Zheng, Keni

Background: Accurate characterization of tumor stiffness and adhesion is crucial when surgically resecting meningiomas. Currently, such determinations are difficult to ascertain through standard preoperative imaging diagnostics and clinical experience. Herein, we explored magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as a means of assessing these parameters and thereby improving neurosurgical resections. Methods: This prospective study of 193 patients with meningiomas involved three distinct patient subsets (cohort 1, 88 [2017–2021]; cohort 2, 55 [2022–2023]; cohort 3, 50 [2023–2024]. We analyzed preoperatively obtained MRE data on meningioma stiffness (cohorts 1 and 2) and adhesion (cohort 2) for accuracy, while matching subjects with or without MRE studies (cohort 3, 1:1 ratio) to define the role of preoperative MRE in improving operative outcomes. Results: Areas under the curve (AUCs) for MRE in gauging meningioma stiffness and adhesion were 0.87 and 0.89, respectively. Both parameters significantly surpassed empiric predictions of stiffness and adhesion rendered by surgeons and radiologists, based on routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRE-determined stiffness measures independently correlated with prolonged resection duration, whereas MRE-assessed adhesion showed independent associations with increased blood loss, longer duration of tumor resection, and higher risk of pial injury. Ultimately, results based on cohort 3 demonstrated that MRE has great potential in this setting to improve neurosurgical procedures by significantly reducing intraoperative bleeding, resection duration, and risks of pial injury. Conclusion: MRE is a promising, noninvasive tool for accurately assessing meningioma stiffness and adhesion, standing to improve the precision and safety of needed surgical intervention.

ABSTRACT Purpose Abnormal restrictions at myofascial interfaces are a key factor in chronic low back pain (CLBP) with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), but no established imaging method exists for quantitative assessment. This pilot study evaluated the clinical feasibility of MR elastography (MRE)‐based slip interface imaging (SII) for visualizing myofascial mobility in CLBP‐MPS patients versus age−/sex‐/BMI‐matched healthy participants. A new SII biomarker, maximal normalized displacement discontinuity (), was introduced, and the previously developed normalized octahedral shear strain (NOSS) map was used for comparison. Preliminary assessments of vibration‐frequency effects, repeatability, and group differences in inter‐muscular mobility were conducted. Methods MRE was conducted at 30, 60, and 90 Hz to compare with NOSS for visualizing inter‐muscular slip interfaces at the quadratus lumborum‐erector spinae (QL‐ES) and erector spinae‐multifidus (ES‐M) muscle boundaries at L3‐L4. Repeatability of and NOSS was assessed at 30 Hz (identified as the best‐performing frequency) using within‐subject coefficients of variation and a linear mixed‐effects model from within‐ and between‐day scans. Clinical feasibility was then assessed via Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests in six CLBP‐MPS patients and matched controls. Results at 30 Hz exhibited superior delineation of slip interfaces compared to higher frequencies and NOSS. demonstrated significantly lower variation and better repeatability than NOSS. Healthy participants showed continuous, well‐defined slip interfaces, whereas CLBP‐MPS patients displayed disrupted interfaces with significant mobility reduction at L4 ES‐M. Conclusion SII with lower vibration frequency and map enhances visualization of lower back myofascial mobility and shows potential for assessing differences between healthy individuals and CLBP‐MPS patients.

AbstractPurposeAbnormal adherence at functional myofascial interfaces is hypothesized as an important phenomenon in myofascial pain syndrome. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of MR elastography (MRE)–based slip interface imaging (SII) to visualize and assess myofascial mobility in healthy volunteers.MethodsSII was used to assess local shear strain at functional myofascial interfaces in the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and thighs. In the FDP, MRE was performed at 90 Hz vibration to each index, middle, ring, and little finger. Two thigh MRE scans were performed at 40 Hz with knees flexed and extended. The normalized octahedral shear strain (NOSS) maps were calculated to visualize myofascial slip interfaces. The entropy of the probability distribution of the gradient NOSS was computed for the two knee positions at the intermuscular interface between vastus lateralis and vastus intermedius, around rectus femoris, and between vastus intermedius and vastus medialis.ResultsNOSS map depicted distinct functional slip interfaces in the FDP for each finger. Compared to knee flexion, clearer slip interfaces and larger gradient NOSS entropy at the vastus lateralis–vastus intermedius interface were observed during knee extension, where the quadriceps are not passively stretched. This suggests the optimal position for using SII to visualize myofascial slip interface in skeletal muscles is when muscles are not subjected to any additional force.ConclusionThe study demonstrated that MRE‐based SII can visualize and assess myofascial interface mobility in extremities. The results provide a foundation for investigating the hypothesis that myofascial pain syndrome is characterized by changes in the mobility of myofascial interfaces.

Increasing concerns have been raised about the long-term negative effects of subconcussive repeated head impact (RHI). To elucidate RHI injury mechanisms, many efforts have studied how head impacts affect the skull-brain biomechanics and have found that mechanical interactions at the skull-brain interface dampen and isolate brain motions by decoupling the brain from the skull. Despite intense interest, in vivo quantification of the functional state of the skull-brain interface remains difficult. This study developed a magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) based technique to non-invasively assess skull-brain mechanical interactions (i.e., motion transmission and isolation function) under dynamic loading. The full MRE displacement data were separated into rigid body motion and wave motion. The rigid body motion was used to calculate the brain-to-skull rotational motion transmission ratio ( R tr ) to quantify skull-brain motion transmissibility, and the wave motion was used to calculate the cortical normalized octahedral shear strain ( NOSS ) (calculated based on a partial derivative computing neural network) to evaluate the isolation capability of the skull-brain interface. Forty-seven healthy volunteers were recruited to investigate the effects of age/sex on R tr and cortical NOSS , and 17 of 47 volunteers received multiple scans to test the repeatability of the proposed techniques under different strain conditions. The results showed that both R tr and NOSS were robust to MRE driver variations and had good repeatability, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values between 0.68 and 0.97 (fair to excellent). No age or sex dependence were observed with R tr , whereas a significant positive correlation between age and NOSS was found in the cerebrum, frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes (all p < 0.05), but not in the occipital lobe ( p = 0.99). The greatest change in NOSS with age was found in the frontal lobe, one of the most frequent locations of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Except for the temporal lobe ( p = 0.0087), there was no significant difference in NOSS between men and women. This work provides motivation for utilizing MRE as a non-invasive tool for quantifying the biomechanics of the skull-brain interface. It evaluated the age and sex dependence and may lead to a better understanding of the protective role and mechanisms of the skull-brain interface in RHI and TBI, as well as improve the accuracy of computational models in simulating the skull-brain interface.