Citations

Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM), commonly referred to as 3D printing, has been broadly used in the field of medical imaging and radiotherapy. In medical imaging applications, patient‐specific anatomic models have been used to aid in preoperative planning, patient communication, imaging technique assessment and optimization, and medical education. Within the field of radiation therapy, 3D printing finds significance in fabricating patient‐specific immobilization devices, custom bolus devices, anthropomorphic phantoms, brachytherapy devices, and electron therapy devices. Consistent with standard medical physics practices there is a need to establish quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) protocols, tolerances, and testing frequencies. The diversity of 3D printing technologies and products poses challenges for medical adoption and thus requires guidelines in workflow standardization and establishment of testing procedures. This report is centered around providing comprehensive vendor‐neutral implementation guidelines and recommendations for QC and QA processes. The scope of this report encompasses diverse requirements within medical imaging and radiation therapy settings, serving both clinical and research purposes. Brief overview of 3D printing technology, common materials, and potential clinical applications is provided. QA team, infrastructure, measurement techniques and challenges are discussed. QA processes for each step in 3D printing are discussed in great detail and baseline and action limits are recommended. This report also touched on regulatory considerations. Key recommendations are summarized at the end of the report.

Abstract Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) directly detects individual photons and measures their energies, enabling the acquisition of multi-energy data from a single x-ray source with higher spatial resolution, thereby allowing visualization of smaller arteries and veins and other important imaging features not seen at conventional CT. It also substantially reduces calcium and stent blooming artifacts. Appropriate patient selection and task-based optimization of acquisition, reconstruction, and interpretation are critical to realize these benefits. Vascular imaging examinations for which early evidence shows that PCD-CT demonstrates higher diagnostic performance compared to conventional CT include coronary CT angiography (CTA) for evaluation of partially calcified plaques or stents, peripheral runoff CTA, detection of cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistulas, and head CTA for evaluation of small intracranial vessels and aneurysms. Current limitations include excessive image noise with the sharpest reconstruction kernels and challenges when adapting conventional CT protocols (eg, requiring sharper kernels, thinner slices, higher matrices, tailored scan modes) to achieve time-efficient image reconstruction and hanging protocols. New solutions and directions will include deep-learning-based image noise reduction, improved spectral separation, strategic triage of specific patient populations to PCD-CT systems, and subspecialty clinical practice recommendations for this new technology.

Abstract Background Radiomics extracts quantitative imaging features from computed tomography (CT) data for clinical decision‐making. However, variations in acquisition parameters—particularly x‐ray tube voltage (kV)—introduce non‐biological variability in attenuation values, limiting the reproducibility of radiomic features across scanners, protocols, and institutions. Purpose To develop and evaluate a CT dAta harmoNiZAtion framework based on deep learNed vIrTual monoEnergetic imaging (TANZANITE), which leverages the keV flexibility of virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) to enable cross‐kV scan translation and radiomics harmonization. Methods TANZANITE is a model hub consisting of multiple pre‐trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs), each designed to translate VMIs from 1 keV level to another. Phantom‐based calibration was first used to determine energy‐equivalent (Eff_E) keV levels corresponding to each tube potential (e.g., Eff_E(A) keV for source kV and Eff_E(B) keV for target kV). A CNN trained using 69 120 patches from seven patient cases to map VMIs from Eff_E(A) to Eff_E(B) was selected from the TANZANITE hub and applied directly to clinical CT images acquired at the source kV. This harmonized the images to match the attenuation characteristics of the target kV setting. Evaluation was conducted on independent dual‐energy CT datasets acquired at 100/Sn150 kV. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the kidney, liver, and spine to assess CT number consistency and radiomic feature reproducibility. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated across 93 non‐shape radiomic features. Results After TANZANITE processing with 100 kV images, CT numbers in evaluated organs closely matched the Sn150 kV reference values in four testing patient cases. For example, mean kidney CT numbers changed from 320 HU (100 kV) to 156 HU (TANZANITE), approximating the Sn150 kV value of 160 HU. Similar changes were observed in the liver (157–105 HU vs. 104 HU reference) and spine (45–22 HU vs. 19 HU reference). Radiomic reproducibility improved substantially across organs: mean CCC increased from 0.590 to 0.995 in the liver, 0.300 to 0.970 in the kidney, and 0.630 to 0.968 in the spine. Post‐TANZANITE, over 98% of features exceeded the stability threshold (CCC ≥ 0.900) in all three representative organs. Conclusion TANZANITE provides a flexible, image‐domain harmonization framework by learning the keV‐to‐keV translation in the VMI domain and applying pre‐trained CNNs to clinical kV images. It improves CT number consistency and organ‐specific radiomic reproducibility without requiring raw projection data or scanner‐specific training. This approach supports consistent quantitative imaging across multiple‐kV acquisition protocols, enhancing radiomics reliability in clinical settings.

A deep learning–based neural network enabled virtual monoenergetic imaging at energy-integrating detector CT, reduced blooming artifacts, and improved stenosis assessment in heavily calcified coronary plaques, with performance comparable to ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector CT.

Purpose Two-dimensional (2D) X-ray imaging is routinely used in radiotherapy for patient alignment but offers limited tumor visibility due to anatomical overlap. We propose a novel technique, prior information-based subtraction (PIBS) radiography, to enhance tumor visualization on 2D X-ray and facilitate more accurate patient alignment. Materials and methods PIBS X-ray improves tumor visualization on 2D X-ray by subtracting signal contributions from non-essential (NE) tissues, which can be obtained from the planning CT (prior information). To demonstrate the feasibility, we acquired four CT scans using a thorax phantom with a spherical lung target, representing the planning CT and three treatment-day CTs capturing the patient’s positions with the lung tumor at three different locations, respectively. NE tissues, defined as structures outside the thoracic cavity, were segmented from the planning CT. On treatment days, we aligned NE tissues based on bony structures via 3D/3D or 2D/2D registration and applied the calculated shifts so the patient’s position matched that in the planning CT. To simulate 2D X-rays, digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were generated from the planning CT of NE tissues and aligned with treatment-day CTs. Subtracting NE tissue contributions from conventional 2D X-ray yielded PIBS X-ray. PIBS X-ray images were compared with conventional X-ray images to assess tumor visibility. Results PIBS X-ray provided better tumor visualization across all projection angles and all tumor locations compared to conventional X-ray, even for certain cases where the tumor was completely indistinguishable on conventional X-ray. Both 3D/3D and 2D/2D registrations produced acceptable alignment of NE tissues because of the clear visibility of bony structures. Conclusion PIBS X-ray is a promising technique to enhance tumor visualization on 2D X-ray. In this study, we demonstrated its potential in improving radiotherapy on-board imaging using a thorax phantom. In the future, we will explore strategies for integrating this technology into clinical workflows and evaluate its clinical benefits in radiotherapy patients.

Cellular and molecular heterogeneity in the liver has been increasingly recognized to drive liver fibrosis progression, but the particular events that occur initially in response to liver injury and trigger immune cell recruitment remain unclear. Here, we identify epigenetically aberrant liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) as key players in this process. Mechanistically, the epigenetic readers like bromodomain-containing protein 4–dependent (BRD4-dependent) super enhancers (SEs) activate proinflammatory genes, including promyelocytic leukemia (PML). The PML protein, in turn, binds BRD4 and amplifies proinflammatory angiocrine signaling through phase separation–dependent SE activation via PML/BRD4 condensate formation. In mouse models, LSEC-specific depletion of the PML/BRD4 complex mitigates liver inflammation and fibrosis. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals that epigenetically aberrant LSECs exhibit a reprogrammed proinflammatory angiocrine landscape in mouse fibrotic livers. TIMP1 + LSECs promote the recruitment of CD63 + monocyte–derived macrophages (MoMFs) during liver fibrosis progression. Thereby, PML/BRD4 in LSECs governs inflammatory immune cell recruitment in liver fibrosis. Pharmacological BRD4 inhibition or epigenetic PML-SE repression alleviates liver inflammation and fibrosis. In conclusion, PML/BRD4-mediated SE activation via phase separation drives proinflammatory angiocrine signaling in LSECs, initiating the inflammatory cascade and subsequent immune cell recruitment during liver fibrosis.

Objective: To examine the association of extent of otosclerotic plaque using high-resolution photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) with hearing and surgical outcomes. Study design: Historical cohort. Setting: Large academic center. Patients: Patients with otosclerosis who completed PCCT imaging at time of initial evaluation. Interventions: Observation, surgery. Main outcome measures: Audiometric data. Results: A total of 53 ears were eligible for study. The mean age at PCCT was 51 years (SD: 14). The mean extent of oval window otosclerotic plaque measured in radial degrees was 112 (SD: 65) and the mean otosclerotic depth was 1.6mm (SD: 0.6). The mean air-bone gap pure-tone average was 18 dB (SD: 12) and the mean Carhart degree was 9 dB (SD: 10). The radial degrees of oval window extent were not significantly associated with air-bone gap (correlation coefficient: 0.14; P =0.3) or Carhart degree (correlation coefficient: 0.04; P =0.8). Likewise, otosclerotic plaque depth was not significantly associated with air-bone gap (correlation coefficient: −0.19; P =0.2) or Carhart degree (correlation coefficient: −0.08; P =0.6). After PCCT, 22 ears underwent surgery. In this subset, oval window extent and plaque depth were not significantly associated with the postoperative changes in air-bone gap or high-frequency thresholds. Conclusions: Despite enhanced visualization of subtle abnormalities with PCCT imaging, the extent of oval window otosclerotic plaque, measured in angular degrees and depth, was not associated with hearing loss at time of initial evaluation or postoperative audiologic changes in patients with otosclerosis.

Background: Accurate characterization of tumor stiffness and adhesion is crucial when surgically resecting meningiomas. Currently, such determinations are difficult to ascertain through standard preoperative imaging diagnostics and clinical experience. Herein, we explored magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as a means of assessing these parameters and thereby improving neurosurgical resections. Methods: This prospective study of 193 patients with meningiomas involved three distinct patient subsets (cohort 1, 88 [2017–2021]; cohort 2, 55 [2022–2023]; cohort 3, 50 [2023–2024]. We analyzed preoperatively obtained MRE data on meningioma stiffness (cohorts 1 and 2) and adhesion (cohort 2) for accuracy, while matching subjects with or without MRE studies (cohort 3, 1:1 ratio) to define the role of preoperative MRE in improving operative outcomes. Results: Areas under the curve (AUCs) for MRE in gauging meningioma stiffness and adhesion were 0.87 and 0.89, respectively. Both parameters significantly surpassed empiric predictions of stiffness and adhesion rendered by surgeons and radiologists, based on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRE-determined stiffness measures independently correlated with prolonged resection duration, whereas MRE-assessed adhesion showed independent associations with increased blood loss, longer duration of tumor resection, and higher risk of pial injury. Ultimately, results based on cohort 3 demonstrated that MRE has great potential in this setting to improve neurosurgical procedures by significantly reducing intraoperative bleeding, resection duration, and risks of pial injury. Conclusion: MRE is a promising, noninvasive tool for accurately assessing meningioma stiffness and adhesion, standing to improve the precision and safety of needed surgical intervention.