Murphy, Crystal M

Introduction Women residing in rural areas or belonging to lower socioeconomic status (SES) strata experience disproportionately low rates of breast cancer screening, contributing to delayed diagnoses and poorer prognoses. In addition, their participation in clinical trials remains markedly limited, reducing opportunities to access preventive and screening interventions. Promoting research preparedness among women before disease onset may empower them to make informed decisions regarding their health and willingness to participate in clinical research with fewer emotional and logistical barriers. Methods and analysis This project applies a community-based participatory research approach to develop and refine the WeCARE (Women’s Engagement for Cancer Awareness, Resources and Education) intervention for women aged 50–74 years who have either never undergone breast cancer screening or have not received screening in the past 5 years and who reside in rural areas or belong to low SES groups. The intervention consists of two components. Component 1 is a single-day, in-person community forum that includes (a) an educational seminar led by an oncologist to address breast cancer risk and screening guidelines, (b) survivor storytelling to enhance emotional engagement and cultural resonance and (c) facilitated navigation to breast cancer screening and future research participation. Component 2 involves structured post-forum follow-up through multiple touchpoints (phone calls and mailed boosters) to reinforce knowledge, address barriers and support screening completion and research enrolment. Quantitative data (eg, screening completion, satisfaction and follow-up engagement) will be summarised using descriptive statistics to assess feasibility and reach on 50 participants. Qualitative feedback from participants will undergo thematic analysis to identify barriers, facilitators and perceived cultural relevance. Integrated mixed-method interpretation will inform iterative refinement of the WeCARE intervention and guide design of subsequent larger trials. Ethics and dissemination Approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB #25–008934). All participants will provide informed consent. Procedures ensure confidentiality, cultural sensitivity and participant safety. Data will be stored in REDCap and disseminated through publications, conferences, local town halls and community reports.

Introduction Burnout among healthcare professionals remains a critical public health issue linked to impaired cognition, emotional exhaustion and diminished clinical performance. Structured breathing practices have demonstrated promise in improving autonomic regulation and cerebral oxygenation, yet their feasibility, acceptability and implementation in real-world healthcare settings remain underexplored. Objectives This single-arm pilot feasibility trial aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and implementation appropriateness of a structured breathing-based intervention for healthcare professionals across community-based Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) sites. Secondary objectives include assessing usability and engagement with the mobile breathing platform, while exploratory analyses will describe magnitude of variability and feasibility of collecting psychological and cerebral haemodynamic measures. This study will commence in November 2025 and is expected to be completed by June 2026. Methods and analysis A total of 40 clinicians (MD/DO/MBBS/PA) and nurses reporting moderate or greater burnout will be enrolled across four MCHS sites. Participants will complete a 4-month structured breathing programme delivered primarily online, supported by a mobile application for practice tracking. Assessments will occur at baseline, 2 months and 4 months, with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measures of cerebral oxygenation collected at baseline and 4 months in a population subset. Primary outcomes include (1) recruitment yield, retention and adherence rates; (2) acceptability and participant satisfaction (survey and qualitative feedback); and (3) implementation appropriateness measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Secondary outcomes include digital engagement and usability through mobile analytics and the System Usability Scale. Exploratory outcomes are psychological indicators (burnout, depression, anxiety, perceived stress, sleep, fatigue, professional fulfilment and resilience) and physiological endpoints (fNIRS). Analyses will be descriptive, summarising feasibility metrics with 95% CIs. Progression criteria (recruitment≥75%, retention≥80%, adherence≥70%, AIM/IAM/FIM≥4.0) will determine readiness for a definitive hybrid effectiveness–implementation trial. Ethics and dissemination The study is approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB # 25-009320). All participants will provide informed consent. Study procedures ensure confidentiality, cultural sensitivity and participant safety. Data will be securely stored in REDCap and disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conference Trial registration number NCT07218458 .