White, Andrew J.

Abstract Background High-intensity glucocorticoid regimens are commonly used to induce and maintain remission in Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM) but are associated with several adverse side-effects. Eminence-based treatment guidelines from CARRA and SHARE both advocate induction of intravenous pulse steroids followed by high dose oral steroids (2 mg/kg) tapered over 12 months. This study compares the time to disease control with reduced glucocorticoid dosing. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records at a single tertiary-care children’s hospital of patients with JDM between 2000 and 2014 who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The primary outcome measure was time to control of muscle and skin disease. Additional outcome measures included glucocorticoid dosing, effect of treatment on height, frequency of calcinosis and complications from treatment. Results Of the 69 patients followed during the study period, 31 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Median length of follow-up was 4.58 years, (3–7.5). Myositis control was achieved in a median of 7.1 months (range 0.9–63.4). Cutaneous disease control was achieved in a median of 16.7 months (range 4.3–89.5). The median starting dose of glucocorticoids was 0.85 mg/kg/day, (range 0.5–1.74). The median duration of steroid treatment was 9.1 months, (range 4.7–17.4), while the median duration of any pharmacotherapy was 29.2 months (range 10.4 to 121.3). Sustained disease control off medications was achieved in 21/31 (68%) patients by the end of review. Persistent calcinosis was identified in only one patient (3%). Conclusion Current accepted treatment paradigms for JDM include oral glucocorticoids beginning at 2 mg/kg/d reduced over 12 months; however, our results suggest that treatment using reduced doses and durations with early use of steroid-sparing agents are comparably effective in achieving favorable outcomes in JDM.

ObjectiveFew data are available regarding the rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) and important medical events (IMEs) outside of product‐based registries and clinical trials for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The Enhanced Drug Safety Surveillance Project (EDSSP) was developed to pilot a novel system to collect SAEs/IMEs in children with JIA. This analysis reports the results from this 4‐year (2008–2012) EDSSP.MethodsParticipating physicians were surveyed monthly to ascertain whether their JIA patients experienced an SAE or IME. Sites were surveyed every 6 months to determine the number of unique JIA patients seen at each site during that 6‐month period. Reporting rates were calculated per 100 person‐years and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated based on a Poisson distribution.ResultsThirty‐seven Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance sites with 115 physicians participated. The mean response rate to the monthly surveys was 65%. There were 147 total SAEs and 145 total IMEs. The largest proportion of SAEs and IMEs occurred in children with polyarticular JIA (39% and 37%, respectively). The majority of SAEs and IMEs were reported for patients receiving therapy with biologic agents (76% and 69%, respectively). The total event rate for SAEs and IMEs combined was 1.07 events per 100 person‐years (95% CI 0.95–1.19). The rates for SAEs and IMEs were 0.54 per 100 person‐years (95% CI 0.45–0.63) and 0.53 per 100 person‐years (95% CI 0.49–0.62), respectively.ConclusionThe EDSSP provided a simple tool for SAE/IME reporting within an established research network and resulted in a similar range of reported events as captured by a traditional product‐based registry.