Back to Authors

Chen, Jing

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9035-9126

Mayo Clinic

Tulane University

Citations 3

Abstract 17097: Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis and Mid-Life Cognitive Function: Evidence From Bogalusa Heart Study
Jin, Xuanyi , Naqvi, Tasneem Z. , Guo, Yajun , Alonso, Camilo Fernández, Chen, Jing , Kang, Soo Jin , Fernandez, Camilo , Mills, Katherine T. , He, Jiang , Urbina, Elaine M. , Bazzano, Lydia

Circulation | December 19, 2023 | Volume: 148 | Issue: Suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.148.suppl_1.17097 Get It

Background: Little is known about the relationship between carotid plaque formation and cognitive function in a middle-aged population. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that there will be an association between carotid atherosclerotic burden and cognitive function in middle-aged adults. Aim: The purpose of the present study is to examine the relationship between carotid artery (CA) plaque and cognitive function in middle-aged white and black men and women from the Bogalusa Heart Study (BHS) cohort. Methods: We included a total of 1,107 BHS participants with echocardiography and carotid ultrasound performed between 2013 and 2016. Cognitive function was quantified in a global cognitive score (GCS) comprised of the z standardized sum of 7 neuropsychiatric tests. CA plaque was defined by carotid intima media thickness ≥1.5mm in any segment of the CA including right and left common artery (RCC/LCC), bulbs (RCB/LCB) as well as right and left internal carotid artery (RIC/LIC). We compared demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic characteristics in participants with or without CA plaque and used linear regression analysis for the association between CA and GCS adjusted for age, sex, race and education. Results: Among all, 373 (33.7%) of participants had one or more CA plaque. The most common locations of CA plaque formation differed according to laterality, with 230 (61.7%), 189 (50.7%), 108 (29.0%), 92 (24.7%), 83 (22.3%), 10 (2.7%) participants having plaque in the RCB, LCB, LCA, RIC, LIC, and RCA, respectively. Participants with CA plaque were likely to be older (49.9 vs. 47.2 years), male (52 vs.38.9%), white (70.2 vs.63.4%,), have larger left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (97.4 vs.94 ml) and LV mass index (83.4 vs.76.3 g/m 2 , all p -value<0.01), but similar LV ejection fraction (60.1 vs.60.0%) as compared to those without CA plaque. Moreover, CA is associated with poorer cognitive function (GCS, standardized β coefficient=-0.07; p =0.02) adjusted for age, sex, and race. However, the association was attenuated after adjusting for education. Conclusion: CA plaque was highly prevalent and inversely associated with cognitive function. The association was attenuated by education emphasizing the importance of social determinants in cognitive health.
Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control on Stroke Subtypes
Wright, Clinton B. , Auchus, Alexander P. , Lerner, Alan J. , Ambrosius, Walter T. , Ay, Hakan , Bates, Jeffrey T. , Chen, Jing , Meschia, James F. , Pancholi, Suchita , Rastogi, Anjay , Sweeney, Mary Ellen, Willard, James , Yee, Jerry , Oparil, Suzanne , Meschia, James F , Papademetriou, Vasilios

Hypertension | February 15, 2021 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1391-1398

10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.16027 Get It

In the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), the number of strokes did not differ significantly by treatment group. However, stroke subtypes have heterogeneous causes that could respond differently to intensive blood pressure control. SPRINT participants (N=9361) were randomized to target systolic blood pressures of <120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) compared with <140 mm Hg (standard treatment). We compared incident hemorrhage, cardiac embolism, large- and small-vessel infarctions across treatment arms. Participants randomized to the intensive arm had mean systolic blood pressures of 121.4 mm Hg in the intensive arm (N=4678) and 136.2 mm Hg in the standard arm (N=4683) at one year. Sixty-nine strokes occurred in the intensive arm and 78 in the standard arm when SPRINT was stopped. The breakdown of stroke subtypes across treatment arms included hemorrhagic (intensive treatment, n=6, standard treatment, n=7) and ischemic stroke subtypes (large artery atherosclerosis: intensive treatment n=11, standard treatment, n=13; cardiac embolism: intensive treatment n=11, standard treatment n=15; small artery occlusion: intensive treatment n=8, standard treatment n=8; other ischemic stroke: intensive treatment n=3, standard treatment n=1). Fewer strokes occurred among participants without prior cardiovascular disease in the intensive (n=43) than the standard arm (n=61), but the difference did not reach predefined statistical significance level of 0.05 ( P =0.09). The interaction between baseline cardiovascular risk factor status and treatment arm on stroke risk did not reach significance ( P =0.05). Similar numbers of stroke subtypes occurred in the intensive BP control and standard control arms of SPRINT.