Group, ANCHOR Study

Background: Long-term outcomes of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery, particularly survivorship, are critical to guide treatment decision-making and patient counseling, yet only a limited number of studies have reported mid- to long-term survivorship. The purpose of this study was to report survivorship rates at a mean 10-year follow-up in a large, multicenter FAI surgery cohort and to identify clinical predictors of survivorship. Methods: A prospective, multicenter cohort study assessed patients treated for FAI with hip arthroscopy or surgical dislocation from 2008 to 2012. At a minimum of 8 years, 362 hips (80.1%) had follow-up that permitted assessment of total hip arthroplasty (THA)-free survivorship. A Cox proportional-hazards model was developed to identify risk factors for THA. Results: tThe cohort included 362 hips with a mean patient age of 32.1 years; 53% were in females, and 95.6% were in Caucasian patients. The THA-free survivorship of the cohort was 90.6% at a mean of 10.4 ± 1.6 years postoperatively. Risk factors for THA were older age at surgery (p = 0.01), male sex (p = 0.02), body mass index of ≥30 kg/m 2 (p = 0.009), and femoral head chondromalacia (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that FAI surgery yielded durable 10-year THA-free survivorship of 90.6%. Older age at surgery, obesity, male sex, and femoral head chondromalacia were key predictors of conversion to THA. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Background Femoral version plays a critical role in pre-arthritic hip pain, particularly in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Variations in femoral version may contribute to hip instability or impingement. This study examines the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for FAI across different femoral version groups. Methods A prospective multicenter cohort of 677 FAI patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy was collected, with 603 patients in this study based on recorded femoral version. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 14-45 years with idiopathic FAI, while previous ipsilateral hip procedures, associated disorders, or Tönnis 2 or greater osteoarthritis were excluded. Femoral version was measured on low-dose computed tomography (CT) utilizing the Yoshioka oblique method and categorized into five subgroups: &lt;5°, 6°-15°, 16°-25°, 26°-35°, 35°+. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were obtained at minimum one-year follow-up. The modified Harris hip score (mHHS) was assessed relative to minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 8 and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) of 74. Additional PROs included HOOS Pain and Sports/Recreation subscores and iHOT-12 score. Composite failure was defined as reoperation for persistent symptoms or failure to achieve either the mHHS MCID or PASS. Results Males had statistically lower femoral version than females (14.0 vs 18.0; p&lt;0.001). In females, 38.0% had a femoral version of 16°-25°, 17.9% between 26°-35°, and 3.6% greater than 35°, compared to 27.6%, 9.2%, and 1.8% in males, respectively (all p&lt;0.001). Increased or decreased femoral versions appear to have similar outcomes to normal version. The mildly increased femoral anteversion groups of 16°-25° and 26°-35° demonstrated the best outcomes with changes in HOOS pain and sports subscores being significantly higher. Severely increased femoral anteversion, &gt;35°, only present in 2.8% of patients, demonstrated a higher composite failure rate (15.4%) compared to moderately increased, 26°-35°, femoral version (3.1%). The decreased femoral version group, ≤5°, had a composite failure of 10.4% compared to normal femoral version, 16°-25° (10.2%). Conclusions The general anatomy differences between males and females lends males to be more in retroversion while females tend to be more anteverted. Overall, outcomes did not seem to differ between increased or decreased femoral versions but were superior at mildly increased femoral versions.

Objectives: The role of psychological factors in the clinical presentation and outcomes of treated is increasingly recognized in orthopaedic surgery. Particularly, in prearthritic hip disorders, young adult hip patients often have significant psychological undertones. Patient resiliency, as quantified by the brief resiliency scale (BRS), is a static patient characteristic and has been increasingly recognized for its potential role in pain and symptomatology. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the correlation between BRS and traditional hip patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 696 patients undergoing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) primary hip arthroscopy surgery was performed and utilized for the current study. Inclusion criteria are patients aged 14 to 45 years old with idiopathic FAI not caused by childhood disease. Exclusion criteria are previous ipsilateral hip procedures or disease processes such as neuromuscular disease or high-grade osteoarthritis. PROMs included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of pain interference, physical function, mobility, anxiety, and depression, as well as hip disability and osteoarthritis and outcome score (HOOS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), international hip outcome tool (iHOT-12), and short form-12 (SF-12). Resiliency was divided into low resiliency (score < 3), normal resiliency (score 3 to 4.3), and high resiliency (score > 4.3) as described by Smith et al 1 to use as categorical variables to compare to the other patient-reported scores. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was calculated and the Kruskall Willis test was used to measure association between BRS and the other PROMs for continuous and categorical values, respectively. R values ≥0.7, ≥0.4, and ≥0.1 signify a strong, moderate, and weak correlation, respectively. For categorical analysis, P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The cohort of 696 patients had mean age was 24.9 ± 7.9 years and a female predominance at 56%. Average BRS scores were 3.7 ± 0.7. Overall, 13.7% of patients had low resiliency, while 65.8% had normal resiliency and 20.5% had high resiliency. Linear correlation, using Pearson coefficients, found associations between BRS and all other scores. There were only weak associations between BRS scores and PROs (all r < 0.25) except a moderate correlation with PROMIS depression (r = -0.476, p < 0.001) and PROMIS anxiety (r = -0.481, p < 0.001). Patients in higher resiliency groups reported less severe symptoms in HOOS – quality of life (p < 0.001), HOOS – sports and recreation (p = 0.004), HOOS – activities of daily living (p = 0.004), HOOS – pain (p = 0.026), iHOT-12 (p = 0.01), mHHS (p = 0.004), SF-12 mental (p < 0.001), PROMIS physical function (p = 0.003), PROMIS pain (p < 0.001), PROMIS mobility (p < 0.001), PROMIS depression (p < 0.001), and PROMIS anxiety (p < 0.001). Patients with higher activity levels (UCLA ≥9) demonstrated higher resiliency (p = 0.04). Conclusions: In FAI patients, patient resiliency appears to influence baseline PROs. Overall, 14% of patients had low resiliency while 21% had high resiliency. Further studies are needed to investigate this relationship and whether concurrent psychological treatment will help improve patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy for FAI. [Figure: see text]

Objectives: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is classically described as restricted internal rotation in flexion resulting in labral and cartilage pathology. Despite 20 years of FAI research, there is still limited understanding of the drivers of symptomatology in the subset of patients with underlying FAI morphology. While the prevalence of FAI morphologies is substantially higher in men, numerous studies have shown more women being treated for FAI compared to men. Soft-tissue laxity and hip instability are increasingly recognized as a potential contributor to symptoms in addition to FAI. The Beighton score is a well-accepted means to quantify soft-tissue laxity and has been validated for self-scoring. The purpose of the current study was to (1) investigate the prevalence of soft-tissue laxity in male and female patients presenting with symptomatic FAI in a multicenter prospective cohort study, and (2) correlate soft-tissue laxity with patient primary complaints of either mobility, stability, or pain. Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 696 FAI patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy surgery was performed and utilized for the current study. Inclusion criteria are patients aged 14 to 45 years old with idiopathic FAI not caused by childhood disease. Exclusion criteria are previous ipsilateral hip procedures or disease processes such as neuromuscular disease or Tonnis 2 or greater osteoarthritis. The Beighton score was assessed by electronic patient self-scoring. Beighton scores >4 were considered a marker of soft-tissue laxity. The MSP index was utilized to have patients rank from most to least the biggest problems with their hip: Mobility (M), Stability (S), or Pain (P). The chi-square or Fisher exact test were utilized to compare groups. Results: The prevalence of Beighton scores >4 was 57.2% in female patients, compared to 29.3% in male patients (p < 0.001). In female patients, 44.4%, 22.6%, and 7.7% had Beighton scores of 5+, 7+, and 9 respectively, compared to 16.7%, 5.8%, and 1.8% in male patients (all p < 0.005). In the overall FAI cohort, pain was the primary complaint in 72.1% of patients, compared to 24.2% complaining primarily of mobility and 3.7% complaining primarily of stability. Among female patients, the presence of soft-tissue laxity (relative to thresholds of Beighton 4, 5, 7, and 9) did not significantly influence the patient primary complaints (with pain being the predominant complaint). Overall, 85 female patients had a Beighton score of 7 or greater and only 2.4% reported stability of the hip as a primary complaint, compared to 2.4% of female patients with a Beighton <7. Stability was more commonly indicated as a second most important factor in the setting of soft-tissue laxity, compared to mobility. Among female patients with a Beighton >7, 29.5% reported stability as a primary or secondary complaint, compared to 15.2% of female patients with a Beighton score <7. Conclusions: Over half of female patients undergoing FAI surgery have underlying soft-tissue laxity as measured by the Beighton score. In the setting of soft-tissue laxity, patient primary symptomatic complaint remains pain, but a secondary complaint is significant more likely to be stability rather than mobility (compared to FAI patients without soft tissue laxity complain of mobility secondarily over stability). Further research is needed to better understand the role of soft-tissue laxity in the pathophysiology of FAI and the outcomes of surgical treatment.