Maghsoudi, Omid Haji

8549 Background: Despite two decades of anti-angiogenic therapy in NSCLC, no predictive biomarker identifies which patients benefit. As VEGF-targeted combinations advance in clinical development, patient selection biomarkers remain a critical unmet need. QVT (Quantitative Vessel Tortuosity) Score is an automated imaging biomarker measuring chaotic tumor vasculature from baseline CT scans and has been shown to be associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) outcomes. We hypothesized that QVT Score could identify patients with chaotic angiogenesis tumors and greater sensitivity to anti-angiogenic therapy. Methods: We analyzed a subset of 334 patients from the SWOG S0819 (NCT00946712) trial with treatment-naïve stage IV non-squamous NSCLC receiving carboplatin/paclitaxel with (56%) or without (44%) bevacizumab. QVT Scores were derived from baseline CTs based on radiologist-defined tumor annotations and radiomic features of tumor vasculature (e.g. vessel twisting, curvature, and branching). Overall survival (OS) was evaluated as the primary endpoint using Cox proportional hazards models with QVT × bevacizumab interaction terms. Bevacizumab was non-randomized in S0819 (physician/patient discretion): to address this, we employed doubly robust estimation combining inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with multivariable covariate adjustment for age, performance status, histology, smoking history, and stage. Results: The QVT Score × bevacizumab interaction was significant (p=0.007, doubly robust estimation) and stayed consistent across sensitivity analyses (p=0.017 multivariable; p=0.047 IPTW), suggesting differential treatment benefit based on pre-treatment vascular phenotype. QVT Score was strongly OS-associated without bevacizumab (HR=3.03, p=0.003) but not with bevacizumab (HR=1.71, p=0.079), consistent with mitigation of high-risk biology. Bevacizumab benefit increased across QVT quartiles (Table 1): patients in the highest quartile had a 60% reduction in mortality (HR=0.40, p<0.001), while patients in the lowest quartile showed no OS benefit (HR=0.89, p=0.64). Conclusions: Despite unfavorable prognosis on standard-of-care therapies (chemotherapy, ICIs), we found that patients with elevated baseline QVT Score may benefit from the addition of anti-angiogenic agents. As VEGF-targeted combinations including bispecific antibodies enter development, radiomic biomarkers may play a crucial role in enriching trial populations and enabling mechanistic longitudinal monitoring. These findings warrant prospective validation in independent randomized clinical trials. Bevacizumab treatment effect by QVT score quartile. QVT Score Quartile N Bevacizumab effect (Hazard Ratio) P Q1 84 0.89 (0.56 -1.42) 0.64 Q2 83 0.70 (0.44-1.12) 0.14 Q3 83 0.54 (0.34-0.85) 0.01 Q4 84 0.40 (0.24-0.65) 0.0003

Abstract Background: Tumor angiogenesis drives treatment resistance by fostering an immunosuppressive microenvironment. VEGF inhibitors (VEGFi) target the vasculature, while immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) do not address this mechanism directly. Quantitative Vessel Tortuosity (QVT) Score is a radiomic biomarker of vascularity previously shown to be associated with ICI response. Here, we introduce QVT Subscore, an interpretable panel that isolates distinct vascular attributes (e.g., branching, curvature, radius), enabling treatment-specific insight into vascularity MoA and vascular normalization. Methods: QVT Subscores are derived by grouping the 910 QVT features comprising QVT Score into six biological categories, summarized by principal component analysis. The panel was evaluated in 557 patients from the phase 3 SWOG S0819 trial and a real-world ICI monotherapy cohort (n=147). QVT score/subscore changes from baseline to first on-treatment CTs were assessed by paired t-test and substratified by objective response (OR). Results: While the mono-chemotherapy showed no vascularity changes, VEGFi regimens reduced QVT Score, with Branch and Curvature Subscores decreasing significantly but Vessel Volume unchanged. In contrast, ICI recipients exhibited significant increases in QVT Score and 5/6 Subscores, showing opposite changes to VEGFi in four subscores and differing effects on vessel Radius and Volume. VEGFi produced the greatest vascularity decrease in patients achieving OR, with milder decreases in non-OR. For ICI, OR showed negligible QVT change, while vascularity significantly increased in non-OR across all subscores except Radius. Conclusions: The QVT Subscore panel captures granular tumor vascular remodeling from different treatments, providing mechanistically grounded insights into clinical trial arm performance. Future work will assess the panel’s potential for identifying regimens that benefit from adding VEGFi. Citation Format: Haojia Li, Pushkar Mutha, Young Kwang Chae, Kai Zhang, Liam Il-Young Chung, Amogh Hiremath, Rhea Chitalia, Justin Yau, Omid Haji-Maghsoudi, Trishan Arul, Vamsidhar Velcheti, Anant Madabhushi, Nathaniel Braman. QVT Subscore: An interpretable radiomic panel of tumor vascularity reveals treatment-specific mechanisms-of-action (MoA) in NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3751.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet current biomarkers such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and response criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, RECIST, V.1.1) align poorly with long-term survival. Radiomics has been proposed as a source of novel biomarkers, but standard radiomic approaches suffer from limited biological interpretability and poor generalizability across treatment settings. We address these gaps by developing the Quantitative Vessel Tortuosity (QVT) score, a biologically interpretable imaging biomarker that quantifies tumor vascular complexity—a known mediator of immune evasion—from routine imaging. We hypothesized that QVT score would improve prognostication and enable treatment response monitoring in ICI-treated NSCLC, independent of current biomarkers. Methods This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 1,301 CT scans from 682 patients with ICI-treated NSCLC. An automated pipeline segmented lesions and tumor-associated vasculature within each scan, extracting 910 QVT features measuring vascular shape and complexity. Unsupervised clustering of these features in a discovery cohort (N=375) was performed to identify fundamental vascular phenotypes. A continuous QVT score was then derived using regularized logistic regression to map patients along this phenotypic spectrum. QVT score was externally validated in ICI monotherapy (N=172) and chemoimmunotherapy (N=135) cohorts. In a longitudinal cohort (n=143), early on-treatment QVT score changes were evaluated for overall survival (OS) association. Results Two robust vascular phenotypes emerged in the discovery cohort: a highly vascularized, chaotic “QVT High” phenotype with poor post-ICI OS and a “QVT Low” phenotype with normalized vasculature and improved ICI outcomes. The continuous QVT score was prognostic for ICI monotherapy (HR=1.17 per 0.1 increase, p=0.0028) and chemoimmunotherapy (HR = 1.23 per 0.1 increase, p = 4.9×10⁻⁵). High QVT status remained prognostic for both treatments after adjustment for PD-L1 and clinical variables (adjusted HR range: 2.13–2.38, p≤0.002). Early decreases in QVT score during therapy, indicating vascular normalization, were associated with improved OS (HR=1.93, p=0.0022) independent of RECIST best overall response and tumor volume change. Conclusions QVT score is a novel, biologically interpretable imaging biomarker that quantifies vascular complexity. It enables automated, non-invasive prediction and monitoring of ICI outcomes by capturing treatment-induced vascular remodeling. Integrating QVT score into clinical decision-making and drug development can address critical gaps in precision oncology.

Three-dimensional radiomic analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis outperformed two-dimensional measures in breast cancer risk assessment.

Abstract Introduction: Mammographic breast density is among the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. However, breast density is typically assessed subjectively by the radiologist according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) based on 2 dimensional (2D) digital mammography (DM) images. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is quickly replacing DM and allows more detailed volumetric imaging of the breast. Advances in radiomics, the high-throughput extraction of radiologic features, has enabled characterization of breast parenchymal complexity beyond breast density alone. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of volumetric parenchymal pattern analysis from DBT and DM with conventional breast density measurement with respect to breast cancer risk estimation. Methods: We performed a case control study among women with concurrent DM and DBT screening (Selenia Dimensions, Hologic Inc.) at our institution between 3/2011-12/2014. Cases were diagnosed with breast cancer within 1 year of screening; controls were confirmed negative or benign at 1 year follow-up, matched on race (Black, White, other/unknown) and age (5-year bins). After exclusions for imaging artifacts, craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views for 187 cases and 737 controls, in six image formats were assessed: 1) raw (“FOR PROCESSING”) DM; 2) processed (“FOR PRESENTATION”) DM; 3) raw DBT central projection; 4) processed DBT central projection; 5) DBT central reconstructed slice; and 6) DBT reconstructed stack. For cases, we analyzed the breast contralateral to cancer diagnosis; for controls the same breast as the matched case. We extracted radiomic features using a lattice-based approach with the publicly available CaPTk software, averaging features for each breast over CC and MLO views. We examined 3 lattice window sizes (6.4, 12.8, and 25.6 mm) and 23 resolutions for image resampling (0.075 - 2mm). We performed PCA on the resulting 487 features for each combination of window size and resolution and built conditional logistic regression models to assess the association of the first 7 principal components with breast cancer, with models including age, BMI, and BI-RADS density. For each image type we calculated the model C-statistic at all window sizes and resolutions, for a total of 2304 experimental conditions. Results: Features from reconstructed DBT scans had on average higher C-statistics across all experimental conditions. A model using only age, BMI, and BI-RADS density had a C-statistic of 0.61. Models using radiomic features plus age, BMI, and BI-RADS density had mean C-statistic of 0.68 (IQR 0.68, 0.69) for reconstructed DBT scans; for all other image types, the mean C-statistic ranged from 0.64 to 0.66. Conclusions: Incorporating volumetric breast parenchymal patterns from DBT improves breast cancer risk estimation beyond markers derived from DM and beyond conventional BI-RADS density. Citation Format: Eric A. Cohen, Omid Haji Maghsoudi, Raymond Acciavatti, Lauren Pantalone, Walter Mankowski, Alex A Nguyen, Christopher G. Scott, Stacey Winham, Andrew D. Maidment, Anne Marie McCarthy, Celine M Vachon, Emily F Conant, Despina Kontos. Volumetric parenchymal pattern analysis for breast cancer risk estimation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Precision Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception of Cancer; 2022 Nov 17-19; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2023;16(1 Suppl): Abstract nr P070.

Digital mammography has seen an explosion in the number of radiomic features used for risk-assessment modeling. However, having more features is not necessarily beneficial, as some features may be overly sensitive to imaging physics (contrast, noise, and image sharpness). To measure the effects of imaging physics, we analyzed the feature variation across imaging acquisition settings (kV, mAs) using an anthropomorphic phantom. We also analyzed the intra-woman variation (IWV), a measure of how much a feature varies between breasts with similar parenchymal patterns—a woman’s left and right breasts. From 341 features, we identified “robust” features that minimized the effects of imaging physics and IWV. We also investigated whether robust features offered better case-control classification in an independent data set of 575 images, all with an overall BI-RADS® assessment of 1 (negative) or 2 (benign); 115 images (cases) were of women who developed cancer at least one year after that screening image, matched to 460 controls. We modeled cancer occurrence via logistic regression, using cross-validated area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) to measure model performance. Models using features from the most-robust quartile of features yielded an AUC = 0.59, versus 0.54 for the least-robust, with p < 0.005 for the difference among the quartiles.

Abstract Accurate estimation of mammographic breast density could aid in augmenting breast cancer risk assessment for women undergoing breast screening with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). Breast density can be estimated from FFDM and is most commonly assessed in the clinic by visual grading into one of the four categories defined by the American College of Radiology BI-RADS. However, BI-RADS density assessment is highly subjective and does not provide a quantitative, continuous measure of percent density (PD), which would allow for more refined risk stratification and assessment of density changes. Here, we introduce Deep-LIBRA, an artificial intelligence (AI) tool for fully-automated assessment of breast PD from FFDM images. Two key modules form the core of Deep-LIBRA: 1) an implementation of a modified U-Net architecture for breast segmentation and 2) a radiomic machine learning module that performs PD estimation within the segmented breast region. To develop and validate Deep-LIBRA, raw (i.e., "For Processing") FFDM images (Selenia Dimensions, Hologic Inc.) acquired at two breast cancer screening practices were retrospectively analyzed. For the breast segmentation module, we used a total of 12,100 FFDM studies from 2,200 individual women and a 90%-10% split-sample training-validation approach, using the Dice coefficient to evaluate the accuracy of Deep-LIBRA versus ground-truth manual breast segmentation. For the PD estimation module we used a total of 3,304 FFDM images from 1,652 individual women; manual PD scores obtained with the widely used Cumulus software were used as the "gold standard" in a three-fold cross-validation setting to assess the accuracy of Deep-LIBRA in PD estimation. PD estimates from Deep-LIBRA were also compared with breast density estimates from the commercially available Volpara software. Breast segmentation had a Dice coefficient of 95.31% when compared to ground-truth manual breast segmentation in the validation set. Deep-LIBRA average differences from ground-truth PD scores in the three cross-validation folds were 4.91%, 4.65%, and 4.22%, while Volpara had corresponding average differences of 6.20%, 6.01%, and 5.94%. Deep-LIBRA PD scores were also significantly different from Volpara PD (t-test p-value &lt; 0.001 in all three folds). Preliminary evaluation results show that Deep-LIBRA is a promising AI approach for accurately assessing PD from FFDM images. Citation Format: Omid Haji Maghsoudi, Scott Christopher, Aimilia Gastounioti, Lauren Pantalone, Fang-Fang Wu, Eric A. Cohen, Winham Stacey, Emily F. Conant, Celine Vachon, Despina Kontos. Deep-LIBRA: An artificial intelligence approach for fully-automated assessment of breast density in digital mammography [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2600.