Kasthuri, Raj S

Abstract Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), an autosomal dominant vasculopathy affecting 1 in 5000 individuals, is the second most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide. Despite this prevalence, comprehensive data on disease manifestations and complications remain limited. To address this gap, the US Congress allocated funding leading to the Comprehensive HHT Outcomes Registry of the United States (CHORUS), a prospective, 15-center longitudinal registry enrolling unselected patients with confirmed HHT. In this initial report, we describe findings from the first 600 participants, with a median age of 53 (range, 0-88) years and 60% female. Despite most participants developing typical HHT manifestations by age 13 years, the majority (63%) were not diagnosed until mid-to-late adulthood. Recurrent spontaneous epistaxis occurred in 95% of participants, chronic gastrointestinal bleeding in 30%, and heavy menstrual bleeding in 35% of postmenarche females, together resulting in moderate-to-severe mucosal bleeding in 76%. Iron deficiency and/or anemia were diagnosed in 68%, with 41% requiring IV iron and 25% requiring red cell transfusions. Serious complications of solid-organ arteriovenous malformations were frequent, including intracranial hemorrhage (3%), pulmonary hemorrhage (2%), venous thromboembolism (7%), arterial thromboembolism (11%), heart failure (7%), and pulmonary hypertension (7%). These data from CHORUS, the first national US registry of its kind, provide reliable, real-world estimates of the incidence, prevalence, and severity of numerous HHT manifestations and complications. HHT has a high burden of moderate-to-severe bleeding, anemia, thrombosis, and major neurologic and cardiopulmonary complications. There is a mean interval between first symptoms and diagnosis of >2 decades, during which substantial, serious, and preventable HHT morbidity, including early intracranial hemorrhage, may occur. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT06259292.

Abstract Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) results in recurrent severe epistaxis, chronic gastrointestinal bleeding, and other morbid manifestations. Pomalidomide was recently demonstrated to be efficacious for bleeding in HHT in the landmark PATH-HHT trial. Given that the vascular remodeling that results in bleeding improvement may require several months, characteristics associated with treatment response would be invaluable to plan treatment. Using data from PATH-HHT (NCT03910244), we identified characteristics associated with change from baseline in Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS; a well-validated 10-point HHT bleeding scale and the trial’s primary end point) using multivariable-adjusted repeated-measures models. Characteristics associated with a better response to pomalidomide at weeks 16 to 24 of the trial included a higher (more severe) baseline ESS (change from baseline, −0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI), −0.99 to −0.54] points per 1-point higher baseline score, P< .001) and concomitant antifibrinolytic therapy (−0.73 [95% CI, −1.48 to 0.01] vs no therapy, P = .05). Characteristics associated with a less robust response were older age (0.29 [95% CI, 0.05-0.53] per 10 years older, P = .02) and underlying ACVRL1 germ line mutation (0.62 [95% CI, −0.04 to 1.27] vs ENG, SMAD4, or mutation not known, P = .06]. Characteristics notably associated with placebo response (placebo effect) were patient-reported outcome measures, such that those experiencing more severe disease at baseline had less placebo effect. In conclusion, several baseline patient and disease characteristics were associated with pomalidomide response, findings that may help guide patient selection for the use of pomalidomide in HHT. This trial was registered at www.Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03910244.

Abstract Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) causes severe recurrent epistaxis, chronic gastrointestinal bleeding, solid organ arteriovenous malformations, and significant anemia. Although it is the second most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide, no approved therapies exist. The multicenter, US randomized, controlled PATH-HHT trial demonstrated efficacy of short-term pomalidomide treatment of epistaxis in HHT. However, questions regarding long-term safety, effectiveness, and utility for HHT-associated gastrointestinal bleeding remain. The PATH-HHT ATLAS (after trial longitudinal assessment study) was a multicenter US longitudinal observational study evaluating patients enrolled in PATH-HHT who continued pomalidomide after PATH-HHT through a poststudy drug access program, with ongoing close monitoring per PATH-HHT protocol and as mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration. Sixty-two patients treated with pomalidomide for HHT for up to 4.4 years were included. Significant, durable improvements in mean epistaxis severity score (5.55 points [baseline] to 2.80 points [month 12]; P< .0001) and mean hematologic support score (9.11 red cell unit equivalents [RUEs] during 6 months pretreatment to 5.73 RUEs [months 7-12]; P = .0056) were observed. Pomalidomide was less effective for gastrointestinal bleeding than for epistaxis, particularly in patients with high red blood cell transfusion requirements. Thirty-one patients (50%) underwent dose reduction from 4 mg daily, primarily due to neutropenia, but most maintained effectiveness at 2 or 3 mg daily. Over 105.2 patient-years of pomalidomide treatment, 0 patients developed peripheral neuropathy, 1 developed venous thromboembolism, and 5 developed serious infections. In conclusion, pomalidomide was effective for HHT-associated epistaxis over extended durations, albeit with nontrivial potential toxicities, and may be considered for certain patients with HHT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT07018401.

ABSTRACT Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT, Osler‐Weber‐Rendu disease) is the second most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide, affecting approximately 1 in 5000 people. Development of disease‐modifying and efficacious hemostatic agents to treat HHT has finally begun after decades without such medical therapies. However, the lack of consensus on standardized severity definitions, outcome criteria, and terminology remains a major obstacle to clinical investigation and therapeutic development in HHT. Additionally, with the ongoing repurposing of antiangiogenic agents and emerging development of novel HHT‐specific therapies, comparative clinical trials are expected in the future. Therefore, to end the problematic heterogeneity hindering these efforts, the Global Research and Medical Advisory Board (GRMAB) of the Cure HHT Foundation, an international group of recognized HHT experts, convened a conference of expert HHT clinician‐investigators from within GRMAB as well as invited external experts in HHT and bleeding disorders generally, patients with HHT, and patient advocates to define standard terminology and definitions for outcomes and severity classification for bleeding and anemia in HHT. These criteria and definitions should be adopted by regulators, investigators, and the pharmaceutical industry in the development and performance of interventional clinical trials and cohort studies to allow improved comparability between clinical trials, facilitate communication between clinicians and investigators, improve therapeutic guideline development, and provide a standardized framework for regulatory agencies. Search Strategy and Selection Criteria Evidence for this report was systematically identified and evaluated utilizing two search strategies in Ovid MEDLINE, described in full detail in the Appendix, pp.4–13. The searches were conducted on January 7, 2025. The titles and abstracts of each record were reviewed, and the inclusion criteria were applied to all search results to identify full text articles to be retrieved for further review. All retrieved full texts were then reviewed to reach a final determination if a study met the inclusion criteria. Included references were then compiled into evidence tables, which were then utilized by the International Consensus Report Working Group throughout the development of report recommendations.

Abstract Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a chronically relapsing disorder caused by autoantibody-mediated deficiency of ADAMTS13. Rituximab is frequently administered to prevent relapses, but whether the durability of rituximab effect is maintained with subsequent treatment courses has not been studied. Using the United States Thrombotic Microangiopathy Consortium (USTMA) retrospective iTTP registry, we evaluated clinical relapse-free survival (RFS) with subsequent courses of rituximab treatment in multiply relapsing patients. Separately, we evaluated overall RFS (composite of time to clinical relapse, ADAMTS13 relapse, or preemptive rituximab) in a prospective iTTP cohort from the Johns Hopkins University and the University of Minnesota. In the USTMA registry, median clinical RFS was shorter after the second or subsequent rituximab-treated episode than the first (2.1 vs 6.0 years; P = .04). White patients’ clinical relapse risk after the second and subsequent rituximab courses was not significantly different compared with the first (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-15.80; P = .57), whereas for Black patients, clinical relapse risk was significantly higher after the second or subsequent courses (HR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.52-5.24; P = .001). In the prospective cohort, overall RFS progressively shortened after each episode of rituximab treatment with the first episode having the longest RFS (2.8 years; interquartile range, 2.0-6.0) and this loss of response durability was most pronounced in Black patients. The durability of rituximab’s effect declines with subsequent treatments, which is more pronounced in Black patients, who may benefit from closer monitoring and alternative immunomodulatory approaches such as maintenance rituximab and consideration of other agents.

Abstract Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is characterized by recurring episodes of thrombotic microangiopathy, causing ischemic organ impairment. Black patients are overrepresented in iTTP cohorts in the United States, but racial disparities in iTTP outcome and response to therapy have not been studied. Using the United States Thrombotic Microangiopathies Consortium iTTP Registry, we evaluated the impact of race on mortality and relapse-free survival (RFS) in confirmed iTTP in the United States from 1995 to 2020. We separately examined the impact of rituximab therapy and presentation with newly diagnosed (de novo) or relapsed iTTP on RFS by race. A total of 645 participants with 1308 iTTP episodes were available for analysis. Acute iTTP mortality did not differ by race. When all episodes of iTTP were included, Black race was associated with shorter RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.16-2.21); the addition of rituximab to corticosteroids improved RFS in White (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73) but not Black patients (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.71-1.31). In de novo iTTP, rituximab delayed relapse, but Black patients had shorter RFS than White patients, regardless of treatment. In relapsed iTTP, rituximab significantly improved RFS in White but not Black patients. Race affects overall relapse risk and response to rituximab in iTTP. Black patients may require closer monitoring, earlier retreatment, and alternative immunosuppression after rituximab treatment. How race, racism, and social determinants of health contribute to the disparity in relapse risk in iTTP deserves further study.