Olson, Jody C.

Outcomes of kidney-alone transplantation (KAT) in former simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant candidates after liver waitlist delisting are not well defined. Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data, we identified adult recipients who underwent KAT between 2005 and 2025 after prior SLK listing (RLD-KAT), which was matched 1:5 to primary KAT recipients without liver disease by age, transplant year, and diabetes status. Patient and graft survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. We identified 163 RLD-KAT recipients matched to 815 controls. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated lower patient survival in RLD-KAT (p = 0.020), whereas death-censored and overall graft survival were similar (p > 0.05). In multivariable models, death-censored graft survival (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.51–1.53), overall graft survival (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.73–1.36), and patient survival (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.76–1.5) did not differ significantly. Six RLD-KAT recipients (3.7%) subsequently underwent liver transplantation. Kidney-alone transplantation in prior SLK candidates was associated with acceptable patient and graft outcomes and a low incidence of subsequent liver transplantation.

Background: Immunotherapy-based regimens have expanded the treatment landscape for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC); however, real-world data are limited. Methods: This retrospective, observational study used data from electronic medical records from Mayo Clinic sites across the United States. Patients with uHCC who initiated a first-line (1L) systemic therapy between June 2020–October 2022 with ≥2 follow-up visits were included. Treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and post-index gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding were assessed by GI bleeding risk defined by Child–Pugh Class B or C, pre-index GI bleeding, uncontrolled hypertension, or significant varices and band ligation. Results: Of 186 included patients, 68.8% had GI bleeding risk and 31.2% did not. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was the most common 1L systemic therapy in patients with or without GI bleeding risk (72.7% and 29.3%, respectively). Median OS (95% confidence interval) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was 12.8 (8.0–19.3) months and not reached in patients with and without GI bleeding risk, respectively. OS rates with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with or without GI bleeding risk, respectively, were 52.3% and 70.6% at 12 months, 41.6% and 57.8% at 18 months, and 34.6% and 51.3% at 24 months. Post-index GI bleeding with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab occurred in 19.4% and 5.9% of patients with and without GI bleeding risk, respectively. Conclusions: During this study period, atezolizumab + bevacizumab was the most common 1L therapy for patients with uHCC, regardless of GI bleeding risk. OS rates with atezolizumab + bevacizumab were lower in patients with versus without GI bleeding risk. Findings highlight the unmet need for guidance on characteristics-driven treatment decisions.

ABSTRACT Background The association between transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt TIPS and waitlist outcomes in simultaneous liver‐kidney (SLK) transplant recipients remains unclear. Methods Between 2003 and 2023, we examined the scientific registry of transplant recipients. All adult candidates with overlapping waiting lists for liver and kidney transplants ( N = 15 087) were analyzed (entire cohort). Candidates without TIPS ( n = 13 980) and with ( n = 1107) were followed through November 30, 2023, and the following outcomes were analyzed: death, SLK transplant, liver‐ or kidney‐alone transplant, or removal from the list. The Aalen–Johansen method was used to calculate the cumulative incidence rates of the outcomes, where the outcomes were considered competing risks. Mixed effects Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the outcomes by TIPS status. We separately analyzed dialysis‐dependent candidates ( n = 10 370). Results In the entire cohort, the 1‐year cumulative incidence of death in those without TIPS was higher than in those with (12.5% vs. 9%). In the dialysis‐dependent cohort, the 1‐year death incidence was 13.3% versus 8.8% in those without TIPS and those with, respectively. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, TIPS was associated with a 29% lower mortality risk in the entire cohort (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.60–0.84, p < 0.001) and a 33% lower risk of mortality in the dialysis‐dependent cohort. The likelihood of receiving SLK was lower for recipients with TIPS in the univariable analysis. However, this association was attenuated after adjustment. The causes of removal were similar irrespective of TIPS status in both cohorts. Conclusion In this large cohort of SLK candidates, those with TIPS had a better waitlist survival, irrespective of their dialysis requirements before transplantation. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

e16167 Background: Guidelines recommend systemic therapy for uHCC ineligible for locoregional therapy. Until the approval of tremelimumab + durvalumab for uHCC, in Oct 2022, 1L systemic therapies in the US included multikinase inhibitors and atezolizumab (A) + bevacizumab (B). It is crucial to understand factors driving real-world treatment decisions and outcomes in uHCC. Methods: Data were collected from electronic medical records from US Mayo Clinic sites. Pts with uHCC who initiated a 1L systemic therapy between Jun 2020–Oct 2022 (A + B was the only approved 1L immunotherapy (IO)-based regimen) with ≥2 follow-up visits, were included. Index was the date of first 1L systemic therapy. Pts were assessed by risk of post-index gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (Child-Pugh class B or C, pre-index GI bleeding, uncontrolled hypertension [HTN] [≥2 anti-HTN drugs or ≥2 vital entries of SBP > 140 mmHg or DBP > 90 mmHg]), or significant varices and band ligation). Treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and post-index GI bleeding were assessed. Results: A total of 186 pts met the inclusion criteria. Most common etiologies of liver disease were MASH (42.7%) and hepatitis C virus (40.2%). Pre-index GI bleeding was reported in 29.0% of pts, of which 46.3% occurred within 6 months (mo) pre-index; 62.4% of pts had EGD, of which 72.4% had varices. There were 128 (68.8%) pts with GI bleeding risk and 58 (31.2%) pts without GI bleeding risk. The most common 1L systemic therapies for pts with GI bleeding risk were A + B (72.7%) and A only (9.4%), while for pts without GI bleeding risk, A + B (29.3%), nivolumab + ipilimumab (13.8%), and B + chemotherapy (12.1%) were the most common. Median OS and OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 mo were lower, and post-index GI bleeding rate was higher in pts with vs without GI bleeding risk (Table). For pts treated with A + B, median OS and OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 mo were lower in pts with vs without GI bleeding risk (Table). Conclusions: In this network, prior to the approval of other 1L IO-based regimens for uHCC, many pts received A + B, despite risk of post-index GI bleeding. Median OS with A + B was shorter in pts with vs without GI bleeding risk. Data highlight the complexity of uHCC and the unmet need for guidance on characteristics-driven treatment decisions. © 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2025 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. All rights reserved. Table. Full cohort A + B cohort All ptsN=186 GI bleeding risk N=128 No GI bleeding risk N=58 All pts N=110 GI bleeding risk N=93 No GI bleeding risk N=17 Median follow-up, mo 20.6 20.9 20.4 21.3 21.6 20.3 Median OS, mo 14.4 11.4 40.3 13.9 12.8 Not reached OS rates, % 12 mo 55.2 48.9 68.9 55.2 52.3 70.6 18 mo 45.3 38.1 61.1 44.1 41.6 57.8 24 mo 39.4 31.8 56.8 37.1 34.6 51.3 Post-index GI bleed, % 17.2 23.4 3.4 17.3 19.4 5.9

572 Background: Guidelines recommend systemic therapy for uHCC ineligible for locoregional therapy. Until the approval of tremelimumab + durvalumab for uHCC, in Oct 2022, 1L systemic therapies in the US included multikinase inhibitors and atezolizumab (A) + bevacizumab (B). It is crucial to understand factors driving real-world treatment decisions and outcomes in uHCC. Characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were assessed in US pts with uHCC treated with 1L systemic therapy. Methods: Data were collected from electronic medical records from US Mayo Clinic sites. Pts with uHCC who initiated an NCCN-recommended 1L systemic therapy between Jun 2020–Oct 2022 (A + B was the only approved 1L immunotherapy (IO)-based regimen) with ≥2 follow-up visits, were included. Index was the date of first 1L systemic therapy. Pts were assessed by risk of post-index gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (pts with Child-Pugh class B or C, pre-index GI bleeding, uncontrolled hypertension [HTN] [≥2 anti-HTN drugs or ≥2 vital entries of SBP >140 mmHg or DBP >90 mmHg]), or significant varices and band ligation). Treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and post-index GI bleeding were assessed. Results: A total of 186 pts met the inclusion criteria. Most common etiologies of liver disease were metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (42.7%) and hepatitis C virus (40.2%). Pre-index GI bleeding was reported in 29.0% of pts, of which 46.3% occurred within 6 months (mo) pre-index; 62.4% of pts had EGD, of which 72.4% had varices. There were 128 (68.8%) pts with GI bleeding risk and 58 (31.2%) pts without GI bleeding risk. The most common 1L systemic therapies for pts with GI bleeding risk were A + B (72.7%) and A only (9.4%), while for pts without GI bleeding risk, A + B (29.3%), nivolumab + ipilimumab (13.8%), and B + chemotherapy (13.8%) were the most common. Median OS and OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 mo were lower, and post-index GI bleeding rate was higher in pts with vs without GI bleeding risk (Table). For pts treated with A + B, median OS and OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 mo were lower in pts with vs without GI bleeding risk (Table). Conclusions: In this network, prior to the approval of other 1L IO-based regimens for uHCC, many pts received A + B, despite risk of post-index GI bleeding. Median OS with A + B was shorter in pts with vs without GI bleeding risk. Data highlight the complexity of uHCC and the unmet need for guidance on characteristics-driven treatment decisions. Full cohort A + B cohort All ptsN=186 GI bleeding risk N=128 No GI bleeding risk N=58 All pts N=110 GI bleeding risk N=93 No GI bleeding risk N=17 Median follow-up, mo 20.6 20.9 20.4 21.3 21.6 20.3 Median OS, mo 14.4 11.4 40.3 13.9 12.8 Not reached OS rates, % 12 mo 55.2 48.9 68.9 55.2 52.3 70.6 18 mo 45.3 38.1 61.1 44.1 41.6 57.8 24 mo 39.4 31.8 56.8 37.1 34.6 51.3 Post-index GI bleed, % 17.2 23.4 3.4 17.3 19.4 5.9

Background Cirrhosis is associated with significant healthcare utilization, yet data about in-hospital decompensations remain sparse. Additionally, the impact of liver transplant candidacy status on resuscitation and outcomes is largely unknown. Aims We aimed to evaluate the characteristics of resuscitation events for patients with cirrhosis with acute decompensation, analyzing liver transplant candidacy and intensive care unit (ICU) transfer parameters. Methods Retrospective single-center review of adult patients with liver cirrhosis who had a rapid response team (RRT) activation during hospitalization and no prior liver transplantation. Results Patients with cirrhosis who were liver transplant candidates were more likely to be younger ( p = .003), have a higher serum total bilirubin ( p = .015), higher INR ( p < .001), and higher MELD 3.0 ( p = .006). There was no significant difference in ICU transfer ( p = .170) after RRT activation. Liver transplant candidates had a lower 30- and 60-day mortality ( p = .008, p = .014) and were less likely to have a code status discussion after decompensation ( p = .001). Lower serum albumin was associated with ICU transfer ( p = .001). Patients who transferred to the ICU were more likely to have a code status discussion within 24 h after RRT ( p = .011) without significant difference in 30- or 60-day mortality ( p = .059, p = .277). Conclusions Liver transplant candidacy in patients with cirrhosis with acute decompensation is not clearly correlated with ICU transfer. Liver transplant candidates are more likely to be younger, have higher MELD 3.0 scores, less likely to have code status discussed after RRT, and have lower 30- and 60-day mortality rates. Patients who transfer to the ICU are more likely to have a code status discussion without any significant difference in 30- or 60-day mortality.

Background: Previous data suggested that the outcomes for liver-alone transplant recipients following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion were comparable to those without TIPS. This study investigates the association between TIPS and outcomes among simultaneous liver–kidney (SLK) recipients in the United States. Methods: Utilizing the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR) standard analysis file from 2003 to 2022, we examined 9717 adult SLK recipients, among whom 858 had undergone TIPS before transplantation. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to assess recipient and death-censored liver and kidney graft survival. Mixed-effects Cox proportional hazard models were employed to analyze the association between TIPS and the outcomes of interest, where the transplant center was treated as a random effect. The models were adjusted for recipient age, sex, MELD score, diabetes, duration of listing, induction, steroid maintenance, hepatitis C status, donor age, donor sex, cold ischemia time, local vs. shipped organs, and allocation era. Results: Overall, the two groups were comparable, with minor differences. Notably, the median liver waiting time was significantly longer in the TIPS group compared to the non-TIPS group (4.1 vs. 2 months, p < 0.001). One-year rejection rates for liver and kidney allografts did not differ significantly between groups. Univariable Cox regression analyses demonstrated no association between TIPS and worse outcomes for recipient, liver, and kidney survival (p = 0.65, p = 0.22, and p = 0.54, respectively). TIPS did not emerge as a predictor of recipient or death-censored liver or kidney graft survival in multivariable models. Conclusion: In this extensive national cohort of SLK transplant recipients, pre-transplant TIPS was not linked to adverse outcomes for recipients or their allografts.

Background: The Sepsis-3 guidelines have incorporated serum lactate levels of >2 mmol/L in septic shock definition to account for higher observed mortality. Further evidence is needed to support this threshold in cirrhosis, as well as target mean arterial pressure (MAP) during resuscitation. Methods: This observational cohort study investigated the association between initial serum lactate and resuscitation MAP levels on in-hospital mortality in patients with and without cirrhosis. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit for the treatment of septic shock between 2006 and 2021 in a quaternary academic center were included. Patients with cirrhosis documented on imaging and International Classification of Disease codes (n=595) were compared to patients without cirrhosis (n=575). The association of intensive care unit admission lactate levels and median 2-hour MAP with in-hospital mortality and the need for continuous renal replacement therapy was assessed. The association between median 24-hour MAP and in-hospital mortality was analyzed post hoc. Results: Within the cirrhosis group, admission lactate levels of 2–4 and >4 mmol/L were associated with increased in-hospital mortality compared to lactate <2 mmol/L [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.69, CI: 1.03–2.81, aOR: 4.02, CI: 2.53–6.52]. Median 24-hour MAP 60–65 and <60 mm Hg were also associated with increased in-hospital mortality compared with MAP >65 mm Hg (aOR: 2.84, CI: 1.64–4.92 and aOR: 7.34, CI: 3.17–18.76). In the noncirrhosis group, associations with in-hospital mortality were weaker for lactate 2–4 and >4 mmol/L (aOR: 1.32, CI: 0.77–2.27 and aOR: 2.25, CI: 1.40–3.67) and median 24-hour MAP 60–65 and <60 mm Hg (aOR: 1.70, CI: 0.65–4.14 and aOR: 4.41, CI: 0.79–29.38). Conclusions: These findings support utilizing lactate >2 mmol/L in the definition of septic shock, as well as a target MAP of >65 mm Hg during resuscitation in patients with cirrhosis.