Raygoza, Jhenitza P.

ABSTRACT Introduction Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death among Latinas. Although breast cancer risk assessment models exist and show promise in reducing mortality, few studies have elicited women's interest in and perceptions around breast cancer risk assessment, particularly among underserved populations, like Latinas, who are susceptible to disparities in breast cancer outcomes. These disparities stem from factors such as limited access to healthcare services, lower rates of screening utilization, language barriers, and socioeconomic challenges, all of which compound their risk and hinder effective engagement with risk assessment tools. This qualitative study aims to explore Latinas' perspectives regarding breast cancer risk assessment and implications on future behaviors. Methods Twenty‐three under‐ or uninsured Latinas aged 45–65 with no personal history of breast cancer took part in either a focus group ( n = 3, 15 participants) or individual interviews (8 participants). Guided by health behavior theories (Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model), data were transcribed, translated, and analyzed using a deductive‐inductive approach to thematic content analysis, resulting in four themes. Results Latinas expressed high interest in knowing their breast cancer risk and reported that the benefits of knowing one's risk outweighed the harms. Latinas also stated that they would continue screening as recommended if found to be at low risk, but that they would speak with their provider or increase screening frequency if found to be at increased risk. Moreover, Latinas described the pivotal role of providers and social networks in influencing interest and perceptions around breast cancer risk assessment and preventive behaviors. Conclusion Underserved Latinas viewed breast cancer risk assessment positively and underscored the need for multilevel, culturally tailored strategies to improve breast cancer risk assessment. This study yielded four distinct themes: (1) Interest and Awareness of Personal Breast Cancer Risk, (2) Benefits and Barriers of Knowing Personal Breast Cancer Risk, (3) Screening Implications of Knowing Personal Breast Cancer Risk, and (4) Provider Influence on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Behaviors. Potential strategies include efforts to improve provider engagement and communication and leveraging social networks to increase awareness and encourage preventive behaviors. Trial Registration NCI‐2023‐00465

Introduction: Health promotion programs focused on cardiovascular disease are underutilized with im/migrants. The one-time referral to group-based interventions model ignores (1) the complex sociocultural influences on behavior change and (2) the socio-historical context of migration, racialization of immigrants and refugees, and the roles these play in differential social integration of refugees. One solution may be to apply community-based participatory research (CBPR) and Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) to social network interventions with opinion leaders. Yet, these interventions are challenging to scale. There is a critical need to understand how to scale community-driven social network interventions to effectively address cardiovascular disease inequities resulting from systemic racism experienced by im/migrant populations. Developed using CBPR and informed by PHCRP, this work builds upon Healthy Immigrant Community (HIC), a collaborative effort between Latinx and Somali im/migrant partners and Rochester Healthy Community Partnership. Our aim is to explore opinion leader recruitment, their characteristics, and expectations for HIC scale-up. Qualitative Hypothesis: Learning more about the opinion leaders’ background and experience in the Healthy Immigrant Community social network intervention will prepare us for a future efficacy study. Methods: We conducted a process evaluation by: (1) interviewing community partners who recruited opinion leaders (n=8) and (2) conducting three pre-intervention focus groups with opinion leaders (Latinx n=4; Somali women n=8; Somali men n=8). We used PHCRP to deductively form codes yet allowed for new ideas that arose from the data by inductively generating additional codes. Results: Interview participants described their decision-making process, qualities considered, recruitment strategies, and expectations for an implementation study. Focus group participants discussed their personal motivations for participation, how they hoped the study would help their community, and the barriers to health they experience because of structural determinism (macro-level forces that sustain inequities). Conclusions: This work will enhance our ability to translate HIC to other communities by expanding our knowledge of opinion leader characteristics that are important in a community-driven, social network intervention. Because social network interventions have been demonstrated to cause positive behavior change, further adapting these interventions in a community setting would be expected to provide a more effective approach compared to individually targeted behavior change strategies. Additionally, selecting OLs is neither time nor resource intensive and could enhance organizational strategies for implementing health promotion programming.

91 Background: Most screening clinical trials are not representative of the populations susceptible to disparities in breast cancer outcomes. Strategies are needed to address known structural barriers to clinical trial participation. We partnered with a federally qualified health center to provide no-cost ride-share services as a strategy to facilitate enrollment of uninsured, Hispanic women in Maricopa County, Arizona into a national trial offering no-cost mammography screening. Objective: This pilot survey study explored the feasibility and experiences of uninsured, Hispanic women with a no-cost ride share program as part of the National Cancer Institute funded ECOG-ACRIN clinical trial, TMIST, studying mammography screening at the Mayo Clinic Arizona in Phoenix. Methods: Participants completed a validated survey by phone and interview-style. Survey items assessed women’s use of and experiences with the ride share service including barriers, benefits, and if the ride share service facilitated their participation in the screening trial. Descriptive statistics were calculated using SAS. Results: A total of 30 women completed the survey (response rate = 30/33). All women first-time Mayo Clinic trial participants and 90% lived at least 30 minutes away from trial facility. The mean age of women was X years, 90% had a high school degree or less, and 97% were Spanish speaking. Most women (73.7%) said that travel distance was a barrier to participation in prior clinical trials. A large proportion of women (73%) reported using ride share services for this trial and all agreed that the ride service made it easier for them to attend their trial visit. Nearly 1/3 (64%) said that they were uncertain or would not have been able to participate without the ride-share as an option. Among women using the ride share service, the main benefits of the program included at-home pick up and the service being of no-cost. Other benefits included flexible timing (86%) and one-on-one service (86%). The primary barrier of the program was the driver not speaking the dominant native language (27.3%). Conclusions: Despite lengthy travel distances, women reported overwhelming positive experiences with the no-cost ride share program and agreed that the service helped facilitate their participation in the clinical trial. Thus, no-cost ride share programs are a promising and feasible strategy to reduce barriers to clinical trial participation among historically underserved populations. Future studies should continue to explore the benefits and sustainability of ride-share programs, including benefits to clinical trial retention.