Citations

Abstract Background Accurate assessment of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients is critical for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) management, yet Doppler-based measurements are technically demanding and require expertise. Objective To develop a multi-view deep learning model capable of classifying LVOT obstruction (> 20mmHg) using routine 2D echocardiographic windows without reliance on Doppler imaging. Methods We trained and externally validated a cross-attention-based video-to-video fusion framework that integrated EchoPrime-derived video representations from three standard transthoracic echocardiographic views to classify LVOT gradients. Results Training was performed on a derivation cohort (N = 1833) from a tertiary care system in the United States, with model performance evaluated on an internal held-out test set (N = 275) and a Korean external validation cohort (N = 46). Single-view baselines showed limited discrimination (external AUROCs 0.47–0.70). Conversely, domain-specific foundational model (EchoPrime) achieved superior single-view performance (AUROCs 0.75–0.80 internal; 0.79–0.83 external), highlighting the importance of echo-specific pretraining and temporal modeling. The proposed multi-view fusion further enhanced predictive performance, with the late fusion model reaching an AUROC of 0.84 on the external cohort with significant population-shift. Conclusions These results suggest LVOT physiology is encoded in routine 2D imaging and can be leveraged for clinically relevant gradient classification without Doppler input- proposed AI-guided strategy demonstrates substantial cost savings compared with the screen-all approach. By integrating complementary spatial-temporal information across multiple views, our approach generalizes robustly across populations and may enable real-time decision support, extend LVOT assessment to portable or resource-limited settings, and complement Doppler-based evaluation for longitudinal HCM management.

Background: Stable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions are primarily treated nonoperatively. Nonoperative treatment includes several recommendations, including the use of an unloader brace. However, little is known about the clinical effectiveness of unloader bracing and its influence on OCD healing, return to sports, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the impact of unloader bracing on patients with stable medial femoral condyle (MFC) OCD lesions treated nonoperatively. Purpose: To investigate the influence of valgus unloader bracing on the success of treating stable MFC OCD with nonoperative treatment strategies. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The authors used a prospective cohort of patients receiving nonoperative care for stable MFC knee OCD lesions. The primary variable of interest was the efficacy of bracing. The primary outcomes were transition from nonoperative care to surgical intervention, return-to-play (RTP) clearance, and PROs. Bivariate testing was used to determine if there were differences between groups. Chi-square testing was used to determine if there were differences in rates of transition to surgery by group. The timing of the transition by each group was assessed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, given the nonparametric nature of the data. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate time at risk, incidence rate, and survival times for each group. Results: A total of 185 knees (bracing group: 123 [66.5%] knees; no-bracing group: 62 [33.5%] knees) were analyzed. Overall, 142 (76.8%) knees were successfully treated nonoperatively. Transition to surgery occurred in 43 (23.2%) knees. There were no differences in transition to surgery by groups, with no differences seen by group. Of the knees that did not transition to surgical care, 65 (71.4%) in the bracing group and 38 (74.5%) in the no-bracing group received RTP clearance ( P = .693). PRO scores were similar between the 2 groups at the time of RTP clearance. Conclusion: The inclusion of an unloader brace in the nonoperative treatment for stable MFC OCD lesions did not decrease the likelihood of patients undergoing surgical intervention or improve their PRO scores at the time of RTP clearance. Registration: NCT02771496 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Abstract Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), an autosomal dominant vasculopathy affecting 1 in 5000 individuals, is the second most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide. Despite this prevalence, comprehensive data on disease manifestations and complications remain limited. To address this gap, the US Congress allocated funding leading to the Comprehensive HHT Outcomes Registry of the United States (CHORUS), a prospective, 15-center longitudinal registry enrolling unselected patients with confirmed HHT. In this initial report, we describe findings from the first 600 participants, with a median age of 53 (range, 0-88) years and 60% female. Despite most participants developing typical HHT manifestations by age 13 years, the majority (63%) were not diagnosed until mid-to-late adulthood. Recurrent spontaneous epistaxis occurred in 95% of participants, chronic gastrointestinal bleeding in 30%, and heavy menstrual bleeding in 35% of postmenarche females, together resulting in moderate-to-severe mucosal bleeding in 76%. Iron deficiency and/or anemia were diagnosed in 68%, with 41% requiring IV iron and 25% requiring red cell transfusions. Serious complications of solid-organ arteriovenous malformations were frequent, including intracranial hemorrhage (3%), pulmonary hemorrhage (2%), venous thromboembolism (7%), arterial thromboembolism (11%), heart failure (7%), and pulmonary hypertension (7%). These data from CHORUS, the first national US registry of its kind, provide reliable, real-world estimates of the incidence, prevalence, and severity of numerous HHT manifestations and complications. HHT has a high burden of moderate-to-severe bleeding, anemia, thrombosis, and major neurologic and cardiopulmonary complications. There is a mean interval between first symptoms and diagnosis of >2 decades, during which substantial, serious, and preventable HHT morbidity, including early intracranial hemorrhage, may occur. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT06259292.

ABSTRACT Introduction Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death among Latinas. Although breast cancer risk assessment models exist and show promise in reducing mortality, few studies have elicited women's interest in and perceptions around breast cancer risk assessment, particularly among underserved populations, like Latinas, who are susceptible to disparities in breast cancer outcomes. These disparities stem from factors such as limited access to healthcare services, lower rates of screening utilization, language barriers, and socioeconomic challenges, all of which compound their risk and hinder effective engagement with risk assessment tools. This qualitative study aims to explore Latinas' perspectives regarding breast cancer risk assessment and implications on future behaviors. Methods Twenty‐three under‐ or uninsured Latinas aged 45–65 with no personal history of breast cancer took part in either a focus group ( n = 3, 15 participants) or individual interviews (8 participants). Guided by health behavior theories (Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model), data were transcribed, translated, and analyzed using a deductive‐inductive approach to thematic content analysis, resulting in four themes. Results Latinas expressed high interest in knowing their breast cancer risk and reported that the benefits of knowing one's risk outweighed the harms. Latinas also stated that they would continue screening as recommended if found to be at low risk, but that they would speak with their provider or increase screening frequency if found to be at increased risk. Moreover, Latinas described the pivotal role of providers and social networks in influencing interest and perceptions around breast cancer risk assessment and preventive behaviors. Conclusion Underserved Latinas viewed breast cancer risk assessment positively and underscored the need for multilevel, culturally tailored strategies to improve breast cancer risk assessment. This study yielded four distinct themes: (1) Interest and Awareness of Personal Breast Cancer Risk, (2) Benefits and Barriers of Knowing Personal Breast Cancer Risk, (3) Screening Implications of Knowing Personal Breast Cancer Risk, and (4) Provider Influence on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Behaviors. Potential strategies include efforts to improve provider engagement and communication and leveraging social networks to increase awareness and encourage preventive behaviors. Trial Registration NCI‐2023‐00465

Introduction Burnout among healthcare professionals remains a critical public health issue linked to impaired cognition, emotional exhaustion and diminished clinical performance. Structured breathing practices have demonstrated promise in improving autonomic regulation and cerebral oxygenation, yet their feasibility, acceptability and implementation in real-world healthcare settings remain underexplored. Objectives This single-arm pilot feasibility trial aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and implementation appropriateness of a structured breathing-based intervention for healthcare professionals across community-based Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) sites. Secondary objectives include assessing usability and engagement with the mobile breathing platform, while exploratory analyses will describe magnitude of variability and feasibility of collecting psychological and cerebral haemodynamic measures. This study will commence in November 2025 and is expected to be completed by June 2026. Methods and analysis A total of 40 clinicians (MD/DO/MBBS/PA) and nurses reporting moderate or greater burnout will be enrolled across four MCHS sites. Participants will complete a 4-month structured breathing programme delivered primarily online, supported by a mobile application for practice tracking. Assessments will occur at baseline, 2 months and 4 months, with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measures of cerebral oxygenation collected at baseline and 4 months in a population subset. Primary outcomes include (1) recruitment yield, retention and adherence rates; (2) acceptability and participant satisfaction (survey and qualitative feedback); and (3) implementation appropriateness measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Secondary outcomes include digital engagement and usability through mobile analytics and the System Usability Scale. Exploratory outcomes are psychological indicators (burnout, depression, anxiety, perceived stress, sleep, fatigue, professional fulfilment and resilience) and physiological endpoints (fNIRS). Analyses will be descriptive, summarising feasibility metrics with 95% CIs. Progression criteria (recruitment≥75%, retention≥80%, adherence≥70%, AIM/IAM/FIM≥4.0) will determine readiness for a definitive hybrid effectiveness–implementation trial. Ethics and dissemination The study is approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB # 25-009320). All participants will provide informed consent. Study procedures ensure confidentiality, cultural sensitivity and participant safety. Data will be securely stored in REDCap and disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conference Trial registration number NCT07218458 .

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability despite advances in risk factor management. Many risk factors for stroke have also been implicated as risk factors for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Given these shared risk factors, cognitive impairment (CI) may represent an accumulation of neurological injury that is associated with an elevated risk of stroke. In ARIC-NCS, we aimed to 1) understand the independent relationship between pre-stroke CI (MCI or Dementia) and incident stroke; 2) explore mortality differences in stroke patients with vs without pre-stroke CI; and 3) evaluate modifiers of these relationships. Methods: 5434 stroke-free participants were evaluated for cognitive status at an in-person visit in 2011-13 (visit 5; ages 66-90), based on cognitive testing and informant interviews. Incident definite or probable strokes (ischemic or hemorrhagic) from visit 5 through 2022 were identified via ongoing surveillance (semi-annual telephone calls, with expert classification). Using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for demographics and vascular risk factors, we evaluated associations between CI (MCI or dementia) and incident stroke, and between CI and death among individuals with stroke. Finally, we tested effect modification by age at visit 5, sex, education, and race, via stratified models and formal interaction terms. Results: Compared to those without CI, individuals with CI (23%) were older (77 vs 75 years, p<0.001), and more frequently male (48% vs 40%). Over 10+ years, CI was independently associated with an increased risk of incident stroke (HR:1.52, 95% CI:1.18-1.96). Among individuals with stroke, risk of death was also higher in CI vs non-CI patients (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.27-2.50). In stratified analysis, we found a significant interaction by sex (p-interaction=0.04): in males, CI was associated with elevated stroke risk (HR:2.01, 95% CI:1.39-2.91) without a similar risk in females (HR:1.22, 95% CI:0.85-1.75). Interactions by race, age, and educational level were not statistically significant, but effect sizes were qualitatively larger in White participants and individuals with more education. Conclusion: CI is associated with incident stroke independent of shared risk factors, especially in men. This work adds to our understanding of populations at risk for stroke, thus aiding efforts to optimize stroke prevention in at-risk populations.

Abstract Background Measurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) using high-sensitivity assays is recommended for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. We determined sex-specific and uniform 99th percentile upper reference limits (URLs) using the new Elecsys® Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay in a global, healthy reference range cohort. Methods Lithium-heparin plasma and serum samples were prospectively collected from apparently healthy individuals aged ≥20 years across 34 global sites in the United States, Europe, China, and Japan. cTnT was measured using the Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay on the Cobas® e 801 analyzer. Exclusion criteria were defined according to the 2022 IFCC guidance. Uniform and sex-specific 99th percentile URLs and nonparametric 95% CIs were determined in plasma and serum separately and combined. Results The final study population comprised 4147 participants (52.5% female) with a median (25th–75th percentiles) age of 48.0 (33.0–59.0) years; 45.8%, 47.9%, 5.2%, and 1.1% were White, Asian, Black, and other/unknown, respectively. For sample matrices combined (n = 8294), 81.0% and 99.2% of cTnT values were above the limit of detection in females and males, respectively. Sex-specific 99th percentile URLs (95% CI) were 18 (16–23) ng/L for females and 32 (28–35) ng/L for males; the uniform 99th percentile URL was 27 (24–31) ng/L. URLs were comparable in plasma and serum samples. Conclusions This study determined sex-specific and uniform 99th percentile URLs for the Troponin T high-sensitivity Gen 6 assay that were comparable irrespective of the matrix used in a large, global, healthy reference population.

Abstract Introduction Burnout among healthcare professionals remains a critical public health issue linked to impaired cognition, emotional exhaustion, and diminished clinical performance. Structured breathing practices have demonstrated promise in improving autonomic regulation and cerebral oxygenation, yet their feasibility and acceptability in real-world healthcare settings remain underexplored. Objectives This single-arm pilot feasibility trial aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and implementation appropriateness of a structured breathing-based intervention for healthcare professionals across community-based Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) sites. Secondary objectives include assessing usability and engagement with the mobile breathing platform, while exploratory analyses will examine preliminary signals of change in psychological well-being and cerebral hemodynamics. Methods and Analysis A total of 40 physicians and nurses reporting moderate or greater burnout will be enrolled across four MCHS sites. Participants will complete a four-month structured breathing program delivered primarily online, supported by a mobile application for practice tracking. Assessments will occur at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months, with optional functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measures of cerebral oxygenation collected at baseline and 4 months in a subset. Primary outcomes include (1) recruitment yield, retention, and adherence rates; (2) acceptability and participant satisfaction (survey and qualitative feedback); and (3) implementation appropriateness measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Secondary outcomes assess digital engagement and usability through mobile analytics and the System Usability Scale (SUS). Exploratory outcomes evaluate psychological indicators—burnout, depression, anxiety, perceived stress, sleep, fatigue, professional fulfillment, and resilience—and physiological endpoints (fNIRS). Analyses will be descriptive, summarizing feasibility metrics with 95% confidence intervals. Progression criteria (recruitment ≥75%, retention ≥80%, adherence ≥70%, AIM/IAM/FIM ≥4.0) will determine readiness for a definitive hybrid effectiveness–implementation trial. Ethics and Dissemination The study is approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB # 25-009320). All participants will provide informed consent. Study procedures ensure confidentiality, cultural sensitivity, and participant safety. Data will be securely stored in REDCap and disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conference ClinicalTrials.gov ID The study has been prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT07218458 ). Strengths and Limitations Evaluates a structured breathing-based intervention using both subjective and objective indicators of feasibility, including recruitment, retention, adherence, and implementation appropriateness. Integrates mobile application analytics with standardized implementation measures (AIM, IAM, FIM) to capture digital engagement and real-world usability. Incorporates functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to explore physiological mechanisms underlying burnout recovery, linking cerebral oxygenation to behavioral outcomes. Conducted across diverse community-based Mayo Clinic Health System sites, enhancing ecological validity and relevance to decentralized clinical settings. Limitations include the single-arm, region-restricted design, modest sample size, and reliance on volunteer participants, which constrain generalizability and preclude causal inference; exploratory outcomes are intended to guide future trial refinement.

Purpose: These consensus guidelines by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) describe best practices for performing intraoperative Electrocorticography (ioECoG) using subdural or depth electrodes for adult and pediatric population. Methods: A group of ACNS members was convened to develop technical standards for performing ioECoG. PubMed searches were performed to identify pertinent peer-reviewed literature. Sections were assigned to individual authors based on expertise. Consensus was achieved during subsequent group discussions to develop evidence-based recommendations to the extent possible. Recommendations: Communication between the neurosurgical and the neurophysiology teams is essential in verifying and documenting the location of the contacts. Most authors recommend ioECoG recordings of at least 5 and up to 30 minutes in duration to allow for sufficient observation of interictal activity. The anesthesia should be adjusted to allow continuous EEG activity and to minimize the effect on the ioECoG recording during general anesthesia or awake surgery. The surgical procedure and technical report should separate ioECoG recordings to define the irritative zone from ioECoG findings during functional mapping. The neurophysiology physician’s physical presence in the operating room is required in the definition of the services. Conclusion: These consensus guidelines by the ACNS describe best practices for performing intraoperative ECoG based on published literature and expert consensus.