Moeckli, Beat

Outcomes of kidney-alone transplantation (KAT) in former simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant candidates after liver waitlist delisting are not well defined. Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data, we identified adult recipients who underwent KAT between 2005 and 2025 after prior SLK listing (RLD-KAT), which was matched 1:5 to primary KAT recipients without liver disease by age, transplant year, and diabetes status. Patient and graft survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. We identified 163 RLD-KAT recipients matched to 815 controls. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated lower patient survival in RLD-KAT (p = 0.020), whereas death-censored and overall graft survival were similar (p > 0.05). In multivariable models, death-censored graft survival (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.51–1.53), overall graft survival (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.73–1.36), and patient survival (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.76–1.5) did not differ significantly. Six RLD-KAT recipients (3.7%) subsequently underwent liver transplantation. Kidney-alone transplantation in prior SLK candidates was associated with acceptable patient and graft outcomes and a low incidence of subsequent liver transplantation.

Hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation (LT) are curative-intent treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients without cirrhosis are typically analyzed as a single group, obscuring potentially important differences between those with histologically normal liver and those with non-cirrhotic parenchymal disease. We aimed to characterize long-term outcomes following HR stratified by underlying parenchymal quality, with a contemporary LT cohort as an external benchmark. Retrospective cohort study of 662 adults undergoing curative-intent surgery for HCC at 2 tertiary centers (2010–2024). Resection patients (n=380) were stratified by non-tumor parenchymal histology into HR-Normal (n=84), HR-Diseased non-cirrhotic (n=159), and HR-Cirrhotic (n=137). A total of 282 LT recipients served as an external reference but were not entered into comparative models. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression, and recurrence by Fine–Gray competing-risks regression. Ninety-day mortality was low across resection strata (1.2%–3.2%). OS differed significantly across parenchymal groups (log-rank p =0.01), driven by superior outcomes in HR-Normal patients compared with both HR-Cirrhotic ( p =0.008) and HR-Diseased ( p =0.005). HR-Cirrhotic and HR-Diseased did not differ ( p =0.97). Five-year OS was 74.4%, 59.8% and 57.2%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, both cirrhosis (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.16–3.54, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic parenchyma (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.21–3.43, p =0.008) independently predicted death versus normal liver. Fine–Gray analysis confirmed higher recurrence risk in cirrhotic (sHR 2.09, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic (sHR 1.80, p =0.04) groups. The LT benchmark cohort achieved a 5-year OS of 82.4%. Histologically normal liver identifies a distinct HR subgroup with favorable oncologic outcomes. The conventional cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic dichotomy underestimates the prognostic impact of underlying parenchymal disease.

Objective: This study aims at establishing benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following open major anatomic hepatectomy for liver tumors of all dignities. Background: Outcomes after open major hepatectomies vary widely lacking reference values for comparisons among centers, indications, types of resections, and minimally invasive procedures. Methods: A standard benchmark methodology was used covering consecutive patients, who underwent open major anatomic hepatectomy from 44 high-volume liver centers from 5 continents over a 5-year period (2016–2020). Benchmark cases were low-risk non-cirrhotic patients without significant comorbidities treated in high-volume centers (≥30 major liver resections/year). Benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median values of all centers. Minimum follow-up period was 1 year in each patient. Results: Of 8044 patients, 2908 (36%) qualified as benchmark (low-risk) cases. Benchmark cutoffs for all indications include R0 resection ≥78%; liver failure (grade B/C) ≤10%; bile leak (grade B/C) ≤18%; complications ≥grade 3 and CCI ® ≤46% and ≤9 at 3 months, respectively. Benchmark values differed significantly between malignant and benign conditions so that reference values must be adjusted accordingly. Extended right hepatectomy (H1, 4-8 or H4-8) disclosed a higher cutoff for liver failure, while extended left (H1-5,8 or H2-5,8) were associated with higher cutoffs for bile leaks, but had superior oncologic outcomes, when compared to formal left hepatectomy (H1-4 or H2-4). The minimal follow-up for a conclusive outcome evaluation following open anatomic major resection must be 3 months. Conclusion: These new benchmark cutoffs for open major hepatectomy provide a powerful tool to convincingly evaluate other approaches including parenchymal-sparing procedures, laparoscopic/robotic approaches, and alternative treatments, such as ablation therapy, irradiation, or novel chemotherapy regimens.