Back to Authors

Rudder, B. de

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic Health System

Citations 2

Community-informed development of an in-person forum to promote breast cancer screening and research preparedness in rural and low-socioeconomic status women
Sharma, Pravesh , Imsande, Kaylynn G., Vitriago, Anni, Seibel, Maria, Pritchett, Josh, Rudder, B. de, Tran, Linh T., Larson, Stephanie L., Flock, Carolyn, Murphy, Crystal, Asiedu, Gladys B. , Odedina, Folakemi T., Lynch, Brian, Haddad, Tufia C. , Pritchett, Joshua , Rudder, Bongi, Larson, Stephanie, Patten, Christi , Asiedu, Gladys B , Haddad, Tufia, Sharma, Pravesh , Imsande, Kaylynn G, Larson, Stephanie, Flock, Carolyn R., Murphy, Crystal, Patten, Christi A. , Odedina, Folakemi

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science | July 13, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1017/cts.2026.10788 Get It

Abstract Rural and low-socioeconomic status women face social determinants of health barriers leading to disproportionately low rates of breast cancer screening and markedly reduced participation in clinical trials. To address this gap, we developed the WeCARE (Women’s Engagement for Cancer Awareness, Resources, and Education) intervention using a community-engaged approach. This paper describes how Community Advisory Board feedback informed the development of Mayo Clinic Health System’s WeCARE intervention components. Their input was systematically analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0) to identify determinants of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility and to guide actionable refinements to intervention content and delivery.
WeCare intervention to improve breast cancer screening and research preparedness in rural and low-socioeconomic women: study protocol for a community-engaged feasibility trial
Min, Hoon‐Ki , Imsande, Kaylynn G, Vitriago, Anni, Seibel, Maria, Rudder, B. de, Watson, Dave , Beenken, Madison, Larson, Stephanie, Flock, Carolyn, Murphy, Crystal, Puljas, Tracy L, Asiedu, Gladys B. , Odedina, Folakemi T, Lynch, Brian , Haddad, Tufia C. , Min, Hoon-Ki Paul , Pritchett, Joshua C. , Rudder, Bongi, Beenken, Madison J, Larson, Stephanie L., Murphy, Crystal M, Patten, Christi A. , Haddad, Tufia C , Tran, Linh Thuy Khanh , Larson, Stephanie L, Flock, Carolyn R.

BMJ Open | June 1, 2026 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 6 | Pages: e113154

10.1136/bmjopen-2025-113154 Get It

Introduction Women residing in rural areas or belonging to lower socioeconomic status (SES) strata experience disproportionately low rates of breast cancer screening, contributing to delayed diagnoses and poorer prognoses. In addition, their participation in clinical trials remains markedly limited, reducing opportunities to access preventive and screening interventions. Promoting research preparedness among women before disease onset may empower them to make informed decisions regarding their health and willingness to participate in clinical research with fewer emotional and logistical barriers. Methods and analysis This project applies a community-based participatory research approach to develop and refine the WeCARE (Women’s Engagement for Cancer Awareness, Resources and Education) intervention for women aged 50–74 years who have either never undergone breast cancer screening or have not received screening in the past 5 years and who reside in rural areas or belong to low SES groups. The intervention consists of two components. Component 1 is a single-day, in-person community forum that includes (a) an educational seminar led by an oncologist to address breast cancer risk and screening guidelines, (b) survivor storytelling to enhance emotional engagement and cultural resonance and (c) facilitated navigation to breast cancer screening and future research participation. Component 2 involves structured post-forum follow-up through multiple touchpoints (phone calls and mailed boosters) to reinforce knowledge, address barriers and support screening completion and research enrolment. Quantitative data (eg, screening completion, satisfaction and follow-up engagement) will be summarised using descriptive statistics to assess feasibility and reach on 50 participants. Qualitative feedback from participants will undergo thematic analysis to identify barriers, facilitators and perceived cultural relevance. Integrated mixed-method interpretation will inform iterative refinement of the WeCARE intervention and guide design of subsequent larger trials. Ethics and dissemination Approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB #25–008934). All participants will provide informed consent. Procedures ensure confidentiality, cultural sensitivity and participant safety. Data will be stored in REDCap and disseminated through publications, conferences, local town halls and community reports.