Li, Zhihao

Hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation (LT) are curative-intent treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients without cirrhosis are typically analyzed as a single group, obscuring potentially important differences between those with histologically normal liver and those with non-cirrhotic parenchymal disease. We aimed to characterize long-term outcomes following HR stratified by underlying parenchymal quality, with a contemporary LT cohort as an external benchmark. Retrospective cohort study of 662 adults undergoing curative-intent surgery for HCC at 2 tertiary centers (2010–2024). Resection patients (n=380) were stratified by non-tumor parenchymal histology into HR-Normal (n=84), HR-Diseased non-cirrhotic (n=159), and HR-Cirrhotic (n=137). A total of 282 LT recipients served as an external reference but were not entered into comparative models. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression, and recurrence by Fine–Gray competing-risks regression. Ninety-day mortality was low across resection strata (1.2%–3.2%). OS differed significantly across parenchymal groups (log-rank p =0.01), driven by superior outcomes in HR-Normal patients compared with both HR-Cirrhotic ( p =0.008) and HR-Diseased ( p =0.005). HR-Cirrhotic and HR-Diseased did not differ ( p =0.97). Five-year OS was 74.4%, 59.8% and 57.2%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, both cirrhosis (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.16–3.54, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic parenchyma (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.21–3.43, p =0.008) independently predicted death versus normal liver. Fine–Gray analysis confirmed higher recurrence risk in cirrhotic (sHR 2.09, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic (sHR 1.80, p =0.04) groups. The LT benchmark cohort achieved a 5-year OS of 82.4%. Histologically normal liver identifies a distinct HR subgroup with favorable oncologic outcomes. The conventional cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic dichotomy underestimates the prognostic impact of underlying parenchymal disease.

Pharmacological plasminogen reduction enhanced liver regeneration experimentally and clinically. siRNA-induced plasminogen deficiency promoted hepatocyte proliferation after partial hepatectomy in mice, contrasting genetic deficiency models. In the HeLiX trial, tranexamic acid reduced post-hepatectomy liver failure odds, suggesting a novel therapeutic strategy.

Background. The adoption of technical variant grafts has expanded the donor pool for pediatric liver transplantation, but it also poses a risk of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). This study evaluated risk and prognostic factors of PVT in children undergoing liver transplantation with technical variant grafts. Methods. A total of 3137 pediatric patients from 19 centers were included: 470 received split/reduced deceased donor grafts and 2667 received living donor grafts. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors, whereas time-dependent Cox models were used to assess the impact on survival. Results. PVT occurred in 102 patients (3.3%) and was associated with increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-7.25; P = 0.027) and graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio, 9.97; 95% CI, 4.90-20.3; P < 0.001). Risk factors included younger age, lower weight, higher Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease score, longer cold ischemia and operation times, higher graft-to-recipient weight ratio, increased red blood cell transfusions, and biliary atresia. After adjusting for center, lower weight (odds ratio, 0.84 per kg; 95% CI, 0.71-1.00; P = 0.047) and biliary atresia (odds ratio, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.10-5.00; P = 0.027) remained predictors. Five-year patient (88.4% versus 93.1%) and graft survival (82.7% versus 96.3%) were significantly inferior in patients with PVT. Conclusions. Low-weight children with biliary atresia constituted a high-risk group, highlighting the necessity for early detection and management.

Background and Aims: Liver transplantation has evolved from a treatment restricted to patients with end-stage liver disease to a therapeutic option for selected patients with primary and metastatic liver malignancies. This review explores the rapidly expanding field of transplant oncology, highlighting its role in hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal liver metastasis, neuroendocrine liver metastasis, and intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Emphasis is placed on strategies to broaden eligibility, optimize donor organ use, and improve oncologic outcomes. Approach and Results: We synthesized current evidence from clinical series, registries, and experimental protocols to evaluate patient selection criteria, outcomes, and peri-transplant management. Key topics include downstaging approaches to meet transplant criteria, such as locoregional therapies and systemic regimens, and their prognostic implications. Advances in donor utilization have been analyzed for their capacity to expand the graft pool. In addition, the review addresses the integration of oncologic principles into immunosuppression regimens, balancing graft protection with cancer control. Collectively, the reported studies demonstrate improved survival and reduced recurrence when stringent selection and multimodal therapy were applied. Conclusions: Transplant oncology reshapes the therapeutic landscape of liver malignancies, with growing evidence supporting liver transplantation in carefully selected patients beyond traditional indications. Optimized downstaging, innovative donor strategies, and tailored immunosuppression are pivotal for safe expansion. Continued collaboration between the transplant and oncology disciplines, along with prospective trials, is essential to further define standardized protocols and solidify transplantation as a cornerstone of multidisciplinary cancer care.

Early allograft failure (EAF) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains a clinical challenge. Existing prediction models developed for deceased donor transplantation poorly apply to LDLT due to distinct surgical and physiological factors. This study identifies clinical determinants of EAF and develops an LDLT-specific prediction model. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study from 17 high-volume LDLT centers (January 2016–December 2020) with external validation at a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia (January 2015–December 2022). The primary outcome was EAF (graft loss or patient death ≤90 d). Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression identified preoperative/intraoperative risk factors. The EAGLE-LDLT model was constructed using postoperative laboratory values. Performance was compared against established models (EAD, MEAF, A2ALL) using ROC analysis and decision curve analysis. The development cohort included 2944 adult LDLT recipients (67.7% male; median age 55 y; median MELD 14) with a 5.5% EAF rate. External validation included 1020 recipients (median MELD 21, 6.7% EAF). Independent risk factors for EAF were MELD (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04–1.08), donor BMI (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.10), portal vein thrombosis (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.13–2.63), and hepaticojejunostomy (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.06–2.36). The EAGLE-LDLT model incorporating peak ALT (>468 U/L), peak INR (>1.9), and bilirubin (>3.5 mg/dL) and INR (>1.3) at POD7, demonstrated superior discrimination (AUC=0.81) compared with MEAF (AUC=0.77, p =0.004), EAD (AUC=0.67, p <0.001), and A2ALL (AUC=0.65, p <0.001). EAGLE-LDLT achieved balanced sensitivity (75.0%) and specificity (73.7%), effectively stratifying patients into high-risk (15% of patients; 40.4% EAF incidence) and low-risk groups. Preoperative and intraoperative clinical factors predict EAF in LDLT. The EAGLE-LDLT model accurately identifies LDLT recipients at the highest risk for EAF postoperatively.

Objective: To establish international benchmark values for relevant outcome parameters in robotic Whipple. Summary Background Data: For safe adoption of surgical innovation, robust quality control is essential. Benchmarking is a validated tool for assessing surgical performance. Recent international consensus identified establishing benchmark values for robotic Whipple as top priority. Methods: We analyzed consecutive patients undergoing robotic Whipple between 2020-2023 with a minimum one-year follow-up. Reference centers were required to perform ≥15 cases/year, be scientifically active in the field, and maintain a prospective database. Benchmark criteria included benign or resectable malignant disease without neoadjuvant therapy, arterial resection, major co-morbidities, or significant previous abdominal surgery. Benchmarks were established for 13 outcome parameters. Result: The benchmark cohort comprised 418 patients from 12 centers across four continents. Benchmark values were: conversion rate ≤4.3%, transfusion rate ≤2.1%, 6-month mortality ≤2.2%, major complications ≤23.2%, and CCI® ≤20.9. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (grade B/C) and hemorrhage (grade B/C) rates were ≤23.6% and ≤12.7%, respectively. For pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n=123), the benchmark for lymph node yield was ≥20. Higher surgical difficulty was associated with increased overall postoperative morbidity (R 2 =0.38, P =0.019), higher center caseload with reduced pancreas-specific complications (R 2 =0.28, P =0.044). Independent POPF predictors included duct diameter ≤4 mm (OR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.82), anticoagulation (OR 2.45, 95% CI: 1.47, 3.99), and indication other than PDAC (OR 2.33, 95% CI: 1.68, 3.27). Conclusions: This study establishes the first international benchmarks for robotic Whipple, demonstrating oncologic outcomes and morbidity comparable to open surgery with the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

Importance Total pancreatectomy (TP) is indicated for advanced pancreatic cancer or multifocal tumors. Furthermore, TP may be performed to avoid the risk of pancreatic fistula in selected patients to improve the perioperative risk profile. Objective To define reference values for TP based on a low-risk cohort treated at expert centers. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter study analyzed outcomes from patients undergoing primary TP for malignant or benign lesions from 25 international expert centers from January 2017 to November 2023. Low-risk patients undergoing TP (LR-TP) were without vascular resections or significant comorbidities. Exposures TP. Main Outcomes and Measures Twenty reference values were derived from the 75th or the 25th percentile of the median values of all centers. Outcomes of LR-TP were compared with a cohort of TP with vascular resection, TP due to high-risk pancreatic anastomosis, and the benchmark values for low-risk pancreatoduodenectomy. Results Of 994 patients, 333 (33.5%; median [IQR] age, 66 [58-72] years; 171 male [51.4%]) qualified as the LR-TP cohort. Reference values included blood loss (≤1000 mL), major complications (≤37%), 3-month postoperative mortality (&amp;lt;6%), and retrieved lymph nodes (≥29). Compared with TP with vascular resections, reference cutoffs were not met for major complications (51% vs LR-TP ≤37%) and 90-day mortality (11% vs LR-TP ≤6%). For TP due to high-risk anastomosis, failure to rescue rate (38% vs ≤6%) and 90-day mortality (11% vs LR-TP ≤6%) were not met. Compared with pancreatoduodenectomy, reference values for postoperative mortality were 3 times higher for LR-TP (≤2% vs ≤6%) and less for resected lymph nodes (≥16 vs ≥29). Conclusions and Relevance This case-control study provided global reference values for TP, indicating significantly higher postoperative morbidity and mortality compared with pancreatoduodenectomy. Perioperative morbidity of TP was especially increased in patients with vascular resections. These reference values can serve for quality control of pancreatic surgery.

Background. Delayed graft function (DGF) in deceased-donor kidney transplantation increases morbidity, prolongs hospitalization, and increases healthcare costs. Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce DGF; however, large-scale real-world data remain limited. Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (2014–2024), including adult dialysis-dependent recipients of deceased-donor kidneys preserved using either static cold storage (SCS) or HMP. The primary outcome was DGF, defined as dialysis requirement within 7 d posttransplant. A matched-pairs analysis was conducted using kidneys from the same donor. Results. The overall cohort included 59 859 recipients (46.8% SCS, 53.2% HMP), with 2208 matched pairs identified. In the overall cohort, HMP grafts had longer cold ischemia times and a higher kidney donor risk index. They were more frequently obtained from older and donation after circulatory death donors. Although the overall DGF incidence was higher with HMP (34.4% versus 30.9%, P < 0.001), matched-pairs analysis revealed significantly lower DGF rates with HMP (29.8% versus 36.1%, P < 0.001). Adjusted analyses identified HMP as protective against DGF (overall cohort odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.78; paired cohort OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93). Additional modifiable risk factors include prolonged cold ischemia time, higher recipient body mass index, and longer dialysis duration. Conclusions. This real-world study demonstrates that HMP is associated with a significant reduction in DGF risk in kidney transplantation compared with SCS, supporting its broader implementation and targeted management of modifiable risk factors.