Bratt, Alex

Pulmonary developmental disorders comprise a heterogeneous group of congenital abnormalities involving the airways, lung parenchyma, pulmonary vasculature, or overlapping developmental pathways. Although these conditions commonly present during infancy or childhood, many remain clinically silent until adulthood, when they are discovered incidentally or manifest with recurrent respiratory symptoms such as infection, hemoptysis, or progressive dyspnea. These abnormalities may be broadly categorized into airway, vascular, parenchymal, and mixed developmental anomalies. Airway abnormalities include congenital tracheobronchomegaly, branching anomalies of the tracheobronchial tree, bronchial atresia, bronchogenic cysts, congenital pulmonary airway malformations (CPAM), and bronchopulmonary sequestration (BPS). Vascular anomalies include pulmonary artery sling, proximal interruption of the pulmonary artery, Scimitar syndrome, and meandering pulmonary veins. Parenchymal disorders encompass congenital lobar overinflation and pulmonary hypoplasia. Increasing recognition of overlapping lesions, particularly combinations of CPAM, sequestration, and bronchial atresia, has challenged traditional compartmental classification systems and supports a developmental spectrum model. This review synthesizes contemporary concepts regarding embryologic mechanisms, pathogenesis, imaging findings, and management of these entities in adults. Particular emphasis is placed on imaging evaluation with CT and MRI, updated terminology, evolving molecular understanding of CPAMs, including lesions with malignant potential, and distinctions between congenital sequestration and pseudosequestration. Recognition of these disorders and their associated anomalies is essential for accurate diagnosis, appropriate management, and surgical planning in adult patients.

Abstract Background Photon‐counting‐detector (PCD) CT systems offer ultra‐high spatial resolution, yet the visual spatial resolution on clinical images often constrained by large pixel size, yielding resolutions below system capabilities. While reducing pixel size and using sharp kernels enhance visual spatial resolution, it increases noise, compromising image quality. Purpose To investigate the combined effects of pixel size and reconstruction kernels on visual spatial resolution using phantom and clinical images and to develop a dedicated high‐resolution deep convolutional neural network (HR‐CNN) to better utilize the intrinsic high spatial resolution of PCD‐CT in clinical imaging. Methods The relationship between spatial resolution, reconstruction kernel, and pixel size was investigated to identify strategies for utilizing the full spatial resolution potential of PCD‐CT. To overcome the increased noise associated with high‐resolution settings, a dedicated HR‐CNN was developed to push the limit of spatial resolution in routine PCD‐CT exams. The HR‐CNN was trained using patient exams acquired with ultra‐high‐resolution (UHR) mode and reconstructed with a 150‐mm field of view (FOV), matrix size of 1024×1024 (0.15‐mm pixel size) and sharpest quantitative kernel (Qr89). The impact of FOV, kernel, and denoising on spatial resolution was studied using bar‐pattern phantoms and a pilot clinical evaluation including 5 patients with interstitial lung diseases. Two thoracic radiologists evaluated 4 different FOV/reconstruction conditions: (1) FOV‐410/Qr56‐Iterative reconstruction (IR), (2) FOV‐410/Qr89‐IR, (3) FOV‐150/Qr89‐IR, and (4) FOV‐150/Qr89‐HR‐CNN in terms of overall image quality, noise, visual spatial resolution, and overall preference. Results With a FOV of 410 mm, the Qr89 sharp kernel displayed bar‐patterns up to 14 lp/cm, not much higher than the routine lung kernel Qr56. When the FOV was reduced to 150 mm, Qr89‐IR allowed for the visualization of line pair patterns ranging from 18 to 20 lp/cm, with 20 lp/cm being moderately discernible. The application of Qr89‐HR‐CNN yielded further improvement, enabling the display of line pair patterns as high as 20–22 lp/cm. In patient cases, both radiologists consistently ranked the FOV‐150 images processed with HR‐CNN as superior across metrics including overall image quality, noise reduction, visual spatial resolution, and overall preference. The HR‐CNN reduced the noise in patients’ images by 93.0 ± 0.6% and 44.9 ± 5.3% in comparison with the original FBP and IR images, respectively. Conclusions The spatial resolution of PCD‐CT is not maximized in routine practice due to the large FOV and high noise levels at sharp kernels. The proposed HR‐CNN denoising method, along with small pixel size, may allow the high spatial resolution toward the system limit to be implemented in practice, which is beneficial in the diagnosis of many diseases, including interstitial lung disease.

Abstract Objectives Large language models (LLMs) offer potential in natural language processing tasks in healthcare. Due to the need for high accuracy, understanding their limitations is essential. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of LLMs in classifying radiology reports for the presence of pulmonary embolism (PE) under various conditions, including different prompt designs and data perturbations. Materials and Methods In this retrospective, institutional review board approved study, we evaluated 3 Google’s LLMs including Gemini-1.5-Pro, Gemini-1.5-Flash-001, and Gemini-1.5-Flash-002, in classifying 11 999 pulmonary CT angiography radiology reports for PE. Ground truth labels were determined by concordance between a computer vision-based PE detection (CVPED) algorithm and multiple LLM runs under various configurations. Discrepancies between algorithms’ classifications were aggregated and manually reviewed. We evaluated the effects of prompt design, data perturbations, and repeated analyses across geographic cloud regions. Performance metrics were calculated. Results Of 11 999 reports, 1296 (10.8%) were PE-positive. Accuracy across LLMs ranged between 0.953 and 0.996. The highest recall rate for a prompt modified after a review of the misclassified cases (up to 0.997). Few-shot prompting improved recall (up to 0.99), while chain-of-thought generally degraded performance. Gemini-1.5-Flash-002 demonstrated the highest robustness against data perturbations. Geographic cloud region variability was minimal for Gemini-1.5+-Pro, while the Flash models showed stable performance. Discussion and Conclusion LLMs demonstrated high performance in classifying radiology reports, though results varied with prompt design and data quality. These findings underscore the need for systematic evaluation and validation of LLMs for clinical applications, particularly in high-stakes scenarios.

The performance of a deep learning model was not different from that of radiologists in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at MRI, and gradient-weighted class activation maps localized the tumor.

Purpose: Quantitative biomarkers from chest computed tomography (CT) can facilitate the incidental detection of important diseases. Atrial fibrillation (AFib) substantially increases the risk for comorbid conditions including stroke. This study investigated the relationship between AFib status and left atrial enlargement (LAE) on CT. Materials and Methods: A total of 500 consecutive patients who had undergone nongated chest CTs were included, and left atrium maximal axial cross-sectional area (LA-MACSA), left atrium anterior-posterior dimension (LA-AP), and vertebral body cross-sectional area (VB-Area) were measured. Height, weight, age, sex, and diagnosis of AFib were obtained from the medical record. Parametric statistical analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves were performed. Machine learning classifiers were run with clinical risk factors and LA measurements to predict patients with AFib. Results: Eighty-five patients with a diagnosis of AFib were identified. Mean LA-MACSA and LA-AP were significantly larger in patients with AFib than in patients without AFib (28.63 vs. 20.53 cm2, P<0.000001; 4.34 vs. 3.5 cm, P<0.000001, respectively), both with area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.73. Multivariable logistic regression analysis including age, sex, and VB-Area with LA-MACSA improved the AUC for predicting AFib (AUC=0.77). An LA-MACSA threshold of 30 cm2 demonstrated high specificity for AFib diagnosis at 92% and sensitivity of 48%, and LA-AP threshold at 4.5 cm demonstrated 90% specificity and 42% sensitivity. A Bayesian machine learning model using age, sex, height, body surface area, and LA-MACSA predicted AFib with an AUC of 0.743. Conclusions: LA-MACSA or LA-AP can be rapidly measured from routine chest CT, and when >30 cm2 and >4.5 cm, respectively, are specific indicators to predict patients at increased risk for AFib.

Abstract Purpose Echocardiography (echo) is widely used for right ventricular (RV) assessment. Current techniques for RV evaluation require additional imaging and manual analysis; machine learning (ML) approaches have the potential to provide efficient, fully automated quantification of RV function. Methods An automated ML model was developed to track the tricuspid annulus on echo using a convolutional neural network approach. The model was trained using 7791 image frames, and automated linear and circumferential indices quantifying annular displacement were generated. Automated indices were compared to an independent reference of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) defined RV dysfunction (RVEF < 50%). Results A total of 101 patients prospectively underwent echo and CMR: Fully automated annular tracking was uniformly successful; analyses entailed minimal processing time (<1 second for all) and no user editing. Findings demonstrate all automated annular shortening indices to be lower among patients with CMR‐quantified RV dysfunction (all P < .001). Magnitude of ML annular displacement decreased stepwise in relation to population‐based tertiles of TAPSE, with similar results when ML analyses were localized to the septal or lateral annulus (all P ≤ .001). Automated segmentation techniques provided good diagnostic performance (AUC 0.69–0.73) in relation to CMR reference and compared to conventional RV indices (TAPSE and S ′) with high negative predictive value (NPV 84%–87% vs 83%–88%). Reproducibility was higher for ML algorithm as compared to manual segmentation with zero inter‐ and intra‐observer variability and ICC 1.0 (manual ICC: 0.87–0.91). Conclusions This study provides an initial validation of a deep learning system for RV assessment using automated tracking of the tricuspid annulus.

Background: There is intense interest and speculation in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to radiology. The goals of this investigation were (1) to assess thoracic radiologists’ perspectives on the role and expected impact of AI in radiology, and (2) to compare radiologists’ perspectives with those of computer science (CS) experts working in the AI development. Methods: An online survey was developed and distributed to chest radiologists and CS experts at leading academic centers and societies, comparing their expectations of AI’s influence on radiologists’ jobs, job satisfaction, salary, and role in society. Results: A total of 95 radiologists and 45 computer scientists responded. Computer scientists reported having read more scientific journal articles on AI/machine learning in the past year than radiologists (mean [95% confidence interval]=17.1 [9.01-25.2] vs. 7.3 [4.7-9.9], P=0.0047). The impact of AI in radiology is expected to be high, with 57.8% and 73.3% of computer scientists and 31.6% and 61.1% of chest radiologists predicting radiologists’ job will be dramatically different in 5 to 10 years, and 10 to 20 years, respectively. Although very few practitioners in both fields expect radiologists to become obsolete, with 0% expecting radiologist obsolescence in 5 years, in the long run, significantly more computer scientists (15.6%) predict radiologist obsolescence in 10 to 20 years, as compared with 3.2% of radiologists reporting the same (P=0.0128). Overall, both chest radiologists and computer scientists are optimistic about the future of AI in radiology, with large majorities expecting radiologists’ job satisfaction to increase or stay the same (89.5% of radiologists vs. 86.7% of CS experts, P=0.7767), radiologists’ salaries to increase or stay the same (83.2% of radiologists vs. 73.4% of CS experts, P=0.1827), and the role of radiologists in society to improve or stay the same (88.4% vs. 86.7%, P=0.7857). Conclusions: Thoracic radiologists and CS experts are generally positive on the impact of AI in radiology. However, a larger percentage, but still small minority, of computer scientists predict radiologist obsolescence in 10 to 20 years. As the future of AI in radiology unfolds, this study presents a historical timestamp of which group of experts’ perceptions were closer to eventual reality.