Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

84 citation(s) found for "Ay, Hakan".

Genome-Wide Interaction Analysis of Menopausal Hormone Therapy Use and Breast Cancer Risk Among 62,370 Women
Wang, Xiaoliang , Auer, Paul L. , Wang, Qin , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Aronson, Kristan J. , Lee, Derrick G. , Mulot, Claire , Patel, Alpa V. , Hoppe, Reiner , Lo, Wing‐Yee, Brüning, Thomas , Hamann, Ute , Larson, Nicole L. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Haiman, Christopher A. , Krüger, Ute , Wagner, Philippe , Vachon, Celine M. , Hunter, David J. , Andrulis, Irene L., Linet, Martha S. , Prentice, Ross L. , Easton, Douglas F. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Lindström, Sara , Wang, Xiaoliang , Middha, Pooja , Dennis, Joe , Dunning, Alison M. , Lush, Michael J. , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Murphy, Rachel A. , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Cordina‐Duverger, Emilie , Guénel, Pascal , Truong, Thérèse , Teras, Lauren R. , Dossus, Laure , Kaaks, Rudolf , Czene, Kamila , Gabrielson, Marike , Hall, Per N , Eriksson, Mikael , Jung, Audrey , Becher, Heiko , Couch, Fergus J. , Olson, Janet E. , Giles, Graham G. , MacInnis, Robert J. , Southey, Melissa C. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Olsson, Håkan , Augustinsson, Annelie , Scott, Christopher G. , Winham, Stacey J. , Vachon, Celine M. , Perou, Charles M. , Olshan, Andrew F. , Troester, Melissa A. , Eliassen, A. Heather , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Brantley, Kristen D. , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Ahearn, Thomas U. , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Evans, D. Gareth , Newman, William G. , Veen, Elke M. van , Howell, Anthony , Wolk, Alicja , Håkansson, Niclas , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Ziogas, Argyrios , Jones, Michael E. , Orr, Nick , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Kitahara, Cari M. , Milne, Roger L. , Kraft, Peter

No container title available | May 24, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-532921/v1 Get It

Abstract Background: Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with increased risk for breast cancer. However, the relevant mechanisms and its interaction with genetic variants are not fully understood. Methods: We conducted a genome-wide interaction analysis between MHT use and genetic variants for breast cancer risk in 27,585 cases and 34,785 controls from 26 observational studies. All women were post-menopausal and of European ancestry. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test for multiplicative interactions between genetic variants and current MHT use. We considered interaction p-values<5x10-8 as genome-wide significant, and p-values<1x10-5 as suggestive. Linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based clumping was performed to identify independent candidate variants.Results: None of the 9.7 million genetic variants tested for interactions with MHT use reached genome-wide significance. Only 213 variants, representing 18 independent loci, had p-values<1x105. The strongest evidence was found for rs4674019 (p-value=2.27x10-7), which showed genome-wide significant interaction (p-value=3.8x10-8) with current MHT use when analysis was restricted to population-based studies only. Limiting the analyses to combined estrogen-progesterone MHT use only or to estrogen receptor (ER) positive cases did not identify any genome-wide significant evidence of interactions. Conclusions: In this large genome-wide SNP-MHT interaction study of breast cancer, we found no strong support for common genetic variants modifying the effect of MHT on breast cancer risk. These results suggest that common genetic variation has limited impact on the observed MHT–breast cancer risk association.
Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control on Stroke Subtypes
Wright, Clinton B. , Auchus, Alexander P. , Lerner, Alan J. , Ambrosius, Walter T. , Ay, Hakan , Bates, Jeffrey T. , Chen, Jing , Meschia, James F. , Pancholi, Suchita , Rastogi, Anjay , Sweeney, Mary Ellen, Willard, James , Yee, Jerry , Oparil, Suzanne , Meschia, James F , Papademetriou, Vasilios

Hypertension | February 15, 2021 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1391-1398

10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.16027 | PMID 33583199 Get It

In the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), the number of strokes did not differ significantly by treatment group. However, stroke subtypes have heterogeneous causes that could respond differently to intensive blood pressure control. SPRINT participants (N=9361) were randomized to target systolic blood pressures of <120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) compared with <140 mm Hg (standard treatment). We compared incident hemorrhage, cardiac embolism, large- and small-vessel infarctions across treatment arms. Participants randomized to the intensive arm had mean systolic blood pressures of 121.4 mm Hg in the intensive arm (N=4678) and 136.2 mm Hg in the standard arm (N=4683) at one year. Sixty-nine strokes occurred in the intensive arm and 78 in the standard arm when SPRINT was stopped. The breakdown of stroke subtypes across treatment arms included hemorrhagic (intensive treatment, n=6, standard treatment, n=7) and ischemic stroke subtypes (large artery atherosclerosis: intensive treatment n=11, standard treatment, n=13; cardiac embolism: intensive treatment n=11, standard treatment n=15; small artery occlusion: intensive treatment n=8, standard treatment n=8; other ischemic stroke: intensive treatment n=3, standard treatment n=1). Fewer strokes occurred among participants without prior cardiovascular disease in the intensive (n=43) than the standard arm (n=61), but the difference did not reach predefined statistical significance level of 0.05 ( P =0.09). The interaction between baseline cardiovascular risk factor status and treatment arm on stroke risk did not reach significance ( P =0.05). Similar numbers of stroke subtypes occurred in the intensive BP control and standard control arms of SPRINT.
Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Survival by Tumor Subtype: Pooled Analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Morra, Anna , Jung, Audrey , Behrens, Sabine , Keeman, Renske , Ahearn, Thomas U. , Arndt, Volker , Augustinsson, Annelie , Auvinen, Päivi , Becher, Heiko , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bojesen, Stig E. , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Brenner, Hermann , Camp, Nicola J. , Campa, Daniele , Castelao, Jose E. , Choi, Ji‐Yeob , Cox, Angela , Easton, Douglas F. , Eccles, Diana M., Egan, Kathleen M. , Evans, D. Gareth , Fasching, Peter A. , Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , Gapstur, Susan M. , Gaudet, Mia M. , Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal , Haiman, Christopher A. , Håkansson, Niclas , Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael , Heyworth, Jane , Hoppe, Reiner , Hopper, John L. , Hunter, David J. , Jager, Agnes , Jakimovska, Milena , Janni, Wolfgang , Koutros, Stella , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Lambrechts, Diether , Li, Jingmei , Lindblom, Annika , Mannermaa, Arto , Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara , Mariapun, Shivaani, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Muranen, Taru , Newman, William G. , Noh, Dong‐Young , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Obi, Nadia , Olsson, Håkan , Park‐Simon, Tjoung‐Won , Petridis, Christos , Plaseska‐Karanfilska, Dijana , Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Rennert, Gad , Rennert, Gad , Rhenius, Valerie , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Schneeweiß, Andreas , Schwentner, Lukas , Shah, Mitul , Shen, Chen‐Yang , Tollenaar, Rob A.�E.�M. , Tomlinson, Ian , Torres, Diana , Vachon, Celine M. , Wang, Qin , Wang, Sophia , Williams, Justin A. , Winqvist, Robert , Wu, Anna H. , Yoo, Keun-Young, Yu, Jyh‐Cherng , Zheng, Wei , Yang, Xiaohong R. , Eliassen, A. Heather , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Eccles, Diana , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Lambrechts, Diether , Arndt, Volker , Augustinsson, Annelie , Brenner, Hermann , Camp, Nicola J , Canzian, Federico , Cox, Angela , Dunning, Alison M , Evans, D Gareth , Fasching, Peter A , Gago-Dominguez, Manuela , García-Sáenz, José A , Gaudet, Mia M , Giles, Graham G , Guénel, Pascal , Hall, Per N , Hart, Steven N , Hartman, Mikael , Ito, Hidemi , Jager, Agnes , Jakubowska, Anna , Janni, Wolfgang , Kaaks, Rudolf , Kapoor, Pooja Middha , Koutros, Stella , Lambrechts, Diether , Li, Jingmei , Matsuo, Keitaro , Milne, Roger L , Muranen, Taru A , Newman, William G , Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won , Pharoah, Paul D P , Rennert, Gad , Rennert, Gad , Rhenius, Valerie , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Schneeweiss, Andreas , Scott, Christopher , Southey, Melissa C , Stram, Daniel O. , Tamimi, Rulla M , Tomlinson, Ian , Torres, Diana , Vachon, Celine M. , Wolk, Alicja , Ziogas, Argyrios , Holmes, Michelle D , García-Closas, Montserrat , Teo, Soo H , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Chang-Claude, Jenny , Lambrechts, Diether , Behrens, Sabine , Eccles, Diana , Keeman, Renske , Zheng, Wei , Wang, Sophia S , Jung, Audrey Y , Becher, Heiko , Eliassen, A Heather , Håkansson, Niclas , Rashid, Muhammad U , Bojesen, Stig E , Lindblom, Annika , Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana , Sawyer, Elinor J , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Freeman, Laura E. Beane , Blomqvist, Carl , Briceño, Ignacio , Brucker, Sara Yvonne , Canzian, Federico , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Clarke, Christine L. , Couch, Fergus J. , Cross, Simon S. , Czene, Kamila , Dörk, Thilo , Dunning, Alison M. , Dwek, Miriam , García-Sáenz, José Á. , Giles, Graham G. , Han, Sileny , Hart, Steven N. , Ito, Hidemi , Jakubowska, Anna , Kaaks, Rudolf , Kang, Daehee , Middha, Pooja , Kitahara, Cari M. , Kraft, Peter , Lacey, James V. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Lubiński, Jan , Lush, Michael J. , Manoochehri, Mehdi, Matsuo, Keitaro , Milne, Roger L. , Olshan, Andrew F. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Presneau, Nadège , Scott, Christopher G. , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Southey, Melissa C. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Tapper, William , Troester, Melissa A. , Truong, Thérèse , Wolk, Alicja , Ziogas, Argyrios , Schmidt, Marjanka K.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | January 26, 2021 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 623-642

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0924 | PMID 33500318 Get It

Abstract Background: It is not known whether modifiable lifestyle factors that predict survival after invasive breast cancer differ by subtype. Methods: We analyzed data for 121,435 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 67 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium with 16,890 deaths (8,554 breast cancer specific) over 10 years. Cox regression was used to estimate associations between risk factors and 10-year all-cause mortality and breast cancer–specific mortality overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) status, and by intrinsic-like subtype. Results: There was no evidence of heterogeneous associations between risk factors and mortality by subtype (Padj &gt; 0.30). The strongest associations were between all-cause mortality and BMI ≥30 versus 18.5–25 kg/m2 [HR (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19 (1.06–1.34)]; current versus never smoking [1.37 (1.27–1.47)], high versus low physical activity [0.43 (0.21–0.86)], age ≥30 years versus &lt;20 years at first pregnancy [0.79 (0.72–0.86)]; &gt;0–&lt;5 years versus ≥10 years since last full-term birth [1.31 (1.11–1.55)]; ever versus never use of oral contraceptives [0.91 (0.87–0.96)]; ever versus never use of menopausal hormone therapy, including current estrogen–progestin therapy [0.61 (0.54–0.69)]. Similar associations with breast cancer mortality were weaker; for example, 1.11 (1.02–1.21) for current versus never smoking. Conclusions: We confirm associations between modifiable lifestyle factors and 10-year all-cause mortality. There was no strong evidence that associations differed by ER status or intrinsic-like subtype. Impact: Given the large dataset and lack of evidence that associations between modifiable risk factors and 10-year mortality differed by subtype, these associations could be cautiously used in prognostication models to inform patient-centered care.
Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology
Paganetti, Harald , Beltran, Chris , Both, Stefan , Flanz, J., Grosshans, David R. , Knopf, Antje , Langendijk, Johannes A. , Nyström, Håkan, Raaymakers, Bas W. , Richter, Christian , Sawakuchi, Gabriel O. , Schippers, Marco, Teo, B, Unkelbach, Jan , Wohlfahrt, Patrick , Furutani, Keith, Sawakuchi, Gabriel O , Beltran, Chris J , Dong, Lei , Furutani, Keith M. , Grassberger, Clemens , Parodi, Katia , Shaitelman, Simona Flora , Lomax, Antony

Physics in Medicine & Biology | November 23, 2020 | Volume: 66 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 05RM01

10.1088/1361-6560/abcd16 | PMID 33227715 Get It

Abstract The treatment of cancer with proton radiation therapy was first suggested in 1946 followed by the first treatments in the 1950s. As of 2020, almost 200 000 patients have been treated with proton beams worldwide and the number of operating proton therapy (PT) facilities will soon reach one hundred. PT has long moved from research institutions into hospital-based facilities that are increasingly being utilized with workflows similar to conventional radiation therapy. While PT has become mainstream and has established itself as a treatment option for many cancers, it is still an area of active research for various reasons: the advanced dose shaping capabilities of PT cause susceptibility to uncertainties, the high degrees of freedom in dose delivery offer room for further improvements, the limited experience and understanding of optimizing pencil beam scanning, and the biological effect difference compared to photon radiation. In addition to these challenges and opportunities currently being investigated, there is an economic aspect because PT treatments are, on average, still more expensive compared to conventional photon based treatment options. This roadmap highlights the current state and future direction in PT categorized into four different themes, ‘improving efficiency’, ‘improving planning and delivery’, ‘improving imaging’, and ‘improving patient selection’.
Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Association Study of Endometrial Cancer and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Identifies Genetic Risk Regions Associated with Risk of Both Cancers
Glubb, Dylan M. , Thompson, Deborah J. , Aben, Katja K.H. , Alsulimani, Ahmad , Amant, Frédéric , Annibali, Daniela , Barricarte, Aurelio , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bermisheva, Marina , Bernardini, Marcus Q. , Bischof, Katharina , Bodelón, Clara , Brand, Alison H. , Brinton, Louise A. , Bruinsma, Fiona , Burghaus, Stefanie , Cai, Hui , Carney, Michael E. , Chen, Chu , Chen, Xiao Qing, Chen, Zhihua , Cunningham, Julie M. , Vivo, Immaculata De , Dörk, Thilo , Edwards, Todd, Ekici, Arif B. , Ewing, Ailith , Fasching, Peter A. , Ferguson, Sarah, Flanagan, James M. , Fostira, Florentia, Gao, Bo , Gaudet, Mia M. , Gawełko, Jan , Goodman, Marc T. , Harter, Philipp , Hein, Alexander , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Hillemanns, Peter , Høgdall, Claus , Holliday, Elizabeth , Huntsman, David G. , Huzarski, Tomasz , Jones, Michael E. , Kelley, Joseph L., Killeen, Jeffrey , Klapdor, Rüdiger , Köbel, Martin , Konopka, Bożena , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Kopperud, Reidun Kristin, Koti, Madhuri , Lambrechts, Diether , Lele, Shashikant , Lester, Jenny, Li, Andrew J., Liang, Dong , Liebrich, Clemens, Lipworth, Loren , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lu, Karen H., May, Taymaa, McGuire, Valerie , McNeish, Iain A. , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Odunsi, Kunle , Olsson, Håkan , Oršulić, Sandra , Osório, Ana , Park‐Simon, Tjoung‐Won , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Podgórska, Agnieszka , Ramus, Susan J. , Riggan, Marjorie J. , Rothstein, Joseph H. , Runnebaum, Ingo B. , Scott, Rodney J. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Sieh, Weiva , Śpiewankiewicz, Beata, Sutphen, Rebecca , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Thompson, Pamela J., Titus, Linda , Tone, Alicia , Edwards, Digna Velez, Vergote, Ignace , Wang, Zhaoming , Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Group, for the OPAL Study, Group, for the AOCS, Whittemore, Alice S. , Wu, Xifeng , Wu, Anna H. , O’Mara, Tracy A. , Lu, Karen H. , Lambrechts, Diether , Barricarte, Aurelio , Bischof, Katharina , Bodelon, Clara , Brenton, James D , Brinton, Louise A , Buchanan, Daniel D , Cunningham, Julie M , De Vivo, Immaculata , Fazio, Anna de , Doherty, Jennifer A , Dörk, Thilo , Dunning, Alison M , Edwards, Todd , Ewing, Ailith , Fasching, Peter A , Flanagan, James M , Friedenreich, Christine M , Gaudet, Mia M , Gawełko, Jan , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Giles, Graham G , Glasspool, Rosalind , Harris, Holly R , Hein, Alexander , Heitz, Florian , Hillemanns, Peter , Jakubowska, Anna , Jones, Michael E , Karlan, Beth Y , Karnezis, Anthony , Kjaer, Susanne K , Klapdor, Rüdiger , Köbel, Martin , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lu, Lingeng , McAlpine, Jessica N , McNeish, Iain A , Menon, Usha , Nevanlinna, H , Orsulic, Sandra , Palli, Domenico , Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won , Permuth, Jennifer B , Ramus, Susan J , Runnebaum, Ingo B , Sieh, Weiva , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Szafron, Lukasz M , Teo, Soo H , Thompson, Pamela J , Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim , Titus, Linda , Tumino, Rosario , Vanderstichele, Adriaan , Vergote, Ignace , Vierkant, Robert A , Webb, Penelope M , Winham, Stacey J , Spurdle, Amanda B , Lambrechts, Diether , Moysich, Kirsten , Wang, Zhaoming , O'Mara, Tracy A , Ekici, Arif B , Amant, Frederic , Høgdall, Claus K , Huzarski, Tomasz , Brand, Alison H , Goodman, Marc T , Attia, John , Berchuck, Andrew , Bjørge, Line , Brenton, James D. , Buchanan, Daniel D. , Bützow, Ralf C. , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Chen, Xiao Qing, Cook, Linda S. , DeFazio, Anna , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Bois, Andreas du , Dunning, Alison M. , Dürst, Matthias , Fountzilas, George , Giles, Graham G. , Glasspool, Rosalind , Gronwald, Jacek , Harris, Holly R. , Heitz, Florian , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Høgdall, Estrid , Jakubowska, Anna , Jensen, Allan , Karlan, Beth Y. , Karnezis, Anthony N. , Хуснутдинова, Э. К. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Kraft, Peter , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Larson, Melissa C. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Macciotta, Alessandra , Mattiello, Amalia , McAlpine, Jessica N. , Modugno, Francesmary , Nevanlinna, Heli , Palli, Domenico , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Permuth, Jennifer B. , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Risch, Harvey A. , Senz, Janine , Setiawan, Veronica Wendy , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Szafron, Lukasz M. , Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim , ­Tumino, ­Rosario , Turman, Constance , Vanderstichele, Adriaan , Edwards, Digna R. Velez , Vierkant, Robert A. , Webb, Penelope M. , Group, for the OPAL Study, Group, for the AOCS, White, Emily , Winham, Stacey J. , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Spurdle, Amanda B.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | November 3, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 217-228

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0739 | PMID 33144283 Get It

Abstract Background: Accumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. We aimed to identify joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci by performing a meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from these two cancers. Methods: Using LDScore regression, we explored the genetic correlation between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e., inverse-variance meta-analysis, colocalization, and M-values) and performed analyses stratified by subtype. Candidate target genes were then prioritized using functional genomic data. Results: Genetic correlation analysis revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10−5). We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (PBonferroni &lt; 2.4 × 10−9). In addition, four novel subgenome-wide regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12, and 11q13.3 were identified (P &lt; 5 × 10−7). Promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and ovarian cell lines and expression quantitative trait loci data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation. Conclusions: Using cross-cancer GWAS meta-analysis, we have identified several joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci and candidate target genes for future functional analysis. Impact: Our research highlights the shared genetic relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Further studies in larger sample sets are required to confirm our findings.
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Women: Subgroup Analysis of the VENOST Study
Uludüz, Derya , Şahin, Şevki , Duman, Taşkın , Öztürk, Şerefnur , Yayla, Vildan , Afşar, Nazire , Üzüner, Nevzat , Midi, İpek , Çınar, Nilgün , Sungur, Mehmet Alı , Domaç, Füsun Mayda , İnce, Birsen , Göksan, Baki , Mısırlı, Cemile Handan , Bakar, Mustafa , Çolakoğlu, Sena, Karahan, Ali Yavuz , Göksu, Eylem Özaydın , Özdağ, Fatih , Şenol, Mehmet Güney , Yürekli, Vedat Ali, Aluçlu, Ufuk, Demir, Serkan , Küçükoğlu, Hayriye , Oruç, Serdar, Yeşilot, Nilüfer , Kusbeci, Ozge Yimaz, Tokuç, Firdevs Ezgi Uçan , Tascilar, Fatma Nida, Gökçe, Mustafa , Çağlayan, Hale Zeynep Batur , Tüfekçi, Ahmet , Yalın, Osman Özgür , Utku, Uygar , Genç, Hamit , Çabalar, Murat , Milanlıoğlu, Aysel , Zeydan, Burcu , Baybaş, Sevim , Kablan, Yüksel , Göksel, Başak Karakurum , Açıkgöz, Mustafa , Kurucu, Hatice , Demirci, Seden , Güneş, Taşkın , Karahan, Ali Yavuz , Nazliel, Bijen , Zeydan, Burcu , Genç, Hamit , Uludüz, Derya , Kozak, Hasan Hüseyin , Aluçlu, Mehmet Ufuk , Küsbeci, Özge Yılmaz , Bektaş, Hesna , Tascilar, Fatma Nida, Aytaç, Emrah , Örken, Dilek Neci̇oğlu , Yılmaz, Arda Şakir , Ekmekci, Hakan

Stroke Research and Treatment | September 1, 2020 | Volume: 2020 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-8

10.1155/2020/8610903 | PMID 32953038 Get It

Background. Early diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) associated with reproductive health-related risk factors (RHRF) including pregnancy, puerperium, and oral contraceptive (OC) use can prevent severe neurological sequelae; thus, the symptoms must be documented in detail for each group. Methods. Out of 1144 patients with CVST, a total of 777 women were enrolled from a multicenter for the study of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (VENOST). Demographic, biochemical, clinical, and radiological aspects were compared for 324 cases with RHRF and 453 cases without RHRF. Results. The mean age of the RHRF (-) group (43.2 ± 13 years) was significantly higher than of the RHRF (+) group (34±9 years). A previous history of deep venous thrombosis (3%), isolated cavernous sinus involvement (1%), cranial neuropathy (13%), comorbid malignancy (7%), and its disability scores after 12 months (9%) were significantly higher in the RHRF (-) group. The RHRF (+) group consisted of 44% cases of puerperium, 33% cases of OC users and 23% of pregnant women. The mean age was found to be higher in OC users (38±9 years). A previous history of deep venous thrombosis was slightly higher in the pregnancy subgroup (4%). Epileptic seizures were more common in the puerperium group (44%). Conclusion. The results of our study indicate that the risk of CSVT increases parallel to age, OC use, and puerperium period. In addition, when considering the frequency of findings and symptoms, epileptic seizures in the puerperium subgroup of the RHRF (+) group and malignancies in the RHRF (-) group may accompany the CSVT. In daily practice, predicting these risks for the CSVT and early recognition of the symptoms will provide significant benefits to patients.
When Is a Critically Ill Cirrhotic Patient Too Sick to Transplant? Development of Consensus Criteria by a Multidisciplinary Panel of 35 International Experts
Blasi, Annabel , Lerut, Jan , Fernández, Javier , Findlay, James Y. , Fondevila, Constantino , Jaber, Samir , Karvellas, Constantine , Kronish, Kate, Laleman, Wim , Laterre, Pierre François, Levesque, Éric , Mandell, M. Susan , Phail, Mark Mc, Olson, Jody C. , Olthoff, Kim M. , Reiberger, Thomas , Reyntjens, Koen , Scatton, Olivier , Simpson, Kenneth J., Subramanian, Ram, Tomescu, Dana , Wagener, Gebhard , McPhail, Mark , Karvellas, Constantine , Reiberger, Thomas , Blasi, Annabel , Weiss, Emmanuel , Saner, Fuat Hakan , Asrani, Sumeet K. , Biancofiore, Gíanni , Durand, François , Francoz, Claire , Gustot, Thierry , Laterre, Pierre‐François , Muiesan, Paolo , Pinna, Antonio Daniele , Saliba, Faouzi , Soubrane, Olivier , Tacke, Frank , Xia, Victor W. , Paugam‐Burtz, Cathérine

Transplantation | June 22, 2020 | Volume: 105 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 561-568

10.1097/tp.0000000000003364 | PMID 32568955 Get It

Background. Critically ill cirrhotic patients are increasingly transplanted, but there is no consensus about futile liver transplantation (LT). Therefore, the decision to delay or deny LT is often extensively debated. These debates arise from different opinions of futility among transplant team members. This study aims to achieve a multinational and multidisciplinary consensus on the definition of futility in LT and to develop well-articulated criteria for not proceeding with LT due to futility. Methods. Thirty-five international experts from anesthesiology/intensive care, hepatology, and transplant surgery were surveyed using the Delphi method. More than 70% of similar answers to a question were necessary to define agreement. Results. The panel recommended patient and graft survival at 1 year after LT to define futility. Severe frailty and persistent fever or <72 hours of appropriate antimicrobial therapy in case of ongoing sepsis were considered reasons to delay LT. A simple assessment of the number of organs failing was considered the most appropriate way to decide whether LT should be delayed or denied, with respiratory, circulatory and metabolic failures having the most influence in this decision. The thresholds of severity of organ failures contraindicating LT for which a consensus was achieved were a Pa o 2 /FiO2 ratio<150 mm Hg, a norepinephrine dose >1 μg/kg per minute and a serum lactate level >9 mmol/L. Conclusions. Our expert panel provides a consensus on the definition of futile LT and on specific criteria for postponing or denying LT. A framework that may facilitate the decision if a patient is too sick for transplant is presented.
Low-Dose Image-Guided Pediatric CNS Radiation Therapy: Final Analysis From a Prospective Low-Dose Cone-Beam CT Protocol From a Multinational Pediatrics Consortium
Alcorn, Sara R. , Zhou, Xian Chiong, Bojechko, C., Rubo, Rodrigo A., Chen, Michael , Dieckmann, Karin , Ford, Eric C., Kobyzeva, Daria , MacDonald, Shannon M. , McNutt, Todd , Nechesnyuk, А. V. , Nilsson, Kristina , Sjostrand, Hakan, Smith, Koren, Stock, Markus , Tryggestad, E., Villar, Rosângela Correa , Winey, Brian , Terezakis, Stephanie , Tryggestad, Erik J, Terezakis, Stephanie A , Ermoian, Ralph P.

Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment | April 24, 2020 | Volume: 19 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/1533033820920650 | PMID 32329413 Get It

Background: Lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography protocols for image-guided radiotherapy may permit target localization while minimizing radiation exposure. We prospectively evaluated a lower-dose cone-beam protocol for central nervous system image-guided radiotherapy across a multinational pediatrics consortium. Methods: Seven institutions prospectively employed a lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography central nervous system protocol (weighted average dose 0.7 mGy) for patients ≤21 years. Treatment table shifts between setup with surface lasers versus cone-beam computed tomography were used to approximate setup accuracy, and vector magnitudes for these shifts were calculated. Setup group mean, interpatient, interinstitution, and random error were estimated, and clinical factors were compared by mixed linear modeling. Results: Among 96 patients, with 2179 pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography acquisitions, median age was 9 years (1-20). Setup parameters were 3.13, 3.02, 1.64, and 1.48 mm for vector magnitude group mean, interpatient, interinstitution, and random error, respectively. On multivariable analysis, there were no significant differences in mean vector magnitude by age, gender, performance status, target location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, or steroid or anesthesia use. Providers rated >99% of images as adequate or better for target localization. Conclusions: A lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography protocol demonstrated table shift vector magnitude that approximate clinical target volume/planning target volume expansions used in central nervous system radiotherapy. There were no significant clinical predictors of setup accuracy identified, supporting use of this lower-dose cone-beam computed tomography protocol across a diverse pediatric population with brain tumors.
Combined Associations of a Polygenic Risk Score and Classical Risk Factors With Breast Cancer Risk
Middha, Pooja , Choudhury, Parichoy Pal , Wilcox, Amber N , Lindström, Sara , Behrens, Sabine , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Wang, Qin , Jung, Audrey , Abu‐Ful, Zomoroda, Andrulis, Irene L. , Aronson, Kristan J. , Auer, Paul L. , Becher, Heiko , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia, Bojesen, Stig E. , Brauch, Hiltrud , Brenner, Hermann , Brüning, Thomas , Campa, Daniele , Carracedo, Ángel , Carter, Brian D., Castelao, Jose E. , Chatterjee, Nilanjan , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Cox, Angela , Earp, H. Shelton , Ekici, Arif B. , Eliassen, A. Heather , Eriksson, Mikael , Evans, D. Gareth , Fasching, Peter A. , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Gabrielson, Marike , Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , Gao, Chi , Gapstur, Susan M. , Gaudet, Mia M. , González‐Neira, Anna , Guénel, Pascal , Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A. , Håkansson, Niclas , Hamann, Ute, Hatse, Sigrid , Holleczek, Bernd , Hoover, Robert N. , Hopper, John L. , Hunter, David J. , Investigators, ABCTB, Investigators, kConFab/AOCS, John, Esther M. , Jones, Michael E. , Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske , Ko, Yon-Dschun, Koutros, Stella , Kurian, Allison W. , Lambrechts, Diether , Lee, Eunjung , Lejbkowicz, Flavio, Linet, Martha S. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Llaneza, Ana, MacInnis, Robert J. , Martinez, Maria Elena, Maurer, Tabea, Newman, William G, Orr, Nick , Perou, Charles M. , Pita, Guillermo , Prentice, Ross L. , Rennert, Gad , Rennert, Hedy S., Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Scott, Rodney J. , Smeets, Ann , Spinelli, John J. , Stone, Jennifer , Taylor, Jack A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Veen, Elke M. van , Weltens, Caroline , Yang, Xiaohong R. , Easton, Douglas F. , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Newman, William G. , Lambrechts, Diether , Norman, Aaron, Polley, Eric C. , Lambrechts, Diether , Rennert, Gad , Behrens, Sabine , Lissowska, Jolanta , Evans, D Gareth , John, Esther M , Maclnnis, Robert , Perou, Charles M , Jones, Michael E , Lambrechts, Diether , Brenner, Hermann , Cox, Angela , Gago-Dominguez, Manuela , Guénel, Pascal , Kapoor, Pooja Middha , Koutros, Stella , Newman, William G , García-Closas, Montserrat , Ekici, Arif B , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Taylor, Jack A , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Kurian, Allison W , Eriksson, Mikael , Figueroa, Jonine D , Jung, Audrey Y , Becher, Heiko , Eliassen, A Heather , Gabrielson, Marike , Håkansson, Niclas , Stone, Jennifer , Bojesen, Stig E , Schoemaker, Minouk J , Wang, Qin , Brauch, Hiltrud , Orr, Nick , Mavaddat, Nasim , Hurson, Amber N. , Dennis, Joe , Ahearn, Thomas U. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Arndt, Volker , Freeman, Laura E. Beane , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia , Benı́tez, Javier , Bernstein, Leslie , Cai, Qiuyin , Canzian, Federico , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Clarke, Christine L. , Couch, Fergus J. , Cross, Simon S. , Czene, Kamila , Dai, James Y. , Fritschi, Lin , Giles, Graham G. , Hall, Per N , Heyworth, Jane , Howell, Anthony , Investigators, ABCTB, Investigators, kConFab/AOCS, Kitahara, Cari M. , Ko, Yon‐Dschun, Marchand, Loı̈c Le , McLean, Catriona , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Norman, Aaron D. , O’Brien, Katie M. , Olshan, Andrew F. , Olson, Janet E. , Olsson, Håkan , Sandler, Dale P. , Saunders, Christobel , Schöttker, Ben , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Scott, Christopher G. , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Southey, Melissa C. , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Troester, Melissa A. , Vachon, Celine M. , Wang, Xiaoliang , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Willett, Walter C. , Winham, Stacey J. , Wolk, Alicja , Zheng, Wei , Ziogas, Argyrios , Dunning, Alison M. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Kraft, Peter , Milne, Roger L.

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | April 23, 2020 | Volume: 113 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 329-337

10.1093/jnci/djaa056 | PMID 32359158 Get It

Abstract We evaluated the joint associations between a new 313-variant PRS (PRS313) and questionnaire-based breast cancer risk factors for women of European ancestry, using 72 284 cases and 80 354 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Interactions were evaluated using standard logistic regression and a newly developed case-only method for breast cancer risk overall and by estrogen receptor status. After accounting for multiple testing, we did not find evidence that per-standard deviation PRS313 odds ratio differed across strata defined by individual risk factors. Goodness-of-fit tests did not reject the assumption of a multiplicative model between PRS313 and each risk factor. Variation in projected absolute lifetime risk of breast cancer associated with classical risk factors was greater for women with higher genetic risk (PRS313 and family history) and, on average, 17.5% higher in the highest vs lowest deciles of genetic risk. These findings have implications for risk prevention for women at increased risk of breast cancer.