Zhou, Zhongxing

Abstract Background Photon‐counting‐detector (PCD) CT systems offer ultra‐high spatial resolution, yet the visual spatial resolution on clinical images often constrained by large pixel size, yielding resolutions below system capabilities. While reducing pixel size and using sharp kernels enhance visual spatial resolution, it increases noise, compromising image quality. Purpose To investigate the combined effects of pixel size and reconstruction kernels on visual spatial resolution using phantom and clinical images and to develop a dedicated high‐resolution deep convolutional neural network (HR‐CNN) to better utilize the intrinsic high spatial resolution of PCD‐CT in clinical imaging. Methods The relationship between spatial resolution, reconstruction kernel, and pixel size was investigated to identify strategies for utilizing the full spatial resolution potential of PCD‐CT. To overcome the increased noise associated with high‐resolution settings, a dedicated HR‐CNN was developed to push the limit of spatial resolution in routine PCD‐CT exams. The HR‐CNN was trained using patient exams acquired with ultra‐high‐resolution (UHR) mode and reconstructed with a 150‐mm field of view (FOV), matrix size of 1024×1024 (0.15‐mm pixel size) and sharpest quantitative kernel (Qr89). The impact of FOV, kernel, and denoising on spatial resolution was studied using bar‐pattern phantoms and a pilot clinical evaluation including 5 patients with interstitial lung diseases. Two thoracic radiologists evaluated 4 different FOV/reconstruction conditions: (1) FOV‐410/Qr56‐Iterative reconstruction (IR), (2) FOV‐410/Qr89‐IR, (3) FOV‐150/Qr89‐IR, and (4) FOV‐150/Qr89‐HR‐CNN in terms of overall image quality, noise, visual spatial resolution, and overall preference. Results With a FOV of 410 mm, the Qr89 sharp kernel displayed bar‐patterns up to 14 lp/cm, not much higher than the routine lung kernel Qr56. When the FOV was reduced to 150 mm, Qr89‐IR allowed for the visualization of line pair patterns ranging from 18 to 20 lp/cm, with 20 lp/cm being moderately discernible. The application of Qr89‐HR‐CNN yielded further improvement, enabling the display of line pair patterns as high as 20–22 lp/cm. In patient cases, both radiologists consistently ranked the FOV‐150 images processed with HR‐CNN as superior across metrics including overall image quality, noise reduction, visual spatial resolution, and overall preference. The HR‐CNN reduced the noise in patients’ images by 93.0 ± 0.6% and 44.9 ± 5.3% in comparison with the original FBP and IR images, respectively. Conclusions The spatial resolution of PCD‐CT is not maximized in routine practice due to the large FOV and high noise levels at sharp kernels. The proposed HR‐CNN denoising method, along with small pixel size, may allow the high spatial resolution toward the system limit to be implemented in practice, which is beneficial in the diagnosis of many diseases, including interstitial lung disease.

Abstract Background Radiomics extracts quantitative imaging features from computed tomography (CT) data for clinical decision‐making. However, variations in acquisition parameters—particularly x‐ray tube voltage (kV)—introduce non‐biological variability in attenuation values, limiting the reproducibility of radiomic features across scanners, protocols, and institutions. Purpose To develop and evaluate a CT dAta harmoNiZAtion framework based on deep learNed vIrTual monoEnergetic imaging (TANZANITE), which leverages the keV flexibility of virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) to enable cross‐kV scan translation and radiomics harmonization. Methods TANZANITE is a model hub consisting of multiple pre‐trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs), each designed to translate VMIs from 1 keV level to another. Phantom‐based calibration was first used to determine energy‐equivalent (Eff_E) keV levels corresponding to each tube potential (e.g., Eff_E(A) keV for source kV and Eff_E(B) keV for target kV). A CNN trained using 69 120 patches from seven patient cases to map VMIs from Eff_E(A) to Eff_E(B) was selected from the TANZANITE hub and applied directly to clinical CT images acquired at the source kV. This harmonized the images to match the attenuation characteristics of the target kV setting. Evaluation was conducted on independent dual‐energy CT datasets acquired at 100/Sn150 kV. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the kidney, liver, and spine to assess CT number consistency and radiomic feature reproducibility. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated across 93 non‐shape radiomic features. Results After TANZANITE processing with 100 kV images, CT numbers in evaluated organs closely matched the Sn150 kV reference values in four testing patient cases. For example, mean kidney CT numbers changed from 320 HU (100 kV) to 156 HU (TANZANITE), approximating the Sn150 kV value of 160 HU. Similar changes were observed in the liver (157–105 HU vs. 104 HU reference) and spine (45–22 HU vs. 19 HU reference). Radiomic reproducibility improved substantially across organs: mean CCC increased from 0.590 to 0.995 in the liver, 0.300 to 0.970 in the kidney, and 0.630 to 0.968 in the spine. Post‐TANZANITE, over 98% of features exceeded the stability threshold (CCC ≥ 0.900) in all three representative organs. Conclusion TANZANITE provides a flexible, image‐domain harmonization framework by learning the keV‐to‐keV translation in the VMI domain and applying pre‐trained CNNs to clinical kV images. It improves CT number consistency and organ‐specific radiomic reproducibility without requiring raw projection data or scanner‐specific training. This approach supports consistent quantitative imaging across multiple‐kV acquisition protocols, enhancing radiomics reliability in clinical settings.