Cheung, Ramsey

SummaryBackgroundRacial and ethnic disparities exist for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) survival.AimTo evaluate the impact of HCV treatment on such disparities.MethodsIn a retrospective cohort study, we analysed 6069 patients with HCV‐related HCC (54.2% Asian, 30.1% White, 8.5% Black, and 7.3% Hispanic) from centres in the United States and Asia.ResultsThe mean age was 61, 60, 59 and 68, respectively, for White, Black, Hispanic and Asian patients. Black patients were most likely to have Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage D, vascular invasion and distant metastasis (23% vs. 5%–15%, 20% vs. 10%–17% and 10% vs. 5%–7%, respectively; all p < 0.0001). Treatment rate with direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAA) was 35.9% for Asian, 34.9% for White, 30.3% for Hispanic (30.3%), and 18.7% for Black patients (p < 0.0001). Among those untreated or without sustained virologic response (SVR), 10‐year survival rates were 35.4, 27.5, 19.3 and 14.0, respectively, for Asian, Hispanic, White and Black patients (p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences among those with SVR (p = 0.44). On multivariable analysis adjusted for relevant confounders, there was no statistically significant association between survival and being Hispanic (aHR: 0.68, p = 0.26) or Black (aHR: 1.18, p = 0.60) versus White. There was a significant association between being Asian American and survival (aHR: 0.24, p = 0.001; non‐U.S. Asian: aHR: 0.66, p = 0.05), and for SVR (aHR: 0.30, p < 0.0001).ConclusionDAA treatment rates were suboptimal. Racial and ethnic disparities resolved with HCV cure. Early diagnosis and improved access to HCV treatment is needed for all patients with HCV infection.

Abstract Background & Aims The epidemiology of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection differs between Asians and non‐Asians, but little is known regarding the effect of ethnicity on outcomes of HBV‐related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aim to characterize the presentation and survival outcomes in Asian and non‐Asian patients with HBV‐related HCC. Methods We analyzed the baseline characteristics and long‐term survival of 613 Asian and 410 non‐Asian patients with HBV‐related HCC from three US and one Spanish centre. Results Overall, non‐Asian patients were more likely to have HIV or hepatitis C co‐infection, cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease and advanced BCLC stage (all P ≤ .04). Compared with Asians, non‐Asians were more likely to be listed for transplantation ( P < .0001) and undergo HCC treatment with curative intent ( P = .003). Propensity‐score matching on HCC diagnosis year, gender and age was performed to balance the two groups for survival analysis and yielded 370 pairs of patients. There was no significant difference in survival overall ( P = .43) and among patients with cirrhosis ( P = .57). Among patients without cirrhosis, non‐Asians had poorer 5‐year survival compared with Asians (37.6% vs 53.7%, P = .01), and was associated with poorer survival after adjusting for age, gender, diabetes, alcohol, co‐infections, diagnosis date, antiviral therapy, BCLC stage and HCC treatment (adjusted HR 2.01 [95% CI 1.07‐3.74], P = .03). Conclusion Among HBV‐related HCC patients, non‐Asians presented with more advanced BCLC stage compared to Asians. Non‐Asian ethnicity was independently associated with twice the risk of mortality among patients without cirrhosis, but not among those with cirrhosis. Additional studies are needed to clarify this disparity.

BACKGROUND: African-Americans (AA) have a higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and lower survival. We characterized survival rates and clinical features associated with survival in AA vs. Caucasians with HCC over the past two decades. METHODS: HCC patients from three US medical centers were matched by year of diagnosis (1991–2016): AA ( n = 578)/Caucasian ( n = 578) and placed in one of two groups—HCC diagnosed prior to 2010 or 2010 and after. Data were obtained from chart review and the National Death Index. Multivariate and survival analysis controlling for key predictors were conducted. RESULTS: Prior to 2010, there was no difference in survival between Caucasians and AA ( p = 0.61). After 2010, AA patients had poorer survival compared to Caucasians (35% vs. 44%, respectively, p = 0.044). Over time, survival improved for Caucasians (32% before 2010 vs. 44% after 2010, p = 0.003), but not AA (36% vs. 35%, p = 0.50). AA on presentation (in the after 2010 cohort) were more likely to have BCLC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer) stage C (24% vs. 15%, p = 0.010) and less likely to receive treatment (85% vs. 93%, p = 0.002) compared to matched Caucasians. BCLC beyond stage A (aHR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.26–2.43, p = 0.001) and child’s class C (aHR 2.05, 95% CI: 1.23–3.41, p = 0.006) were the strongest predictors of mortality, while race was not. CONCLUSIONS: African-Americans presented with more advanced HCC and had poorer survival compared to Caucasians after 2010. Tumor stage was an independent predictor of mortality, but ethnicity was not. Further efforts are needed to improve early HCC diagnosis for AA.