Back to Authors

Sinha, Saurabh R.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0305-6731

Mayo Clinic

University of Pennsylvania

Citations 8

American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Technical Standards for Performing Intraoperative Electrocorticography
Husain, Aatif, Tatum, William, Gavvala, Jay R. , Inati, Sarah, Jacobs, Julia, Gloss, David , Alkawadri, Rafeed , Nordli, Doug, Templer, Jessica W. , Keller, Crystal M., Nuwer, Marc, Gavvala, Jay R , Templer, Jessica W , Schuele, Stephan , Selioutski, Olga , Sinha, Saurabh R. , Nuwer, Marc R.

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology | December 29, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 101-109

10.1097/wnp.0000000000001233 Get It

Purpose: These consensus guidelines by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) describe best practices for performing intraoperative Electrocorticography (ioECoG) using subdural or depth electrodes for adult and pediatric population. Methods: A group of ACNS members was convened to develop technical standards for performing ioECoG. PubMed searches were performed to identify pertinent peer-reviewed literature. Sections were assigned to individual authors based on expertise. Consensus was achieved during subsequent group discussions to develop evidence-based recommendations to the extent possible. Recommendations: Communication between the neurosurgical and the neurophysiology teams is essential in verifying and documenting the location of the contacts. Most authors recommend ioECoG recordings of at least 5 and up to 30 minutes in duration to allow for sufficient observation of interictal activity. The anesthesia should be adjusted to allow continuous EEG activity and to minimize the effect on the ioECoG recording during general anesthesia or awake surgery. The surgical procedure and technical report should separate ioECoG recordings to define the irritative zone from ioECoG findings during functional mapping. The neurophysiology physician’s physical presence in the operating room is required in the definition of the services. Conclusion: These consensus guidelines by the ACNS describe best practices for performing intraoperative ECoG based on published literature and expert consensus.
American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Technical Standards for Electrical Stimulation With Intracranial Electrodes for Functional Brain Mapping and Seizure Induction
Arya, Ravindra , Baumer, Fiona M. , Jayakar, Prasanna, Kheder, Ammar , Lesser, Ronald P. , Miller, Kai J. , Nuwer, Marc R. , Pedersen, Nigel P. , Ritaccio, Anthony L. , Sabsevitz, David S. , So, Elson L., Tatum, William O. , Templer, Jessica W. , Baumer, Fiona M , Arya, Ravindra , Templer, Jessica W , Chauvel, Patrick , Frauscher, Birgit , Lega, Bradley Charles , Sinha, Saurabh R. , Schuele, Stephan

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology | February 13, 2025 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 190-200

10.1097/wnp.0000000000001149 Get It

Purpose: These American Clinical Neurophysiology Society technical standards suggest best practices for electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) with subdural and stereotactic depth electrodes for seizure induction and mapping of brain function. Methods: A working group was convened from American Clinical Neurophysiology Society membership with expertise in ESM. PubMed searches were performed to identify pertinent peer-reviewed literature. Recurrent meetings reviewed progress, built consensus by discussion, and developed evidence-based recommendations to the extent possible. Recommendations: Stimulators used for ESM should have sufficient dynamic range, ability to interrupt a stimulus train, and ictal disrupt mechanism(s). Charge density should be calculated for the specific electrodes and ESM settings, the maximum safe limits being 52 to 57 μC/cm 2 /phase for subdural electrodes and not established for stereotactic depth electrodes. Subdural ESM for functional mapping is typically performed at 50-Hz pulse frequency, 200- to 300-µs pulse width, 2- to 8-s train duration, and 1- to 20-mA current strength. Stereo ESM is commonly performed using 2 different pulse frequencies: 1 Hz (300–500 µs pulse width, train duration up to 30 s, and often a constant current of 3–5 mA), and 50 Hz (100–500 µs pulse width, train duration 2-8 s, and 0.5–10 mA current intensity). Conclusions: This guideline provides technical standards for the performance of ESM, which will likely evolve over time with advances in technology and additional evidence (also see Graphical Abstract).
Epilepsy Surgery Education: A Survey of US Epilepsy Fellowship Program Directors
Katyal, Roohi , Gutierrez, Camilo , Day, Brian K., Gavvala, Jay R. , Sheth, Sameer A. , Gavvala, Jay R , Sheikh, Irfan , Sinha, Saurabh R. , Wirrell, Elaine , Beniczky, Sándor , Nascimento, Fábio A.

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology | February 12, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1-8

10.1097/wnp.0000000000001144 Get It

Purpose: To understand the current state of epilepsy surgery education delivered to epilepsy fellows in the United States. Methods: An online survey focused on characteristics of epilepsy surgery education was distributed to all 93 epilepsy fellowship program directors listed on the ACGME website (accessed in May 2022). Programs were stratified per the number of fellows currently enrolled: 0 to 3 (group A) and ≥4 (group B). Results: Forty-one of 93 (44%) epilepsy fellowship programs were included in the study. The average number of resective surgeries, ablations, or corpus callosotomies per year was mostly 0 to 30 (54%) in group A and mostly >30 (80%) in group B ( P = 0.05). The average number of intracranial implantations per year was mostly 0 to 20 (58%) in group A and mostly >20 (80%) in group B ( P < 0.05). The average number of neurostimulation implantations per year was 15 (range 0–90; vagal nerve stimulation), 7 (range 0–25; responsive neurostimulation), and 4 (range 0–10; deep brain stimulation). In 78% of programs, fellows are not required to present a minimum number of epilepsy surgery cases in multidisciplinary conference before graduation. Roughly half of programs (51%) reported not using objective measures to assess fellow competency in epilepsy surgery. Conclusions: Our results suggest significant variability in epilepsy surgery volume and, consequently, fellow exposure to surgical cases and lack of standardized, objective measures in fellow teaching and assessment in the field of epilepsy surgery across programs in the United States. We advocate development of a core epilepsy surgery curriculum including minimum standards at the national level.
Minimum Technical Requirements for Performing Ambulatory EEG
Tatum, William O. , Halford, Jonathan J. , Olejniczak, Piotr W., Selioutski, Olga , Grigg‐Damberger, Madeleine , Gloss, David , Acharya, Jayant N. , Tsuchida, Tammy N., Drislane, Frank W. , Halford, Jonathan J , Selioutski, Olga , Schuele, Stephan , Sinha, Saurabh R.

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology | June 15, 2022 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 435-440

10.1097/wnp.0000000000000950 Get It

Summary: Ambulatory EEG (AEEG) devices offer portable, multichannel, digital EEG recording with or without video in the patient's natural environment. The technology applied for AEEG recording is like the technology for routine EEG and inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring but designed to be compact and wearable. Computer-based AEEG technology is well-suited to digital recording, signal processing, and visual display. However, acquiring interpretable EEG outside of the hospital setting presents its own technical challenges. Published guidelines have established technical standards for performing routine EEG and inpatient video-EEG monitoring, but technical standards for AEEG are lacking. Therefore, this guideline provides minimal technical standards for the performance of AEEG which are essential to ensure the quality of studies for clinical and research practice. We expect these minimum standards to evolve over time with improved performance and advances in the technology.
Clinical Neurophysiology Fellowship Program Directors Survey on a Standardized Fellowship Match Process: A Call for Action
Liu, Lynn , Bensalem‐Owen, Meriem, LaRoche, Suzette M. , Nuwer, Marc R. , Lee, Leslie H., Rubin, Devon I., Laughlin, Ruple S. , Karakis, Ioannis , López, Jaime R. , Schmitt, Sarah E , Britton, Jeffrey W. , Sinha, Saurabh R.

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology | April 21, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 561-566

10.1097/wnp.0000000000000852 Get It

Purpose: To survey US Clinical Neurophysiology (CNP) fellowship program directors on the nature of CNP and related training programs, current recruitment cycle, and views for a standardized process. Methods: A 23-question electronic survey was sent to all 93 US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited CNP fellowship program directors from December 2020 to January 2021. Results: The response rate was 60%. There was great variability in the number of CNP positions and CNP tracks offered. The following tracks were identified: 48% EEG dominant, 26% EMG dominant, 22% split equally between EEG and EMG, and 2% and 1% were neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring and autonomic dominant, respectively. Of the responding institutions, 43% offered a second year of training options to CNP fellows, mainly in conjunction with Epilepsy fellowship, which was pursued by 25% of CNP fellows. Many programs indicated flexibility in their design between different CNP tracks or between CNP and other related training programs based on the available candidates. The median percentage of CNP fellowship positions filled over the last 5 years was 80%, and there was great variation in the recruitment timeline across institutions. Overall, 86% of program directors favored a universal timeline and 71% favored a formal match for CNP. The respondents were split between an independent CNP match (39%) and joining the initiatives of affiliate societies on a standardized process (61%). Conclusions: There is significant heterogeneity in the makeup of the CNP fellowship programs and the recruitment process. The majority of CNP program directors are in favor of standardization of the recruitment process.
American Clinical Neurophysiology Society: EEG Guidelines Introduction
Tsuchida, Tammy N., Acharya, Jayant N. , Kuratani, John, Sinha, Saurabh R. , Tatum, William O. , Drislane, Frank W. , Halford, Jonathan J. , Stecker, Mark M.

The Neurodiagnostic Journal | January 4, 2017 | Volume: 56 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 231-234

10.1080/21646821.2016.1245513 Get It

American Clinical Neurophysiology Society: EEG Guidelines Introduction
Tsuchida, Tammy N., Acharya, Jayant N. , Halford, Jonathan J. , Kuratani, John, Sinha, Saurabh R. , Tatum, William O. , Drislane, Frank W. , Stecker, Mark M. , Halford, Jonathan J

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology | August 9, 2016 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 301-302

10.1097/wnp.0000000000000315 Get It

Summary: This revision to the EEG Guidelines is an update incorporating current EEG technology and practice. “Standards of practice in clinical electroencephalography” (previously Guideline 4) has been removed. It is currently undergoing revision through collaboration among multiple medical societies and will become part of “Qualifications and Responsibilities of Personnel Performing and Interpreting Clinical Neurophysiology Procedures.” The remaining guidelines are reordered and renumbered.