Chollet, Laurève

Abstract Aim To confirm or refute recent pilot studies showing unexpectedly high rates of undetected heart failure (HF) in cardiology patients. Methods We assessed the prevalence, characteristics, and outcome of undetected HF in a large prospective cohort study of patients referred for non-invasive coronary artery disease (CAD) work-up with cardiac positron emission tomography computed tomography. HF presence and phenotype were centrally adjudicated by an independent cardiologist according to clinical practice guidelines requiring three mandatory criteria: symptoms, elevated natriuretic peptides, and structural/functional cardiac abnormalities. The endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death and acute HF (AHF) hospitalization through 2-year of follow-up. Results Among 1738 eligible patients (median age 67 years, 30% women), 138 patients (7.9%) had known HF, and 534 of 1600 patients (33.4%) without known HF had adjudicated undetected HF, resulting in a ratio of undetected HF to known HF of 3.9 (95%CI, 3.2–4.7)-to-1 and a number needed to screen to detect one patient with undetected HF of 3.0 (95%CI, 2.9-3.1). In undetected HF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was preserved in 72.3%, mildly reduced in 16%, and reduced in 11.7%. Older age, known CAD, atrial fibrillation, previous pacemaker implantation, and ECG abnormalities were associated with a higher likelihood for undetected HF. Undetected HF was associated with an increased cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio 7.37 [95%CI, 3.87-14.06], p<0.001, versus no HF). Conclusion One-out-of three patients referred for CAD work-up had undetected HF, which was associated with cardiovascular death and AHF hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients is critical for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy management, yet Doppler-based measurements are technically demanding and require expertise. The objective of this work was to develop a multi-view deep learning model capable of classifying LVOT obstruction (>20 mm Hg) using routine 2-dimensional echocardiographic windows without reliance on Doppler imaging. METHODS: We trained and externally validated a cross-attention-based video-to-video fusion framework that integrated EchoPrime-derived video representations from 3 standard transthoracic echocardiographic views to classify LVOT gradients. RESULTS: Training was performed on a derivation cohort (N=1833) from a tertiary care system in the United States, with model performance evaluated on an internally held-out test set (N=275) and a Korean external validation cohort (N=46). Single-view baselines showed limited discrimination (external area under the receiver operating curves, 0.47–0.70). Conversely, the domain-specific foundational model (EchoPrime) achieved superior single-view performance (area under the receiver operating curves, 0.75–0.80 internal; 0.79–0.83 external), highlighting the importance of echo-specific pretraining and temporal modeling. The proposed multi-view fusion further enhanced predictive performance, with the late fusion model reaching an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.84 on the external cohort with significant population-shift. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest LVOT physiology is encoded in routine 2-dimensional imaging and can be leveraged for clinically relevant gradient classification without Doppler input. The proposed artificial intelligence-guided strategy demonstrates substantial cost savings compared with the screen-all approach. By integrating complementary spatial-temporal information across multiple views, our approach generalizes robustly across populations and may enable real-time decision support, extend LVOT assessment to portable or resource-limited settings, and complement Doppler-based evaluation for longitudinal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy management.

Background:The development of symptoms or left ventricular dysfunction in severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. While elective transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is supported by robust randomized evidence, data on TAVR performed in non-elective settings (urgent, emergent, or salvage) remain limited and heterogeneous. In these settings, outcomes may be influenced more by baseline clinical severity than by procedural factors. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the safety and effectiveness of non-elective TAVR and to compare the associated outcomes with those of elective TAVR.Methods:This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered with PROSPERO. The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for studies published after 2002 evaluating urgent, emergent, or salvage TAVR in adult patients with severe AS. Eligible studies were required to include elective TAVR as a comparator. Outcomes included mortality and major procedural complications. Prespecified era-based analyses and sensitivity analyses excluding studies at critical risk of bias were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.Results:A total of 17 observational studies published between 2015 and 2025 were included, comprising 215,141 patients. Compared with elective patients, those undergoing non-elective TAVR had more advanced heart failure, higher NYHA class, greater comorbidity burden, and higher surgical risk scores, whereas baseline echocardiographic severity of AS was similar. Pooled outcomes for non-elective TAVR showed in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality rates of 5.1%, 12.4%, and 26.7%, respectively. Non-elective TAVR was associated with higher mortality at all time points compared with elective procedures; meanwhile, rates of stroke, vascular complications, and permanent pacemaker implantation were similar, while major bleeding and acute kidney injury were more frequent. Era-based analyses showed a stable relative mortality risk over time.Conclusions:Although non-elective TAVR is associated with worse outcomes than elective procedures, these differences appear to be largely driven by baseline clinical severity rather than by the transcatheter intervention. In unstable patients with severe AS, non-elective TAVR remains the most effective definitive treatment option compared with balloon aortic valvuloplasty or conservative management.The PROSPERO Registration:CRD420251239620, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251239620.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses is essential for guiding revascularization and improving outcomes. Although invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains the gold standard for functional lesion assessment, its use is limited by procedural invasiveness, cost, and complexity. CT-derived FFR (FFRct), based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD), was the first major advance in noninvasive physiological assessment, but its adoption has been hindered by intensive off-site computation and dependence on high-quality imaging. This review summarizes the evolution from invasive FFR to AI-driven functional assessment of coronary lesions. We examine the principles and validation of CFD-based FFRct and then focus on the shift toward artificial intelligence, including both machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches. These methods range from models using engineered geometric and plaque features trained on large synthetic datasets to end-to-end systems that learn directly from imaging data. We discuss key validation studies evaluating diagnostic accuracy, prognostic value, and clinical utility, with attention to performance in challenging settings such as intermediate stenoses, heavy calcification, and patients with comorbidities. We also highlight major barriers to widespread adoption, including dependence on input data quality, limited explainability, regulatory hurdles, and integration into clinical workflows. Finally, we outline future directions, including AI-enabled virtual PCI planning, multimodal risk stratification, and broader access to functional cardiac assessment. AI has the potential to transform noninvasive coronary imaging by enabling a single CCTA scan to provide rapid, integrated evaluation of anatomy, plaque characteristics, and physiological significance, supporting more personalized care and better clinical outcomes.

Abstract Background Accurate assessment of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients is critical for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) management, yet Doppler-based measurements are technically demanding and require expertise. Objective To develop a multi-view deep learning model capable of classifying LVOT obstruction (> 20mmHg) using routine 2D echocardiographic windows without reliance on Doppler imaging. Methods We trained and externally validated a cross-attention-based video-to-video fusion framework that integrated EchoPrime-derived video representations from three standard transthoracic echocardiographic views to classify LVOT gradients. Results Training was performed on a derivation cohort (N = 1833) from a tertiary care system in the United States, with model performance evaluated on an internal held-out test set (N = 275) and a Korean external validation cohort (N = 46). Single-view baselines showed limited discrimination (external AUROCs 0.47–0.70). Conversely, domain-specific foundational model (EchoPrime) achieved superior single-view performance (AUROCs 0.75–0.80 internal; 0.79–0.83 external), highlighting the importance of echo-specific pretraining and temporal modeling. The proposed multi-view fusion further enhanced predictive performance, with the late fusion model reaching an AUROC of 0.84 on the external cohort with significant population-shift. Conclusions These results suggest LVOT physiology is encoded in routine 2D imaging and can be leveraged for clinically relevant gradient classification without Doppler input- proposed AI-guided strategy demonstrates substantial cost savings compared with the screen-all approach. By integrating complementary spatial-temporal information across multiple views, our approach generalizes robustly across populations and may enable real-time decision support, extend LVOT assessment to portable or resource-limited settings, and complement Doppler-based evaluation for longitudinal HCM management.