Nepple, Jeffrey J.

Background: Stable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions are primarily treated nonoperatively. Nonoperative treatment includes several recommendations, including the use of an unloader brace. However, little is known about the clinical effectiveness of unloader bracing and its influence on OCD healing, return to sports, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the impact of unloader bracing on patients with stable medial femoral condyle (MFC) OCD lesions treated nonoperatively. Purpose: To investigate the influence of valgus unloader bracing on the success of treating stable MFC OCD with nonoperative treatment strategies. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The authors used a prospective cohort of patients receiving nonoperative care for stable MFC knee OCD lesions. The primary variable of interest was the efficacy of bracing. The primary outcomes were transition from nonoperative care to surgical intervention, return-to-play (RTP) clearance, and PROs. Bivariate testing was used to determine if there were differences between groups. Chi-square testing was used to determine if there were differences in rates of transition to surgery by group. The timing of the transition by each group was assessed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, given the nonparametric nature of the data. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate time at risk, incidence rate, and survival times for each group. Results: A total of 185 knees (bracing group: 123 [66.5%] knees; no-bracing group: 62 [33.5%] knees) were analyzed. Overall, 142 (76.8%) knees were successfully treated nonoperatively. Transition to surgery occurred in 43 (23.2%) knees. There were no differences in transition to surgery by groups, with no differences seen by group. Of the knees that did not transition to surgical care, 65 (71.4%) in the bracing group and 38 (74.5%) in the no-bracing group received RTP clearance ( P = .693). PRO scores were similar between the 2 groups at the time of RTP clearance. Conclusion: The inclusion of an unloader brace in the nonoperative treatment for stable MFC OCD lesions did not decrease the likelihood of patients undergoing surgical intervention or improve their PRO scores at the time of RTP clearance. Registration: NCT02771496 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Background: Long-term outcomes of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery, particularly survivorship, are critical to guide treatment decision-making and patient counseling, yet only a limited number of studies have reported mid- to long-term survivorship. The purpose of this study was to report survivorship rates at a mean 10-year follow-up in a large, multicenter FAI surgery cohort and to identify clinical predictors of survivorship. Methods: A prospective, multicenter cohort study assessed patients treated for FAI with hip arthroscopy or surgical dislocation from 2008 to 2012. At a minimum of 8 years, 362 hips (80.1%) had follow-up that permitted assessment of total hip arthroplasty (THA)-free survivorship. A Cox proportional-hazards model was developed to identify risk factors for THA. Results: tThe cohort included 362 hips with a mean patient age of 32.1 years; 53% were in females, and 95.6% were in Caucasian patients. The THA-free survivorship of the cohort was 90.6% at a mean of 10.4 ± 1.6 years postoperatively. Risk factors for THA were older age at surgery (p = 0.01), male sex (p = 0.02), body mass index of ≥30 kg/m 2 (p = 0.009), and femoral head chondromalacia (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that FAI surgery yielded durable 10-year THA-free survivorship of 90.6%. Older age at surgery, obesity, male sex, and femoral head chondromalacia were key predictors of conversion to THA. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Background Femoral version plays a critical role in pre-arthritic hip pain, particularly in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Variations in femoral version may contribute to hip instability or impingement. This study examines the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for FAI across different femoral version groups. Methods A prospective multicenter cohort of 677 FAI patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy was collected, with 603 patients in this study based on recorded femoral version. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 14-45 years with idiopathic FAI, while previous ipsilateral hip procedures, associated disorders, or Tönnis 2 or greater osteoarthritis were excluded. Femoral version was measured on low-dose computed tomography (CT) utilizing the Yoshioka oblique method and categorized into five subgroups: &lt;5°, 6°-15°, 16°-25°, 26°-35°, 35°+. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were obtained at minimum one-year follow-up. The modified Harris hip score (mHHS) was assessed relative to minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 8 and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) of 74. Additional PROs included HOOS Pain and Sports/Recreation subscores and iHOT-12 score. Composite failure was defined as reoperation for persistent symptoms or failure to achieve either the mHHS MCID or PASS. Results Males had statistically lower femoral version than females (14.0 vs 18.0; p&lt;0.001). In females, 38.0% had a femoral version of 16°-25°, 17.9% between 26°-35°, and 3.6% greater than 35°, compared to 27.6%, 9.2%, and 1.8% in males, respectively (all p&lt;0.001). Increased or decreased femoral versions appear to have similar outcomes to normal version. The mildly increased femoral anteversion groups of 16°-25° and 26°-35° demonstrated the best outcomes with changes in HOOS pain and sports subscores being significantly higher. Severely increased femoral anteversion, &gt;35°, only present in 2.8% of patients, demonstrated a higher composite failure rate (15.4%) compared to moderately increased, 26°-35°, femoral version (3.1%). The decreased femoral version group, ≤5°, had a composite failure of 10.4% compared to normal femoral version, 16°-25° (10.2%). Conclusions The general anatomy differences between males and females lends males to be more in retroversion while females tend to be more anteverted. Overall, outcomes did not seem to differ between increased or decreased femoral versions but were superior at mildly increased femoral versions.

Objectives: The role of femoral version (FV[MOU1] ) in the pre-arthritic hip pain remains increasingly recognized, including in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Increased femoral version or decreased femoral version may play a role in hip biomechanics contributing to hip instability or impingement, respectively. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for FAI across different femoral version groups in a multicenter prospective cohort study. Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 677 FAI patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy was performed. The current study included 603 patients with low-dose CT performed preoperatively for measurement of femoral version from the larger cohort. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 14-45 years with idiopathic FAI. Exclusion criteria were previous ipsilateral hip procedures, associated disorders, or Tönnis 2 or greater osteoarthritis. Femoral version was measured on low-dose computed tomography (CT) utilizing the Yoshioka oblique method and was broken into five subgroups: <5° (decreased FV), 6-15° (normal FV), 16-25° (mildly increased FV), 26-35° (moderately increased FV), 35°+ (severely increased FV). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were measured at a minimum one-year follow-up. The modified Harris hip score (mHHS) was assessed relative to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 8 and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) of 74. Additional PROs included the HOOS Pain and Sports/Recreation subscores and the iHOT-12 score. Composite failure was defined as a reoperation for persistent symptoms or a failure to achieve either the mHHS MCID or PASS. Independent t-test (Mann-Whitney U) and ANOVA were utilized to compare groups. Results: Males had statistically lower femoral version than females (14.0° vs 18.0°; p<0.001). In females, 38.0% had mildly increased FV, 17.9% had moderately increased FV, and 3.6% had severely elevated FV. This is compared to 27.6%, 9.2%, and 1.8% in males, respectively (all p<0.001). Decreased FV was present in 7.1% of males, compared to 5.9% of females. Increased or decreased femoral versions appear to have similar outcomes to normal version when evaluated by PROs or outcome states. In fact, mildly increased and moderate increased FV group demonstrated the best outcomes. Changes in HOOS pain and sports subscores were significantly higher for these groups. Severely increased FV, >35°, was only present in 2.8% of patients but did demonstrate a higher rate of composite failure (15.4%) compared to moderately increased FV (3.1%). The decreased FV group had a composite failure of 10.4% compared to normal femoral version, 16-25° (10.2%). Conclusions: In a patient cohort undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI, significant differences in FV between males and females were present. Overall, in a multicenter prospective cohort study, the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for FAI did not seem to differ between increased or decreased femoral versions but were superior in mild to moderately increased FV. Future research with longer-term follow-up is still needed to definitively establish the longevity of outcomes of hip arthroscopy relative to FV.

Abstract Background: Resilience, quantified by the brief resilience scale (BRS), has been recognized for its role in pain and symptomatology in musculoskeletal conditions. The role of psychological factors in the clinical presentation and outcomes of FAI surgery continues to be poorly understood. Methods: This is a prospective multicenter study of FAI patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy. PROMs were administered at baseline, 3-, and 6-months post-op and included the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of anxiety and depression, as well as Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (HOOS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). Resilience was characterized by BRS score and divided into low (“L”, score&lt;3), normal (“N”, score 3-4.3), and high resilience (“H”, score&gt;4.3). Results: 675 patients were included with a mean age of 24.9±7.8 years and female predominance (56%). Mean BRS scores were 3.7±0.7 (1.5-5.0). 13.8% (n=93) had low resilience, 65.9% (n=445) had normal resilience, and 20.3% (n=137) had high resilience. Lower resilience had more severe symptoms in HOOS pain (p&lt;0.001), HOOS sports (p=0.003), HOOS ADL (p&lt;0.001), HOOS QoL (p&lt;0.001), iHOT-12 (p=0.002), and mHHS (p&lt;0.001). Anxiety (L: 50.5%/N: 14.4%/H: 2.2%) and depression (L: 38.7%/N: 8.8%/H: 2.9%) were higher in lower resilience groups (all p&lt;0.001) and this trend stayed consistent in female and male sub-analyses with females having greater anxiety and depression symptoms. The follow-up cohort with 3- and 6-months follow-up was 487 patients and had similar baseline characteristics as the baseline cohort. Lower resilience had lower postoperative PROs (with similar change) (p&lt;0.05). After treatment, rates of anxiety or depression decreased from 22.1% to 15.6% with the low resilience group having the highest change from 62.9% to 45.9%. Conclusion: Low resilience correlates with more severe symptoms and predicts anxiety/depression in FAI. 13.8% had low resilience while 20.3% had high resilience. Lower resilience had worse postoperative PROs. Particularly in patients with low resilience at presentation, rates of anxiety or depression symptoms decreased postoperatively. Further studies are needed to understand the role of resilience in longer-term outcomes of FAI and whether concurrent psychological treatment will help improve patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy for FAI.

Abstract Introduction: Labral injury at the time of open and arthroscopic hip preservation surgery for symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is managed with debridement versus refixation by the treating surgeon based on tear pattern, tissue quality, and hip morphology. While refixation has been favored based on mid-term outcomes in some series, differences in the long-term patient reported outcomes (PROMS) have not been defined in well-designed and matched prospective series. Methods: This study consisted of a prospective, multi-center cohort that underwent primary surgical treatment for symptomatic FAI. Patients were included if they underwent corrective osteoplasty and a labral refixation or a labral debridement procedure. Using a ratio of 1:1, hips with labral refixation and labral debridement were matched by age, sex, and surgical approach. Postoperative assessments were conducted at a minimum 8 years after surgery using PROMS and assessment of reoperations. Results: A total of 237 hips (n=188 labral refixation, n=49 labral debridement) met the inclusion criteria for the current study. 48 hips from the labral refixation and 48 hips from debridement groups with mean follow-up of 10.3±1.7 years and 10.6±2.1 years respectively were included. No significant differences were observed in the femoral head, acetabular cartilage grade, or labral grade between the groups. The mHHS improved 19.8±19.6 and 23.4±16.8 from baseline to the final follow-up in the labral refixation and debridement groups, respectively (p=0.43). There were no significant differences in PROMS between the labral refixation and debridement groups. Overall, 66% and 76% of the labral refixation and debridement groups achieved the MCID for the mHHS respectively (p=0.30). There were more revision surgeries with labral refixation than with debridement (10.4% vs. 2.1%, p=0.09), but more conversions to total hip replacement in the labral debridement group (8.3% vs. 4.2%, p=0.38), but neither of these differences were statistically significant. Discussion: Both labral refixation and debridement are effective with durable improvement in PROMS at a mean of 10 years in a prospective cohort of patients treated surgically for symptomatic FAI. No significant differences in baseline or final PROMS were observed, and similar rates of revision and conversion to hip replacement were observed in the debridement and refixation groups.

Abstract Introduction: Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has been increasingly utilized in FAI due to its improved ability to characterize the complex and variable hip morphologies of FAI patients, compared to plain radiographs. This study defined FAI morphology between females and males as well as across adolescents, young adults, and older adults. Methods: A multi-center, prospective cohort of FAI patients undergoing primary arthroscopy was performed. Patients 14-45 years of age with idiopathic FAI were included. Low-dose CT was used for preoperative planning. Analysis focused on acetabular and femoral morphology and the differences between females/males and adolescents (A,14-18.9)/young adults (Y,19-24.9)/older adults (O,25+). Adolescents were the reference group during analysis. Results: There were 604 patients with CT data. Mean age was 24.9 years with 55.9% female. Males had more anterosuperior coverage (i.e. 64.2% vs 62.5% at 1:00), lower version (14.1° vs 18.0°), smaller femoral neck-shaft angles (130.9° vs 133.4°), and larger alpha angles (i.e. 72.1° vs 58.6° at 1:00) compared to females. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that females had associations with more femoral anteversion (OR: 1.05,CI: 1.03-1.07) and larger femoral neck-shaft angles (OR: 1.11,CI: 1.06-1.16). Males has associations with larger alpha angles at 1:00 (OR: 1.05,CI: 1.02-1.07) and 1:30 (OR: 1.03,CI: 1.00-1.06) as well as radial coverage at 1:00 (OR: 1.18,CI: 1.11-1.26). For females, adolescents had slightly less radial coverage at 2:00 (49.9%) compared to young (51.2%) and older adults (51.4%). Femoral neck-shaft angle decreased across age groups (A: 134.4°,Y: 133.0°,O: 132.7°). Alpha angles increased at 2:00 with age (A:54.6°,Y:55.3°,O:58.7°). Multivariable analysis had femoral neck-shaft angle decreasing for young (OR: 0.932,CI: 0.87) and older adults (OR:0.92,CI: 0.86-0.98) and it also had alpha angle at 1:15 increasing for young adults (OR: 1.03,CI: 1.00-1.06) and older adults (OR: 1.03,CI: 1.01-1.06). Males did not have any appreciable differences alpha angles, femoral version, or acetabular coverage across age groups. Conclusion: Differences in morphology identified on CT exist between females and males as well as across age groups for females. These differences may offer insight into disease pathomechanics between these patient populations. Further studies should confirm these findings and look at how they affect patient outcomes after treatment.

Abstract Background: Long-term outcomes of FAI surgery are critical to understand it’s hip preserving ability, yet few studies have reported mid to long-term survivorship following FAI surgery. The purpose of this study was to report rates of treatment failure after first-generation FAI surgery at an average 10- year follow-up. Methods: A prospective, multicenter cohort study assessed patients treated for FAI with hip arthroscopy or surgical dislocation by seven surgeons at four institutions from 2008 to 2012. Inclusion criteria included primary surgery and diagnosis of isolated cam or combined cam/pincer type FAI. At an average 10-year follow-up, 362/452 eligible hips (80.1%) achieved follow-up. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Results: Three hundred and sixty two hips were evaluated at a mean of 10.0 ± 2.3 years follow-up. At time of final follow-up, 34 hips (9.2%) had undergone conversion to THA at a mean of 5.2 ± 3.1 years post-operatively. An additional 18 patients (4.9%) underwent non-arthroplasty revision preservation surgery at a mean of 2.0 ± 1.5 years post-operatively. The Kaplan Meier survivorship rates after 5 and 10 years of surgery were 94.9% and 95.2% for conversion to THA and 91 % and 95.2% for revision hip preservation. Older age (HR:1.06, CI: 1.01-1.10; p=0.009), BMI≥30 (HR:4.14, CI:1.52-11.24, p=0.005), male sex (HR:3.23, CI: 1.18-9.09, p=0.02), and lower baseline mHHS (HR:1.03, CI: 1.01-1.04, p=0.01) were significant predictors of conversion to THA. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that FAI surgery yields durable outcomes with the majority of patients (85.9%) not requiring revision surgery or conversion to total hip arthroplasty at an average 10 years. Age 30 years, male sex, and obesity were significantly associated with the risk of THA conversion.

Background: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee is a focal idiopathic alteration of subchondral bone and/or its precursor with risk for instability and disruption of adjacent cartilage. Treatment options focused on preventing premature osteoarthritis vary depending on multiple patient and lesion characteristics, including lesion mobility. Purpose: To differentiate lesion mobility before arthroscopy using a multivariable model that includes patient demographic characteristics and physical examination findings. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Demographic, preoperative physical examination, and radiographic data were collected from a multicenter national prospective cohort of patients with OCD of the knee. Inclusion criteria included patients <19 years of age and patients with arthroscopically confirmed mobility status based on the Research on Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee arthroscopy classification. Multivariable logistic regression analysis using stepwise model selection was used to determine factors associated with the likelihood of a mobile versus an immobile lesion. A 75% partition of the data was used for model training, and 25% was used as a validation cohort. Quantitative model fit statistics were computed using the holdout data, including sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), along with the corresponding 95% CI. Results: A total of 407 patients in the prospective cohort met inclusion criteria, and 62% were male. The mean ± SD age was 13.7 ± 2.2 years, height 161.8 ± 5.3 cm, and weight 59.2 ± 42.2 kg. Arthroscopic evaluation yielded 235 immobile and 172 mobile lesions. Multivariable analysis determined that the best model to predict lesion mobility included chronologic age ≥14 years ( P < .001), effusion on physical examination ( P < .001), and any loss of range of motion on physical examination ( P = .07), while controlling for male sex ( P = .38) and weight >54.4 kg ( P = .12). In the 25% holdout validation sample (n = 102), a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 82%, and an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82-0.95) were achieved with these predictive factors. Conclusion: Age, effusion, and loss of motion can predict knee OCD lesion mobility at the time of arthroscopy. Education about lesion mobility can help with surgical planning and patient and family counseling.

Objectives: The role of psychological factors in the clinical presentation and outcomes of treated is increasingly recognized in orthopaedic surgery. Particularly, in prearthritic hip disorders, young adult hip patients often have significant psychological undertones. Patient resiliency, as quantified by the brief resiliency scale (BRS), is a static patient characteristic and has been increasingly recognized for its potential role in pain and symptomatology. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the correlation between BRS and traditional hip patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 696 patients undergoing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) primary hip arthroscopy surgery was performed and utilized for the current study. Inclusion criteria are patients aged 14 to 45 years old with idiopathic FAI not caused by childhood disease. Exclusion criteria are previous ipsilateral hip procedures or disease processes such as neuromuscular disease or high-grade osteoarthritis. PROMs included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of pain interference, physical function, mobility, anxiety, and depression, as well as hip disability and osteoarthritis and outcome score (HOOS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), international hip outcome tool (iHOT-12), and short form-12 (SF-12). Resiliency was divided into low resiliency (score < 3), normal resiliency (score 3 to 4.3), and high resiliency (score > 4.3) as described by Smith et al 1 to use as categorical variables to compare to the other patient-reported scores. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was calculated and the Kruskall Willis test was used to measure association between BRS and the other PROMs for continuous and categorical values, respectively. R values ≥0.7, ≥0.4, and ≥0.1 signify a strong, moderate, and weak correlation, respectively. For categorical analysis, P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The cohort of 696 patients had mean age was 24.9 ± 7.9 years and a female predominance at 56%. Average BRS scores were 3.7 ± 0.7. Overall, 13.7% of patients had low resiliency, while 65.8% had normal resiliency and 20.5% had high resiliency. Linear correlation, using Pearson coefficients, found associations between BRS and all other scores. There were only weak associations between BRS scores and PROs (all r < 0.25) except a moderate correlation with PROMIS depression (r = -0.476, p < 0.001) and PROMIS anxiety (r = -0.481, p < 0.001). Patients in higher resiliency groups reported less severe symptoms in HOOS – quality of life (p < 0.001), HOOS – sports and recreation (p = 0.004), HOOS – activities of daily living (p = 0.004), HOOS – pain (p = 0.026), iHOT-12 (p = 0.01), mHHS (p = 0.004), SF-12 mental (p < 0.001), PROMIS physical function (p = 0.003), PROMIS pain (p < 0.001), PROMIS mobility (p < 0.001), PROMIS depression (p < 0.001), and PROMIS anxiety (p < 0.001). Patients with higher activity levels (UCLA ≥9) demonstrated higher resiliency (p = 0.04). Conclusions: In FAI patients, patient resiliency appears to influence baseline PROs. Overall, 14% of patients had low resiliency while 21% had high resiliency. Further studies are needed to investigate this relationship and whether concurrent psychological treatment will help improve patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy for FAI. [Figure: see text]