Ilmer, Matthias

Hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation (LT) are curative-intent treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients without cirrhosis are typically analyzed as a single group, obscuring potentially important differences between those with histologically normal liver and those with non-cirrhotic parenchymal disease. We aimed to characterize long-term outcomes following HR stratified by underlying parenchymal quality, with a contemporary LT cohort as an external benchmark. Retrospective cohort study of 662 adults undergoing curative-intent surgery for HCC at 2 tertiary centers (2010–2024). Resection patients (n=380) were stratified by non-tumor parenchymal histology into HR-Normal (n=84), HR-Diseased non-cirrhotic (n=159), and HR-Cirrhotic (n=137). A total of 282 LT recipients served as an external reference but were not entered into comparative models. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier and multivariable Cox regression, and recurrence by Fine–Gray competing-risks regression. Ninety-day mortality was low across resection strata (1.2%–3.2%). OS differed significantly across parenchymal groups (log-rank p =0.01), driven by superior outcomes in HR-Normal patients compared with both HR-Cirrhotic ( p =0.008) and HR-Diseased ( p =0.005). HR-Cirrhotic and HR-Diseased did not differ ( p =0.97). Five-year OS was 74.4%, 59.8% and 57.2%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, both cirrhosis (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.16–3.54, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic parenchyma (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.21–3.43, p =0.008) independently predicted death versus normal liver. Fine–Gray analysis confirmed higher recurrence risk in cirrhotic (sHR 2.09, p =0.01) and diseased non-cirrhotic (sHR 1.80, p =0.04) groups. The LT benchmark cohort achieved a 5-year OS of 82.4%. Histologically normal liver identifies a distinct HR subgroup with favorable oncologic outcomes. The conventional cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic dichotomy underestimates the prognostic impact of underlying parenchymal disease.

Background. Liver transplantation (LT) remains the most effective treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), offering 5-y recurrence rates as low as 15%. Recent advances in organ preservation, particularly hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE), have demonstrated the ability to attenuate ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI). However, whether HOPE can reduce HCC recurrence rates by mitigating IRI remains an open question. In this study, we aimed to compare oncological outcomes after LT for HCC with and without the use of HOPE. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 137 patients who underwent LT for HCC with grafts from donation after brain death. Risk factors for HCC recurrence were analyzed using Cox regression. To assess the impact of HOPE on oncological outcomes, propensity score matching was used to adjust for baseline differences. Results. Cox regression identified Milan Criteria status as a significant predictor of HCC recurrence. Among the 32 patients in the HOPE group, no HCC recurrence was observed over a median follow-up of 2.11 y. In contrast, within the control group of 105 patients, 8 (7.6%) experienced recurrence within 2 y posttransplantation. Although this translated into a significant difference in time-to-recurrence after propensity score matching, recurrence-free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that HOPE treatment of donation after brain death liver grafts may reduce early HCC recurrence after LT. Although only nonsignificant trends were observed in recurrence-free survival and overall survival within the first 2 y posttransplant, these results underscore the potential of HOPE to influence oncological outcomes. Long-term follow-up, prospective randomized controlled trials, and basic research are warranted to further elucidate the role of HOPE and IRI.

ABSTRACT Background Living kidney donation is a crucial option for addressing the global organ shortage and providing kidney transplantation for patients suffering from end‐stage kidney disease. Ensuring donor safety necessitates a comprehensive preoperative assessment of kidney anatomy and function. This study evaluates the relationship between kidney volumes derived from deep learning‐based MRI volumetry, intraoperative kidney volume measurements, split renal function measured by renal scintigraphy, and post‐donation eGFR. Deep learning‐based MRI volumetry is hypothesized to be a reliable method with good correlation. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 178 living kidney donors. Deep learning MRI volumetry‐based kidney volumes were compared with intraoperative volumes of the explanted donor kidneys obtained using the water displacement method. Additionally, MRI‐based volume ratios were compared with scintigraphy‐based split renal function ratios to determine their ability to predict the kidney with poorer renal function and post‐donation eGFR. Results Deep learning‐based MRI volumetry strongly correlated with intraoperatively measured kidney volumes (Pearson's correlation; r = 0.7671; p < 0.0001), confirming its precision in volume estimation. Although MRI‐based kidney volume ratios demonstrated only a moderate correlation with scintigraphy‐based split renal function ratios ( r = 0.4798), MRI volumetry correlated with 1‐year post‐donation eGFR. It tended to be better than renal scintigraphy ( r = 0.6829 versus r = 0.6191). Conclusion Deep learning‐based MRI volumetry is a reliable, non‐invasive tool for estimating kidney volumes in living donors, offering a radiation‐free alternative for preoperative assessment. While it differs from renal scintigraphy in evaluating split renal function ratios, its correlation with post‐donation eGFR tends to be better, supporting its potential role in living kidney donor assessment.

Objectives: Every year, around 300 million surgeries are conducted worldwide, with an estimated 4.2 million deaths occurring within 30 days after surgery. Adequate patient education is crucial, but often falls short due to the stress patients experience before surgery. Large language models (LLMs) can significantly enhance this process by delivering thorough information and addressing patient concerns that might otherwise go unnoticed. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer-4o’s audio-based responses to frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding six general surgical procedures. Three experienced surgeons and two senior residents formulated seven general and three procedure-specific FAQs for both preoperative and postoperative situations, covering six surgical scenarios (major: pancreatic head resection, rectal resection, total gastrectomy; minor: cholecystectomy, Lichtenstein procedure, hemithyroidectomy). In total, 120 audio responses were generated, transcribed, and assessed by 11 surgeons from 6 different German university hospitals. Results: ChatGPT-4o demonstrated strong performance, achieving an average score of 4.12/5 for accuracy, 4.46/5 for relevance, and 0.22/5 for potential harm across 120 questions. Postoperative responses surpassed preoperative ones in both accuracy and relevance, while also exhibiting lower potential for harm. Additionally, responses related to minor surgeries were minimal, but significantly more accurate compared to those for major surgeries. Conclusions: This study underscores GPT-4o’s potential to enhance patient education both before and after surgery by delivering accurate and relevant responses to FAQs about various surgical procedures. Responses regarding the postoperative course proved to be more accurate and less harmful than those addressing preoperative ones. Although a few responses carried moderate risks, the overall performance was robust, indicating GPT-4o’s value in patient education. The study suggests the development of hospital-specific applications or the integration of GPT-4o into interactive robotic systems to provide patients with reliable, immediate answers, thereby improving patient satisfaction and informed decision-making.