were diagnosed with breast cancer. PVs in ATM , BRCA1 , BRCA2 , CHEK2 , and PALB2 were strongly associated with breast cancer risk, with BRCA1 and PALB2 PVs showing evidence of heterogeneity by family history. In models considering PVs, family history, and established risk factors, the estimated cumulative risks of breast cancer by age 50 years ranged from 2.4% (95% CI, 2.4-2.4) in women with no PVs and no family history to 35.5% (95% CI, 21.6-55.1) in PALB2 PV carriers with a family history. Among women who have not been diagnosed with breast cancer by age 50 years, the cumulative risk of breast cancer by age 80 years ranged from 11.1% (95% CI, 11.0-11.2) in noncarriers with no family history to 70.5% (95% CI, 52.8-83.5) for PALB2 carriers with a family history. PV-specific cumulative risk estimates varied across subgroups defined by race and ethnicity and potentially modifiable epidemiologic risk factors. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, population-based estimates of cumulative breast cancer risk for established PVs, as informed by the CARRIERS case-control sample, varied by family history and potentially modifiable risk factors. These estimates provide guidance for identifying individuals who will most benefit from enhanced screening and prevention strategies.
Combined Associations of a Polygenic Risk Score and Classical Risk Factors With Breast Cancer Risk
Middha, Pooja , Choudhury, Parichoy Pal , Wilcox, Amber N , Lindström, Sara , Behrens, Sabine , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Wang, Qin , Jung, Audrey , Abu‐Ful, Zomoroda, Andrulis, Irene L. , Aronson, Kristan J. , Auer, Paul L. , Becher, Heiko , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia, Bojesen, Stig E. , Brauch, Hiltrud , Brenner, Hermann , Brüning, Thomas , Campa, Daniele , Carracedo, Ángel , Carter, Brian D., Castelao, Jose E. , Chatterjee, Nilanjan , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Cox, Angela , Earp, H. Shelton , Ekici, Arif B. , Eliassen, A. Heather , Eriksson, Mikael , Evans, D. Gareth , Fasching, Peter A. , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Gabrielson, Marike , Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , Gao, Chi , Gapstur, Susan M. , Gaudet, Mia M. , González‐Neira, Anna , Guénel, Pascal , Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A. , Håkansson, Niclas , Hamann, Ute, Hatse, Sigrid , Holleczek, Bernd , Hoover, Robert N. , Hopper, John L. , Hunter, David J. , Investigators, ABCTB, Investigators, kConFab/AOCS, John, Esther M. , Jones, Michael E. , Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske , Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella , Kurian, Allison W. , Lambrechts, Diether , Lee, Eunjung , Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Linet, Martha S. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Llaneza, Ana, MacInnis, Robert J. , Martinez, Maria Elena, Maurer, Tabea, Newman, William G, Orr, Nick , Perou, Charles M. , Pita, Guillermo , Prentice, Ross L. , Rennert, Gad , Rennert, Hedy S., Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Scott, Rodney J. , Smeets, Ann , Spinelli, John J. , Stone, Jennifer , Taylor, Jack A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Veen, Elke M. van , Weltens, Caroline , Yang, Xiaohong R. , Easton, Douglas F. , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Newman, William G. , Lambrechts, Diether , Norman, Aaron, Polley, Eric C. , Lambrechts, Diether , Rennert, Gad , Behrens, Sabine , Lissowska, Jolanta , Evans, D Gareth , John, Esther M , Maclnnis, Robert , Perou, Charles M , Jones, Michael E , Lambrechts, Diether , Brenner, Hermann , Cox, Angela , Gago-Dominguez, Manuela , Guénel, Pascal , Kapoor, Pooja Middha , Koutros, Stella , Newman, William G , García-Closas, Montserrat , Ekici, Arif B , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Taylor, Jack A , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Kurian, Allison W , Eriksson, Mikael , Figueroa, Jonine D , Jung, Audrey Y , Becher, Heiko , Eliassen, A Heather , Gabrielson, Marike , Håkansson, Niclas , Stone, Jennifer , Bojesen, Stig E , Schoemaker, Minouk J , Wang, Qin , Brauch, Hiltrud , Orr, Nick , Mavaddat, Nasim , Hurson, Amber N. , Dennis, Joe , Ahearn, Thomas U. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Arndt, Volker , Freeman, Laura E. Beane , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia , Benı́tez, Javier , Bernstein, Leslie , Cai, Qiuyin , Canzian, Federico , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Clarke, Christine L. , Couch, Fergus J. , Cross, Simon S. , Czene, Kamila , Dai, James Y. , Fritschi, Lin , Giles, Graham G. , Hall, Per N , Heyworth, Jane , Howell, Anthony , Investigators, ABCTB, Investigators, kConFab/AOCS, Kitahara, Cari M. , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Marchand, Loı̈c Le , McLean, Catriona , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Norman, Aaron D. , O’Brien, Katie M. , Olshan, Andrew F. , Olson, Janet E. , Olsson, Håkan , Sandler, Dale P. , Saunders, Christobel , Schöttker, Ben , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Scott, Christopher G. , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Southey, Melissa C. , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Troester, Melissa A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Wang, Xiaoliang , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Willett, Walter C. , Winham, Stacey J. , Wolk, Alicja , Zheng, Wei , Ziogas, Argyrios , Dunning, Alison M. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Kraft, Peter , Milne, Roger L.

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | April 23, 2020 | Volume: 113 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 329-337

10.1093/jnci/djaa056 Get It

Abstract We evaluated the joint associations between a new 313-variant PRS (PRS313) and questionnaire-based breast cancer risk factors for women of European ancestry, using 72 284 cases and 80 354 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Interactions were evaluated using standard logistic regression and a newly developed case-only method for breast cancer risk overall and by estrogen receptor status. After accounting for multiple testing, we did not find evidence that per-standard deviation PRS313 odds ratio differed across strata defined by individual risk factors. Goodness-of-fit tests did not reject the assumption of a multiplicative model between PRS313 and each risk factor. Variation in projected absolute lifetime risk of breast cancer associated with classical risk factors was greater for women with higher genetic risk (PRS313 and family history) and, on average, 17.5% higher in the highest vs lowest deciles of genetic risk. These findings have implications for risk prevention for women at increased risk of breast cancer.
A Candidate Gene Study of Folate-Associated One Carbon Metabolism Genes and Colorectal Cancer Risk
Levine, A. Joan, Figueiredo, Jane C. , Conti, David V. , Kennedy, Kathleen A. , Duggan, David , Poynter, Jenny N. , Martinez, Maria Elena, Haile, Robert W. , Lee, Won , Campbell, Peter T. , Newcomb, Polly A. , Hopper, John L. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Baron, John A. , Limburg, Paul J. , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , Haile, Robert W , Conti, David V

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | July 8, 2010 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1812-1821

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0151 Get It

Abstract Background: Folate-associated one-carbon metabolism (FOCM) may play an important role in colorectal carcinogenesis. Variation in FOCM genes may explain some of the underlying risk of colorectal cancer. Methods: This study utilized data from 1,805 population-based colorectal cancer cases and 2,878 matched sibling controls from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. We used a comprehensive haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphism (tagSNP) approach to select 395 tagSNPs in 15 genes involved in folate and vitamin B12 metabolism. Genotyping was done using the Illumina GoldenGate or Sequenom platforms. Risk factor and dietary data were collected using self-completed questionnaires. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status was determined using standard techniques, and tumor subsite was obtained from pathology reports. The association between SNPs and colorectal cancer was assessed using conditional logistic regression with sibships as the matching factor and assuming a log additive or codominant model. Results: In the log additive model, two linked (r2 = 0.99) tagSNPs in the DHFR gene (rs1677693 and rs1643659) were associated with a significant decrease in colorectal cancer risk after correction for multiple testing (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.94; P = 0.029; and odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.95; P = 0.034 for rs1677693 and rs1643659, respectively). These two linked (r2 = 0.99) tagSNPs and one tagSNP in the MTR gene (rs4659744) were significantly associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk only among individuals not using multivitamin supplements. Conclusions: Overall, we found only moderate evidence that genetic variation in 15 folate pathway genes may affect colorectal cancer risk except in non–multivitamin users. Impact: This study suggests that multivitamin supplement use may modify the association between folate pathway genes and colorectal cancer risk in a post-folic-acid-supplemented population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(7); 1812–21. ©2010 AACR.
Genetic Variability in theMTHFRGene and Colorectal Cancer Risk Using the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry
Levine, A. Joan, Figueiredo, Jane C. , Poynter, Jenny N. , Conti, David V. , Duggan, David , Martinez, Maria Elena, Haile, Robert W. , Lee, Won Jung , Campbell, Peter T. , Newcomb, Polly A. , Hopper, John L. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Baron, John A. , Limburg, Paul J. , Ulrich, Cornelia M. , Haile, Robert W , Conti, David V

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | January 7, 2010 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 89-100

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-0727 Get It

AbstractBackground: The MTHFR C677T TT genotype is associated with a 15% to 18% reduction in colorectal cancer risk, but it is not clear if other variants of the gene are associated with colorectal cancer risk.Methods: We used a tagSNP approach to comprehensively evaluate associations between variation in the MTHFR gene and colorectal cancer risk using a large family-based case-control study of 1,750 population-based and 245 clinic-based families from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. We assessed 22 TagSNPs, selected based on pairwise r2 >95%, using the Haploview Tagger and genotyped the TagSNPs on the Illumina GoldenGate or Sequenom platforms. The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and colorectal cancer was assessed using log-additive, codominant, and recessive models.Results: From studying the population-based families, the C677T (rs1801133) and A1298C (rs1801131) polymorphisms were associated with a decreased colorectal cancer risk overall [odds ratio (OR), 0.81; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.63-1.04; and OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.64-1.07, respectively]. The 677 TT genotype was associated with a decreased risk of microsatellite-stable/microsatellite-low tumors (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.97) and an increased risk of microsatellite-high tumors (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 0.91-5.43; Pinteraction = 0.01), as well as an increased risk of proximal cancers and a decreased risk of distal and rectal cancers (Pinteraction = 0.02). No other single nucleotide polymorphism was associated with risk overall or within subgroups.Conclusion: The 677 TT and 1298 CC genotypes may each be associated with a decrease in colorectal cancer risk. We observed little evidence of additional genetic variability in the MTHFR gene relevant to colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(1); 89–100