Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Association Study of Endometrial Cancer and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Identifies Genetic Risk Regions Associated with Risk of Both Cancers
Abstract Background: Accumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. We aimed to identify joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci by performing a meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from these two cancers. Methods: Using LDScore regression, we explored the genetic correlation between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e., inverse-variance meta-analysis, colocalization, and M-values) and performed analyses stratified by subtype. Candidate target genes were then prioritized using functional genomic data. Results: Genetic correlation analysis revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10−5). We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (PBonferroni < 2.4 × 10−9). In addition, four novel subgenome-wide regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12, and 11q13.3 were identified (P < 5 × 10−7). Promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and ovarian cell lines and expression quantitative trait loci data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation. Conclusions: Using cross-cancer GWAS meta-analysis, we have identified several joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci and candidate target genes for future functional analysis. Impact: Our research highlights the shared genetic relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Further studies in larger sample sets are required to confirm our findings.
Development and Validation of the Gene Expression Predictor of High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Molecular SubTYPE (PrOTYPE)
Abstract Purpose: Gene expression–based molecular subtypes of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSOC), demonstrated across multiple studies, may provide improved stratification for molecularly targeted trials. However, evaluation of clinical utility has been hindered by nonstandardized methods, which are not applicable in a clinical setting. We sought to generate a clinical grade minimal gene set assay for classification of individual tumor specimens into HGSOC subtypes and confirm previously reported subtype-associated features. Experimental Design: Adopting two independent approaches, we derived and internally validated algorithms for subtype prediction using published gene expression data from 1,650 tumors. We applied resulting models to NanoString data on 3,829 HGSOCs from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We further developed, confirmed, and validated a reduced, minimal gene set predictor, with methods suitable for a single-patient setting. Results: Gene expression data were used to derive the predictor of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma molecular subtype (PrOTYPE) assay. We established a de facto standard as a consensus of two parallel approaches. PrOTYPE subtypes are significantly associated with age, stage, residual disease, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and outcome. The locked-down clinical grade PrOTYPE test includes a model with 55 genes that predicted gene expression subtype with >95% accuracy that was maintained in all analytic and biological validations. Conclusions: We validated the PrOTYPE assay following the Institute of Medicine guidelines for the development of omics-based tests. This fully defined and locked-down clinical grade assay will enable trial design with molecular subtype stratification and allow for objective assessment of the predictive value of HGSOC molecular subtypes in precision medicine applications. See related commentary by McMullen et al., p. 5271
Abstract Background: Mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MC) and mucinous borderline ovarian tumours (MBOT) are associated with ERBB2 amplification and KRAS activating mutations. These events occur in a near-mutually exclusive pattern, and KRAS mutations are more prevalent in MBOTs than MC's whereas ERBB2 amplification is more frequently seen in MCs. Frequencies of mutations in other oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes in MC are not well established though TP53, BRAF, NRAS, and CDKN2A mutations have all been reported. As these carcinomas are commonly chemo-resistant a definitive molecular categorization of this subtype is needed as treatment options are explored. Methods: We undertook review of pathology reports and after exclusion of potential gastric, appendiceal or pancreatic involvement over 100 mucinous ovarian tumours were identified. HPV testing was undertaken to exclude rare metastasis from endocervical primary site. All specimens were assayed for p53 expression via TMA and subject to sequencing of common cancer gene hotspots using Ion-Torrent or Illumina MiSeq. Previously derived data on ERBB2 status was combined in our analysis and, where available, samples showing heterogeneity of ERBB2 amplification and any other Ras-pathway activating mutation were microdissected with components evaluated independently for concurrent hotspot mutations. Results: All samples were consistent with mucinous tumours of ovarian origin and none were HPV positive. We detected mutations in KRAS, BRAF, CDKN2A, TP53, PTEN, PIK3CA as well as presumed somatic/detrimental, variants in APC that have not previously been reported in mucinous tumours. Despite some samples having enriched tumour content, lower than expected allelic frequencies of KRAS activating mutations suggested intra-tumoural heterogeneity. This was consistent with results observed previously with rare ERBB2 amplification coinciding KRAS mutations. Conclusions: The prevalence of Ras-pathway mutations, especially amongst borderline lesions, suggests these mutations are critical for tumour onset. However varying allelic frequencies of KRAS mutations suggest progression to carcinoma is strongly influenced by other molecular features. Citation Format: Michael S. Anglesio, Robertson Mackenzie, Stefan Kommoss, Boris J. Winterhoff, Benjamin Kipp, Jaoquin Garcia, Jesse S. Voss, Kevin Halling, Sarah Kerr, Janine Senz, Winnie Yang, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz, Elena-Sophie Prigge, Miriam Reuschenbach, Anna V. Tinker, Blake Gilks, Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez, David G. Huntsman, Jessica N. McAlpine. Defining ovarian mucinous tumors: Cancer genes and heterogeneity. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: From Concept to Clinic; Sep 18-21, 2013; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2013;19(19 Suppl):Abstract nr A18.
Molecular characterization of mucinous ovarian tumours supports a stratified treatment approach with HER2 targeting in 19% of carcinomas
AbstractMucinous ovarian carcinomas (MCs) typically do not respond to current conventional therapy. We have previously demonstrated amplification of HER2 in 6 of 33 (18.2%) mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MCs) and presented anecdotal evidence of response with HER2‐targeted treatment in a small series of women with recurrent HER2‐amplified (HER2+) MC. Here, we explore HER2 amplification and KRAS mutation status in an independent cohort of 189 MCs and 199 mucinous borderline ovarian tumours (MBOTs) and their association to clinicopathological features. HER2 status was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), FISH, and CISH, and interpreted per ASCO/CAP guidelines, with intratumoural heterogeneity assessment on full sections, where available. KRAS mutation testing was performed with Sanger sequencing. Stage and grade were associated with recurrence on both univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). Assessment of HER2 status revealed overexpression/amplification of HER2 in 29/154 (18.8%) MCs and 11/176 (6.2%) MBOTs. There was excellent agreement between IHC, FISH, and CISH assessment of HER2 status (perfect concordance of HER2 0 or 1+ IHC with non‐amplified status, and 3+ IHC with amplified status). KRAS mutations were seen in 31/71 (43.6%) MCs and 26/33 (78.8%) MBOTs, and were near mutually exclusive of HER2 amplification. In the 189 MC cases, a total of 54 recurrences and 59 deaths (53 of progressive disease) were observed. Within MCs, either HER2 amplification/overexpression or KRAS mutation was associated with decreased likelihood of disease recurrence (p = 0.019) or death (p = 0.0041) when compared to cases with neither feature. Intratumoural heterogeneity was noted in 26% of HER2‐overexpressing cases. These data support the stratification of MCs for the testing of new treatments, with HER2‐targeted therapy as a viable option for HER2+ advanced or recurrent disease. Further research is required to delineate the molecular and clinical features of the ∼34% of MC cases with neither HER2 amplification nor KRAS mutations.