McAlpine, Jessica N

Abstract Background Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy (OBS), the removal of fallopian tubes during hysterectomy or instead of tubal ligation, is recommended to reduce ovarian cancer risk. However, data on the effectiveness of prophylactic OBS is limited. Methods This population-based retrospective cohort included individuals aged 18–80 in Ontario, Canada, who underwent OBS or comparator surgeries (hysterectomy with ovarian and tubal conservation or tubal ligation) from 2011 to 2023. Individuals with gynecologic cancer before or within six months of surgery were excluded. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Sensitivity analyses varied the time between surgery and cancer diagnosis to account for pre-existing serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas. Results Among 196,839 individuals, 57,941 underwent OBS and 138,898 underwent comparator surgeries. 142 epithelial ovarian cancers were diagnosed (19 in the OBS group and 123 in the comparator surgery group). OBS was associated with reduced risk of any ovarian carcinoma, with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.98). For serous ovarian carcinoma (high- and low-grade combined due to missing grade data), the aHR was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.99). Sensitivity analyses with 12- and 18-month intervals showed aHRs of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.99) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.35 to 1.01) for all ovarian carcinomas, and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.23 to 1.01) and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.99) for serous ovarian carcinoma, respectively. Conclusions OBS was associated with reduced risk of ovarian carcinoma, supporting its role as a primary prevention strategy.

Abstract Purpose: Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is the second most-common type of ovarian carcinoma, comprising 10%–20% of cases. Recently, the study of ENOC has benefitted from comparisons to endometrial carcinomas including defining ENOC with four prognostic molecular subtypes. Each subtype suggests differential mechanisms of progression, although tumor-initiating events remain elusive. There is evidence that the ovarian microenvironment may be critical to early lesion establishment and progression. However, while immune infiltrates have been well studied in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, studies in ENOC are limited. Experimental Design: We report on 210 ENOC, with clinical follow-up and molecular subtype annotation. Using multiplex IHC and immunofluorescence, we examine the prevalence of T-cell lineage, B-cell lineage, macrophages, and populations with programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death-ligand 1 across subtypes of ENOC. Results: Immune cell infiltrates in tumor epithelium and stroma showed higher densities in ENOC subtypes with known high mutation burden (POLEmut and MMRd). While molecular subtypes were prognostically significant, immune infiltrates were not (overall survival P > 0.2). Analysis by molecular subtype revealed that immune cell density was prognostically significant in only the no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype, where immune infiltrates lacking B cells (TILB minus) had inferior outcome (disease-specific survival: HR, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–14.7; P < 0.05). Similar to endometrial carcinomas, molecular subtype stratification was generally superior to immune response in predicting outcomes. Conclusions: Subtype stratification is critical for better understanding of ENOC, in particular the distribution and prognostic significance of immune cell infiltrates. The role of B cells in the immune response within NSMP tumors warrants further study.

Abstract Background: Accumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. We aimed to identify joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci by performing a meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from these two cancers. Methods: Using LDScore regression, we explored the genetic correlation between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e., inverse-variance meta-analysis, colocalization, and M-values) and performed analyses stratified by subtype. Candidate target genes were then prioritized using functional genomic data. Results: Genetic correlation analysis revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10−5). We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (PBonferroni < 2.4 × 10−9). In addition, four novel subgenome-wide regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12, and 11q13.3 were identified (P < 5 × 10−7). Promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and ovarian cell lines and expression quantitative trait loci data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation. Conclusions: Using cross-cancer GWAS meta-analysis, we have identified several joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci and candidate target genes for future functional analysis. Impact: Our research highlights the shared genetic relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Further studies in larger sample sets are required to confirm our findings.