Abstract Background Immigrants to the United States often face challenges from limited healthcare access and less healthy environments which contribute to rising obesity and cardiovascular risk. Purpose To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a community-based social network intervention for cardiovascular risk reduction among Hispanic and Somali adults. Methods A social network-informed, community-based participatory research-derived health promotion intervention was delivered by Hispanic and Somali lay health promoters (HPs) to members of their social networks over 1 year (12 biweekly sessions in months 0-6; 12 biweekly check-ins in months 7-12). Using a closed-cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized design, social networks were randomly assigned to receive the intervention immediately or after a delay of 1 year. Measurements at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months were derived from 6 of the American Heart Association’s “Life’s Simple 7”: BMI, blood pressure, fasting glucose, cholesterol, physical activity and dietary quality (range 0-12, with higher values indicating lower cardiovascular risk). Waist circumference and proportion of participants who achieved >5% body weight loss were also assessed. Results Four hundred seventy-five participants were enrolled among 51 HPs (29 Hispanic; 22 Somali). There was a statistically significant improvement in cardiovascular risk in the intervention group (n = 246) compared with controls (n = 229) at 6 months (0.4 [1.8] vs. −0.1 [1.7]; P = .03) that was not sustained at 12 months (0.5 [1.9] vs. 0.3 [1.8]; P = .38). There was a statistically significant higher proportion of participants who lost >5% of body weight in the intervention group compared with controls at 12 months (37% [15] vs. 18% [7.9]; P = .02). Reductions in weight and waist circumference in the intervention group compared with controls did not achieve statistical significance. Conclusion A social network intervention, delivered by lay HPs was feasible and resulted in a modest improvement of cardiovascular risk and clinically significant weight loss. Clinical Trial Identification Number NCT05136339.
Abstract P650: Addressing Cardiovascular Disease Inequities: Qualitative Process Evaluation From a Co-Investigation With Im/Migrants Exploring How to Sustain a Community-Driven, Social Network Intervention Using a Racism-Conscious Approach
Introduction: Health promotion programs focused on cardiovascular disease are underutilized with im/migrants. The one-time referral to group-based interventions model ignores (1) the complex sociocultural influences on behavior change and (2) the socio-historical context of migration, racialization of immigrants and refugees, and the roles these play in differential social integration of refugees. One solution may be to apply community-based participatory research (CBPR) and Public Health Critical Race Praxis (PHCRP) to social network interventions with opinion leaders. Yet, these interventions are challenging to scale. There is a critical need to understand how to scale community-driven social network interventions to effectively address cardiovascular disease inequities resulting from systemic racism experienced by im/migrant populations. Developed using CBPR and informed by PHCRP, this work builds upon Healthy Immigrant Community (HIC), a collaborative effort between Latinx and Somali im/migrant partners and Rochester Healthy Community Partnership. Our aim is to explore opinion leader recruitment, their characteristics, and expectations for HIC scale-up. Qualitative Hypothesis: Learning more about the opinion leaders’ background and experience in the Healthy Immigrant Community social network intervention will prepare us for a future efficacy study. Methods: We conducted a process evaluation by: (1) interviewing community partners who recruited opinion leaders (n=8) and (2) conducting three pre-intervention focus groups with opinion leaders (Latinx n=4; Somali women n=8; Somali men n=8). We used PHCRP to deductively form codes yet allowed for new ideas that arose from the data by inductively generating additional codes. Results: Interview participants described their decision-making process, qualities considered, recruitment strategies, and expectations for an implementation study. Focus group participants discussed their personal motivations for participation, how they hoped the study would help their community, and the barriers to health they experience because of structural determinism (macro-level forces that sustain inequities). Conclusions: This work will enhance our ability to translate HIC to other communities by expanding our knowledge of opinion leader characteristics that are important in a community-driven, social network intervention. Because social network interventions have been demonstrated to cause positive behavior change, further adapting these interventions in a community setting would be expected to provide a more effective approach compared to individually targeted behavior change strategies. Additionally, selecting OLs is neither time nor resource intensive and could enhance organizational strategies for implementing health promotion programming.
Community-Engaged Bidirectional Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication With Immigrant and Refugee Populations During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Objectives: This study was conducted to assess an intervention that was created by a community–academic partnership to address COVID-19 health inequities. We evaluated a community-engaged bidirectional pandemic crisis and emergency risk communication (CERC) framework with immigrant and refugee populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A 17-year community-engaged research partnership adopted a CERC framework in March 2020 to address COVID-19 prevention, testing, and socioeconomic impacts with immigrant and refugee groups in southeast Minnesota. The partnership used bidirectional communication between communication leaders and their social networks to refine messages, leverage resources, and advise policy makers. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation for intervention acceptability, feasibility, reach, adaptation, and sustainability through multisource data, including email communications, work group notes, semistructured interviews, and focus groups. Results: The intervention reached at least 39 000 people in 9 months. It was implemented as intended and perceived efficacy was high. Frequent communication between community and academic partners allowed the team to respond rapidly to concerns and facilitated connection of community members to resources. Framework implementation also led to systems and policy changes to meet the needs of immigrant and refugee populations. Conclusions: Community-engaged CERC is feasible and sustainable and can reduce COVID-19 disparities through shared creation and dissemination of public health messages, enhanced connection to existing resources, and incorporation of community perspectives in regional pandemic mitigation policies.