Wang, Xiaoliang

Background: Considering the pathophysiological importance of the intestine-passing microbiota, we hypothesized that the mutational and microbial profiles of colorectal cancer might gradually change along detailed anatomical locations and that these trends might differ by the age of diagnosis and the microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Methods: We assessed somatic mutations and selected bacterial species in colorectal carcinomas along the cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum, utilizing targeted sequencing data ( N = 5685) from the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium and tissue microbial data ( N = 1389) from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study and Nurses’ Health Study. Results: There were decreasing trends from the cecum to rectum in the prevalence of gene mutations in the IGF/PI3K, receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)/RAS, TGFB, and WNT signaling pathways (all P trend < 0.0001), as well as high levels of Bacteroides fragilis ( P trend < 0.0001) and high levels of Fusobacterium nucleatum ( P trend = 0.0029) (but not enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis or pks+ Escherichia coli ). Conversely, TP53 pathway mutations showed an increasing cecum-to-rectum trend ( P trend < 0.0001). Similar to later-onset cases diagnosed at ages 50 years and older, in early-onset cases diagnosed under the age of 50 years, we found generally decreasing cecum-to-rectum trends of IGF/PI3K, RTK/RAS, TGFB, and WNT pathway mutations and an increasing cecum-to-rectum trend in TP53 pathway mutations. By contrast, the cecum-to-rectum prevalence-changing trends in IGF/PI3K, RTK/RAS, TGFB, and TP53 pathway mutations were present in non–MSI-high tumors but not in MSI-high tumors (all P interaction < 0.0052). Conclusion: Non–MSI-high colorectal cancers exhibited decreasing cecum-to-rectum trends of IGF/PI3K, RTK/RAS, and TGFB pathway mutations (and an increasing trend of TP53 pathway mutations), in contrast to MSI-high tumors that demonstrated no such trends. Our study highlights the importance of detailed colorectal subsite information combined with tumor molecular and microbial characteristics in colorectal cancer research.

Abstract Background The treatment (tx) landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has evolved, with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-preferred novel therapies (NTs), such as acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and venetoclax-based regimens, now preferred over ibrutinib and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in front-line (1L) settings. We previously showed that patients (pts) from different racial/ethnic groups may not have equitable access to NTs. Here, we examined racial/ethnic inequities in 1L NT utilization among US pts with CLL and potential social determinants of health (SDOH) drivers of these inequities. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized the US-based, electronic health record-derived de-identified Flatiron Health Research Database, linked to neighborhood (US Census track or block group) data from American Community Survey and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality datasets. Eligible pts included adults with CLL who started 1L tx 01/01/2019-07/31/2024. The primary outcome was receipt of 1L therapy (CIT vs preferred NTs, ibrutinib vs preferred NTs), with NCCN guideline-preferred NTs (v2.2023-v3.2025) as a reference. Associations between race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic) and 1L tx types were assessed using logistic regressions, adjusting for age, sex, year of 1L start, immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region status, and del17p/TP53 status. To better understand which SDOH factors contribute to racial and ethnic inequities in tx utilization, we performed mediation analysis using Multiple Mediation Analysis implemented through nonlinear multiple additive regression tree models. Individual-level (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, practice type, insurance) and 20 area-level SDOH factors measuring social deprivation (defined as limited access to economic, social, neighborhood, physical, or healthcare resources) were assessed as potential mediators. Results Of the 4452 pts included in the study, 3717 were White (83%), 371 were Black (8%), 209 were Hispanic (5%), and 155 were Other race (4%). Black and Hispanic pts were more likely to live in neighborhoods with higher social deprivation, such as residential segregation (predominant race/ethnicity in the area: White, Black, Hispanic, Diverse), with no internet access, no vehicle ownership, and no health insurance coverage. Overall, 37% of pts received a preferred NT, highest among White (38%) pts, followed by Black (35%) and Hispanic (26%) pts. Compared with White pts, Hispanic pts were more likely to receive CIT than preferred NTs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46-3.09); Black (aOR 1.44; 95% CI 1.05-1.97) and Hispanic pts (aOR 1.83; 95% CI 1.17-2.85) were more likely to receive ibrutinib than preferred NTs. Pts living in areas with the highest social deprivation were less likely than their counterparts in lowest social deprivation neighborhoods to receive preferred NTs. Specifically, residence in predominantly Black or Hispanic neighborhoods (26% or 27% vs 39% predominantly White), areas with lowest socioeconomic status (32% vs 40%), and neighborhoods with the lowest levels of internet access (32% vs 39%), vehicle ownership (32% vs 39%), and health insurance coverage (34% vs 41%) was associated with lowest receipt of preferred NTs. In the mediation analysis, individual- and area-level SDOH factors explained 94.4% (95% CI 2.9-185.9) of the observed Black-White inequity in receipt of ibrutinib versus preferred NTs; residential segregation appeared to be the most important mediator (59.7%; 95% CI −3.5 to 123.0). Similarly, the Hispanic-White inequity in receipt of preferred NTs was driven by the combined effect of area-level SDOH and individual-level variables (88.5%; 95% CI 45.6-131.3), with residential segregation as the main driver (48.3%; 95% CI 10.7-85.9), followed by practice setting (9.8%; 95% CI −3.5 to 23.1). In contrast, measured SDOH factors did not explain the inequity in receipt of CIT versus preferred NTs between Hispanic and White pts (21.5%; 95% CI −8.3 to 51.4), suggesting that other factors may contribute to the observed inequities. Conclusion Black and Hispanic pts with CLL were less likely than White pts to receive preferred NTs. A significant proportion of these disparities was explained by area-level SDOH, particularly residential segregation. These findings underscore the need to address structural barriers to ensure equitable access to emerging, guideline-recommended treatments.

Abstract Background Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) is the most common leukemia in US adults and incidence increases with age. Although the treatment (tx) landscape has evolved, it is unclear whether tx selection differs for older patients (pts), given concerns around comorbidities, toxicity, and efficacy. There is a need to better understand pt characteristics, tx patterns, and biomarker use among pts aged ≥65 yrs with CLL/SLL in the current therapeutic era. Methods A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted using the de-identified 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) Research Identifiable Files. Included pts were diagnosed with CLL/SLL at age ≥65 and initiated first-line (1L) tx 1/1/2020-9/30/2024 (with ≥12 mo in database prior to 1L tx start). Index date was defined as date of 1L tx start, and pts were followed to death, end of Medicare enrollment, or study end, whichever occurred first. 1L tx was defined as any CLL pharmacologic tx within the first 90 days of index date. Tx utilization was summarized as the number and proportion of pts who received each tx at each line. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and social characteristics and baseline comorbidities, in all pts and by 1L tx. Proportion and timing of documented biomarker orders any time prior to index were summarized by test type (CLL fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH], TP53 DNA sequencing and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region [IGHV] test) and by 1L tx. Results Of the 21,008 pts included, median age was 76.4 yrs at 1L tx, with 43% of pts aged 65-74 yrs, 43% aged 75-84 and 14% aged ≥85. The majority of pts were male (58%) and White (91%). About 8% and 9% of pts had dual eligibility status and low-income subsidy, respectively. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 4 (range: 1-21), with 40% of pts having CCI ≥5. Covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) monotherapies (mono) were most common at 1L tx (41%), including 10% zanubrutinib (zanu), 15% ibrutinib (ibr), and 16% acalabrutinib (acala). B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2)+anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was less common (11%), and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) was used by 13% of pts, mostly BR (8%) and FCR (3%). Other less common tx included cBTKi+anti-CD20mAb (6%) or cBTKi+BCL2 therapies (1%). Among remaining pts, most received anti-CD20mAb (22%). The use of cBTKi mono increased from 41.7% in 2020 (ibr 30.6%; acala 11.1%) to 47.6% in 2024, driven by increased use of zanu (27.8%; acala 15.7%; ibr 4.2%). BCL2+anti-CD20mAb increased from 9.2% in 2020 to 12.6% in 2024. Pts treated with cBTKi mono were older than those with BCL2+anti-CD20mAb (median age 77.2 vs 74.5), and more likely to have dual eligibility status (10% vs 4%) or low-income subsidy (11% vs 5%). More pts who received zanu mono had CCI ≥5 (39%) versus acala (36%), ibr (35%), or BCL2+anti-CD20mAb (32%). Pts with BCL2+anti-CD20mAb were less likely to have diabetes (23% vs 26%), congestive heart failure (CHF; 16% vs 19%), chronic pulmonary disease (23% vs 27%), and renal diseases (23% vs 27%). Pts with ibr were less likely to have myocardial infarction (29% vs 34%), coronary artery disease (22% vs 25%), CHF (16% vs 19%), and atrial fibrillation (12% vs 18%). Overall, 69% of pts had FISH testing prior to 1L tx, but test orders for TP53 (12%) or IGHV (28%) status were infrequent. Pts with ibr had the lowest rates of TP53 tests (6%), whereas pts with CIT had the lowest rates of IGHV tests (16%). The timing of tests showed a binomial distribution where most pts received FISH, TP53, or IGHV tests either ≤60 days prior to 1L tx (46%, 50%, 33%), or &gt;1 yr before 1L tx (30%, 22%, 43%). Among pts who received ≥2 lines of therapy for CLL (n=4428; 21%), cBTKi mono was the most common in 2L (41%), including 14% zanu, 17% acala, and 10% ibr. CIT and BCL2+anti-CD20mAb were used in 12% and 9% of pts, respectively. Only 634 (3%) pts had 3L+ tx, of whom 33% received cBTKi mono, including 16% zanu, 12% acala, and 5% ibr (5%). Conclusion This large real-world study found that cBTKi mono was the most common 1L tx choice among pts aged ≥65 with CLL/SLL, with increased use of next-generation cBTKi. Pts with more baseline comorbidities were less likely to receive ibr or BCL2-based tx. FISH testing was not performed in nearly one-third of pts, and most pts did not have TP53 or IGVH sequencing prior to tx. Future studies are needed to continue to evaluate evolving tx paradigms in older pts with CLL/SLL.

e13741 Background: The NCCN guidelines for first-line (1L) regimens in CLL have evolved over the past decade, shifting from ibrutinib (ibr) and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) to second-generation BTK inhibitor and venetoclax combinations. We evaluated real-world use of preferred 1L treatment (tx) since 2016 in CLL patients (pts) in routine care to identify differences in prescribing based on race/ethnicity and practice type. Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized the US nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database. Eligible pts had confirmed CLL and initiated 1L tx between 01/01/16-07/31/24. Primary outcome was receipt of preferred 1L tx defined by NCCN guidelines in four time periods by race/ethnicity (Hispanic, White, Black, Asian/Other). Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using logistic regression, additionally adjusting for age, sex, ECOG performance status, IGHV, del17p/ TP53 mutation status, time period, and practice type. Results: A total of 7528 pts were included. Compared with White pts (n = 5472), Black pts (n = 640) were younger (median age at 1L: 68 vs 71). More Black and Hispanic (n = 290) pts were treated at community practices (86% vs 80% White). Of those pts tested, more Black pts had unmutated IGHV than White (77% vs 56%). Presence of del17p/ TP53 mutation was similar across races/ethnicities. The proportion of pts receiving preferred 1L tx based on the NCCN Guidelines significantly differed by race/ethnicity (Table) ( P = 0.0021). The proportion of Hispanic pts treated with preferred 1L tx was significantly lower than White (OR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47-0.79), but Black was similar to White (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.89-1.30). Updates to NCCN guidelines were significantly associated with pts receiving preferred 1L tx by practice type ( P = 0.0005). In 2016-2018, 44% of community practices and 55% of academic centers adopted targeted therapies (TTs); in 2019, ibr use increased in both practices (77% vs 68%, respectively). Adherence to preferred tx improved across practices in 2020 but decreased with the prioritization of second-generation therapies. After the approval of zanu, use of TTs was 71% in community practices and 74% in academic centers. Conclusions: Inequities in pts with CLL receiving preferred 1L tx suggests disproportionate use of CIT and ibr by race/ethnicity. Use of preferred TTs also differed by practice type and time period, with increased adoption after pivotal trials. Time period % Pts receiving preferred tx by race a White Black Hispanic Asian/Other 2016-2018:Preferred tx ibr 46% 50% 43% 45% 2019(v2.2019: Jan 2019)Preferred tx ibr 76% 76% 67% 79% 2020-Jun 2022(v4.2020: Feb 2020)Preferred tx acala, VO, ibr 84% 84% 69% 83% Jul 2022-Jul 2024(v2.2023: Aug 2022)Preferred tx acala, VO, zanu 72% 66% 56% 73% VO, venetoclax + obinutuzumab. a By listing of NCCN preference (preferred vs other) among non-del17p and age >65.

Abstract Despite the widespread use of carfilzomib (K) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), there is no consensus on optimal K dose in milligrams per square meter (mg/m2) or dosing schedule. We assessed three modern K prescribing patterns in RRMM using a large United States electronic health record-derived database. Our final cohort (n = 486) included 136 patients (28.0%) who received K 56 mg/m2 once weekly (K56-1x), 86 (17.7%) who received 56 mg/m2 twice weekly (K56-2x), and 264 (54.3%) who received 70 mg/m2 once weekly (K70-1x). Between 2016 and 2023, once-weekly dosing became more common: K70-1x proportions changed from 21.1% in 2016 to 50.6% in 2023, K56-1x from 15.8% to 37.0%, and K56-2x from 63.2% to 12.3%. Median real-world progression-free survival was 13.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.2-20.7] for K56-1x, 13.2 months (95% CI 9.0-28.1 months) for K56-2x, and 10.9 months (95% CI 9.9-15.3 months) for K70-1x; these differences were not statistically significant (log-rank p = 0.46). The prevalence of heart failure was comparable (<5% in all cohorts). In summary, our findings do not support improved outcomes with twice-weekly carfilzomib in RRMM. K56-1x may provide the best balance of efficacy, safety, and avoidance of time toxicity from frequent infusions.

Introduction: Most induction regimens for multiple myeloma (MM) contain bortezomib. In most clinical trials, bortezomib has been prescribed either intravenously or subcutaneously twice per week in 21-day or 28-day cycles. However, several retrospective single-center studies have shown that once-weekly bortezomib has comparable efficacy and less peripheral neuropathy compared to twice-weekly bortezomib ( Sidana et al, PLoS One 2017; Cook et al, AJH 2021). These findings have also been confirmed by a secondary analysis of data from three prospective Phase 3 randomized studies ( Mateos et al, Haematologica 2014). As such, many clinicians have adopted once-weekly bortezomib regimens in routine care in the past decade. However, the real-world (RW) prevalence and efficacy of once-weekly vs twice-weekly bortezomib regimens in a larger population have not yet been characterized. Methods: This study used US nationwide longitudinal Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified data. We included patients aged 18-70 years with newly diagnosed MM between 2017-2022 with ≥ 6 months of follow-up and ≥ 2 clinical visits who were treated with a first-line (1L) bortezomib-containing regimen. Patients aged &gt;70 were excluded a priori given the likelihood of altered practice patterns and more frequent comorbidities. Twice-weekly bortezomib was defined as patients for whom the most frequent interval between two doses of 1L bortezomib within a cycle was 3.0-4.9 days, while once-weekly bortezomib was defined as a corresponding interval of 5.0-9.9 days. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess demographic and clinical factors associated with once-weekly vs twice-weekly (reference) bortezomib. RW progression free survival (rwPFS) and RW overall survival (rwOS) from 1L treatment initiation were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Outcomes were compared using Cox proportional hazards model including transplant as a time-varying covariate and adjustment for other demographic and clinical factors. Results: Of 2,522 patients included, 927 (36.8%) received twice-weekly while 1,522 (63.2%) received once-weekly bortezomib. Approximately half of patients (50.3%) were non-Latinx White, 21.7% non-Latinx Black, and 8.0% Latinx. Most patients were treated in the community setting (78.8%). Rates of once-weekly bortezomib administration were 66.2% and 62.1% among patients treated at academic and community practices, respectively. The frequency of weekly bortezomib use increased over time, from 58.0% between 2017-2019 to 68.8% between 2020-2022. In multivariate analysis, ECOG PS ≥ 2 (odds ratio [OR] 1.50; [95% CI 1.14 to 1.99] vs ECOG PS 0), and more recent year of diagnosis (OR 1.14; [95% CI 1.08 to 1.20] per year) were associated with higher odds of receiving once-weekly bortezomib. Conversely, Latinx patients vs non-Latinx White (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.44 to 0.82]) and patients with ≥ 2 high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCA) vs 0 HRCA (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.48 to 0.91]) had lower odds of receiving once-weekly bortezomib administration. No significant associations were found between gender, ISS stage, practice setting, insurance category, or baseline creatinine. There was no statistically significant difference in rwPFS among patients receiving once-weekly (median 37.3 months, 95% CI 33.8 to 42.5) vs twice-weekly bortezomib (median 39.2 months, 95% CI 32.9 to 42.8) (HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.77 to 1.00]) (Figure 1A). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in rwOS with median 25.5 months follow-up (Figure 1B). Median rwOS was not reached in either group (hazard ratio 0.89 [95% CI 0.75 to 1.07]). Discussion: We evaluated US bortezomib prescribing patterns for the first time in the modern era using a large nationwide RW-study. Whereas prescribing patterns have shifted towards once-weekly bortezomib over time, over 30% of patients diagnosed in the last three years received twice-weekly bortezomib. Importantly, once-weekly and twice-weekly bortezomib performed comparably with regard to rwPFS and rwOS. While our study did not analyze neuropathy or patient quality of life, once-weekly bortezomib is known to be associated with less neuropathy and less time in clinic. These data further support the conclusion that once-weekly bortezomib should be considered the standard of care for newly diagnosed patients with MM.

Abstract Background: There are conflicting data on whether nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Using Mendelian randomization (MR), we investigated the relationship between genetic predisposition to NAFLD and risk for pancreatic cancer. Methods: Data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) within the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium (PanScan; cases n = 5,090, controls n = 8,733) and the Pancreatic Cancer Case Control Consortium (PanC4; cases n = 4,163, controls n = 3,792) were analyzed. We used data on 68 genetic variants with four different MR methods [inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger, simple median, and penalized weighted median] separately to predict genetic heritability of NAFLD. We then assessed the relationship between each of the four MR methods and pancreatic cancer risk, using logistic regression to calculate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for PC risk factors, including obesity and diabetes. Results: No association was found between genetically predicted NAFLD and pancreatic cancer risk in the PanScan or PanC4 samples [e.g., PanScan, IVW OR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88–1.22; MR-Egger OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65–1.21; PanC4, IVW OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.90–1.27; MR-Egger OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.67–1.28]. None of the four MR methods indicated an association between genetically predicted NAFLD and pancreatic cancer risk in either sample. Conclusions: Genetic predisposition to NAFLD is not associated with pancreatic cancer risk. Impact: Given the close relationship between NAFLD and metabolic conditions, it is plausible that any association between NAFLD and pancreatic cancer might reflect host metabolic perturbations (e.g., obesity, diabetes, or metabolic syndrome) and does not necessarily reflect a causal relationship between NAFLD and pancreatic cancer.

Abstract Background Obesity is an established risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), but the evidence for the association is inconsistent across molecular subtypes of the disease. Methods We pooled data on body mass index (BMI), tumor microsatellite instability status, CpG island methylator phenotype status, BRAF and KRAS mutations, and Jass classification types for 11 872 CRC cases and 11 013 controls from 11 observational studies. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for covariables. Results Higher BMI was associated with increased CRC risk (OR per 5 kg/m2 = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.22). The positive association was stronger for men than women but similar across tumor subtypes defined by individual molecular markers. In analyses by Jass type, higher BMI was associated with elevated CRC risk for types 1-4 cases but not for type 5 CRC cases (considered familial-like/Lynch syndrome microsatellite instability-H, CpG island methylator phenotype-low or negative, BRAF-wild type, KRAS-wild type, OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.20). This pattern of associations for BMI and Jass types was consistent by sex and design of contributing studies (cohort or case-control). Conclusions In contrast to previous reports with fewer study participants, we found limited evidence of heterogeneity for the association between BMI and CRC risk according to molecular subtype, suggesting that obesity influences nearly all major pathways involved in colorectal carcinogenesis. The null association observed for the Jass type 5 suggests that BMI is not a risk factor for the development of CRC for individuals with Lynch syndrome.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than 200 susceptibility loci for breast cancer, but these variants explain less than a fifth of the disease risk. Although gene–environment interactions have been proposed to account for some of the remaining heritability, few studies have empirically assessed this. We obtained genotype and risk factor data from 46,060 cases and 47,929 controls of European ancestry from population-based studies within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). We built gene expression prediction models for 4,864 genes with a significant (P &lt; 0.01) heritable component using the transcriptome and genotype data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. We leveraged predicted gene expression information to investigate the interactions between gene-centric genetic variation and 14 established risk factors in association with breast cancer risk, using a mixed-effects score test. After adjusting for number of tests using Bonferroni correction, no interaction remained statistically significant. The strongest interaction observed was between the predicted expression of the C13orf45 gene and age at first full-term pregnancy (PGXE = 4.44 × 10−6). In this transcriptome-informed genome-wide gene–environment interaction study of breast cancer, we found no strong support for the role of gene expression in modifying the associations between established risk factors and breast cancer risk. Our study suggests a limited role of gene–environment interactions in breast cancer risk.